DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 29573--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: RussianAsset? Date: March 17, 2025, 9:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Defeating Putin Might Be the ONLY WAY to Stop WW3!!
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3L8iX1n6ek
#Post#: 29989--------------------------------------------------
Re: Random Thoughts....
By: FUCKEMALL!!! Date: April 20, 2025, 3:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
LET'S NUKE RUSSIA!!!!!!! NUKE RUSSIA NOW!!! FUCK IT!!! NUKE
PUTIN AND RUSSIA ASAP!!!!! NUKE RUSSIA NOW!!!!
#Post#: 29995--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 20, 2025, 5:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
While I agree with the sentiment, we still need to worry about
Russian counterstrikes. Russia's large land area gives it a
considerable advantage in nuclear war against territorially
smaller countries:
HTML https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20190805_R45861_images_baf7a8bf106935cf0ee4bf69e5ddbbc26570c35b.png
On account of the above, I recommend joint conventional
invasions of Russia first. Russia has repeatedly threatened use
of nukes in reaction to everything happening that it dislikes,
but has never actually followed through on its threats,
therefore we should not be too worried about a nuclear response
to conventional invasions. The aim of the conventional invasions
should be to capture enough Russian WMD facilities to minimize
Russia's advantage.
#Post#: 30621--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 18, 2025, 8:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVgnWyiu-24
So what is NATO waiting for?
#Post#: 31285--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 5, 2025, 4:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11vRSCvwFWE
Estonia should take back its territory ASAP:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian%E2%80%93Russian_territorial_dispute
[quote]Estonian–Russian territorial dispute have clouded
Estonia–Russia relations. After the dissolution of the Soviet
Union, Estonia had hoped for the return of more than 2,000
square kilometers (770 sq mi) of territory annexed by Russia
after World War II in 1945.[/quote]
Which is not to say that Estonia is in any way on our side:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonia%E2%80%93Israel_relations
[quote]Estonian nationals and Israeli nationals can visit each
other without visa.
...
Estonia adopted the IHRA definition of antisemitism[4] and
Estonia is one of the countries to boycott Durban IV Conference
in 2021.[5]
...
The Estonian police arrested five who distribute antisemitic and
pro-Hamas leaflets in Tallinn on 7 November.[7] In 2024 Estonia
suspended funding to UNRWA due to Hamas links
accusations.[8][/quote]
The best outcome is as many deaths as possible on both sides.
(Further information about Durban IV:
HTML https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/38-countries-boycott-antisemitic-durban-iv-conference
[quote]A total of 38 countries openly boycotted the 20th
anniversary of the World Conference Against Racism in Durban on
Wednesday citing concerns of antisemitism and anti-Israel bias.
The countries boycotting Durban IV were: Albania, Australia,
Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, France, Georgia,
Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Montenegro, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, North
Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,
Sweden, Ukraine, UK, US and Uruguay. The European Union also did
not participate or speak at the commemoration.
...
Iran, Syria and the Palestinian Authority used the Durban
platform as an opportunity to vilify Israel, alleging that
Israel is a racist, colonial and apartheid state.[/quote] )
#Post#: 31299--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: Zhang Caizhi Date: November 6, 2025, 6:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]The countries boycotting Durban IV were: Albania,
Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus,
Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, France,
Georgia, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Israel, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Moldova, Netherlands, New
Zealand, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, UK, US and Uruguay. The
European Union also did not participate or speak at the
commemoration.[/quote]
Hmm, Albania?
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albania%E2%80%93Israel_relations
[quote]In 2008, direct commercial flights began between the two
countries.[19] The countries also agreed to eliminate the need
for tourist visas between them.[20]
In 2020, Albania became the first Muslim-majority country to
formally adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance
Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism and promise to fight
anti-Jewish prejudice.[4] The measure to adopt the definition
was proposed by Socialist Party MP Taulant Balla, and accepted
unanimously by the Parliament of Albania.[4][31]
[/quote]
#Post#: 31301--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 7, 2025, 1:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Balla also looks like what we would expect:
HTML https://albaniandailynews.com/foto/2023/07/20230715091926_art.jpg
#Post#: 31317--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 9, 2025, 6:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
False Leftist stupidity:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYt9letzkJ8
China's best move is to offer a folkist deal to India whereby
India, without needing to risk any Indian troops, receives a
significant fraction of however much of Siberia's resources
China manages to acquire. If India then were to sabotage China's
invasion of Siberia, it would be sabotaging its own only chance
(since India has no way to invade Siberia from its own
territory) to access these resources. It should not be difficult
for India to conclude that it gains far less from sabotaging
China than by simply waiting to receive the free resources.
Woke comments:
[quote]I think you VASTLY overestimate the threat posed by India
to China in the event of a Sino-Russian War.[/quote]
[quote]I don't see how India would invade China. For India to do
an invasion of China, they'd to go through the Himalaya's and
just don't see that happening. There is territorial disputes in
the area, but both China and India knows the cost of going to
war with one another would be devastating to both.[/quote]
[quote]Both nations have strict no first use policies regarding
their nukes and operating military aircraft over the Himalayas
has the same difficulties to overcome as civilian airliners.
Thise can be overcome, but only in small scale operations. Any
war between India and China will be of limited scale and result
in no significant exchange of territory, only loss of
life.[/quote]
[quote]China invading Russia to get their own oil in
Siberia....... Timing? Now? Russia can not win on 1 front, so
most certainly Russia can not win on 2 fronts. Wait untill
Ukraine is victorious? Russian men of fighting age will have
been exterminated by then, but Russia is putting everything in
building a military industrial complex at this moment , and that
capacity would ba available when they stop fighting Ukraine.
Seems to me this would be the ideal time for China if they want
to take the Siberian oil.[/quote]
[quote]The Nazis called it "liebensraum".... What will the
chinese call it??[/quote]
[quote]China will benefit if it takes areas like Lake Baikal and
leaves Taiwan alone.[/quote]
[quote]Taiwan which has preserved the culture while continuing
to develop.[/quote]
[quote]Taiwans main value to China, is a technological and
economic powerhouse, that will never pose any serious threat.
Instead, the cultural bonds, if carefully nurtured, would make
an excellent ally in practice.[/quote]
[quote]fingers crossed for a Mandate of Heaven to overthrow
Xi[/quote]
#Post#: 31436--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: PotatoChip Date: November 23, 2025, 2:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Is World War III Already Starting? A Geostrategic Breakdown |
Prof. Jiang Xueqin
[quote]This is an exclusive highlight from Professor Jiang
Xueqin’s public lecture on global geo-strategy.
In this segment, he breaks down the rising tensions between
Israel, Iran, and the United States, and uses game-theory to
explain how major powers make strategic decisions in moments of
global crisis.[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsFgN4yByus
Comment:
[quote]climate catastrophe might be the wild card that changes
all this though.[/quote]
Climate change would most likely accelerate this outcome, and
the global south would probably still pay the heaviest price.
Perhaps it's time to take all the information from this forum
and start putting it time capsules? ???
#Post#: 31820--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 28, 2025, 7:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57us0xQ-pUQ
[quote]Chinese invasion of Mongolia is likely to
2:18
push Chinese-Russian relations into outward hostility[/quote]
This is what China should want, as in so doing it would gain
many new allies among countries currently hostile to Russia.
[quote]and simultaneously double China's
2:23
border with Russia[/quote]
This is thinking about it backwards. Instead, we should think
that it would double Russia's border with China. Who should be
more worried about a longer border: Russia or China?
[quote]at a time when China would much rather focus its military
attention into the East and South China
2:32
seas.[/quote]
This is precisely the mistake that Dugin wants China to make:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/war/msg29540/#msg29540
[quote]And with no Russian troops there, Mongolia is
effectively a buffer state between China and
2:37
Russia.[/quote]
Again, this is thinking about it backwards. Instead, we should
think that, with no Chinese troops there, Mongolia is
effectively a buffer state between Russia and China. It is
Russia that benefits more from such a buffer state (which is
precisely why Russia set it up in the first place:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/russia-the-last-colonial-empire/msg15079/#msg15079<br
/>) So why not remove this benefit from Russia?
[quote]there are still
3:36
very few reasons for China to invade Mongolia. It wouldn't gain
access to any mineral wealth that
3:41
doesn't already dominate through trade[/quote]
What about the mineral wealth in Russia that it could far more
easily acquire later by invading Mongolia now?
[quote]it would have to rule over 3 million people who
definitely don't want to be ruled by China.[/quote]
Which is far fewer than the equivalent number in Taiwan.
Therefore we should minimally agree that China invading Mongolia
instead of Taiwan would be an immense improvement. (To say
nothing about the racial gulf between Taiwanese and Mongolians
such that eliminating the latter's bloodlines would only improve
racial quality whereas far more care is required in dealing with
the former's bloodlines.)
Related:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/re-turanian-diffusion/msg31420/#msg31420
Turanist comments:
[quote]Disagree. Shallow research. Mongolia have own long
history and culture, language that define as unique to any other
country. We been here as nomads, hunters for 5000 years with
China and Russia. All this times we invade china and russia some
point also lost recognition some point. But we never lost our
uniq identity as Mongols. You will suprise that Mongols have
independent happy rich country that 3 million people with enuogh
recouce to survive next 5000 years. Hope you learn better
undestanding of geography and world. Stop being stupid and
ignorant. Disrespectful to Mongolian people.[/quote]
[quote]Take it back? You better be careful when you talk about
Mongols. We invented Russia and China. That is why we can manage
our selfs😂😂😂 you will never
understand[/quote]
This is why it would be a good thing for your bloodlines to be
eliminated.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page