URI: 
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 29144--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
       By: rp Date: January 11, 2025, 4:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_India_Act_1935
       [Quote]
       The Government of India Act 1935 (25 & 26 Geo. 5. c. 42) was an
       act passed by the British Parliament that originally received
       royal assent in August 1935. It was the longest act that the
       British Parliament ever enacted until the Greater London
       Authority Act 1999 surpassed it.[citation needed] Because of its
       length, the act was retroactively split by the Government of
       India (Reprinting) Act 1935 (26 Geo. 5. & 1 Edw. 8. c. 1) into
       two separate acts:
       The Government of India Act 1935 (26 Geo. 5. & 1 Edw. 8. c. 2),
       having 321 sections and 10 schedules.
       The Government of Burma Act 1935 (26 Geo. 5. & 1 Edw. 8. c. 3),
       having 159 sections and 6 schedules
       [/Quote]
       #Post#: 29340--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
       By: rp Date: February 10, 2025, 7:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/more-3200-serving-life-without-parole-nonviolent-offenses-finds-aclu
       #Post#: 31293--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 6, 2025, 2:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Western colonialism led to illegalization of **** worldwide
       (2:50-2:57):
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP6tgqG0TUM
       Legal **** is negatively correlated with nuclear families, and
       nuclear families are positively correlated with machinism,
       therefore legal **** is negatively correlated with machinism
       (7:34-8:01, 9:10-9:36). This is the real reason why Western
       civilization, and in particular Yahwism (as explicitly mentioned
       in the video), is opposed to legal ****.
       Decolonization should include re-legalizing **** in all
       non-Western countries where **** was formerly legal. I
       personally have zero interest in the industry (and despise both
       prostitutes and their customers*), but it does not initiate
       violence (I would of course legally require all prostitutes to
       have their reproductive organs removed first unless they have
       already reached menopause) and therefore should be legal (and
       taxable  ;D ).
       (* I view people who marry with gaining money in mind or who
       offer money to facilitate marriage no differently than I view
       prostitutes and their customers respectively.)
       #Post#: 31806--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 27, 2025, 1:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stating the obvious about the absurdity of Western law:
  HTML https://x.com/eveningbtc/status/2004132351803347221
  HTML https://x.com/nofucksmagee/status/2004242884124725659
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page