URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 14359--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: guest30 Date: June 27, 2022, 9:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       Liberals say that we must not to be easily offended when we
       accused by others with ridiculous or offensive words. Because if
       we keep fine with other people's offensive words and not attack
       them back with violence. Peace of society will prevail. And the
       people who are easily offended considered by them as "not
       exciting" and "hard feeling". What the solution of that
       argument?
       On this case, I find difficulties on answer that thing
       #Post#: 14360--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 27, 2022, 9:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is why I want to bring back duelling. It is best way to
       resolve "hard feelings" between individuals while preventing
       conflict from escalating.
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-duelling/
       Is duelling "not exciting"?
       #Post#: 14362--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: guest30 Date: June 27, 2022, 10:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       [quote]Is duelling "not exciting"?[/quote]
       They not want it. It will led more individuals who side with the
       individual who are duelling, to participate in fight too. And
       there will be a riot. And riot will harass the society order.
       And they consider people who are duelling to the people who are
       offensd them, are no different to them
       #Post#: 14363--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 27, 2022, 10:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If duelling were legalized, anyone who disrupts a duel will be
       charged with a crime. Also, if duelling were legalized, duels
       could occur at government-run locations which could limit the
       number of people attending and have other measures designed to
       keep order.
       Thus the people most worried about duels degenerating into riots
       are the ones who should most want duelling to be legalized (as
       opposed to occurring underground).
       #Post#: 14365--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: guest30 Date: June 27, 2022, 11:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       [quote]...if duelling were legalized, ...[/quote]
       Duelling care to the strongest, not to people who are being
       offended by the offenders. What should we do if the offenders
       who are win, not the innocents? Duelling activity is naturally
       Darwinist by concept. Not Idealist...
       #Post#: 14366--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 28, 2022, 12:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "What should we do if the offenders who are win, not the
       innocents?"
       Do better next time.
       "Duelling activity is naturally Darwinist by concept."
       No, duelling gives an advantage the side least afraid to die,
       whereas Darwinian competition gives an advantage to the side
       that most wants to survive.
       "Not Idealist..."
       Do you have a better alternative?
       #Post#: 14367--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: guest30 Date: June 28, 2022, 1:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       [quote]Do you have a better alternative?[/quote]
       Recognize the reason why the offenders offend the victim. And
       know who are their friends. If they are really offenders who are
       guilty, every single of their friends who actively make a good
       contact with him/her, and including him/her can be punished for
       their association. their good contact with him/her offending the
       innocents. Of course the liberals and conservatives don't care
       about feelings. Anyone who not want to be bothered to understand
       an empathic communication, or a new form of empathic
       communication which useful for a specific individual deserves to
       be punished, whether using Otto Warmbier treatment, or Das
       Reich's treatment.
       This is why in Islam, people who offend the innocents cannot be
       pardoned until the victims forgive them.
       This is why authoritarian moral police need to be enforced, not
       just security police. Like this historical police groups :
       [quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_forces_of_Nazi_Germany
       "...Sicherheitspolizei (SiPo; security police) consisting of two
       sub-departments of the Gestapo (Secret State Police) and
       Kriminalpolizei (Kripo; criminal police)"[/quote]
       No duelling, but supervising and controlling...
       Remember your thoughts which we agree...
       Anti-Relativism, both politically, or morally...
       That thought is something that despised by the today leftist and
       rightist which poisoned by Masonic (Relativist) and Darwinist
       (Naturalist) teachings
       #Post#: 14368--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 28, 2022, 1:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Recognize the reason why the offenders offend the victim."
       Who is the offender and who is the victim in a private verbal
       dispute between individuals that both individuals entered into
       voluntarily?
       #Post#: 14369--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: guest30 Date: June 28, 2022, 3:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @90sRetroFan
       [quote]Who is the offender and who is the victim in a private
       verbal dispute between individuals that both individuals entered
       into voluntarily?[/quote]
       The offender is the people who insult the victim. The victim is
       the people who are offended by him/her. We can see from the
       victim's depressed facial expression to show that they are
       really offended. And see their records of previous activity to
       show that they are not deserve to be offended, and they are
       really offended. We can interview the victim for 3 or 5 days
       with full attention.
       After that, we already know that the offender are really guilty,
       so we can punish them with ostracism. If they still do that
       thing, then harsh punishment by the authorities is the last
       solution.
       Most of the offenders and bulliers are like to the traditional
       and progressive ideology and way of thinking. You can trust my
       15 years real-life observation, and also people's social media
       activity observation for 5 years.
       Only totalitarian guided expression which solve that
       communication and expression's problem.
       #Post#: 14370--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Debate with the Liberals
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 28, 2022, 4:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "The offender is the people who insult the victim. The victim is
       the people who are offended by him/her."
       What if both sides are offended by each other, and each claim
       the other insulted themselves?
       "We can see from the victim's depressed facial expression to
       show that they are really offended."
       Have you bothered to watch the Karen videos we have posted?
       "And see their records of previous activity to show that they
       are not deserve to be offended, and they are really offended.
       According to whose judgement?
       "We can interview the victim for 3 or 5 days with full
       attention."
       They will just say whatever makes themselves look good.
       "After that, we already know that the offender are really
       guilty"
       No, you don't.
       "You can trust my 15 years real-life observation, and also
       people's social media activity observation for 5 years."
       I do not. Would you trust someone else who claimed to have the
       same experience as what you described above, but who has
       political views opposed to yours?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page