DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs Right
*****************************************************
#Post#: 26214--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: May 2, 2024, 6:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.infowars.com/posts/eva-vlaardingerbroek-warns-whites-to-take-stand-against-globalist-great-replacement-agenda/
--- Quote ---
> Dutch political commentator and lawyer Eva Vlaardingerbroek
warned that Europeans must take a stand against the huge
demographic shift brought by mass migration orchestrated by
their leaders or risk becoming a minority in their home
countries.
>
> When asked by Remix News at CPAC Hungary 2024 this week how
conservatives should deal with accusations of racism while also
not wanting to be demographically replaced in their home
countries, Vlaardingerbroek responded, “You can’t.”
>
> “That’s the thing, you can’t. So you have to pick a side. Of
course, you’re going to be attacked if you say, “Hey, this
continent, Europe, has been predominantly White for the entirety
of its history, and now suddenly within one generation, a few
bureaucrats have decided against the will of the people that we
should suddenly be a minority,” she said.
>
> “‘Why do we agree with that, or why do we allow that to
happen?’ If you say that, you are going to be attacked.”
--- End Quote ---
The "bureaucrats" you refer to are not importing "non-whites"
against the will of those individuals. In other words, those
"non-whites" themselves first decide to migrate, and the
"bureaucrats" you refer to are merely not initiating violence
against them. They are also not initiating violence against you,
as you are also free to stay or emigrate as you choose. You, on
the other hand, want the "bureaucrats" to initiate violence
against "non-whites" for the sake of keeping "whites" a
majority. So yes, of course you deserve retaliatory violence.
--- Quote ---
> “But the only other option then you have is saying nothing and
have it happen, so the choice is yours, and I’ve made my
choice,” she continued. “I think there are many ways in which
you can defend yourself, of course, against this ridiculous
attack, so I’m sure that they’re going say about me that I’m a
terrible racist again. No, that’s not true. I don’t think that
any race is superior to another. I just think that mine is also
not inferior to that of others.”
--- End Quote ---
Well, you seem to think that "whites" deserve to be treated as
if they were superior to "non-whites" (see below).
--- Quote ---
> “So, I don’t have to be pointed at as the root of all evil, as
the Neo-Marxist critical race theory does,” she said. “I don’t
have to become a minority in my own country, as Joe Biden said
would be ‘a good thing,’ would be ‘our strength.’ No, why
actually? Who was the racist here? Explain to me why we don’t
have the right to exist, why we’re not allowed to be a majority
in the continent, in the countries that we have been a majority
in since forever? Explain it to me. Turn the question around.”
--- End Quote ---
Did "whites" allow indigenous ethnicities to remain a majority
in continents (e.g. North & South Americas, Australasia) where
they had been the majority? So why should "whites" be entitled
to what they saw no problem denying others?
How many "whites" live outside "Europe"? Why should not at least
the same number of "non-whites" live in "Europe"?
As for who was the racist here, well, was it "whites" or
"non-whites" who started categorizing people as
"white"/"non-white" in the first place?
Enemy background:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Vlaardingerbroek
--- Quote ---
> Eva Lotte Louise Joan Vlaardingerbroek (born 3 September 1996)
is a Dutch far-right activist,[1] known for propagating
conspiracy theories[2][3][4] and expressing anti-feminist
sentiments in the past.
> ...
> She has made numerous appearances with American conservative
pundit Tucker Carlson on his current affairs program Tucker
Carlson Tonight on Fox News and with Mark Steyn on his eponymous
British talk show on the GB News. During Carlson's show, she
falsely claimed that the Dutch farming crisis is not a result of
the nitrogen crisis,[7] instead promoting the Great Replacement
Theory, a recurrent theme in her speeches and discussions.
> ...
> Vlaardingerbroek joined the far-right political party Forum
for Democracy (FvD) in 2016.
> ...
> In November 2023, Vlaardingerbroek stated that she would vote
for the Party for Freedom (PVV) in the 2023 Dutch general
election.[15]
> ...
> journalists branded Vlaardingerbroek the "shield maiden of the
far right" and an "Aryan princess"
--- End Quote ---
Oh please, as if her views are not subhuman enough, look at her
face shape:
HTML https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZjYxYzgwZTAtNmRkNS00MDVmLTk1ZWYtMGRjMGM5NmJjZTljXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTAyMzYwNzgw._V1_FMjpg_UX1000_.jpg
(When are False Leftists going to learn?)
--- Quote ---
> During the COVID-19 pandemic, Vlaardingerbroek spoke out as a
firm critic of lockdowns
> ...
> Also in 2021, Vlaardingerbroek worked for some time in Sweden
as presenter of her own pan-European talk show "Let's Talk About
It" on the YouTube channel of Swedish media outlet Riks,[22]
which is affiliated with the far-right party
Sverigedemokraterna.[23]
> ...
> Until late 2020, Vlaardingerbroek was in a relationship with
French author Julien Rochedy, who between 2012 and 2014 had been
president of Génération Nation, the youth wing of the French
right-wing populist party Front National.[34][35] During the
conflict within the FvD in November 2020, which had seen
Vlaardingerbroek publicly turn against party leader Thierry
Baudet, Baudet revealed that Vlaardingerbroek and he had had a
love affair in 2017,[36] to which Vlaardingerbroek responded
that it had been nothing more than a brief fling.[37]
>
> On 29 March 2022, Will Witt, former commentator for the
American conservative advocacy group PragerU, announced that he
and Vlaardingerbroek had become engaged.[38] The couple had been
introduced by PragerU co-founder Dennis Prager about a year
prior.[39]
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/En9jYfYW8AA_k4T.jpg
#Post#: 28360--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: October 22, 2024, 5:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies complain that the government pays people for being
charitable:
HTML https://www.amren.com/news/2024/10/germany-syrian-migrant-earns-shocking-e13000-a-month-for-housing-5-underage-migrants-in-his-apartment/
--- Quote ---
> Although the single man is officially a hairdresser, a career
which usually generates little income, he recently learned he
could become a host father and earn substantial amounts of money
by housing unaccompanied minors.
> ...
> This is far from the only case involving migrants earning
extraordinary amounts of money from German taxpayers.
--- End Quote ---
They portray this as wealth being redistributed to immigrants.
But this ignores that any taxpayer (including natives) can
similarly get paid by the state if they were similarly willing
to host unaccompanied minors. Thus there is no unfairness here:
if all taxpayers were hosting unaccompanied minors, the fraction
of tax money set aside for payments to hosts would be evenly
redistributed. This is no different than the state paying people
for recycling: if everyone recycled, the money would be evenly
redistributed; it is only because some people don't recycle that
more money ends up going to those who do. If you choose to be
lazy, you cannot complain when those who choose to not be lazy
get more subsidies than you do.
#Post#: 28630--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: rp
Date: November 12, 2024, 8:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Is this true?:
HTML https://x.com/vdare/status/1223618834227253248?t=qbZm-s4xEgvz5Fi05YDlKA&s=19
[Quote]
The future will become more technological and automated, so it’s
crazy for America to continue admitting millions of low-skilled
immigrants .
Washington should wake up and realize that:
"Automation makes immigration obsolete."
vdare.com/posts/automati…
#Post#: 28633--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 12, 2024, 10:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Automation is either less/as efficient than manual labour or
more efficient. If the former, then it has not yet made manual
labour obsolete. If the latter, then an automated service can
satisfactorily serve more customers than its manual counterpart
can, thus the correct direction of migration for optimizing
customer service is into the country with more automation.
#Post#: 29379--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: rp
Date: February 15, 2025, 1:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Just do it legally":
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI-Om38o4VQ
#Post#: 29641--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: March 23, 2025, 4:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0VXd1-t4Go
#Post#: 29955--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: WorseThanWeThought
Date: April 17, 2025, 11:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
U.S. intelligence contradicts Trump’s justification for mass
deportations
--- Quote ---
> [...]
> The National Intelligence Council, drawing on the acumen of
the United States’ 18 intelligence agencies, determined in a
secret assessment early this month that the Venezuelan
government is not directing an invasion of the United States by
the prison gang Tren de Aragua, a judgment that contradicts
President Donald Trump’s public statements, according to people
familiar with the matter.
>
> The determination is the U.S. government’s most comprehensive
assessment to date undercutting Trump’s rationale for deporting
suspected gang members without due process under the Alien
Enemies Act, the 1798 law last used during World War II that
laid the foundation for the incarceration of more than 110,000
Japanese Americans.
>
> Trump invoked the act in mid-March, proclaiming without
evidence that Tren de Aragua is perpetrating an “invasion” of
the United States “at the direction” of the regime of Venezuelan
President Nicolás Maduro. Under the Alien Enemies Act, the
government sent planeloads of alleged gang members to El
Salvador’s notorious megaprison despite a judge’s order to turn
the planes around and afford the detainees an opportunity to
challenge their removal through standard legal processes.
>
> The intelligence product found that although there are some
low-level contacts between the Maduro government and Tren de
Aragua, or TdA, the gang does not operate at the direction of
Venezuela’s leader. The product builds on U.S. intelligence
findings in February, first reported by the New York Times, that
the gang is not controlled by Venezuela.
> [...]
> The finding was nearly unanimous among the U.S. intelligence
agencies with the exception of the FBI, which assessed a
moderate level of cooperation between the gang and the
Venezuelan government, two people familiar with the matter said.
> [...]
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/u-s-intelligence-contradicts-trump-s-justification-for-mass-deportations/ar-AA1D8C88?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=f11bad89e50842c79614d647c53e2eeb&ei=12
#Post#: 30234--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: May 18, 2025, 5:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1TGWGdQgBg
#Post#: 30371--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: June 4, 2025, 5:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPCUljCjqiQ
#Post#: 30594--------------------------------------------------
Re: Debunking Rightist Anti-Immigration Arguments
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: July 12, 2025, 6:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51rKpcTmPVw
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 6
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page