DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 29494--------------------------------------------------
Re: Duginism
By: rp Date: March 5, 2025, 11:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If it is impossible to confront Duginism directly, I support
this (given the rise of racism/machinism of "Whites" in the U.S.
as well):
HTML https://x.com/sabrewulf001/status/1895559468030836866?t=eVm7LasLYYvEPQ9RwSQUFw&s=19
[quote]
USA & Russia should go to war - full on.
nothing of value would be lost. there would be fewer
whites/christians in the world.
that is ALWAYS a good thing.
@iamyesyouareno @AnnCoulter @MattWalshBlog @michaeljknowles
@charliekirk11 @RichardBSpencer @JesseKellyDC
[/Quote]
But, as the very next reply notes, the time at which this is [I]
least likely[/I] to happen is right now.
HTML https://x.com/Meghanshh/status/1895578111833752017?t=gkvDkiBBIECAPPfSGDoBYg&s=19
[Quote]
Unfortunately, that is impossible. This incident has cemented
rus-u.s partnership for the next decade. This was always the
plan. Putin gets ukraine, U.S gets access to the Arctic.
Multipolarity 101.
[/Quote]
#Post#: 29498--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Duginism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 6, 2025, 2:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]Multipolarity 101.[/quote]
And this is why I was saying:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/duginism/msg28598/#msg28598
As for war against Russia, I would prefer attrition to maximize
between Russia and EU countries first. (This would also free up
more space for climate refugees.)
#Post#: 29501--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Duginism
By: rp Date: March 6, 2025, 2:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Well at least now we know Britain and France are going to put
boots on the ground in Ukraine. Russia will definitely not be
deterred due to its massive nuclear arsenal, which means more
attrition between EU and Russia. I hope this draws the U.S. in
as well due to treaty obligation, as I would like to see
"Whites" (including Jews), especially machinists, genocided.
#Post#: 29502--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 6, 2025, 3:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Britain and France"
By the same logic, I would prefer attrition from Poland etc. to
maximize first.
#Post#: 29539--------------------------------------------------
Re: Australia
By: rp Date: March 11, 2025, 6:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://x.com/igorsushko/status/1892692858496278856?t=HFBwzwFlvo7XnTRP8DbcwQ&s=19
[quote]
Australia doesn't have nukes and is not in NATO.
In the new world order, I fail to see significant obstacles to
China invading Australia to take its natural resources valued at
$20 trillion, a bargain even if it costs China $2 trillion.
Australia's population is only 26 million.
[/Quote]
The question is, why isn't China doing this?
#Post#: 29540--------------------------------------------------
Re: Australia
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 11, 2025, 7:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, the answer to your question: Eurocentrist Xi.
Secondly, I would not want Australia becoming Chinese territory.
Australia should be Nusantaran territory. Chinese territorial
expansion should happen northwards.
Thirdly, Dugin is the one who wants China to be tempted into
territorially expanding southwards:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics
[quote]Dugin envisions the fall of China. The People's Republic
of China, which represents an extreme geopolitical danger as an
ideological enemy to the independent Russian Federation, "must,
to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled". Dugin suggests
that Russia start by taking Tibet–Xinjiang–Inner
Mongolia–Manchuria as a security belt.[1] Russia should offer
China help "in a southern direction – Indochina (except Vietnam,
whose people is already pro-Russia), the Philippines, Indonesia,
Australia" as geopolitical compensation.[9][/quote]
However, I re-emphasize my belief that China's current lack of
interest in Australia is not due to anti-Duginism, but merely
due to being too psychologically colonized (hence also lack of
interest in taking back Manchuria etc.).
#Post#: 29541--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Australia
By: rp Date: March 11, 2025, 8:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I see. It is India who has the most to gain from taking back
from Australia, as it would be poetic justice for colonialism.
#Post#: 29542--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 11, 2025, 8:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
India lacks pre-colonial-era historical ties to Australia. India
is not the only former victim of British colonialism, so by your
reasoning every former victim of British colonialism would have
a similarly valid claim to Australia. In that case who should
rule Australia?
You seem to be confusing economic justice (which is to be sought
by migration by former victims of Western colonialism to the
territories of former colonial powers) with statal ownership of
territory. I would not mind Australia being demographically 100%
populated by people of Indian ancestry, but that population
should not be paying taxes to India, but should be paying taxes
to whomever rules Australia in the future (preferably
Nusantara). People of Indian ancestry in future Australia will
be equivalent to people of Indian ancestry in present-day
Singapore.
#Post#: 29543--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: rp Date: March 11, 2025, 9:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I see. Thank you for clearing that up. But I will say that
emigrants need a security guarantee from the Indisn government,
as they are subjected to racist attacks.
#Post#: 29544--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 11, 2025, 10:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. Unless the Indian government offers the same
security guarantee to all migrants from all countries to all
countries, it would be applying an ingroup-outgroup
double-standard. It should be the local government that offers
any such security guarantees to immigrants. It is the one with
the pragmatic incentive to do so, after all, since it wants to
keep them around paying taxes, and indeed attract more
immigrants (and hence their tax money) if possible based on the
positive reviews of existing immigrants.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page