URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 12286--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: March 26, 2022, 3:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This area of decolonization is gradually receiving more
       attention:
  HTML https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/opinions-colonial-legacies-endure-in-africas-legal-systems-%e2%80%94-undermining-rule-of-law/ar-AAVe4ok
       --- Quote ---
       > Recently there was a huge controversy in Zimbabwe over the
       alleged purchase of British horsehair wigs for Zimbabwean
       judges. Given the financial challenges faced by ordinary
       Zimbabweans, it was not surprising that the issue manifested in
       a larger debate over government financial mismanagement and its
       failure to provide adequate legal services for regular citizens.
       >
       > More poignantly, in the larger African context the debate was
       also about the continued influence of European metropoles over
       their former African colonies in many aspects of life. That the
       Zimbabwean judges needed to purchase British horsehair wigs —
       which are no longer required even in many British legal contexts
       — is a telling relic of the colonial legacy foisted by Britain
       on its African colonies. Not only must Zimbabweans pay Britain
       for the wigs, but they do so to fuel a legal system rooted in
       the colonial era, when Britain systematically created and
       maintained legal systems, constitutions and other institutions
       patterned after its own. While in recent decades those
       colonial-era legal systems and institutions are being replaced
       by many African nations, they continue to hold such influence
       that a formerly colonized African nation’s adherence to the
       “rule of law” cannot be evaluated without considering the impact
       of its subjugated past.
       >
       > As Britain established its colonial rule in Africa, it brought
       with it ideas about the rule of law, with the two becoming
       inseparable.
       >
       > In 1844, the legal system in what was then the Gold Coast
       colony became attached to the British legal system. Before 1821
       several European powers held claims in this region and
       established commercial settlements and forts to facilitate the
       trans-Atlantic enslaved person trade. The British consolidated
       control gradually over the 19th century. Local groups gradually
       submitted to British “protection” in an ongoing conflict with
       the Asante state to the north. Finally in 1844, some Indigenous
       Ghanaian chiefdoms accepted British sovereignty over them in
       exchange for protection from their warring neighbors. While
       conceding to British sovereignty, the chiefdoms also agreed to
       the British adjudicating serious crimes and to a long-term plan
       of adapting their customs and practices in conformity with
       British law.
       >
       > When the British formally colonized the chiefdoms, they agreed
       to accept Indigenous law as part of the dual legal system. But
       they also added “repugnancy clauses” that excluded aspects of
       the Ghanaian customs or cultures that the British considered
       “appalling,” “ridiculous” or “unhelpful to maintaining Christian
       ideals.”
       >
       > Hence, during the colonial era, customary Ghanaian courts led
       by Indigenous judges were allowed to adjudicate matters deemed
       to be part of the Indigenous customs on issues such as marriage
       and inheritance. But besides being subject to the repugnancy
       clauses, the legal system’s ultimate decision-maker, the supreme
       court, had a British official at the helm.
       >
       > This system endured and became even more complete after the
       British consolidated rule over the entire Gold Coast territory
       by the turn of the 20th century. The British metropole
       introduced the 1925 constitution that empowered it to legally
       rule over Ghanaians as well as control the colony’s financial
       interests, including Ghana’s vast gold deposits and cocoa, which
       during that era was fast becoming a global cash crop.
       Notwithstanding the British introduction of new constitutions in
       1946 and 1954 to appease Ghanaians by granting them some
       legislative powers, the metropole retained full powers over the
       colony’s legal systems, police and defense systems, and external
       affairs.
       >
       > The metropole specifically created the police force in 1876 to
       protect the railways and gold mines, which generated significant
       financial benefits to it. While the colonial government tasked
       police with generally maintaining order, their primary
       responsibility was to protect Britain’s property interests and
       the colonialists’ personal safety. Policing was used as part of
       the empire’s tools for the larger commercial enterprise of
       colonization, to maximally generate funds for the mother nation
       and minimize its costs.
       >
       > Eventually as the nationalist movement gained power, Ghanaians
       demanded full independence, which they achieved in 1957.
       >
       > And yet, many parts of the colonial legal system endured.
       >
       > Like other former British African colonies, Ghana has a
       pluralist legal system that includes the British common law,
       customary law and religious law. The current Ghanaian
       constitution, established in 1992, specifically identifies that
       the “common law of Ghana shall comprise the rules of law
       generally known as the common law, the rules generally known as
       the doctrines of equity and the rules of customary law including
       those determined by the Superior Court of Judicature.”
       >
       > Notably, Ghanaian legislators eliminated the repugnancy
       clauses right after independence between 1958 and 1960, because
       they were insulted that their own laws were somehow “repugnant.”
       Even so many provisions of Ghana’s criminal code and supreme
       court decisions closely tracked British law and influenced
       judicial administration in a post-colonial Ghana. For example,
       Ghana’s current Criminal Code specifically criminalizes
       consensual same-sex sexual acts between males. This law is a
       relic of British colonial era when the metropole transported its
       anti-sodomy laws to its colonies.
       >
       > Until 1993, Ghana utilized the British-created magistrate and
       circuit courts to administer its judicial system. With the 1993
       Courts Act, Ghana finally created regional, circuit and
       community tribunals that replaced the British-instituted courts
       and were placed under the Judicial Service headed by Ghana’s
       chief justice.
       >
       > Some legal commentators note that despite relatively recent
       changes to the Ghanaian constitution and its overall legal
       systems, the influence of the British colonial order persists
       even in the current constitution, evident by the subordination
       of customary law — “the rules of law which by custom are
       applicable to particular communities in Ghana” — to other
       sources of law. Customary courts have jurisdiction on issues
       such as marriage, divorce, child custody and guardianship. For
       example, a customary court may determine alimony and other
       marital benefits.
       >
       > Besides the colonial legacy shaping Ghana’s legal system and
       constitution, colonial relics can also be discerned in other
       institutional structures driving the rule of law in today’s
       Ghana. For example, successive Ghanaian political and ruling
       classes since 1957 have used the police as their tool to oppress
       ordinary Ghanaians. For instance, the first Ghanaian president,
       Kwame Nkrumah, used the police to spy on his political
       opponents, and the police leadership was actively involved in
       the military coup that toppled Nkrumah in 1966.
       >
       > Various constitutions introduced by successive
       post-independent Ghanaian governments retained the British
       Westminster-style government structure until the 1979
       constitution, which adopted the U.S. presidential-style
       government. And similar colonial-era legacies and influences can
       easily be identified in other Ghanaian institutions such as the
       military (which was also established by the British) and the
       judiciary.
       >
       > Similar to Zimbabwean judges’ tradition of wearing British
       horsehair wigs and judicial robes, Ghanaian lawyers and judges
       engage in the same behavior of wearing British-styled wigs and
       robes despite disdain and indignation by the general public who
       consider it a relic of a painful colonial past.
       >
       > Ghana is not the only African nation struggling to rid itself
       of its colonial legacies. Kenyans are having the same
       conversation about the continued influence of the colonial past.
       They are questioning local governmental laws that prohibit
       making noise on the streets, committing acts deemed contrary to
       public decency, washing or repairing vehicles in non-designated
       areas, and loitering at night, all traceable to laws instituted
       during the colonial era. The #EndSARS movement against
       dismantling the SARS (Special Anti-Robbery Squad) unit of the
       Nigerian police was in large part a protest of overall police
       brutality common in Nigeria since the institution was created
       during the colonial era. And in my recent book on the rule of
       law, I systematically show how colonial legacy continues to
       manifest in five British-colonized nations (Ghana, Kenya,
       Nigeria, South Africa and Zimbabwe) and how it undermines each
       nation’s adherence to the rule of law.
       >
       > While the leaders and people of African countries have
       gradually made changes to these institutional structures to
       limit the influence of colonial legacies, many ordinary African
       citizens are still suffering colonialization’s ill effects when
       subjected to contexts involving the rule of law.
       --- End Quote ---
       Those who prefer living under British law should emigrate to
       Britain. It is that simple.
       #Post#: 12390--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: March 31, 2022, 3:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They should have been hanged as the colonialists they are
       instead of being allowed to resign:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/uk-judges-quit-hong-kong-082839506.html
       --- Quote ---
       > LONDON/HONG KONG (Reuters) - Two senior British judges,
       including the president of the UK Supreme Court, resigned from
       Hong Kong's highest court on Wednesday because of a sweeping
       national security law imposed by China cracking down on dissent
       in the former British colony.
       >
       > Robert Reed, who heads Britain's top judicial body, said that
       he and colleague Patrick Hodge would relinquish their roles with
       immediate effect as non-permanent judges on the Hong Kong Court
       of Final Appeal (CFA).
       > ...
       > Local lawyers said the resignations would likely put pressure
       on the 10 other foreign Court of Final Appeal judges to quit.
       Six of these are British.
       >
       > Those judges, also from Canada and Australia, are mostly
       retired senior jurists in their home countries, unlike Reed and
       Hodge, who were still serving.
       >
       > Two other foreign judges, Britain's Brenda Hale and
       Australia's James Spigelman, have also stepped down from the
       city's highest court since 2020.
       --- End Quote ---
       Yet many remain psychologically colonized:
       --- Quote ---
       > "It is a big blow to the local fraternity and the grand
       tradition of Hong Kong's rule of law," one veteran barrister
       told Reuters. "For all the pressures ahead, we really needed
       them and I fear what comes next."
       >
       > In a statement on Wednesday, Hong Kong Law Society president
       Chan Chak Ming urged Reed and Hodge to reconsider their moves,
       expressing "deep regret" and saying that the decision
       "disappointingly falls short" of the support among the public
       and legal community for the continued role of overseas judges.
       --- End Quote ---
       If there existed genuine benefits to having overseas judges,
       Britain would also invite judges from China to sit on courts in
       Britain. It doesn't.
       #Post#: 12463--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: rp
       Date: April 3, 2022, 8:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       On the issue of the court system, I am in favor of abolishing
       the state court system and replacing it with the Federal court
       system. I believe this could help us gain control over states
       with rightist judges/courts. In addition, this would also
       strengthen autocracy, as federal judges are appointed (albeit by
       a democratically elected president, but in the future that
       shouldn't be a problem due to demographic blue shift), in
       contrast to state judges, most of whom are elected (by rightist
       untermensch/Atlantic Gentiles, I might add).
       Remember, it took the federal government to stamp out the
       segregationism of the individual states. What do you think?
       #Post#: 13422--------------------------------------------------
       Legal Decolonization
   DIR By: rp
       Date: May 18, 2022, 2:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is worrying our enemies:
       Why the Left Could Push For a National Police Force
  HTML https://www.texaspolicy.com/why-the-left-could-push-for-a-national-police-force/
       I'm all for a Gestsapo style secret police force hunting down
       barbarians and executing them on the spot.
       #Post#: 13424--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: rp
       Date: May 18, 2022, 11:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If only!:
  HTML https://twitter.com/JacobHeaton96/status/1423318822040178689
       --- Quote ---
       > Democrats don’t want to defund the police, they want to
       nationalize the Capitol police and turn them into a Nazi style
       SS.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 13434--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: May 18, 2022, 8:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If we look at the history of policing in ancient non-Western
       civilizations:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police#History
       --- Quote ---
       > China
       > Law enforcement in ancient China was carried out by "prefects"
       for thousands of years since it developed in both the Chu and
       Jin kingdoms of the Spring and Autumn period. In Jin, dozens of
       prefects were spread across the state, each having limited
       authority and employment period. They were appointed by local
       magistrates, who reported to higher authorities such as
       governors, who in turn were appointed by the emperor, and they
       oversaw the civil administration of their "prefecture", or
       jurisdiction. Under each prefect were "subprefects" who helped
       collectively with law enforcement in the area. Some prefects
       were responsible for handling investigations, much like modern
       police detectives. Prefects could also be women.[13] Local
       citizens could report minor judicial offenses against them such
       as robberies at a local prefectural office. The concept of the
       "prefecture system" spread to other cultures such as Korea and
       Japan.
       >
       > Babylonia
       > In Babylonia, law enforcement tasks were initially entrusted
       to individuals with military backgrounds or imperial magnates
       during the Old Babylonian period, but eventually, law
       enforcement was delegated to officers known as paqūdus, who
       were present in both cities and rural settlements. A paqūdu
       was responsible for investigating petty crimes and carrying out
       arrests.[14][15]
       >
       > Egypt
       > In ancient Egypt evidence of law enforcement exists as far
       back as the Old Kingdom period. There are records of an office
       known as "Judge Commandant of the Police" dating to the fourth
       dynasty.[16] During the fifth dynasty at the end of the Old
       Kingdom period, officers armed with wooden sticks were tasked
       with guarding public places such as markets, temples, and parks,
       and apprehending criminals. They are known to have made use of
       trained monkeys, baboons, and dogs in guard duties and catching
       criminals. After the Old Kingdom collapsed, ushering in the
       First Intermediate Period, it is thought that the same model
       applied. During this period, Bedouins were hired to guard the
       borders and protect trade caravans. During the Middle Kingdom
       period, a professional police force was created with a specific
       focus on enforcing the law, as opposed to the previous informal
       arrangement of using warriors as police. The police force was
       further reformed during the New Kingdom period. Police officers
       served as interrogators, prosecutors, and court bailiffs, and
       were responsible for administering punishments handed down by
       judges.
       > ...
       > India
       > Law enforcement systems existed in the various kingdoms and
       empires of ancient India. The Apastamba Dharmasutra prescribes
       that kings should appoint officers and subordinates in the towns
       and villages to protect their subjects from crime. Various
       inscriptions and literature from ancient India suggest that a
       variety of roles existed for law enforcement officials such as
       those of a constable, thief catcher, watchman, and
       detective.[23] In ancient India up to medieval and early modern
       times, kotwals were in charge of local law enforcement.[24]
       >
       > Persian Empire
       > The Persian Empire had well-organized police forces. A police
       force existed in every place of importance. In the cities, each
       ward was under the command of a Superintendent of Police, known
       as a Kuipan, who was expected to command implicit obedience in
       his subordinates. Police officers also acted as prosecutors and
       carried out punishments imposed by the courts. They were
       required to know the court procedure for prosecuting cases and
       advancing accusations.[25]
       > ...
       > The Americas
       > Pre-Columbian civilizations in the Americas also had organized
       law enforcement. The city-states of the Maya civilization had
       constables known as tupils, as well as bailiffs.[29] In the
       Aztec Empire, judges had officers serving under them who were
       empowered to perform arrests, even of dignitaries.[30] In the
       Inca Empire, officials called curaca enforced the law among the
       households they were assigned to oversee, with inspectors known
       as tokoyrikoq (lit. 'he who sees all') also stationed
       throughout the provinces to keep order.[31][32]
       --- End Quote ---
       a common feature is a top-down approach. In contrast:
       --- Quote ---
       > The English system of maintaining public order since the
       Norman conquest was a private system of tithings known as the
       mutual pledge system. This system was introduced under Alfred
       the Great. Communities were divided into groups of ten families
       called tithings, each of which was overseen by a chief
       tithingman. Every household head was responsible for the good
       behavior of his own family and the good behavior of other
       members of his tithing. Every male aged 12 and over was required
       to participate in a tithing. Members of tithings were
       responsible for raising "hue and cry" upon witnessing or
       learning of a crime, and the men of his tithing were responsible
       for capturing the criminal.
       > ...
       > Following the Norman conquest of England in 1066, the tithing
       system was tightened with the frankpledge system. By the end of
       the 13th century, the office of constable developed. Constables
       had the same responsibilities as chief tithingmen and
       additionally as royal officers. The constable was elected by his
       parish every year.
       > ...
       > From about 1500, private watchmen were funded by private
       individuals and organisations to carry out police functions.
       They were later nicknamed 'Charlies', probably after the
       reigning monarch King Charles II. Thief-takers were also
       rewarded for catching thieves and returning the stolen property.
       They were private individuals usually hired by crime victims.
       > ...
       > Up to the early 18th century, the level of state involvement
       in law enforcement in Britain was low. Although some law
       enforcement officials existed in the form of constables and
       watchmen, there was no organized police force.
       > ...
       > Law enforcement was mostly up to the private citizens, who had
       the right and duty to prosecute crimes in which they were
       involved or in which they were not.
       > ...
       > Thief-takers became infamously known not so much for what they
       were supposed to do, catching real criminals and prosecuting
       them, as for "setting themselves up as intermediaries between
       victims and their attackers, extracting payments for the return
       of stolen goods and using the threat of prosecution to keep
       offenders in thrall". Some of them, such as Jonathan Wild,
       became infamous at the time for staging robberies in order to
       receive the reward.[46][47]
       --- End Quote ---
       Thus the rightist feeling as presented in the article you linked
       to:
       --- Quote ---
       > Policing is best accomplished as a uniquely local endeavor.
       The police are a part of the communities they serve, and
       centralizing them in Washington would change that for the worse.
       --- End Quote ---
       is in line with the latter approach.
       #Post#: 13437--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: rp
       Date: May 18, 2022, 10:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We see the contrast in the (non-Western) autocratic approach
       versus the (Western) democratic approach.
       #Post#: 13941--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: June 8, 2022, 8:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is what decolonization is about:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/taliban-detain-afghan-fashion-model-120330348.html
       --- Quote ---
       > ISLAMABAD (AP) — The Taliban have arrested a well-known Afghan
       fashion model and three of his colleagues, accusing them of
       disrespecting Islam and the Quran, the Muslim holy book,
       according to videos released by Afghanistan's new rulers.
       >
       > Ajmal Haqiqi — known for his fashion shows, YouTube clips and
       modeling events — appeared handcuffed in videos posted on
       Twitter by the Taliban intelligence agency on Tuesday.
       >
       > In one widely circulated and contentious video, Haqiqi is seen
       laughing as his colleague Ghulam Sakhi — who is known to have a
       speech impediment that he uses for humor — recites verses of the
       Quran in Arabic, in a comical voice.
       --- End Quote ---
       This is Haqiqi:
       [img]
  HTML https://scontent.fhkg4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/142926542_100958718688273_7743388172018750314_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=973b4a&_nc_ohc=3XUIXweiLZAAX9TksQp&_nc_ht=scontent.fhkg4-1.fna&oh=00_AT8AoBevHbr7XI4CU7SVt2KlgV6KrZYNi4MedZ2Hcq0nHQ&oe=62C50B9C[/img]
       --- Quote ---
       > Later Wednesday, Amnesty International released a statement,
       urging the Taliban to “immediately and unconditionally” release
       Haqiqi and his colleagues.
       --- End Quote ---
       No, cut off their tongues one slice at a time!
       #Post#: 14181--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Monetary Wealth
   DIR By: rp
       Date: June 19, 2022, 2:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: 90sRetroFan link ---
       >
       > Bankruptcy:
       >
       >
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankruptcy
       >
       > [quote]Bankruptcy is a legal process through which people or
       other entities who cannot repay debts to creditors may seek
       relief from some or all of their debts. In most jurisdictions,
       bankruptcy is imposed by a court order, often initiated by the
       debtor.
       --- End Quote ---
       is another Western institution spread around the world during
       the colonial era that has been thoughtlessly continued, but
       which we need to get rid of. It is an institution that favours
       people who take risks with money, since if it goes well they
       keep the profits, but if it goes badly they are insulated from
       the consequences:
  HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjMDhBAXgAIjq35.jpg
       It is strategically sensible for capitalism to support
       bankruptcy as capitalism wants more people to take risks with
       money (so that some succeed). By eliminating bankruptcy, we
       would also weaken capitalism as a whole, as people would become
       more cautious with money.
       So where does bankruptcy come from?
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_bankruptcy_law
       --- Quote ---
       > In Judaism and the Torah, or Old Testament, every seventh year
       is decreed by Mosaic Law as a Sabbatical year wherein the
       release of all debts that are owed by members of the Jewish
       community is mandated, but not of "gentiles".[1] The seventh
       Sabbatical year, or forty-ninth year, is then followed by
       another Sabbatical year known as the Year of Jubilee wherein the
       release of all debts is mandated, for fellow community members
       and foreigners alike, and the release of all debt-slaves is also
       mandated.[2] The Year of Jubilee is announced in advance on the
       Day of Atonement, or the tenth day of the seventh Biblical
       month, in the forty-ninth year by the blowing of trumpets
       throughout the land of Israel.
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankruptcy_Act_1705
       --- Quote ---
       > Under the Act, the Lord Chancellor was given power to
       discharge bankrupts, once disclosure of all assets and various
       procedures had been fulfilled.
       >
       > Discharge from debt was introduced for those who cooperated
       with creditors.
       --- End Quote ---
       [/quote]
       I heard from that in some non-Western countries, borrowers would
       commit suicide out of honor if they defaulted on their loans. It
       seems that this honor based code has all but vanished now, with
       the predominance of guiltless Western culture.
       #Post#: 14207--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Legal decolonization
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: June 20, 2022, 2:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Excellent!
  HTML https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hong-kong-lawyers-next-target-210000651.html
       --- Quote ---
       > (Bloomberg) -- Veteran human rights lawyer Michael Vidler
       decided it was too dangerous to work in Hong Kong the moment a
       judge designated to handle national security law cases implied
       offering legal support to democracy activists could be a crime.
       > ...
       > “It was deeply disturbing for me as a lawyer to be, in
       essence, accused of inciting a crime because a potential client
       had a piece of paper on him which listed my firm as a source of
       legal advice and assistance,” said Vidler, who previously
       defended now-jailed democracy activist Joshua Wong and won a
       landmark appeal that recognized spousal visas for same sex
       couples.
       > ...
       > Vidler left Hong Kong in May after almost two decades working
       in the former British colony, and closed his law firm shortly
       after. His experience reflects growing concern that Hong Kong’s
       rule of law, for decades a foundational pillar of its standing
       as an international financial center, is becoming more
       influenced by the mainland where the Communist Party controls
       the courts.
       --- End Quote ---
       Now will someone track down this Western colonialist and finish
       him off?
       --- Quote ---
       > Authorities have ramped up pressure on lawyers who’ve defended
       some of the 10,000 protesters arrested during the 2019 unrest.
       Prominent barrister Margaret Ng was arrested over her work with
       a fund providing financial aid to activists, with police
       reporting other lawyers to their professional bodies for
       misconduct unearthed in that investigation. She has denied the
       charges and a court hearing is set for Sept. 19.
       >
       > Former Hong Kong Bar Association chief and human rights lawyer
       Paul Harris left the city in March after being questioned by
       national security police.
       --- End Quote ---
       And hopefully the same for this Western colonialist?
       --- Quote ---
       > “Any degradation of Hong Kong’s strong rule-of-law tradition
       by hollowing out rule-of-law-related institutions will not be
       favorable to the security of international investments and
       finance,” said Michael Davis, a professor of law and
       international affairs at O.P. Jindal Global University in India,
       and former law professor at the University of Hong Kong.
       --- End Quote ---
       That's what we want! (And hopefully the same treatment as above
       for this Western colonialist?)
       --- Quote ---
       > Keith Richburg, head of the Foreign Correspondents’ Club, Hong
       Kong, said the board suspended its longstanding Human Rights
       Press Awards earlier this year after lawyers advised him the
       police would probably investigate the organization for “aiding,
       promoting or celebrating sedition,” according to a recording of
       a meeting with local journalists to explain the decision.
       --- End Quote ---
       This Western colonialist apparently hasn't left, so the
       government should hang him in public!
       --- Quote ---
       > Perhaps most significantly, it changed the rules for bail by
       removing the presumption of innocence, a precedent that’s seen
       scores of defendants jailed for more than a year without a trial
       and has since been expanded to other crimes with a security
       element.
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you! The unethicality of bail was previously explained
       here:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/legal-decolonization/msg752/#msg752
       Continuing:
       --- Quote ---
       > So far, all four security law cases that have come to trial
       have resulted in guilty verdicts, with the sole defendant who
       fought charges denied a reduction in sentence in part because he
       chose not to plead guilty.
       --- End Quote ---
       I dislike the practice of guilty pleas leading to reduced
       sentences, though. A guilty plea does not reduce the initial
       crime, therefore should not reduce the sentence for that crime.
       Reducing the sentence on account of a guilty plea amounts to
       reducing the sentence in in exchange for less work for the
       judge, which in an honourable world would be interpreted as the
       judge accepting a bribe from the criminal.
       --- Quote ---
       > Despite fears for the legal protection of civil liberties,
       four lawyers who either currently practice or recently worked in
       Hong Kong said there appears to be an expectation in the
       business community that other areas of law won’t be eroded,
       which they considered to be misguided. All four spoke on the
       condition of anonymity.
       >
       > “Commercial law won’t be interfered with because that’s one of
       the pillars of Hong Kong being an international center for
       business, trade, and finance,” said George Cautherley, vice
       chairman of the International Chamber of Commerce in the city.
       --- End Quote ---
       This Western colonialist (who apparently also hasn't left)
       should also be hanged in public.
  HTML https://newsdiaryonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Hong-Kong-and-China.png
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 6
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page