DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Colonial Era
*****************************************************
#Post#: 30100--------------------------------------------------
Re: Gnosticism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: May 6, 2025, 7:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Further evidence that Hitler’s religion was Gnosticism –
TIKHistory (May 8, 2023)
HTML https://youtu.be/PMyzTnIessE?t=826
--- Quote ---
> [Minute 13:45]
>
> Adolf Hitler, May 1, 1933:
>
> “German Volksgenossen [fellow citizens]! The fact that the
world stands so strongly against us is an even stronger reason
why we must become one unity… [They] will no longer be able to
silence the call for equal rights for our Volk!”
>
> The German Volk has awakened. They will no longer tolerate
those in their midst who do not support Germany! We want to
achieve the new awakening of this nation in an honest
way—through our industry, our perseverance, our unwavering
determination! We do not ask the Almighty, “God, deliver us!” We
want to take part actively, to work, to accept one another as
brothers, united in a common struggle, so that one day the time
will come when we can stand before God and rightfully plead to
Him: “Lord, You see we have changed. The German Volk is no
longer a disgraceful Volk, no longer one that is shameful,
self-denigrating, faint-hearted, or low in faith. No, Sir, the
German Volk is once again strong in its will, strong in its
perseverance, strong in bearing any sacrifice. Lord, we will not
forsake You! Now bless our struggle for our freedom and thus for
our German Volk and Fatherland!”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, May 1, 1933
>
> Source: "Adolf Hitler – Collection of Speeches 1922–1945," PDF
pp. 130–131. [Minute 15:04]
>
> TIKHistory explains:
>
> "Wait wait wait... let's read that part again. 'The German
Volk is no longer a disgraceful Volk, no longer one that is
shameful, self-denigrating, faint-hearted, or low in faith.'
Okay, hold on—Germany at that time was majority Christian? In
fact, even today, most are still Christian. So how could their
faith be small? And the reason is that this is not the Christian
God he’s referring to; it is a false god. He is referring to the
true deity of the Aryan race, who is above the creator god.
However, it’s very easy to misunderstand this and assume he is
referring to the Christian God, which is why many people
conclude that he was a Christian. Furthermore, this part shows
that he was trying to make Germans better, through struggle,
hard work, or sacrifice—but also through blood purity—so that
'one day the time will come' when they can 'stand before God'
and tell Him they are no longer as they once were. They have
transcended… which is as clear as day; this is the goal of
Gnosticism."
>
> [Minute 16:09]
>
> [Minute 16:09] Adolf Hitler, March 28, 1936:
>
> “German Volksgenossen [fellow citizens], we have many things
to make right before our own history and before our eternal God.
Destiny has withdrawn its protection from us. Our Volk has
fallen—fallen to depths rarely seen before. In this difficult
hardship, we have once again learned how to pray; we have
learned to revere our God; we have regained our faith in the
virtues of the Volk, and we have strived to become better. As a
result, a new community has formed.”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, March 28, 1936
>
> Source: "Adolf Hitler – Collection of Speeches 1922–1945," PDF
p. 327.
>
> TIKHistory explains:
>
> "So it is not the Christian God because there were already
many Christians in Germany. Now they have 'learned how to pray'
and 'revere [God]' again, which clearly they did not do before,
even though they were all Christians. So once again, this is
further evidence that this is not Christianity."
>
> [Minute 17:02]
>
> .......
>
> [Minute 29:05]
>
> “So let no one waste prayers on me that I will never ask for.
If my presence on this earth is destiny, I owe it to a higher
will. However, I owe nothing to the Church that takes care of
the salvation of souls, and in my opinion, it is too cruel. I
admit that one cannot impose one’s will by force, but I am
horrified by anyone who enjoys causing suffering to the bodies
of others and oppressing their souls.”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, February 27, 1942
>
> Source: Hitler’s Table Talk, p. 343.
>
> TIKHistory explains:
>
> "So he believes in the human soul and that the soul is
separate from our body, because he mentions it several times."
>
> [Minute 29:54]
>
> “Our era will surely witness the end of the disease of
Christianity. This disease will last another hundred years,
perhaps two hundred more. My regret is that I cannot, like
whichever prophet it was, see the promised land from afar.”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, February 27, 1942
>
> Source: Hitler’s Table Talk, p. 343.
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 30107--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: May 6, 2025, 9:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The REAL Religion behind National Socialism - TIKHistory (24
April 2023)
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y011Pdrb3Sk
--- Quote ---
> 📌 [Minute 31:26 – 35:46]
>
> 🔹 Quote (Adolf Hitler):
>
> “Nature can create ten thousand such destroyers, who act as
the worst kind of pathogens, poisoning the human soul. It is a
horrifying thought, yet unavoidable, that the vast majority of
Jews appear to have been destined by Nature to play this
disgraceful role.”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 63
>
> 🔹 TIKHistory Explanation:
>
> We must not forget that the demiurge (the false god of the
material world) appears to be the Jewish god. Hitler claimed
that Jews “poison the human soul,” an idea similar to that of
the Cathars and Messalians, who believed demons reside in the
human soul.
>
> Hitler essentially saw Jews as demonic beings—worshippers of a
false god (the devil or demiurge). They corrupt the soul and
imprison it in the material world (a kind of soul prison). This
is why Hitler refers to “Nature” (with a capital N) as their
creator—because, in Gnostic terms, Nature (the demiurge) is the
creator, not the true God.
>
> 🔹 Quote (Adolf Hitler):
>
> “Could it be that this nation, which lives only for the Earth,
has been promised the Earth in return?”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 69
>
> 🔹 TIKHistory Explanation:
>
> Again, they “live only for the Earth” because they are not
divine beings. They were created by the demiurge, not the True
God, so they do not possess souls. They exist solely for the
material world.
>
> Yet they have been “promised the Earth”—meaning, the demiurge
(the false creator) rewards them for keeping souls bound to the
material world. Their reward? The ability to create Hell on
Earth—a playground for demonic beings like themselves.
>
> 🔹 Quote (Adolf Hitler):
>
> “If the Jew, aided by his Marxist creed, triumphs over the
peoples of this world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of
humanity… And so today, I believe that my actions are in
accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing
firm against the Jew, I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 69
>
> 🔹 TIKHistory Explanation:
>
> Some have believed Hitler was a Christian who believed in the
Christian God. But the Christian God is the same as the Jewish
God. To a Gnostic, that “god” is actually the demiurge—or Satan.
>
> Hitler believed in a “Supreme Creator” who is above the Jewish
god—akin to how Freemasons refer to the “Great Architect of the
Universe.” This is where the misunderstanding arises. People
assume Hitler was referring to the Christian God when he said
“Almighty Creator,” but that is not the case.
>
> Again, Gnosticism is a parasitic religion that borrows from
others. That’s why the Nazis could appear simultaneously
Christian and pagan. Hitler could invoke the “Almighty Creator”
here but still reject the Old Testament—because it wasn’t
Christian scripture in his view.
>
> 🔹 Quote (Adolf Hitler):
>
> “The great Jewish leaders are convinced that the day is near
when the commandments of the Old Testament will be fulfilled and
the Jews will devour the other nations of the Earth.”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 570
>
> 🔹 TIKHistory Explanation:
>
> This quote alone should be enough to disprove the idea that
Hitler was a Christian. We’re not relying on Table Talks
here—it’s in Mein Kampf itself, so it cannot be dismissed.
>
> Hitler opposed the Jewish Old Testament, which—if you didn’t
know—is a core part of the Christian Bible. It’s understandable
why some might think he was Christian because of his occasional
language, but now that we recognize the influence of Gnosticism,
these statements make perfect sense.
>
> On that same page, Hitler also claims that Jews found it
difficult to infiltrate nationalist Japan. So instead, he said,
they aimed to use other nations to destroy Japan. This was part
of why Hitler supported Japan: keeping it strong prevented
Jewish domination of the world. “The enemy of my enemy is my
friend,” so to speak.
>
> 🔹 Quote (Adolf Hitler):
>
> “He [the Jew] does not want to see a national Japanese state
stand when he establishes his future millennial empire, and
therefore he wants to destroy it before founding his own
dictatorship.”
>
> — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 570
--- End Quote ---
Therefore, Hitler's Gnosticism and his opposition to the
materialist worldview based on Judeo-Christianity are proof that
he was fundamentally against Western Civilization. Because
Judeo-Christian ideas form the foundation of Western cultural
values and way of life.
Recall on Western Civilization
--- Quote ---
> In this book, Bendix makes it clear why “ancient Judaism” was
a “cornerstone” of Weber’s effort “to explain the distinguishing
characteristics of Western civilization” (199). It is
astonishing that all the participants I have named in this
debate are oblivious to Weber’s investigations on Judaism and
its relationship to rationalism. According to Bendix, Weber
contrasted the Asian belief in magic, which “assumed that the
whole world is brimful of powers that act in a manner beyond
human comprehension,” to the presence in ancient Judaism of “a
highly rational religious ethic of social conduct…free of magic
and all forms of irrational quest for salvation” (205). He makes
clear how Weber traced the fundamental disposition of
Christianity to master and change the world, rather than
withdraw from its imperfections, back to ancient Jewish
prophecy. For Weber,12 “the great contribution of the Biblical
prophets was to make the morally correct actions of everyday
life into a special duty of a people chosen by the mightiest
God” (247). Bendix adds that for the prophets “the events of the
world were not determined by magic or blind chance but by
Yahwe’s will” (249). The world is a meaningful place and the
motives of Yahwe as a ruler of this world are not beyond the
ability of the prophets to comprehend. “His ability to hear the
divine voice was the prophet’s self-legitimation, a uniquely
personal experience of a burdensome mission” (246).
--- End Quote ---
Source :
The Uniqueness of Western Civilization by Ricardo Duchesne Page
256 - 257
--- Quote ---
> Abraham writes that Weber came to these views in conscious
opposition to Werner Sombart’s contemporaneous book, The Jews
and Modern Capitalism (1913), where he had argued that Jews were
the major promoters of a modern nation-less capitalism. Kalberg
appears to be in agreement with Abraham in writing that Weber
“saw the capitalism of the Jews as a form of the speculative
capitalism that had existed universally” (2002: xxiii).
Nevertheless, it seems to me that Weber did detect in Judaism a
rationalistic disposition as well as a “this-worldly” attitude
to the world that had strong affi nities with Protestantism. As
Love reminds us, Weber wrote in the Protestant Ethic that
Puritanism inherited the “perfectly unemotional wisdom of the
Hebrews” which had seen “the rational suppression of the
mystical…side of religion.” Weber also observed that Old
Testament morality, despite its traditional basis in ethics,
“was able to give a powerful impetus to that spirit of
self-righteous and sober legality which was so characteristic of
the worldly asceticism of….Protestantism” (in Love 2000b:
200).13 He included Judaism – together with the theoretical
rationality of Catholic theology and the Protestant rediscovery
of the original Judaic ethic in his grand theory of Western
rationalization. It was ultimately Protestantism that promoted
the modern spirit of capitalism, but this should not lead us to
conclude that Weber did not also attribute a very important
(early) role to Judaism.
--- End Quote ---
Source :
The Uniqueness of Western Civilization by Ricardo Duchesne Page
259 - 260
#Post#: 30145--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: May 8, 2025, 10:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
But TIK, if Hitler wasn't a Madman, why did he assume Britain
wouldn't fight? (5th September 2022)
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtaHERBX5o4
Hitler's War against Europe Was Planned: How His Economic
Policies Revealed a Drive for Armament and Centralized Control
--- Quote ---
> [Minute 10 : 19 until 14:16]
>
> The narrative from the past has long been that the Third Reich
did not have a war economy until the god-emperor Albert Speer
descended from the heavens in mid-1942 and sorted everything
out. This is the version often repeated in documentaries and
books, including one of the most popular from the 1960s — The
Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by William Shirer. This is my
grandfather’s 1964 copy, which is why it’s worn out. But here’s
what Shirer said about the German economy:
>
> “Despite all the plans and all the talk in Nazi Germany about
‘total war,’ the country’s resources were still far from being
‘fully organized.’ At Hitler’s insistence, the production of
civilian goods was maintained at very high levels during the war
— seemingly to keep up morale. And he refused to implement
prewar plans to mobilize women to work in the factories.”
>
> Reference: Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, p.
1291.
>
> So it’s no surprise that you — and many others — believe the
Third Reich didn’t have a war economy. That’s the narrative that
has been spread for decades, so it must be true, right? But is
it really?
>
> No — the Third Reich absolutely had a war economy. In fact,
Germany implemented a war economy during peacetime, which is why
its economy collapsed in 1937. Rearmament was already ramping up
by early 1935. Price and wage controls were introduced as early
as 1934, massive regulations were put in place, there were
controls on inputs and outputs, and debt piled up even though
tax rates had already increased by 25% — and would increase
further.
>
> Sources:
>
> 1. Aly, Hitler’s Beneficiaries, p. 37.
>
> 2. Harrison, The Economics of World War II, p. 131.
>
> 3. Rees, The Holocaust, p. 92; Tooze, The Wages of
Destruction, pp. 96–97.
>
> 4. Reimann, The Vampire Economy (essentially the entire book).
>
> “Between 1933 and 1935, German military spending rose from
less than 1% of national income to nearly 10% — a larger and
faster increase than had ever been seen before in peacetime in a
capitalist country.”
>
> References : Rees, The Holocaust, p. 92
>
> So yes, the Third Reich had a war economy before going to war.
When war finally came, there wasn’t a dramatic economic shift or
wartime mobilization — because the economy was already
functioning as a war economy, unlike almost every other power.
>
> Sure, Hitler may have maintained higher civilian goods
production than some would expect, but there’s a very clear
reason for that. Hitler had lived through the German Revolution
of 1918–1919. There were major shortages of everything during
World War I. He saw how the standard of living had dropped to
about half of what it was in 1913, and how the first street
demonstrations in Munich were triggered by a mere 6-pfennig
increase in the price of beer. In Episode 2 of my Weimar
Hyperinflation series, I even mention: “It’s no surprise the
National Socialists didn’t destroy their alcohol stockpiles
before the Battle of Berlin.”
>
> So it’s understandable why Hitler would want to maintain
consumer goods production during WWII — he didn’t want another
“stab in the back.” But regardless of how efficient it was, or
whether Albert Speer improved that efficiency, Nazi Germany had
a war economy from the mid-1930s onward.
>
> And yes, I know that contradicts what older books and
documentaries claim. But the reason they say Germany didn’t have
a war economy is because admitting that it did would force them
to acknowledge that Germany had a war economy in peacetime —
which would mean acknowledging what the economic policies of the
National Socialist German Workers’ Party really were. And they
couldn’t do that, because it would be too unpopular. So instead,
they claimed it wasn’t a war economy — which is the big lie.
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 30168--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: May 10, 2025, 9:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hitler's Real Plan on Great Britain
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ucrF2PHBOc&t=3965s
The WORST channel? Zoomer Historian DEBUNKED by facts and logic
(reupload) - What Why How, 20th February 2024
--- Quote ---
> Minute 01 : 06 : 08 until 01 : 09 : 40 (Transcribed with
assistance from ChatGPT Pro)
>
> Although on page 333 of Mein Kampf he stated the following —
“The English nation must be regarded as the most valuable ally
in the world. During its leadership, the broad popular spirit
justifies the expectation of brutality and determined
perseverance in fighting a battle through to a victorious end,
by any means necessary and regardless of time and sacrifice.” —
it is certainly ironic that Hitler, long before the war with
Britain, could foresee the difficult resistance they might
offer. You can find that quote and others like it, but
essentially, Hitler wanted Britain as his ally in restoring
German dominance on the continent. Initially, Hitler did not
plan to go to war with Britain. His main concern was the
conquest of Lebensraum — living space — in the East.
>
> But what happened after the war began is what truly matters.
When it became clear that Britain would not shy away from war or
agree to peace with Germany, Hitler and his officers began to
draft plans targeting the British Isles. Germany did, in fact,
prepare military plans for the invasion and occupation of
Britain. Operation Sea Lion was a serious invasion plan that
Hitler fully supported. There are countless books on this topic.
If you're looking for a brief summary, The Rise and Fall of the
Third Reich contains an entire chapter dedicated to it.
>
> Essentially, Hitler fully expected Britain to surrender after
France fell. But, of course, many within the German government —
including the Führer and those responsible for bringing Britain
into line with the new order — still treated the matter
seriously. The SS, in particular, saw it as a serious
undertaking. As Shirer wrote on page 762:
>
> “The massive secret German military archives leave no doubt
that Hitler’s plans were dead serious, and that despite many
doubts, the Nazi dictator fully intended to carry them out if
there was a reasonable chance of success. Their ultimate fate
was not decided by a lack of will or effort, but by the fortunes
of war, which for the first time began to turn against him.”
>
> So, had Germany succeeded in conquering Britain — unlikely as
it was — what would have happened?
>
> On September 9, 1940, Field Marshal Walter von Brauchitsch,
the Commander-in-Chief of the German Army — a rather
high-ranking position — issued the following order regarding the
British military administration:
>
> “Except where local conditions necessitate exceptions, the
male population between the ages of 17 and 45 is to be detained
and deported to the Continent as quickly as possible.”
>
> Severe measures were also to be taken against any form of
resistance — including passive resistance.
>
> References : Unterlagen des Generalquartiermeisters im
Generalstab des Heeres beim OKH: Sammelmappe „Militärverwaltung
England" - Befehle und Weisungen über die Organisation und den
Einsatz der Militärverwaltung in England (1) (9. September 1940)
:
HTML https://wwii.germandocsinrussia.org/de/nodes/7336#page/1/mode/grid/zoom/1
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 30171--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: May 11, 2025, 8:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
From Plato to Hitler: The Ideological Origins of National
Socialism - TIKHistory, 5th June 2023
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4jOKPpWDr0
--- Quote ---
> [Minute 13:56 to 17:20]
>
> Hitler described struggle as “the father of all things,”
which, according to Videla, was inspired by Heraclitus (who said
that war is the father of everything).
>
>
> [Minute 14:05] "In this sense, National Socialism’s worldview
is the heir to the Indo-European thought of Heraclitus and his
world of eternal strife, called Polemos. In this worldview, the
unification of all entities in the universe forms a chaotic and
undifferentiated mass known as Hen, or ‘One,’ in other words,
the collector of all things. Hen is pure existence, a formless
being. It is the apparent chaos, the undifferentiated mass. Only
struggle, Polemos, makes it possible for individual beings to be
extracted from that undifferentiated chaos."
>
> Reference:
>
> Videla, National Socialism: Its Principles and Philosophy, p.
47.
>
> TIKHistory comments:
>
> “Does this sound like Gnosticism to you? Because to me, it
certainly does! (And it has been debated whether Heraclitus was
influenced by Zoroastrianism [whatever you call it], which was
Gnosticism. They influenced the Manichaeans, who influenced the
Cathars.) And for those of you who haven’t watched my latest
video on ‘The REAL Religion Behind National Socialism,’ let me
give a brief synopsis. Gnostic believers believe that the
Christian God who created the material world is actually the
devil or a demiurge, and that there is a True God above and
beyond the Christian God. This demiurge has trapped our souls in
this world; our bodies are our prison. And the True God is
non-material, so Gnostic followers seek to transcend the
material realm, which will free their bodies and allow their
souls to unite with the True God. Heraclitus’s beliefs sound
very similar to this.” [Minute 15:49]
>
> References:
>
> 1. Broek, Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity to Modern
Times, p. 1, p. 4, p. 6, p. 9.
>
> 2. Voegelin, The New Science of Politics, Kindle p. 118.
>
>
>
> [Minute 15:50] “For Nietzsche and the Nazis, an irreparable
chasm opened at the very beginning of the West with Socratic
philosophy and later with the Platonic myth of the cave, the
myth about a new reality for the Indo-European West. Plato built
an analogy where human life on earth is equated to life inside a
cave. The inhabitants inside the Platonic cave feel the shadows
projected onto the inner wall by outside beings. Among these
shadows, the inhabitants build their own ideas about reality. In
this analogy, the natural world, which corresponds to the
interior of the cave, represents the transcendent and eternal
ideas, the true essence of the illusory shadows. The ideal
emerged at that point as the new truth, beyond the earthly
realm. In this myth, human beings and the world are merely
shadows of an essence that is real. Since then, the father of
all things has been seen as a transmundane entity, perfect,
without error or defeat. The essence of beings has become ideal,
an eternal archetype, metaphysically immutable, incapable of
struggle, a conservative entity mostly unreachable,
transcendent, foreign, and unworthy of human interaction.”
[Minute 17:20]
>
> Reference:
>
> Videla, National Socialism: Its Principles and Philosophy, p.
49.
--- End Quote ---
Aryanism.net explained Hitler's worldview correctly before
TIKHistory did so
Captured by Wayback Machine Internet Archive on 7th December
2018
--- Quote ---
> National Socialism perceives injustice perpetrated against
all. At the most fundamental level, just by being born, every
one of us is automatically and for the entire duration of our
lives a perpetual and constant victim of injustice, because none
of us chose to be born. The courage to acknowledge this plainly
obvious and utterly irrefutable fact (“The whole of life is one
perpetual hazard, and birth is the greatest hazard of them all.”
– Adolf Hitler) [1] distinguishes National Socialism from every
other form of socialism. Whereas all the others sooner or later
tends towards utopianism, National Socialism repudiates
utopianism (a False Left idea) from the outset by this
acknowledgement and hence elevates itself to a genuinely
eschatological ideology on a par with the ancient (True Left)
pan-Gnostic religions.
>
> “Even we are not so simple as to believe that there will ever
be an age in which there will be no drawbacks. But that does not
release us from the obligation to fight for the removal of the
defects which we have recognized, to overcome the shortcomings
and to strive towards the ideal.” – Adolf Hitler [2][3]
--- End Quote ---
Source :
1.
words of Adolf Hitler – Translated by Norman Cameron and R.H.
Stevens Page 659
HTML https://archive.org/details/HitlerTableTalk/page/n663/mode/2up?q=The+richest+people+are+the+least+reasonable%2C+and+some+so+stupid+that+they+become+misers
2.
One First Volume: A Retrospect Second Volume: The National
Socialist Movement New Age Books New Delhi (India) by Adolf
Hitler Page 396
HTML https://archive.org/details/isbn_9788178224640/page/n3/mode/2up?q=Even+we+are+not+so+simple+as+to+believe+that+there+will+ever+be+an+age+in+which+no+drawbacks.+But+does+release+us+from+the+obligation+fight+for+removal+of+defects+have+recognized%2C+overcome+shortcomings+and+strive+towards+ideal&view=theater
3. National Socialism Basics - Aryanism
HTML https://web.archive.org/web/20181207225307/http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-basics/
#Post#: 30274--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: May 28, 2025, 7:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: antihellenistic link ---
>
> Hitler's Real Plan on Great Britain
>
>
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ucrF2PHBOc&t=3965s
>
> The WORST channel? Zoomer Historian DEBUNKED by facts and
logic (reupload) - What Why How, 20th February 2024
>
> [quote]Minute 01 : 06 : 08 until 01 : 09 : 40 (Transcribed
with assistance from ChatGPT Pro)
>
> Although on page 333 of Mein Kampf he stated the following —
“The English nation must be regarded as the most valuable ally
in the world. During its leadership, the broad popular spirit
justifies the expectation of brutality and determined
perseverance in fighting a battle through to a victorious end,
by any means necessary and regardless of time and sacrifice.” —
it is certainly ironic that Hitler, long before the war with
Britain, could foresee the difficult resistance they might
offer. You can find that quote and others like it, but
essentially, Hitler wanted Britain as his ally in restoring
German dominance on the continent. Initially, Hitler did not
plan to go to war with Britain. His main concern was the
conquest of Lebensraum — living space — in the East.
>
> But what happened after the war began is what truly matters.
When it became clear that Britain would not shy away from war or
agree to peace with Germany, Hitler and his officers began to
draft plans targeting the British Isles. Germany did, in fact,
prepare military plans for the invasion and occupation of
Britain. Operation Sea Lion was a serious invasion plan that
Hitler fully supported. There are countless books on this topic.
If you're looking for a brief summary, The Rise and Fall of the
Third Reich contains an entire chapter dedicated to it.
>
> Essentially, Hitler fully expected Britain to surrender after
France fell. But, of course, many within the German government —
including the Führer and those responsible for bringing Britain
into line with the new order — still treated the matter
seriously. The SS, in particular, saw it as a serious
undertaking. As Shirer wrote on page 762:
>
> “The massive secret German military archives leave no doubt
that Hitler’s plans were dead serious, and that despite many
doubts, the Nazi dictator fully intended to carry them out if
there was a reasonable chance of success. Their ultimate fate
was not decided by a lack of will or effort, but by the fortunes
of war, which for the first time began to turn against him.”
>
> So, had Germany succeeded in conquering Britain — unlikely as
it was — what would have happened?
>
> On September 9, 1940, Field Marshal Walter von Brauchitsch,
the Commander-in-Chief of the German Army — a rather
high-ranking position — issued the following order regarding the
British military administration:
>
> “Except where local conditions necessitate exceptions, the
male population between the ages of 17 and 45 is to be detained
and deported to the Continent as quickly as possible.”
>
> Severe measures were also to be taken against any form of
resistance — including passive resistance.
>
> References : Unterlagen des Generalquartiermeisters im
Generalstab des Heeres beim OKH: Sammelmappe „Militärverwaltung
England" - Befehle und Weisungen über die Organisation und den
Einsatz der Militärverwaltung in England (1) (9. September 1940)
:
HTML https://wwii.germandocsinrussia.org/de/nodes/7336#page/1/mode/grid/zoom/1
--- End Quote ---
[/quote]
Notes on Adolf Hitler's Eastern European Expansion Plan written
by Richard Walter Darré, an expert on Nazi “blood and soil”
ideology and served as Reich Minister of Food and Agriculture
from 1933 to 1942.
--- Quote ---
> In the draft of the Führer's speech together with Backe,
describing the disaster that befell the agricultural workers.
Hitler: "What do you suggest?" Me: Industry and trade should be
forced to tie themselves together like agriculture... However,
the idea did not really develop... it seems that Hitler did not
think that the time had come or had not realized it. Then they
talked about the racial problem.
>
> I said: The Baltic Sea - our empire! Adolf Hitler said: "In
the southeast we still have to deal with the Austrian problem,
but our future is the Baltic Sea and the Russian territories. It
is better to sacrifice another 2 million miners in the war and
finally have some breathing space in terms of space policy."...
>
> I asked the Führer not to put into practice the bread cards
requested by Göring.
>
> – Walter Darré's Diary of 30 September 1937
>
> ...
>
> 21 October [1939]: Adolf Hitler made a statement about the
situation to the leaders of the Reich and Gau in strict
confidence, including "In history, whoever wins is right, but in
this war I will let myself be guided only by my conscience, my
people, which is the will of God, and I will carry out actions
that would probably be condemned by present international law.
What we need is space, and I hope to find it in the East."
--- End Quote ---
Source :
BArch N 1094-I/78 Walter Darré's Diary for 30 September 1937,
pp. 69-70, diary entry for 21 October 1939 p. 112
HTML https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/c41f24b3-aeac-47ed-9d9e-62cc2efa2188/
#Post#: 30390--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: June 6, 2025, 2:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: antihellenistic link ---
>
> Hitler's Real Plan on Great Britain
>
>
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ucrF2PHBOc&t=3965s
>
> The WORST channel? Zoomer Historian DEBUNKED by facts and
logic (reupload) - What Why How, 20th February 2024
>
> [quote]Minute 01 : 06 : 08 until 01 : 09 : 40 (Transcribed
with assistance from ChatGPT Pro)
>
> Although on page 333 of Mein Kampf he stated the following —
“The English nation must be regarded as the most valuable ally
in the world. During its leadership, the broad popular spirit
justifies the expectation of brutality and determined
perseverance in fighting a battle through to a victorious end,
by any means necessary and regardless of time and sacrifice.” —
it is certainly ironic that Hitler, long before the war with
Britain, could foresee the difficult resistance they might
offer. You can find that quote and others like it, but
essentially, Hitler wanted Britain as his ally in restoring
German dominance on the continent. Initially, Hitler did not
plan to go to war with Britain. His main concern was the
conquest of Lebensraum — living space — in the East.
>
> But what happened after the war began is what truly matters.
When it became clear that Britain would not shy away from war or
agree to peace with Germany, Hitler and his officers began to
draft plans targeting the British Isles. Germany did, in fact,
prepare military plans for the invasion and occupation of
Britain. Operation Sea Lion was a serious invasion plan that
Hitler fully supported. There are countless books on this topic.
If you're looking for a brief summary, The Rise and Fall of the
Third Reich contains an entire chapter dedicated to it.
>
> Essentially, Hitler fully expected Britain to surrender after
France fell. But, of course, many within the German government —
including the Führer and those responsible for bringing Britain
into line with the new order — still treated the matter
seriously. The SS, in particular, saw it as a serious
undertaking. As Shirer wrote on page 762:
>
> “The massive secret German military archives leave no doubt
that Hitler’s plans were dead serious, and that despite many
doubts, the Nazi dictator fully intended to carry them out if
there was a reasonable chance of success. Their ultimate fate
was not decided by a lack of will or effort, but by the fortunes
of war, which for the first time began to turn against him.”
>
> So, had Germany succeeded in conquering Britain — unlikely as
it was — what would have happened?
>
> On September 9, 1940, Field Marshal Walter von Brauchitsch,
the Commander-in-Chief of the German Army — a rather
high-ranking position — issued the following order regarding the
British military administration:
>
> “Except where local conditions necessitate exceptions, the
male population between the ages of 17 and 45 is to be detained
and deported to the Continent as quickly as possible.”
>
> Severe measures were also to be taken against any form of
resistance — including passive resistance.
>
> References : Unterlagen des Generalquartiermeisters im
Generalstab des Heeres beim OKH: Sammelmappe „Militärverwaltung
England" - Befehle und Weisungen über die Organisation und den
Einsatz der Militärverwaltung in England (1) (9. September 1940)
:
HTML https://wwii.germandocsinrussia.org/de/nodes/7336#page/1/mode/grid/zoom/1
--- End Quote ---
[/quote]
Historical notes on the thoughts of Propaganda Minister Joseph
Goebbels and Hitler about plans to invade England
--- Quote ---
> In his propaganda briefing on June 23, 1941, Goebbels
presented three main reasons to his staff for waging war against
the Soviet Union, which were intended to be prominently featured
in propaganda efforts.
>
> First, he argued that "the possibility of launching a major
offensive against England [...] does not exist as long as Russia
remains a potential enemy," since a large portion of Germany’s
military potential had to be stationed on the Eastern Front to
counterbalance the Soviet military machine.
>
> Second, the invasion would result in a "massive increase in
the supply of petrol, petroleum, and grain"—an argument that,
due to its straightforward and utilitarian nature, was more
suitable for direct propaganda rather than for the broader
media.
>
> Third, the "conflict with Russia" was essentially inevitable.
In other words, "In order for Europe to remain at peace for
decades to come, Bolshevism and National Socialism cannot
coexist." In short: "It is better for the conflict to occur now
than at a time when Russia has reorganized itself internally and
rearmed."
--- End Quote ---
Source:
1. Peter Longerich, Goebbels: A Biography, translated by Alan
Bance, Jeremy Noakes, and Lesley Sharpe (2015), pp. 480–481.
2. Die Tagebücher yon Joseph Goebbels Im Auftrag des Instituts
für Zeitgeschichte und mit Unterstützung des Staatlichen
Archivdienstes Rußlands Herausgegeben von Elke Fröhlich Teil I
Aufzeichnungen 1923-1941 Band 9 Dezember 1940 - Juli 1941
Bearbeitet von Elke Fröhlich K G · Saur München 1998 Page 397
until 399
From the writings :
23. Juni 1941
Gestern: ein drückend heißer Tag. Unsere Truppen werden es im
Kampf nicht leicht haben.
Molotow redet: ein rüdes Geschimpfe, ein Appell an den
Patriotismus, larmoyante Klagen, dazwischen schaut die Angst
heraus: "Wir werden siegen", sagt er. On verra! England ist noch
zwiespältig. Man ist zu überrascht. Keine klare Linie. USA
vorläufig nur Sensation. Antonescu erläßt poetische Aufrufe an
Armee und Volk. Finnland rührt sich noch nicht. Ungarn sehr
stark antibolschewistisch für uns eintretend. Italien erklärt
Rußland den Krieg. Sehr anständig. Eine Welle von
Antibolschewismus geht durch ganz Europa. Der Entschluß des
Führers ist die größte überhaupt nur denkbare Sensation.
Unser Luftangriff startet in größtem Stil. Mit 700 Stukas und
200 Jägern. Auf russische Städte, darunter Kiew mit 200 Toten
und Flugplätze. Die ganze 3 000 km lange Front hat die
Kampftätigkeit aufgenommen. Die ersten kleinen Flüsse sind
überall überschritten
Wir greifen Southampton sehr stark an. Englische Luftangriffe
auf das Rheinund Ruhrgebiet, aber ohne sichtbaren Erfolg.
Mittags bei Alfieri. Er war zu Ribbentrop bestellt, der ihm
gesagt hat, Pavolinis Besuch sei unerwünscht. Das ist die Höhe
der Taktlosigkeit. Das werde ich bei nächster Gelegenheit doch
dem Führer vortragen müssen
Mit Pavolini Filmprobleme besprochen, insbesondere regelmäßigen
Austausch von Wochenschausujets und Spielfilmen. Wir kommen da
zu einem vollkommenen Akkord. Auch sollen in größerem Stile
wechselseitige Journalistenbesuche durchgeführt werden.
Nachmittags klärt sich die psychologische Situation schon mehr.
Der Aufruf des Führers wird in der ganzen Welt wörtlich
wiedergegeben. London sagt vorläufig, Hitler ist wahnsinnig und
verweist dabei auf das Beispiel Napoleon, das auch Molotow
anführte. Damit müssen wir uns noch auseinandersetzen. Einige
englische Stimmen rufen auch zur Vernunft und legen dar, was
England verliert, wenn wir die Ukraine erobern. USA verlegt sich
aufs Schimpfen, das tut aber bekanntlich nicht weh. Wenn wir
siegen, haben wir recht. Aus Japan noch keine Stellungnahme
Die Russen haben bereits schwerste Flugzeugverluste. Bei einem
Angriff auf Tilsit verloren sie von 43 angreifenden Flugzeugen
22. Die Operationen entwickeln sich planmäßig.
Bericht aus London von einem neutralen Augenzeugen: schwerste
Bombenschäden fast in allen bombardierten Städten. Stimmung aber
noch vollkommen intakt. Starke soziale und antiplutokratische
Strömungen. Churchill weiterhin sehr populär. Vorläufig ist eine
Erschütterung seiner Stellung noch nicht zu bemerken
Ich habe den ganzen Nachmittag sehr angestrengt zu arbeiten.
Ribbentrop hat nach meiner Verlesung der Führerproklamation noch
seinen Senf dazu gegeben. Dienst an der Eitelkeit!
Der russische Aufmarsch gleicht dem der Franzosen von 1870. Er
wird dieselbe Katastrophe erleiden. Die Russen verteidigen sich
vorerst nur mäßig. Aber ihre Luftwaffe hat gleich furchtbare
Verluste erlebt: 200 abgeschossen, 200 zerstört am Boden und 200
beschädigt. Das ist schon ein sehr bedenklicher Ausfall. Wir
werden es bald schaffen. Wir müssen es bald schaffen. Im Volk
ist eine leicht deprimierte Stimmung. Das Volk will den Frieden,
zwar nicht den verlorenen, aber jeder neu aufgemachte
Kriegsschauplatz bereitet ihm Sorgen und Kummer.
Die spanische Presse geht ganz groß ins Zeug. Ebenso die
schwedische. Es macht sich so etwas wie Kreuzzugsstimmung in
Europa breit. Das können wir gut gebrauchen. Aber nur nicht so
sehr auf der Parole "für das Christentum" herumreiten. Das ist
doch etwas zu heuchlerisch
Antonescu hat seinen Bruder zu seinem Stellvertreter ernannt.
Das ist nicht gerade schön, aber uns geht es ja nichts an. In
London weiterhin Mangel an Klarheit. Der Schock war zu groß.
Am frühen Abend Empfang für Pavolini in kleinem Kreise in Lanke.
Eine Reihe von netten Leuten. Aber ich habe keine Ruhe, mich
ihnen zu widmen. Jede Minute fast kommen neue Nachrichten.
Meistens recht erfreuliche. Bis zur Stunde 1 100 russische
Flugzeuge vernichtet. Das ist ein Schlag ins Kontor. Brest
genommen. Alle Tagesziele erreicht. Bisher keine Komplikationen.
Wir können sehr beruhigt sein. Das Sowjetregime wird wie Zunder
auseinanderbrechen
Churchill redet. Eine tolle Schimpferei gegen den Führer. Sonst
ist seine Rede eine einzige Bestätigung für die Zusammenarbeit
zwischen London und Moskau gegen uns.
Der Besuch Pavolinis verläuft sehr angenehm. Wir verleben einen
schönen und anregenden Abend. Wochenschau vor ihm bearbeitet. Er
und seine Leute staunen nur so
Es wird wieder sehr spät. Schlaf ist in letzter Zeit für uns ein
Luxus geworden.
3. Joseph Goebbels Tagebücher 1924 -1945 Band 1 Einführung
1924-1929 Herausgegeben von Ralf Georg Reuth Piper München
Zürich Page 1611 until 1613
From the writings :
Gestern : ein drückend heißer Tag. Unsere Truppen werden es im
Kampf nicht leicht haben. Molotow redet : ein tolles Geschimpfe
, und Appell an den Patriotismus , larmoyante Klagen ,
dazwischen schaut die Angst heraus : »Wir werden siegen« , sagt
er. Der arme ! England ist noch zwiespältig. Man ist zu
überrascht . Keine klare Linie . In USA vorläufig nur Sensation
. Antonescu erläßt poetische Aufrufe an Armee und Volk. Finnland
rührt sich noch nicht . Ungarn sehr stark antibolschewistisch
für uns eintretend . Italien erklärt Rußland den Krieg. Sehr
anständig. Eine Welle von Antibolschewismus geht durch ganz
Europa. Der Entschluß des Führers ist die größte überhaupt nur
denkbare Sensation . Unser Luftangriff startet in größtem Stil .
Mit 900 Stukas und 200 Jägern . Auf russische Städte , darunter
Kiew mit . . . und Flugplätze . Die ganze 3000 km lange Front
hat die Kampftätigkeit aufgenommen . Die ersten kleinen Flüsse
sind überall überschritten . Wir greifen Southampton sehr stark
an . Englische Luftangriffe auf das Rhein- und Ruhrgebiet, aber
ohne sichtbaren Erfolg. Mittags bei Alfieri . . . . zu
Ribbentrop bestellt , der ihm gesagt hat , Pavolinis Besuch sei
unerwünscht. Das ist die Höhe der . . losigkeit. Das werde ich
bei nächster Gelegenheit doch dem Führer vortragen müssen . Mit
Pavolini Filmprobleme besprochen : insbesondere regelmäßigen
Austausch von Wochenschausujets und Spielfilmen . Wir kommen da
zu einem vollkommenen Akkord . Auch sollen in größerem Stile
wechselseitige Journalistenbesuche durchgeführt werden .
Nachmittags klärt sich die psychologische Situation schon . Der
Aufruf des Führers wird in der ganzen Welt wörtlich
wiedergegeben . London sagt vorläufig, Hitler sei wahnsinnig,
und verweist dabei auf das Beispiel Napoleon , das auch Molotow
anführte . Damit müssen wir uns noch auseinandersetzen . Einige
englische Stimmen rufen auch zur Vernunft und legen dar, was
England verliert , wenn wir die Ukraine erobern . USA verlegt
sich aufs Schimpfen. Das tut aber bekanntlich nicht weh . Wenn
wir siegen , haben wir recht. Aus Japan noch keine Stellungnahme
. Die Russen haben bereits schwerste Flugzeugverluste . Bei
einem Angriff auf Tilsit verloren sie von 73 angreifenden
Flugzeugen 22 . Die Operationen entwickeln sich planmäßig.
Bericht aus London von einem neutralen Augenzeugen : schwerste
Bombenschäden fast in allen bombardierten Städten. Stimmung aber
noch vollkommen intakt . Starke soziale und antiplutokratische
Strömungen. Churchill weiterhin sehr populär. Vorläufig ist eine
Erschütterung seiner Stellung noch nicht zu bemerken . Ich habe
den ganzen Nachmittag sehr angestrengt zu arbeiten . Ribbentrop
hat nach meiner Verlesung der Führerproklamation noch seinene
Senf dazu gegeben . Dienst an der Eitelkeit ! Der russische
Aufmarsch . . . dem der Franzosen von 1870 . Er wird dieselbe
Katastrophe erleiden . Die Russen verteidigen sich vorerst nur
mäßig. Aber ihre Luftwaffe hat gleich furchtbare Verluste
erlitten : 200 abgeschossen, 200 zerstört am Boden und 200
beschädigt . Das ist schon ein sehr bedenklicher Ausfall . Wir
werden es bald schaffen . Wir müssen es auch bald schaffen. Im
Volk ist eine leicht deprimierte Stimmung. Das Volk will den
Frieden zwar nicht den verlorenen [ ! ] , aber jeder neu
aufgemachte Kriegsschauplatz bereitet ihm Sorgen und Kummer. Die
spanische Presse geht ganz groß ins Zeug. Ebenso die schwedische
. Es macht sich so etwas wie Kreuzzugsstimmung in Europa breit .
Das können wir gut gebrauchen . Aber nur nicht so sehr auf der
Parole »für das Christentum« herumreiten. Das ist doch etwas zu
heuchlerisch . Antonescu hat seinen Bruder zu seinem
Stellvertreter ernannt . Das ist nicht gerade schön , aber uns
geht es ja nichts an . In London weiterhin Mangel an Klarheit.
Der Schock war zu groß . Am frühen Abend Empfang für Pavolini in
kleinem Kreise in Lanke . Eine Reihe von netten Gästen . Aber
ich habe keine Ruhe , mich ihnen zu widmen. Jede Minute fast
kommen neue Nachrichten. Meistens recht erfreuliche . Bis zur
Stunde 1000 russische Flugzeuge vernichtet . Das ist ein Schlag
ins Kontor. Brest 129 genommen . Alle Tagesziele erreicht .
Bisher keine Komplikationen. Wir können sehr beruhigt sei n .
Das Sowjetregime wird wie Zunder auseinanderbrechen . Churchill
redet . 130 Eine tolle Schimpferei gegen den Führer. Sonst ist
seine Rede eine einzige Bestätigung für die Zusammenarbeit
zwischen London und Moskau gegen uns . Der Besuch Pavolinis
verläuft sehr angenehm . Wir verleben einen schönen und
anregenden Abend . Wochenschau vor ihm bearbeitet . Er und seine
Leute staunen nur so . Es wird wieder sehr spät . Schlaf ist in
letzter Zeit für uns ein Luxus geworden
--- Quote ---
> I believe that the end of this war will mark the beginning of
a lasting friendship with England. But first we must knock her
out—for only then can we live in peace with her, and the English
can only respect someone who has first knocked her out. The
memory of 1918 must be erased.
--- End Quote ---
- Adolf Hitler, Night of July 22-23, 1941 : English
Arrogance—The Birth of German Industry—Commercial Competition
with England—Steps Towards a Lasting Understanding Between
Germany and England—The Scarcity of English Philosophical and
Artistic Feelings
Source :
1. Hitler’s Table Talk His Private Conversations (1941-1944)
words of Adolf Hitler Translated by Norman Cameron dan R.H.
Stevens Page 12
2. Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier Page 59 until
60
From the text :
22.7.1941 nachts
(Wolfsschanze)
Aufgenommen: Heim. F.d.R.: Picker
Überlegen ist der Engländer dem Deutschen durch sein
Selbstbewusstsein. Selbstbewusstsein hat nur, wer befehlen kann.
Überall in der Welt sitzen Deutsche an der Arbeit, ohne dass sie
den ihnen dafür gebührenden Lohn erhielten; ihre Leistung wird
anerkannt. Aber dass sie nur ihrer Arbeit leben, lässt sie
denen, die an ihnen verdienen, nur bedauernswert erscheinen.
Woran es liegt, dass der Deutsche in der Zeit bis zum Weltkrieg
in der angel- sächsischen Welt nicht gern gesehen war?
Um 1870 hatten wir einen ungeheuren Bevölkerungszuwachs. Die
Folge war, dass jährlich 200’000 bis 300’000 Menschen auswandern
mussten. Dem konnte man nur abhelfen, wenn man diese Menschen in
den Arbeitsprozess einschaltete. Als Arbeitsprodukt kamen in
Frage lediglich Erzeugnisse aus den deutschen Rohstoffen Kohle
und Eisen. Der Bedarf an Erzeugnissen aus diesen Stoffen war bis
dahin durch England gedeckt worden. Die Engländer pflegten erste
Qualität zu verlangen und dafür hohe Preise zu bezahlen. Dem,
der unter solchen Umständen ins Geschäft kommen will, bleibt
nichts übrig, als den Mono-polisten zu unterbieten.
Unser Bienenfleiss hat uns zur Herstellung von Massenartikeln
instand ge- setzt. Diese waren billig, aber sie konnten nicht
die Qualität der englischen Er- zeugnisse haben: Wir waren
Anfänger und kannten die Produktionsgeheim- nisse nicht. So kam
es, dass auf einer Weltausstellung in Philadelphia in den acht-
ziger Jahren (1876) die deutsche Produktion das Prädikat «billig
und schlecht» erhielt. Mit der Zeit haben sich dann aber drei
Produktionsgruppen heraus- gebildet, in denen unsere Arbeit der
englischen an Qualität überlegen war: die chemische Industrie,
an der Spitze die Pharmazeutik, die Farbenherstellung und dann
vor dem Weltkrieg die Gewinnung von Stickstoff aus der Luft; die
Herstellung elektrischer Geräte und die Erzeugung optischer
Instrumente. England hat diese Konkurrenz so lebhaft zu spüren
bekommen, dass es sich mit aller Macht dagegen wehrte. Aber
weder die handelspolitischen Versuche wie der Schutzzoll oder
zwischenstaatliche Verträge noch das Prädikat «Made in Germany»
halfen.
Für den Engländer bestand das Lebensideal in der Daseinsform des
viktoriani- schen Zeitalters: Dem Engländer waren die
ungezählten Millionen des Kolonial- reichs und 35 Millionen
Menschen im eigenen Land dienstbar. Dazu kam i Million
bürgerlicher Mittelstand und darüber 1’000 Herren, denen der
Ertrag aus der Arbeit der anderen mühelos zufloss. Für diese
englische Herrenschicht war das Aufkommen Deutschlands das
Unglück. Im Grunde war mit unserem wirtschaftlichen Aufstieg das
Schicksal Englands bereits besiegelt, und künftig wird sich das
englische Reich nur halten können, wenn Deutschland dazusteht
Ich bin sicher, das Ende des Krieges ist der Anfang der
dauernden Freund- schaft mit England. Voraussetzung dafür, dass
wir mit ihnen in Ruhe leben, ist der Knock-out-Schlag, den der
Engländer von dem erwartet, den er achten soll: 1918 muss
ausgelöscht sein.
#Post#: 30392--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: June 6, 2025, 10:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Will Hitler save Europe?
--- Quote ---
> The European Confederation (German: Europäischer Staatenbund)
was a proposed political institution of European unity, which
was to be part of a broader restructuring (Neuordnung) in the
aftermath of a German victory in the Second World War. The plan
was proposed by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop
in March 1943.
>
> Some historians have argued that the concept was primarily a
propaganda tool. However, others have argued that there was
genuine enthusiasm for European unity among Nazi and Fascist
political leaders and intellectuals since references to the
concept were made in secret government memoranda and
conversations.[1]
>
> ...
>
> The draft of the Act stated that the Confederation's purpose
was to ensure that wars never again break between European
peoples.[7] Its members were to be sovereign states that
guaranteed the freedom, the national character and the political
independence of other member states.[7]
>
> The organisation of the internal affairs of each member state
was to be its respective sovereign decision.[7] The member
states were to defend the interests of Europe and protect the
Continent from external enemies.[7] European economy was to be
reorganised in mutual agreement between the member states, with
internal custom and other barriers progressively abolished.[7]
Also, trans-European rail, autobahn, waterway and airline
networks were all to be developed according to a common plan.[8]
>
> Goals
>
> The project's goals were assuring Germany's allies that their
independence would be respected after the war, giving the
impression to the Allies that Europe was united in defying them
and portraying the Allies as fighting not for the liberation of
European states but against the unification of the European
continent. That was hoped to neuter Western Allied propaganda
against Germany.[11]
>
> A clear call for the Confederation would also allow the
Germans to recruit more men for the Waffen-SS from the occupied
countries and to force them to bolster their war effort in the
personal and material spheres.[12] Also, the Confederation would
deter the neutral countries of Europe from joining the Allied
powers.[11]
>
> ...
>
> Reception by Vichy France
>
> Vichy French Prime Minister Pierre Laval was enthusiastic
about the proposal and wrote in a document to Adolf Hitler that
France was ready for territorial sacrifices in Tunisia and
Alsace-Lorraine to bring about an "atmosphere of confidence" in
Europe.[2] He also stated that France must prepare to join the
customs union, and was ready to accept long-term German military
occupation of the French Atlantic Coast if it was necessary for
the protection of Continental Europe.[2] He also hoped that the
measures would not exclude Germany and Italy later allowing
France to regain "a position appropriate to its continental and
colonial past".[2]
>
> Rejection by Hitler
>
> Hitler was dismissive of the plan, as his vision of postwar
Europe was one of total German hegemony. Ernst von Weizsäcker,
Secretary of State at the Foreign Office, recorded in his
diaries Hitler's position on the matter. On April 13, 1943,
Weizsäcker wrote,
>
> "Reorganization of Europe: no enthusiasm for this idea on our
side; the present jejune communiqué is a compromise between two
parties".[10]
>
> On May 5, 1943, he wrote,
>
> "The reason why we are not to be drawn into a conversation
about the "New Order" in Europe is indicated confidentially by
the Führer: our neighbours are all our enemies; we must get all
we can out of them, but cannot and must not promise them
anything".[10]
--- End Quote ---
Source :
1. Wikipedia contributors. (2024, November 4). European
Confederation. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved
03:16, June 7, 2025, from
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Confederation&oldid=1255309539
2. Nativist Concern. (2025, March 19). Why I’m Not a National
Socialist. Retrieved June 7, 2025, from Substack.com website:
HTML https://nativistconcern.substack.com/p/why-im-not-a-national-socialist
#Post#: 30421--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: June 11, 2025, 1:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Compare Hitler's view of the world with Benito Mussolini's
While Hitler begin to renounced his views on race in Mein Kampf,
and attempted to change his views on race to be more friendly
towards black people, Benito Mussolini held the opposite view of
Hitler's[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
--- Quote ---
> However, for Italy — as well as for other countries inhabited
by people of the White race — it is a matter of life or death.
It is a matter of knowing whether the civilization of the white
man is destined to perish in the face of the growing number of
yellow and black races.
--- End Quote ---
— Benito Mussolini, Is The White Race Dying?
--- Quote ---
> “[When the] city dies, the nation – deprived of the young
life-blood of new generations – is now made up of people who are
old and degenerate and cannot defend itself against a younger
people which launches an attack on the now unguarded frontiers
[...] This will happen, and not just to cities and nations, but
on an infinitely greater scale: the whole White race, the
Western race can be submerged by other coloured races which are
multiplying at a rate unknown in our race."
--- End Quote ---
— Benito Mussolini quoted in Fascism by Roger Griffin
--- Quote ---
> “We are moving towards an Africanized America in which the
white race, due to the inexorable law of numbers, will end up
being overwhelmed by the fertile nephews of the proverbial Uncle
Tom. Will we see blacks in the White House in half a century, in
a century?”
--- End Quote ---
— Benito Mussolini, Europe Without Europeans
...
--- Quote ---
> "The Ethiopian invasion was seen as an opportunity to address
the situation discussed in Mussolini's 1934 essay. He pushed for
demographic colonization, which involved creating permanent
Italian settlements to solve Italy's land hunger problem and
repopulating East Africa as a white European space. Maintaining
racial boundaries was central to Mussolini's colonial culture
vision. This motivated many in the Fascist party to serve the
regime, and architects and urban planners used race as the main
criterion for spatial organization in Ethiopia. They followed
the mandates to keep Italian and African cultures separate and
unequal, passing laws in 1939 with the goal of preserving
"racial prestige." These laws regulated interracial social
contact and enforced racial segregation."[9]
--- End Quote ---
Source :
1. Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 273
2. Hitler aus nächster Nähe. Aufzeichnungen eines Vertrauten
1929-1932 Page 227 and 228
3. Otto Wagener, Hitler – Memoirs of a Confidant Page 363
4. Hitler's Black Victims (Crosscurrents in African American
History) by Clarence Lusane Pages 267 – 270
5. Treu bis in den Tod. Von Deutsch-Ostafrika nach
Sachsenhausen. Eine Lebensgeschichte Paperback – 1 Aug. 2007 by
Marianne Bechhaus-Gerst Page 75-77
HTML https://books.google.co.id/books?redir_esc=y&hl=id&id=r9dVq2EsN7cC&q=Arbeitsschutz#v=onepage&q=martin%20bormann&f=false
6. Kuzniar-Clark - Black Nazis II Ethnic Minorities and
Foreigners in Hitler's Armed Forces Page 46 and 144
7. Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier by Henry Picker
page 81 107, and 241
8. Adolf Hitler - Table Talk page 146, 319, 320, 442, and 443
9. The Fascio Newsletter. (2022, January 23). Racism In Italian
Fascism. Retrieved June 11, 2025, from Substack.com website:
HTML https://fascio.substack.com/p/italian-racism-in-fascism?utm_source=publication-search
#Post#: 30428--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: June 11, 2025, 10:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: antihellenistic link ---
>
> Hitler's Real Plan on Great Britain
>
>
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ucrF2PHBOc&t=3965s
>
> The WORST channel? Zoomer Historian DEBUNKED by facts and
logic (reupload) - What Why How, 20th February 2024
>
> [quote]Minute 01 : 06 : 08 until 01 : 09 : 40 (Transcribed
with assistance from ChatGPT Pro)
>
> Although on page 333 of Mein Kampf he stated the following —
“The English nation must be regarded as the most valuable ally
in the world. During its leadership, the broad popular spirit
justifies the expectation of brutality and determined
perseverance in fighting a battle through to a victorious end,
by any means necessary and regardless of time and sacrifice.” —
it is certainly ironic that Hitler, long before the war with
Britain, could foresee the difficult resistance they might
offer. You can find that quote and others like it, but
essentially, Hitler wanted Britain as his ally in restoring
German dominance on the continent. Initially, Hitler did not
plan to go to war with Britain. His main concern was the
conquest of Lebensraum — living space — in the East.
>
> But what happened after the war began is what truly matters.
When it became clear that Britain would not shy away from war or
agree to peace with Germany, Hitler and his officers began to
draft plans targeting the British Isles. Germany did, in fact,
prepare military plans for the invasion and occupation of
Britain. Operation Sea Lion was a serious invasion plan that
Hitler fully supported. There are countless books on this topic.
If you're looking for a brief summary, The Rise and Fall of the
Third Reich contains an entire chapter dedicated to it.
>
> Essentially, Hitler fully expected Britain to surrender after
France fell. But, of course, many within the German government —
including the Führer and those responsible for bringing Britain
into line with the new order — still treated the matter
seriously. The SS, in particular, saw it as a serious
undertaking. As Shirer wrote on page 762:
>
> “The massive secret German military archives leave no doubt
that Hitler’s plans were dead serious, and that despite many
doubts, the Nazi dictator fully intended to carry them out if
there was a reasonable chance of success. Their ultimate fate
was not decided by a lack of will or effort, but by the fortunes
of war, which for the first time began to turn against him.”
>
> So, had Germany succeeded in conquering Britain — unlikely as
it was — what would have happened?
>
> On September 9, 1940, Field Marshal Walter von Brauchitsch,
the Commander-in-Chief of the German Army — a rather
high-ranking position — issued the following order regarding the
British military administration:
>
> “Except where local conditions necessitate exceptions, the
male population between the ages of 17 and 45 is to be detained
and deported to the Continent as quickly as possible.”
>
> Severe measures were also to be taken against any form of
resistance — including passive resistance.
>
> References : Unterlagen des Generalquartiermeisters im
Generalstab des Heeres beim OKH: Sammelmappe „Militärverwaltung
England" - Befehle und Weisungen über die Organisation und den
Einsatz der Militärverwaltung in England (1) (9. September 1940)
:
HTML https://wwii.germandocsinrussia.org/de/nodes/7336#page/1/mode/grid/zoom/1
--- End Quote ---
[/quote]
What was Hitler's reason for not attacking England? (Explanation
Part 1)
--- Quote ---
> "At the beginning of the conference, the Nazi warlord showed a
rather negative mood and his mind was torn by contradictions. He
[Hitler] would not give the order for the invasion, but he would
not cancel it either, as Raeder noted in the Naval War Diary,
"he had apparently planned it on September 13 [1940].
>
> What was the reason for his final change of heart? Haider
recorded it in detail. [Page 770]
>
> A successful landing [according to the Fuehrer] followed by an
occupation would end the war in a short time. England would
starve. The landing would not have to take place within the
specified time... But a long war was undesirable. We had
achieved all we needed.
>
> Britain's hopes for Russia and America, Hitler said, had not
been realized. Russia would not bleed for England. American
rearmament would not be fully effective until 1945. For now, the
quickest solution is a landing in England. The Navy has reached
the necessary conditions. The Luftwaffe operation is beyond
praise. Four or five days of good weather would bring decisive
results… We have a good chance of bringing England to its knees.
>
> So what went wrong? Why the hesitation to launch an invasion?
>
> The problem was, Hitler admitted:
>
> The enemy keeps rising again and again… The enemy fighters
have not been completely eliminated. Our own reports of
successes do not give a completely reliable picture, although
the enemy has been badly damaged.
>
> Overall, Hitler declared, despite all our successes, the
prerequisite conditions for Operation Sea Lion have not yet been
realized. [Page 771]
>
> ....
>
> We realized [Adolf Galland, the famous German fighter ace,
later testified] that the R.A.F. fighter squadrons had to be
controlled from the ground by some new procedures because we
heard the orders skillfully and accurately directing Spitfires
and Hurricanes into German formations . . . For us, this control
of radar and fighter planes was a surprise and very bitter.33"
[Page 776]
--- End Quote ---
Source :
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany
by William L. Shirer Page 770, 771, and 776
HTML https://archive.org/details/B-001-014-606/page/770/mode/2up?q=The+time+for+Hitler+to+make+his+fatal+decision+to+launch+the+invasion
What was Hitler's reason for not attacking England? (Explanation
Part 2)
--- Quote ---
> Schon gegen Ende Juli [1940], einen Monat nach der
Niederwerfung Frankreichs, erkannte ich, daß der Frieden uns
einmal mehr enteilte. Wenige Wochen später wußte ich, daß die
Invasion der englischen Inseln vor den Herbststürmen nicht mehr
gelingen konnte, da wir uns nicht der Luftherrschaft zu sichern
vermocht hatten. Ich erkannte, daß uns die Invasion Englands
niemals gelingen würde.
>
> - Adolf Hitler, 26. Februar 1945
>
> "By the end of July [1940], one month after the defeat of
France, I realized that peace was once again eluding us. A few
weeks later, I knew that the invasion of the English islands
before the autumn storms could no longer succeed, as we had not
been able to secure air supremacy. I realized that we would
never succeed in invading England."
>
> - Adolf Hitler, February 26, 1945
--- End Quote ---
Source :
1. Hitler's Political Testament: The Bormann Dictates of
February and April 1945 Pages 50 - 51
2. Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
Documents) Page 47
*****************************************************
Page 23 of 24
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page