DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 11453--------------------------------------------------
1960s Counterculture Movement
DIR By: guest30
Date: February 24, 2022, 7:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@90sRetroFan
--- Quote ---
> "Counterculture-influenced (hence non-homophobic) people
living in Western countries need to be taught to abandon
democracy."
--- End Quote ---
Why you spend more time to educate them about the correct way to
manage the people and the nation, in previous time you said that
people cannot be educated about their behaviour because it is
result from the bloodlines and genetic which they have?
I already prove that what you say are true, I try to infiltrate
the social democrat party which most of them are supporting
democratic system and liberalism for 7 months, I give them many
of accurate arguments about the flaws of democracy, and they
just give me satirical answer, whether they are run out of
arguments or they just try to cover up their ideological's
error, I believe that what you say about genetic and bloodline's
influence on human are true.
Only punishment, law and power which can educate them...
#Post#: 11486--------------------------------------------------
Re: 1960s Counterculture Movement
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 25, 2022, 8:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Why you spend more time to educate them about the correct way
to manage the people and the nation, in previous time you said
that people cannot be educated about their behaviour because it
is result from the bloodlines and genetic which they have?"
People cannot be educated to change what they value, but they
can be educated to change what they believe is the best method
to achieve what they value.
People who like the Counterculture value many of the same things
we do, but they have been misled into believing that democracy
is the best way to achieve these things. We should try to
educate them that autocracy is a better way to achieve these
same things. Indeed, if they liked the Counterculture even more
than they already do, they would have figured this out by
themselves, since Counterculture thinking considers Western
civilization to be inferior to non-Western civilizations, and
democracy is a unique feature of Western civilization. So our
education of such people is really just pushing them further in
the direction they themselves are internally inclined to go, so
that they reach the logical conclusion.
On the other hand, people who dislike the Counterculture cannot
be educated to like the Counterculture. These are the people
whose bloodlines should be eliminated.
"I give them many of accurate arguments about the flaws of
democracy"
But did you accuse them of being Eurocentrists? Did you tell
them that democracy never existed in Nusantara in its entire
pre-colonial history, and therefore to like democracy is to
consider Nusantara's entire pre-colonial history inferior to
what the Western colonizers brought them? They can still like
democracy, but what you can do is force them to admit that it is
impossible to be a proud Nusantaran while liking democracy.
#Post#: 11538--------------------------------------------------
Re: 1960s Counterculture Movement
DIR By: guest30
Date: February 27, 2022, 5:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
@90sRetroFan
--- Quote ---
> People cannot be educated to change what they value, but they
can be educated to change what they believe is the best method
to achieve what they value.
--- End Quote ---
Unfortunately, the party which I try to enter consider democracy
and democratization are their main value.
--- Quote ---
> But did you accuse them of being Eurocentrists? Did you tell
them that democracy never existed in Nusantara in its entire
pre-colonial history, and therefore to like democracy is to
consider Nusantara's entire pre-colonial history inferior to
what the Western colonizers brought them? They can still like
democracy, but what you can do is force them to admit that it is
impossible to be a proud Nusantaran while liking democracy.
--- End Quote ---
I even show them that Nusantara people can be united for
hundreds of years using absolute monarchy which used by
Majapahit Empire, even it can unite today Melayu (Malaysia),
Shonento (Singapore), half of "Philippines", and Madagascar. And
their absolute monarchy government led to integration to the
Islamic people who already control over Nusantara during it's
dissolution, and Majapahit Buddhist Empire's people voluntarily
let the Islamic leader Adi Pati Unus (Raden Patah) continuing
Majapahit formerly Buddhist dictatorial monarch government. And
also I already show to them that Islamic people during
continuing Majapahit Kingdom allowed to use Sharia Law, and it
being a basis for Nusantara people to learn an ideology through
Islamic education place named madrasa, which opposing Dutch
people's colonial ideology, "White Nationalism" and "Racial
Separatism", so I want to give them a conclusion that
Nusantara's original system of government are work rather than
today's nation's democracy.
And I also tell to them that Sukarno, the founder of Nusantara
realize that liberalism and democracy are not work, it make many
of separatist movements because they given liberty to make a
choice even tough it contrary to the nation's goals. So he end
democratic government in 1959 and became semi-fascist dictator
until his dissolution in 1965 under terms of "Guided-Democracy".
They keep responding with unethical attitude, that is satirizing
me and ask a question which not relevant to what I discuss to
them.
And for additional information for you, Sukarno explicitly
change the nation's basic rule, UUD 1945 (Undang-Undang Dasar
1945) into a rule which inspired from Piagam Jakarta's agreement
during 5 July 1959. What is Piagam Jakarta? That is an agreement
which Sukarno want, because it resulting to allow Nusantara to
use Islamic sharia law which more support Nusantara's rule to
the people and it's nation's goal, anti-colonialism. Contrary to
Sukarno's previous ideological belief, secular nationalism and
Traditional Communism (Democratic Socialism). And it's Piagam
Jakarta-inspired national rule still legitimate until now, but
no single today Nusantara's leader want to implement it.
Sukarno's fascist leadership resulting Nusantara people from
various race and ideologies unite again once more...
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1