URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 14371--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: guest30
       Date: June 28, 2022, 4:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       --- Quote ---
       > [quote]"The offender is the people who insult the victim. The
       victim is the people who are offended by him/her."
       --- End Quote ---
       What if both sides are offended by each other, and each claim
       the other insulted themselves?[/quote]
       That is why we need more observation on that two people
       --- Quote ---
       > Have you bothered to watch the Karen videos we have posted?
       --- End Quote ---
       I see some of the statements you already made on that Karenism
       topic. Indeed, sometimes, the offender can cleverly cover up
       their crime
       --- Quote ---
       > [quote]"And see their records of previous activity to show
       that they are not deserve to be offended, and they are really
       offended.
       --- End Quote ---
       According to whose judgement?[/quote]
       From people who know that event, and they can be trusted because
       they are morally good, or moral rational absolutist, not moral
       traditional absolutist
       --- Quote ---
       > [quote]"We can interview the victim for 3 or 5 days with full
       attention."
       --- End Quote ---
       They will just say whatever makes themselves look good.[/quote]
       The victim will tell about them honestly if we really show that
       we want to help and side with the victim
       #Post#: 14376--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: June 28, 2022, 8:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "From people who know that event, and they can be trusted
       because they are morally good, or moral rational absolutist, not
       moral traditional absolutist"
       Trump will say his supporters are morally good.
       "The victim will tell about them honestly if we really show that
       we want to help and side with the victim"
       But you don't know who the victim is! The more you show you want
       to side with the victim, the more both sides will each portray
       themselves as the victim.
       This is why duelling is the answer. It is not up to any
       third-party (especially not the government) to decide who has
       been offended in a private verbal dispute. Whoever is ready to
       give up their own life to kill the other person is the one who
       is offended. If both sides feel this way, it should be allowed
       to happen. But if only one side feels this way, the other side
       will surely back down (or have the opponent murdered prior to
       the duel, whereupon a crime will have been committed and the
       government can now intervene). Either way, the dispute is
       resolved without any external opinion ever being invoked, and
       hence no one else (especially not the government) can be accused
       of favouritism.
       #Post#: 14495--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: guest30
       Date: July 5, 2022, 9:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       I ever debate with the Nusantaran liberals on Discord server, I
       remind them about the danger of Zionism, Judaism, and
       Westernization worldview based on the True Left's National
       Socialist ideological doctrine. And I'm also promoting real
       hard-opposition to the political and ideological opponents, like
       open confrontation and hot debate because they are dangerous by
       power. But I'm got cancel-cultured by them with silent treatment
       way. They not answer every single of my arguments which mostly
       based on this forum, only with satirical and condemnation of my
       "radical" thinking. Are our ideas are wrong, or they don't want
       to hear the facts?
       #Post#: 14511--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: July 5, 2022, 7:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is why you should post your debates on a blog so that
       people can see how your opponents respond. Debating is not about
       persuading your opponent; it is about making your opponent look
       inferior in the eyes of the audience. Debating without an
       audience is useless.
       "Nusantaran liberals"
       This is an oxymoron. Call them Indonesians FFS! Only True
       Leftists can be Nusantarans!
       #Post#: 14515--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: guest78
       Date: July 5, 2022, 8:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Debating is not about persuading your opponent; it is about
       making your opponent look inferior in the eyes of the audience.
       --- End Quote ---
       This is why Monarchists do not debate. Debating is what people
       living in Western-styled democracies do. This is one of the main
       reasons Western-styled democracies always have mediocre
       leadership at best.
       Starting at 1:29:50 onward is well worth the listen in regards
       to the point 90sRF and I made above:
       John Allan Martinson Jr - Monarchism The Last Bastille Podcast
       51
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhoYbdVMg9M
       Can you even imagine a military attempting to function as a
       democracy? No, neither can I. Yet, in most Western-styled
       democracies the democratically elected President also functions
       as the 'commander-in-chief'. This alone is extremely peculiar if
       you really sit back and think about it...
       #Post#: 14517--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: July 5, 2022, 9:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "This is why Monarchists do not debate."
       This is not true. In historical monarchies, it was common
       practice for the monarch to get ministers with opposing views to
       debate on topics of the monarch's choice, with the monarch as
       the sole audience, asking questions to both sides and ultimately
       deciding which side won.
       --- Quote ---
       > Debating is what people living in Western-styled democracies
       do.
       --- End Quote ---
       No, deciding who won a debate based on majority opinion is what
       people living in Western-styled democracies do.
       #Post#: 14530--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: guest30
       Date: July 6, 2022, 12:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       --- Quote ---
       > No, deciding who won a debate based on majority opinion is
       what people living in Western-styled democracies do.
       --- End Quote ---
       From this news information which posted on 19 January 2016 14 :
       34 (3 years ago). We know that the majority of British people
       proud of the British colonialism in the past.
       Source :
  HTML https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/british-people-are-proud-of-colonialism-and-the-british-empire-poll-finds-a6821206.html
       --- Quote ---
       > "The British public are generally proud of their country’s
       role in colonialism and the British Empire, according to a new
       poll.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > YouGov found 44 per cent were proud of Britain’s history of
       colonialism while only 21 per cent regretted that it happened.
       23 per cent held neither view.
       >
       > The same poll also asked about whether the British Empire was
       a good thing or a bad thing: 43 per cent said it was good, while
       only 19 per cent said it was bad. 25 per cent responded that it
       was “neither”.
       >
       > “I think there is an enormous amount to be proud of in what
       the British Empire did and was responsible for,” Mr Cameron said
       in 2013 on a visit to India.
       >
       > “But of course there were bad events as well as good events.
       The bad events we should learn from and the good events we
       should celebrate"  - David Cameroon, Former British Prime
       Minister (11 July 2010 - 13 July 2016)"
       --- End Quote ---
       If we using democratic way of thinking. We will justify that the
       British Colonial Empire was good.
       But if we using what is the true or wrong based on rational mind
       and moral principle. We will justify that London Blitz in 1940
       need to happen again.
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/54/London_Blitz_791940.jpg/1200px-London_Blitz_791940.jpg
       Picture Source : View along the River Thames in London towards
       smoke rising from the London docks after an air raid during the
       Blitz. 7 September 1940 - Wikipedia (Link/URL :
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/54/London_Blitz_791940.jpg/1200px-London_Blitz_791940.jpg)
  HTML https://cdn.britannica.com/81/142181-050-F07B28D6/dome-smoke-fire-bombing-raid-St-Pauls-Cathedral-1940.jpg
       Picture Source : the Blitz World War II - History - Britannica
       (Link/URL :
  HTML https://cdn.britannica.com/81/142181-050-F07B28D6/dome-smoke-fire-bombing-raid-St-Pauls-Cathedral-1940.jpg)
       [img]
  HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/f92a73df93569fa43e9cdc95d228abbc/2863b1bc0ffa2a0f-fb/s640x960/f72aa9fb3ac4bd202a55a52ddd1d35c2cae85bde.pnj[/img]
       Picture Source : The Longest Night: The Bombing of London on May
       10, 1941 Cover - Amazon (Link/URL :
  HTML https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91F-4cirpVL.jpg)
       #Post#: 14567--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: guest30
       Date: July 7, 2022, 11:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       The liberals say that today's liberal world is has less war and
       conflicts compared to the previous era. We already feel
       comfortable with fredom of speeches and freedom of expressions,
       and not want any revolution. What is the good answer for it?
       #Post#: 14568--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: July 7, 2022, 11:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "today's liberal world is has less war and conflicts"
       That is not true:
  HTML https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/xVUWN1s7lxx0rqahI2gJituVnSw=/0x0:3088x2018/1200x0/filters:focal(0x0:3088x2018):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3816326/ourworldindata_wars-long-run-military-civilian-fatalities-from-brecke1.0.png
       #Post#: 14569--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
   DIR By: guest30
       Date: July 8, 2022, 12:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       They not consider colonial era was part of liberalism trend.
       They consider colonial era was different context.
       *****************************************************
       Page 7 of 9
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page