DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Issues
*****************************************************
#Post#: 760--------------------------------------------------
Agorism
By: guest5 Date: August 12, 2020, 8:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Next Gen Farming Without Soil and 90% Less Water | GRATEFUL
[quote]Aeroponics grows fruits and vegetables faster, cheaper
and better.[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ww2TP_tU7o
#Post#: 761--------------------------------------------------
Re: Vertical Farming?
By: guest5 Date: August 12, 2020, 8:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Growing Up: How Vertical Farming Works
[quote]Shedding the restrictions of seasonal weather patterns,
overcoming transportation challenges and enhancing yields,
vertical farming could be the future of food production.[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT4TWbPLrN8
#Post#: 1439--------------------------------------------------
Agorism
By: Starling Date: October 8, 2020, 6:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Is Self-Sufficiency Possible?"
A call to return the everyday economy to the spirit of the Greek
Agora, as well as using modern tech to simplify life. Namely,
making it so that people can make what they need - tools, ovens,
furniture, etc - on their own or at the most local level. Alfred
Rosenberg talked about this in Myth of the XX Century in his own
(and more directly NS) way.
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObFtEC-gm7g
Link to what the vid refers to here:
HTML https://www.corbettreport.com/is-self-sufficiency-possible-questions-for-corbett-070/
Most interesting link:
HTML https://www.opensourceecology.org/steam-camp-sept-2020/
#Post#: 1442--------------------------------------------------
Re: Agorism
By: guest5 Date: October 8, 2020, 9:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[img]
HTML https://i2.wp.com/marketbusinessnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Autarky.png?ssl=1[/img]
[img]
HTML https://image.slidesharecdn.com/politicalinterference-191010064610/95/political-interference-10-638.jpg?cb=1570690001[/img]
HTML https://d65im9osfb1r5.cloudfront.net/thesaurus.net/autarky_thumbnail.png
[img]
HTML https://image.slidesharecdn.com/autarky-160328170555/95/autarky-proponents-opponents-examples-4-638.jpg?cb=1459184962[/img]
Best proponent of autarky that ever existed since the creation
of western civilization? NATIONAL SOCIALISM!
#Post#: 1880--------------------------------------------------
Re: Vertical Farming?
By: guest5 Date: October 30, 2020, 8:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
World's Biggest Vertical Garden & Curious Plastic Bottle Village
| Mystery Places | Free Documentary
[quote]Mystery Places: World's Biggest Vertical Garden, Curious
Plastic Bottle Village & Journey to Chernobyl | Lost Places
Documentary
Mystery Places - Dangerous Mining Work in Indones[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx9pmiwQgQM
#Post#: 2088--------------------------------------------------
Re: Agorism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 9, 2020, 11:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
The intellectuals in the food sovereignty movement can be
overly-theoretical fops at times, but in practice food
sovereignty is about plain and simple local autarky.
It is sometimes said that most hunger crises around the globe
are due to logistics problems of transporting food, rather than
inability to grow enough food. In reality, they are caused by
the anti-autarkic practice of wasting a third of all food that
is grown (thanks to consumerism), and the huge-scale
machine-reliant Western methods of farming which make
local-scale and subsistence farming increasingly economically
infeasible in many nations (hence the need for food to be
imported in the first place!).
This is recognized by the food sovereignty movement:
[quote]The Green Revolution is upheld by some proponents of food
security as a success story in increasing crop yields and
combating world hunger. However, many in the food sovereignty
movement are critical of the green revolution and accuse those
who advocate it as following too much of a Western culture
technocratic program that is out of touch with the needs of
majority of small producers and peasants.[/quote]
Even in the US, with its huge transportation network and
highly-productive mechanized farming industry (which is only
economically possible due to government subsidies), countless
communities do not have access to fresh and non-processed food
at all. These are called food deserts. In simplified terms, they
exist because it is not profitable for companies to ship produce
into poor communities. As an additional problem, few cities
would be able to feed themselves in the event of a large-scale
disaster that disrupted the transportation network.
This raises the question, can bringing back subsistence farming
or intensive small-scale farming within urbanized areas solve
these issues? I think, increasingly, the Left is realizing the
answer is not only yes, but that such a shift must occur in
order for society to be able to abandon consumerism and the
fuel-machine-reliant way of living.
Communities which have been the most strongly exploited and
damaged by the industrialized consumer economy are at the
forefront of reshaping local economies and food systems. To give
one example, Detroit, which knows first-hand how destructive
anti-autarkic economic practices can be, is a leader of food
sovereignty in the US:
[quote]Mission
DFPC is committed to nurturing the development and maintenance
of a sustainable, localized food system and a food-secure City
of Detroit in which all of its residents are hunger-free,
healthy, and benefit economically from the food system that
impacts their lives.
Vision
We envision a city of Detroit with a healthy, vibrant,
hunger-free populace that has easy access to fresh produce and
other healthy food choices; a city in which the residents are
educated about healthy food choices, and understand their
relationship to the food system; a city in which urban
agriculture, composting and other sustainable practices
contribute to its economic vitality; and a city in which all of
its residents, workers, guests and visitors are treated with
respect, justice and dignity by those from whom they obtain
food.
...
Values
...
Justice - To actively work for racial equity and healing. To
challenge institutional and structural systems that perpetuate
injustice of all kinds and do not take into account those most
adversely affected by inequities in the food system.
...
Inclusion - To actively develop leadership and seek
participation from Detroiters, especially those who are most
impacted by the lack of access, justice, and sovereignty in the
local food system.[/quote]
detroitfoodpc.org/who-we-are
Autarky facilitates folkism and builds resilient communities,
which is perhaps one of the reasons why 'the powers that be'
(who benefit from divided and distrusting communities) have been
quick to dismiss it.
---
This is an important issue for leftists (see next paragraph),
but I would first like to clarify that this is not an
exclusively leftist issue at least in theory, as I know many
rightists who would support food sovereignty as part of their
anti-globalism. Certainly a rightist community would benefit
from food sovereignty just as much as a leftist community would
under equivalent circumstance. In practice, however, food
sovereignty may well be more pertinent to leftists at the
present time:
few cities would be able to feed themselves in the event of a
large-scale disaster that disrupted the transportation network.
Voting and other statistics show that in some countries
(including the US) large concentrations of leftists live in
urban habitats whereas rightists are more likely to live in
rural habitats. In the event of civil war, this would put
leftists at a critical disadvantage if urban habitats still
depend on rural habitats for food (which rightists could cut
off, thereby besieging us), at which point - unless we are
receiving food aid from abroad - we would lose the war even if
we possessed superior combat ability. This scenario has already
been discussed in rightist blogs etc., which are hence confident
of winning a hypothetical civil war against us. Urban food
sovereignty would be an obvious precaution as part of our
preparation for Left vs Right civil war.
On the other hand, is urban farming the kind of food sovereignty
we should solely focus on, or should we also try to acquire
rural farmland where large-scale food production already occurs?
The difference is that the latter would take existing food
production facilities away from rightist control at the same
time as it supplies us with food, whereas the former would not
reduce the rightist food supply, but merely increase our own.
Therefore, while I doubtless support urban farming, I advise
that we also look into strategic acquisitions of rural farmland.
---
In the US, the Driftless Area of Wisconsin, and really, most of
the upper Mississippi valley is left-leaning. These areas are
some of the core of rural US farmland.
Here is a map showing results of the 2012 presidential election.
Notice that in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, even the counties
which voted 'red' voted it by a lower margin than states like
Kansas and Nebraska. As a bonus, these areas actually have more
fertile soil which requires less irrigation than the firmly red
states in the same longitude as Kansas. I believe the blue areas
in the South are also largely rural and suited for agriculture.
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ab/2012nationwide
countymapshadedbypercentagewon.svg/1280px-2012nationwidecountyma
pshadedbypercentagewon.svg.png
Problematically, the average age for farmers in the US is quite
old, and as they die off within the next decades, a lot of that
land will go up for sale or lease. But land prices have risen so
high that without significant funds, it will be difficult for
anyone except large corporations to acquire it.
---
From what I have read about urban farming, it is very difficult
to make a living doing it. Food prices are so artificially low
(both due to governments keeping food prices cheap to keep
discontent low, and because of subsidies for mechanized
farming--which, due to economies of scale, out-competes small
non-mechanized farmers). However, if an urban or small-scale
rural farmer is efficient and understands their local market
they actually can make a living by farming useful food crops (as
opposed to "specialty artisanal" yuppie **** like herbs).
Although there are a number of different authors, practitioners,
and approaches on the topic of urban and small-scale farming,
many people who are currently having success fall under the
umbrella of "SPIN" (s-mall p-lot in-tensive) methods:
spinfarming.com/whatsSpin/
With this being said, farming is barely economically-feasible
for rural farmers either. Apparently over half of US farmers
have to work a second job to make ends meet (and remember, they
are getting big subsidies from the government too!):
[quote]“Part-time farming is pervasive and it appears to me to
be permanent, and I think there’ll even be more reliance on
off-farm income,” says Paul Lasley, a professor of sociology at
Iowa State University, who studies farm communities.
Lasley says 50 to 60 percent of farmers in the U.S. have some
kind of second job – off the farm. Maybe they drive a school
bus, or sell insulation like Bob Lilienthal.[/quote]
www.marketplace.org/2015/03/04/business/why-more-half-farmers-ha
ve-second-job
Additionally, food is rotting in the fields because farm owners
can't afford to pay laborers (and because non-immigrant
Americans, accustomed to a life of luxury, seem to be too lazy
to work the agricultural jobs which rightists claim are being
"stolen" by immigrants).
[quote]More than half of U.S. farm workers are undocumented
immigrants, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Yet, that
pool of workers is shrinking.
A recent Pew Research report found that more Mexican immigrants
are now leaving the U.S. than coming into the country, citing
tougher enforcement of immigration laws and the slow economic
recovery here in the U.S. (The report accounted for both
documented and undocumented immigrants).
With fewer workers, farm owners say costs are rising and they
often must leave unpicked fruit to rot in the fields. Many
producers are even opting to leave the U.S. for countries with
lower costs and fewer regulations, said Tom Nassif, CEO of
Western Growers, a trade organization that represents farm
owners both in the U.S. and abroad.[/quote]
money.cnn.com/2016/09/29/news/economy/american-farm-workers/inde
x.html
[quote]few cities would be able to feed themselves in the event
of a large-scale disaster that disrupted the transportation
network.[/quote]
This source is not necessarily True Leftist, but this quote is a
good reminder that it doesn't, and shouldn't, have to be this
way:
[quote]As a reality check, I'd like to remind everyone that in
the 1850's, prior to refrigerated transport, New York City
supplied all its food for a population of over a million from
within 7 miles of the borders of the city. (It wasn't worth the
cost of horse feed and time to go further than 7 miles to export
food into the city). No one would discount a system of community
food security for one million people as non-commercial.[/quote]
www.whale.to/a/blume.html
Another insight from the article:
[quote]The reason why monocultures are favored by corporations
EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE THE LEAST EFFICIENT WAY OF PRODUCING FOOD
in pounds of food per acre is that it can be done with the least
amount of labor. To harvest the three sisters you would need a
digital harvester—i.e. two hands—not a combine.[/quote]
This is a major problem with the Western economic system in
general--it prefers a resource-intensive approach rather than a
labor-intensive approach. For example, when it comes to
repairing broken electronics, it is often cheaper to throw away
an entire TV and buy a new one than it is to take it to a repair
shop so a single broken capacitor can be discovered and
replaced. Pure insanity.
Consumerism would be much reduced if individuals actually had to
take care of and repair a finite amount of goods, rather than
simply throw away functional but "old" items and replace them
with one of the millions of new goods already produced and
sitting on store shelves. The "right to repair" movement is one
group which tries to run contrary to the "throw away culture"
prevalent today.
This actually has implications in farming. Machinery companies
are trying to prevent farmers from repairing equipment that they
own or lease. For true food sovereignty, a farmer must not
merely have the "right" to repair their tools, but have the
knowledge to do it as well.
repair.org/agriculture/
#Post#: 2089--------------------------------------------------
Re: Agorism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 9, 2020, 11:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT contd.
I had a question relating to food: Before I found you guys; I
was interested in Entomophagy as an alternative to conventional
livestock; requiring less feed, water, and space. I know what
you've said about veganism and sustainable evils, but until
carnivorous human bloodlines can be phased out, if the First
World transitioned to raising bugs instead of cows like much of
the third world, it could stave off the food crisis and buy us
some time for activism. Also it might open people's minds to
other aspects of non-western cultures. So, should I continue to
promote Entomophagy to those who would never embrace veganism,
or should I forget it?
---
I remember one of my old school teachers saying that one day
there would be a cow shortage and we'd have to get our protein
from crickets. Why can't we get our protein from nuts, seeds and
legumes? I am aware of some people having allergies, but I'm not
aware of anyone being allergic to ALL protein-rich plant-based
foodstuffs.
---
The obvious problem with entomophagy is that it results in a
much larger number of victims of violence for the same quantity
of food.
From your link:
[quote]Crickets, the most commonly farmed insects, have a
smaller environmental footprint than beef. But when fed with
poultry feed and kept alive with the help of an energy-intensive
heating system, their environmental footprint may be on a par
with chicken.[/quote]
OK. An average chicken - one individual victim - weighs roughly
2kg. How many crickets - individual victims - is 2kg of
crickets?
"So, should I continue to promote Entomophagy to those who would
never embrace veganism, or should I forget it?"
I try to encourage those who would never embrace veganism to
practice flexitarianism. Eating vegan one day per week reduces
the problem by 1/7, so if seven people do that it is equal to
one person eating fully vegan. (In rare cases, flexitarians also
transition to full vegan as their bodies eventually realize that
vegan diet is better for it.) I suggest flexitarianism would be
a better approach than entomophagy for inferior people.
www.bbcgoodfood.com/howto/guide/what-flexitarian-diet
greenmonday.org/
Speaking of inferiority, time to post these maps again:
chartsbin.com/view/12730
chartsbin.com/view/1491
HTML http://file:///F:/tl/Issues/Food%20sovereignty%20-%20autarky%20in%20action%20True%20Left_files/feed-vs-food.jpg
Also:
www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-03/uoia-wpe032719.php
---
Yeah, that definitely seems like an easier sell. Besides, if
someone's one of those hard-line, 'veggies-are-for-virgins',
'fruits-are-for-fags' carnivores, they're probably beyond
reasoning with anyway.
Hey, my home state's in the light blue. so is my birth state.
---
"'veggies-are-for-virgins', 'fruits-are-for-fags'"
And this brings us back to the field of aesthetics again. The
vegan community needs to embrace the vegan stereotype (actually
racial type) of low sexual dimorphism, instead of trying to
prove it wrong. I personally have never even understood how
"virgin" is an insult! "Fag" is indeed an insult, implying
slavishness:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagging
but "virgin" implies dignity, idealism, romanticism or at the
very least high standards. On even the most rudimentary level of
consideration (we might have to start a new topic for the higher
levels), how unlikely is it that the two individuals (out of an
entire world with its ridiculously large population) meant for
each other manage to actually meet each other? Are we supposed
to believe that all non-virgins have found the one meant for
them? Of course they haven't! I would guess only an extremely
few pairs have genuinely been fortunate enough to do so. What is
actually going on with the remainder is that (with the exception
of **** victims) they have disgracefully settled for the
sub-ideal, in the process betraying the one (originally) meant
for them who might still be waiting for them (now in vain).
This was implicitly understood in late 20th century pop culture:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slasher_film#Common_tropes
[quote]The final girl trope is discussed in film studies as
being a young woman (occasionally a young man) left alone to
face the killer's advances in the movie's end.[7] Laurie Strode
(Jamie Lee Curtis), the heroine in Halloween, is an example of a
typical final girl.[8] Final girls are often, like Laurie
Strode, virgins among sexually active teens.[10][/quote]
---
"This is a major problem with the Western economic system in
general--it prefers a resource-intensive approach rather than a
labor-intensive approach."
Here is a good example of the alternative approach:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kx3cfoPjyR4
Of course I utterly condemn ultimately selling the ducks to be
slaughtered, but this is still way better than using chemicals
on the rice and raising the ducks in factory conditions; you can
see how much the ducks enjoy farming! (Back in the Golden Age I
am sure the ducks were allowed to stay on the Neolithic
subsistence farm their whole lives.)
---
Related:
psmag.com/news/the-usda-gives-fewer-loans-to-women-and-minority-
farmers-a-government-watchdog-finds
[quote]It's been more than a decade since a group of
African-American, Latinx, indigenous, and women farmers first
sued the United States Department of Agriculture for its
discriminatory lending practices in several class action
lawsuits.
For years, the department that provides financial support to
farmers denied loans to women and people of color at higher
rates than their white male counterparts. This discrimination
helped ensure that the most profitable producers would be white
and male, and nearly drove African-American farmers off their
land: Between 1910 and 2007, black farmers lost 80 percent of
their farmland, in part because they lacked access to loans or
insurance.
According to a new report from the U.S. Government
Accountability Office, very little has changed. Congress'
non-partisan investigative agency found that women and
minorities—who already comprise a disproportionately small share
of U.S. farmers—have a harder time obtaining loans and credit
from private lenders and banks regulated by the USDA, and from
the department itself. Often, these loans make the difference in
whether a farmer can afford to keep an operation running, or
whether beginning farmers—often recent immigrants—can break into
the business.
John Boyd, a Virginia farmer and the founder and president of
the National Black Farmers Association, says he was denied a
farm operating loan this year for the first time in 17 years,
meaning he'll now have trouble farming his 700 acres of grain.
"It's tough—it's hard," he says. "Right now I'm farming off
credit cards."
Boyd is one of many black farmers who have had this experience,
and now there's the data to prove it: From 2015 to 2017, farmers
defined by the USDA as "socially disadvantaged"—Native Americans
and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans, African Americans, Pacific
Islanders, Latinxs, and women—represented 17 percent of primary
producers, but only 8 percent of total outstanding farm debt.
Although the USDA provides only a small portion of direct
payments, it also oversees loans from commercial banks, which
have historically courted white men. "The top 10 percent of
large-scale farmers, corporate farmers, they're very clearly
white men—they aren't women, they aren't people of color," Boyd
says. "That's who's been getting the service. That's who's been
getting the loans."
For Boyd, whose organization represents more than 109,000
farmers in 42 states, these findings validate what he's known
for decades. "It's new information for a lot of people who have
been denying it for so long, especially the top 10 banks," he
says.[/quote]
---
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLf3NB2SRA4
---
The best solution to rising water levels (and looks good too!):
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5MKlSoubOY
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONfhrASy44
Trivia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bengal#Etymology
[quote]Other accounts speculate that the name is derived from
Venga (Bôngo), which came from the Austric word "Bonga" meaning
the Sun-god.[/quote]
#Post#: 2090--------------------------------------------------
Re: Agorism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 9, 2020, 11:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT contd.
www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/young-asian-americans-turn-fa
rming-means-cultural-reclamation-n1072036
[quote]De Leña is one of several first-generation Asian American
farmers who left their more traditional career paths for
full-time farming on the West Coast. De Leña, who once worked at
environmental justice nonprofits, found new meaning in growing
food as a means of cultural reclamation.
...
The United States Census of Agriculture shows that Asian
Americans made up less than 1 percent of the farming population
in the United States in 2017. More than 95 percent of the
full-time operators in the U.S. are white. These numbers stand
in contrast to the 19th and early 20th century, when Asian
American farmers were ubiquitous. The drastic demographic shift
started with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, and later grew
in 1913, when the California Alien Land Law prohibited Asian
Americans from owning land. Between 1920 and 1930 alone,
Japanese-owned farmland dropped by more than 40 percent.
Mai Nguyen, a first-generation Vietnamese American farmer with
the National Young Farmers Coalition, said structural racism and
discrimination against Asian American farmers and other farmers
of color persist today.
“There's high segregation based on race and ethnicity in our
rural spaces,” Nguyen said. “While there are large populations
of Asian American farmers, they're segregated in a way that
they're not as visible as our white counterparts.” Nguyen said
this lack of visibility harms older Asian American farmers who
are denied access to markets, land and resources as a result.
...
Nguyen said that oftentimes, young farmers of color are pushed
into “marginal land,” or smaller and more affordable tracts of
land, since prime farmland is typically owned by white farmers
with several generations of resources and access to
capital.[/quote]
---
Alex Jones says he'll eat his neighbors.... Anyone here
surprised? Yea, didn't think so....
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRRyXYwVQGQ
---
A flash of sanity:
www.yahoo.com/news/italy-offer-permits-illegal-migrants-12583837
8.html
[quote]ROME, May 5 (Reuters) - Italy plans to give work permits
to thousands of irregular migrants to help farms deal with the
Covid-19 epidemic that has cut the flow of cheap labour from
abroad, a political source said on Tuesday.
...
Agriculture lobbies have warned Italy will have to throw away
huge amounts of fruit and vegetables because there is nobody to
pick them, worsening the effects of a shutdown costing the food
sector 7 billion euros ($7.58 billion).
The influx of seasonal workers to help on farms has been halted
by the block on travel into Italy since its outbreak came to
light in February. It has so far killed more than 29,000 people.
Interior Minister Luciana Lamorgese is ready to offer temporary
permits to some 200,000 irregular migrants currently jobless or
living in the shadow economy, to work in agriculture, the
ministry source told Reuters.
The move is also intended to help in the fight against the
coronavirus. "If someone falls ill we need to test them and it's
difficult to do this if we don't even know their name," the
source said.[/quote]
What our enemies think:
[quote]"They are working on a huge legalization of irregular
migrants ... madness, we will try to stop them in any way,"
League leader and former Interior Minister Matteo Salvini wrote
on Twitter.[/quote]
Salvini probably prefers Jones' approach?
---
"Eat your leftist ass"
This is why it is important for leftists to use firearms ASAP
#Post#: 2377--------------------------------------------------
Re: Climate, Weather, and Climate Effects, 2020 and Beyond
By: Starling Date: November 20, 2020, 1:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Korean Natural Farming
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_natural_farming
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_natural_farming[list]
[li]Use the nutrients contained within the seeds[/li]
[li]Use indigenous microorganisms (IMO's)[/li]
[li]Maximize inborn potential with fewer inputs[/li]
[li]Avoid commercial fertilizers[/li]
[li]Avoid tilling[/li]
[li]No use of livestock waste[/li]
[/list]In Hawaii, crop productivity increased 2-fold with the
use of KNF, while reducing water use by 30% and eliminating the
use of pesticides proved to be a superior cover crop on degraded
Hawaii fields.
More about this style of farming in Hawaii:
HTML https://naturalfarminghawaii.net/
HTML https://hawaiianparadisecoop.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/the-basics-of-korean-natural-farming-methods/
In South Korea, Natural Farming has been embraced by the South
Korean government after one county experimented and every farmer
in the county practiced it for a year. These rice farmers not
only had bigger yields than usual, but saved money on their
inputs and sold their rice for a premium. Where they practice
Natural Farming it has had the added benefit of cleaning up the
waterways, rivers and even coastal
waters.
HTML https://web.archive.org/web/20140628024150/http://www.kalapanaorganics.com%3a80/natural-farming-with-indigenous-microorganisms/natural-farming/
HTML https://web.archive.org/web/20140628024150/http://www.kalapanaorganics.com%3a80/natural-farming-with-indigenous-microorganisms/natural-farming/
The Basics of Korean Natural Farming
(KNP)
HTML https://hawaiianparadisecoop.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/the-basics-of-korean-natural-farming-methods/
HTML https://hawaiianparadisecoop.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/the-basics-of-korean-natural-farming-methods/
[img width=989
height=1280]
HTML https://naturalfarminghawaii.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/coresolutions-scaled.jpg[/img]
#Post#: 2507--------------------------------------------------
Re: Agorism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 27, 2020, 10:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfchPwv6fbo
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page