URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Colonial Era
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 29125--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: rp
       Date: January 9, 2025, 1:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Note the absence of the swastika on the original symbol:
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Obergruppenf%C3%BChrersaal_mit_Schwarzer_Sonne%2C_Wewelsburg_%2810573256656%29_b.jpg
       In fact, most depictions of the symbol lack the swastika:
       [Img]
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/BlackSun.svg[/img]
       The one in my original post seems to be an anomaly
       #Post#: 29126--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: January 9, 2025, 3:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The absence of the swastika in the original reflects Himmler's
       absence of any feeling of indebtedness to Hitler in the
       formation of Himmler's own ideology. The forced addition of the
       swastika to the version in your earlier post reflects the intent
       of either illiterate or dishonest neo-Nazis who want to portray
       Hitler and Himmler as ideologically aligned.
       #Post#: 29253--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: January 27, 2025, 6:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Source :
       Exposing Hitler as Zionist's Telegram Post on 26th January 2025
       --- Quote ---
       > The purpose of this channel isn't to initiate anti-Germanic
       sentiments or resentments at all but to shoo away this black
       cloud on our movement, or White identity politics. Neo-Nazis
       tend to think that Nazism is a beacon of hope or it helps unite
       our people, well it's just the opposite in reality. What do you
       think a normie is going to think if you approach them with
       legitimate issues face White people and then drag Nazism into
       the conversation? They will be immediately turned off at the
       very least and any chance of converting them over to our side
       has been tarnished. Not only is it normie-repellant but it also
       helps the Zionists with their narratives—-they can't claim
       Anti-Semitism and that Nazism is growing if they don't have
       Nazi's playing the role of their dialectal opposition. When
       people support Nazism in public, they can send their media crews
       to film it and then show the rest of the nation at how evil and
       hateful Whites are and that we need more laws, more authority,
       more policing of these types of groups that threatens Jews. They
       can't play the victim card unless they have an opposition to
       point the finger at.
       >
       > So when I point out the terrible things that the Nazi's did to
       other Europeans, the intent is not to create bitter resentments
       towards Germans/Germany but to just highlight that they weren't
       actually pro-White or pro-European as modern Nazi propaganda
       likes to tout. I actually love Germany and the culture, so don't
       think I'm anti-German in any way.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://t.me/exposinghitler/1967
       #Post#: 29258--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: January 27, 2025, 10:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our enemy began to realize that Hitler's regime's social norms
       and laws were fundamentally rejected Western Civilization
       --- Quote ---
       > The National Socialist Rejection of Intelligence Research (IQ)
       >
       > "Contradicting common beliefs, the National Socialists were
       opposed to intelligence research.”
       >
       > (Becker, 1938; Jänsch, 1938, p. 2).
       >
       > In their view, intelligence research would represent a
       'supremacy of Bourgeois spirit' to 'fortify its hegemony'.
       >
       > (Becker, 1938; Jänsch, 1938, p. 3).
       >
       > “Selection in schools according to intelligence would stand
       for a 'system of examination of Jewish origin' (p. 4),
       especially the concept of intelligence as a 'one-dimensional
       criterion' (p. 3) and ‘one common central factor’.”
       >
       > (Becker, 1938, p. 24).
       >
       > “Because people differ and therefore intelligence differs (p.
       4) they called for an ‘intelligence measurement according to a
       national and typological point of view’.”
       >
       > (Becker, 1938 p. 15).
       >
       > “For Germans, they asked for a measurement of 'contextual
       particularism', 'conscientiousness' and 'actually of the
       character value of intelligence'. They were opposed to a
       measurement solely based on the 'theoretical intelligence' of
       'intellectualism'.
       >
       > (Becker, 1938, p. 22).
       >
       > “Instead, they favored the measuring of ‘practical
       intelligence’.”
       >
       > (Becker, 1938, p. 18).
       >
       > Nazi researchers were opposed to the methods of correlation
       and factor analysis (p. 23f). For them, general intelligence did
       not exist. They stated, 'In fact, there is no general,
       qualitatively comparable and form type independent
       intelligence.'
       >
       > (Jänsch, 1938, p. 4)"
       >
       > ...
       >
       > A Truly National Socialist Sociology
       >
       > With the dominance of ideologies aligned with Nazism came the
       dismissal of foreign perspectives, particularly from Germany’s
       Western neighbors, which were frequently linked to ‘Jewish’
       thought and, by their mere presence, posed a danger to the
       uniformity of German sociology. A sharp condemnation of the West
       is made:
       >
       > “The science of ‘sociology’ has been discredited in Germany
       because in the past, its name has often covered either
       ‘inessential thinking’ (Geistreichelei) or the influx of Western
       thinking hostile to the Volk. It has often succumbed to the
       combative doctrines of the Western nations that, in the name of
       an empirical science, claimed the universality of Western
       European social experience and institutions and thus became a
       weapon of England, France, and America. It often lent its name
       to Jewish thinking, which aimed at leading the German people to
       dismiss its völkisch necessities.” (Pfeffer 1939a)
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Immediately following the Nazis' rise to power, considered a
       clear indication of the ‘revival of Germany’, historical
       occurrences were interpreted through the lens of German
       historical philosophical models. Post-1936, bio-racial
       interpretations were rooted in idealism with realism and
       materialism being completely rejected. Furthermore, histories
       based on “empirical science” were rejected in favor of a more
       mythological narratives. This approach aligned National
       Socialist attitudes far more with those of pre-enlightenment
       Medieval Christian traditions than contemporary liberal humanist
       perspectives. In a sense, there was a strong anti-humanist
       stance to be found within Nazi sociology.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Hitler's worldview inspired Modern Counterculture Movements
       >
       > The Great Irony: Sociological overlaps between National
       Socialism’s Race Idealism and Progressive Liberalism’s ‘Woke’
       Anti-Race Realism
       >
       > Dr. Robin DiAngelo is the author of "What Does it Mean to Be
       White? Developing White Racial Literacy" and has been popular
       anti-racist educator for many years now. In the presentation
       above, it should be noted just how much overlap there is between
       her sociological analysis and the sociological approaches
       proposed by the National Socialist academics of the Third Reich.
       The irony is immeasurably comedic. DiAngelo inadvertently sets
       up the exact sociological justifications for the NS concept of
       the “Volksgemeinschaft” (Folk-Community) and uses formulations
       that were identical to Adolf Hitler’s.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The Fascifist. (2025, January 27). The Sociology of Nazi Race
       Science: Retrieved January 28, 2025, from Substack.com website:
  HTML https://fascio.substack.com/p/the-sociology-of-nazi-race-science
       #Post#: 29260--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: January 27, 2025, 11:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > This approach aligned National Socialist attitudes far more
       with those of pre-enlightenment Medieval Christian traditions
       --- End Quote ---
       --- Quote ---
       > Hitler's worldview inspired Modern Counterculture Movements
       --- End Quote ---
       We figured this out 15 years ago.
       #Post#: 29326--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: February 7, 2025, 9:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Africans served under Wimmer-Lamquet, who sympathized with the
       average Africans’ plight under white rule. He lamented, “It was
       not easy to be a black person. Seldom could one make out well.
       The Africans accepted white rule as inevitable, and often
       endured inconceivable things…the arbitrariness of white rule
       left the Africans speechless.” [1] [2]
       --- End Quote ---
       About Franz Wimmer Lamquet :
       Translated from German to English with Google Translate
       --- Quote ---
       > Reinhard Heydrich had selected him for later deployment in
       East Africa. In May 1936 he travelled to Tanganyika to take over
       a coffee plantation. After the invasion of Poland , he was
       interned first in Tanga and then in Dar es Salaam . Returned to
       Europe in 1940, Heydrich selected him in March 1940 for
       deployment in the Middle East and prepared him for deployment
       with the Brandenburgers . His special assignment included
       learning Arabic and marrying the daughter of the "Blue Sultan"
       of Mauritania . In May 1941 he was posted to Special Staff F in
       Iraq and Syria . He was then tasked with setting up a special
       combat unit for deployment in the Sahara . His proposal to set
       up an agent school was approved. The Wimmer Special Commando,
       which he led, consisted of Foreign Legionnaires and locals. It
       was used for terrorist acts in North Africa. [ 1 ] He was
       considered the "German Lawrence of Arabia ". [ 2 ] It was not
       assigned to the German Afrika Korps , but after Heydrich's death
       came under the direct command of Adolf Hitler . In the spring of
       1943, Wimmer-Lamquet was promoted to SS-Standartenführer . [3]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       1. Black Nazis II!: Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler's
       Armed Forces: The Unbiased History Page 137 - 138
       2. Balkenkreuz und Halbmond: als Abwehroffizier in Afrika und im
       Vorderen Orient Page 47
  HTML https://books.google.co.id/books?redir_esc=y&hl=id&id=GZUhAQAAIAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Willk%C3%BCr
       3. Page "Franz Wimmer-Lamquet". In: Wikipedia - The free
       encyclopedia. Last edited: February 6, 2025, 08:48 UTC. URL:
  HTML https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Franz_Wimmer-Lamquet&oldid=253038120<br
       />(Accessed: February 8, 2025, 03:54 UTC)
       #Post#: 29373--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: February 13, 2025, 9:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Related Why do people always talk about Hitler, but not
       Stalin? Didn’t Stalin also do so much damage, arguably just as
       much as Hitler? So how come everyone knows Hitler’s name, but
       Stalin is not as talked about?
       >
       > The main reason Hitler famously became “the mascot of evil” is
       primarily because of a Western-centric way of seeing the world.
       Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot are at their core regarded as “Eastern
       despots”. How many American people refer to someone they dislike
       as “Oh, stop being such an Idi Amin!”, I’m not seeing it.
       European and American people see Hitler as evil above all others
       because he killed millions of mostly white people and he did so
       in the heart of Europe.
       >
       > ...
       >
       >
       [img]
  HTML https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2af3cbbb16e60bcb7be9be2a192483ed-lq[/img]
       >
       > In a lot of countries I have visited, Hitler is not talked
       about as being uniquely evil or wicked. Rather, to some of my
       Asian, African and Indian friends, he’s just another historical
       despot. Someone killed a lot of people, started wars, committed
       genocide… just as their own historical leaders have done in the
       past. They don’t mind Hitler because he’s just one of the many
       murderous leaders the world has seen. And they believe he did it
       because he was, at his core, a patriot. Which is why some even
       view him with rose-tinted and rather forgiving glasses. Plus,
       didn’t Hitler take on the British empire, too? An action sure to
       win you some fans in all the corners of the globe. Quite a tough
       pill to swallow for many Westerners — outside of the West,
       Hitler isn’t really seen as evil incarnate by most people.
       --- End Quote ---
       - Jean-Marie Valheur Follow Upvoted by Bryce Forgue, M.A.
       History, University of Central Florida (2020) and  Brady
       Swanson, Studied history extensively for six years
       Source :
  HTML https://qr.ae/pYaFjH
       #Post#: 29378--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: rp
       Date: February 14, 2025, 11:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCGE4-XQI1o
       #Post#: 29385--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: February 15, 2025, 10:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I academically agree with Pittman. Hitler himself was a fan of
       Lincoln, as we pointed out ages ago.
       #Post#: 29547--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: March 12, 2025, 4:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > I can't stand those meme type of channels on Telegram where
       they post short, flashing clips of wholesome, classical,
       traditional European type of stuff and then mix in Nazi
       propaganda.
       >
       > Why would that time period be looked up on with pride and
       glory, when it cost millions of European lives and destroyed a
       significant portion of European cultures(?)
       >
       > Do you think if you showed such a video to a world war two
       refugee who lost their families and homes because of the war,
       they would be uplifted and proud to be European? Or would the
       Nazi content remind them of everything they lost and how they
       had to start over in a foreign country(?)
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       Exposing Hitler as Zionist - Telegram
  HTML https://t.me/exposinghitler/2010
       *****************************************************
       Page 21 of 24
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page