DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 24454--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 2424 Date: December 15, 2023, 8:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=rp link=topic=1116.msg24452#msg24452
date=1702648482]
"forcible assimilation"
No. Those who fail to adopt to the culture will simply be
prohibited from reproducing. In contrast, it is the communist
who would say that the subjects should be forced to adopt using
torture.
[/quote]
How would you enforce it? telling everyone you dislike that they
will simply not be able to have children is a sure way to make
them dislike your movement.
Anyways what culture are we talking about here? i'm talking
about the "culture", the agenda that permeates modern day china
which you invoked when you talked about Xinjiang and by
extension their treatment of muslims, this is not some CIA
propaganda ops, lest you sound like deluded russophiles who deny
the atrocities of the communists against muslims, pretending
like this is a sort of "model" for a noble state that could be
applied elsewhere makes you lose a lot of credibility. Compare
the treatment of muslims in china to the treatment in ww2
germany, no doubt there were racists and tribalists too but i
didn't see any muslims being brought to the camps, because there
was no need to rebel against a state that fights for you. China,
instead, tries to appease all the western occupiers and the
eastern countries that larp as western by fighting their own
little "war on terror".
#Post#: 24456--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: rp Date: December 15, 2023, 4:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"How would you enforce it? telling everyone you dislike that
they will simply not be able to have children is a sure way to
make them dislike your movement."
We have never claimed that the Aryanist ideal will be a popular
one. Quite the contrary.
"Anyways what culture are we talking about here?"
I definitely agree that the Chinese culture that the Xinjiang
Muslims are being assimilated into is far from a noble one. For
example, I have even heard reports that the Uyghurs are being
forced to eat pork and drink alcohol! But I never claimed that
this is the culture that we should impose onto the Kashmiris. I
was merely praising the methods. I should also note, that there
are plenty of non-fundamentalist Muslims in other parts of China
who to the best of my knowledge are not being persecuted. My
main issue with the fundamentalists is that (in the case of
China) they are threatening the integrity of the state, or (in
the case of India) justify their ignoble behaviors (e.g.
beef-eating) and bigoted attitudes (Kashmiri society is
extremely racist).
Also, about the Uyghurs (who claim Xinjiang is actually "East
Turkestan"), for the record:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkestan#Etymology_and_terminology
[quote]Known as Turan to the Persians, western Turkestan has
also been known historically as Sogdia, "Ma wara'u'n-nahr" (by
its Arab conquerors), and Transoxiana by western travelers. The
latter two names refer to its position beyond the River Oxus
when approached from the south, emphasizing Turkestan's
long-standing relationship with Iran, the Persian Empires, and
the Umayyad and Abbasid Caliphates.
Oghuz Turks (also known as Turkmens), Kyrgyzs, Uzbeks, Kazakhs,
Khazars, Uyghurs, and Hazaras are some of the Turkic inhabitants
of the region who, as history progressed, have spread further
into Eurasia forming such Turkic nations as Turkey, and
subnational regions like Tatarstan in Russia and Crimea in
Ukraine. Tajiks and Russians form sizable non-Turkic minorities.
It is subdivided into Afghan Turkestan and historical Russian
Turkestan in the west, and Chinese Turkestan or East
Turkestan.[/quote]
#Post#: 24833--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: rp Date: January 15, 2024, 11:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=g.s.29 link=topic=1116.msg24447#msg24447
date=1702632839]
Pakistanis have been brainwashed in the name of Islam since 1947
while their secular pro western elites, especially in the
Pakistani Army have all their assets in London or other Western
countries.
For 60 years India was ruled by the Congress (Gandhians,
Nehruvians) which promoted false ideas of secularism and
"diversity" within India which merely created more communal
divisions between muslims and Hindus.
Pakistanis dreaming to wipe out Hindus, it is an old dream and
they failed miserably at it. They ruled India for 1000 years and
failed at it. British colonialism failed wiping out Hinduism and
dharmic religions. They are far more Aryans than even Islam and
christianiaty which though anti jewish have many of their core
foundations based on judaism and jewish toxic ideas. Since 2014
With BJP and Modi India has regained and is regaining its former
dharmic glory slowly and steadily.
As for Hindu Survivalism vs Islamic Militarism, the entire
concept of Ghazwa e Hind Pakistan dreams of is a concept devised
by the British with whom the Pakistani Army keeps close ties
with till date and Pakistan is still deeply colonized nation,
while India is moving more ahead.
But BJP and Modi ji, while having made a progress in improving
India US ties (which in the Congress Ruled India was INDIA USSR
brotherhood) has failed to see the reality of Israel.
[/quote]
The biggest mistake India made was to establish diplomatic
relations with Israel after improving India-US ties via
liberalization (in addition to getting rid of the few remnants
of autocracy from the previous governments). I hope improvements
in US-China relations will provide a chance for India to become
autocratic, as this would signify that one can maintain good
relations with the US without being democratic. Similarly, if
the US turns anti-Israel, it can influence India to turn
anti-Zionist as well.
#Post#: 24885--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 21, 2024, 12:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
We should help make this happen:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yki6pigUbfw
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/what-was-prussia/msg11864/#msg11864
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/war/msg12099/?topicseen#msg12099
#Post#: 24897--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 23, 2024, 8:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyq6r_uD8f4
[img width=1280
height=852]
HTML https://previews.123rf.com/images/underverse/underverse1506/underverse150600672/41158664-do-it-word-on-notes-paper-with-cork-background.jpg[/img]
#Post#: 24920--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: SpookedSwedes Date: January 27, 2024, 4:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Swedes Spooked as Government, Military Say to Prepare for War |
Vantage with Palki Sharma
[quote]Swedes Spooked as Government, Military Say to Prepare for
War | Vantage with Palki Sharma
Calls from Sweden's government and military urging Swedes to be
ready for war has triggered panicked buying, frightened children
and a fierce debate in the Nordic country. Is it realism or fear
mongering? Why is Sweden preparing for war? Palki Sharma tells
you.[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbcY6JMFuQk
#Post#: 24921--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: UKCitizenArmies Date: January 27, 2024, 2:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
U.K. army chief says citizens should be ready to fight in
possible land war
[quote]London - U.K. civilians should be ready to fight in a
hypothetical land war, the head of the British army, Gen.
Patrick Sanders, said Wednesday, warning that the ongoing
Russian invasion of Ukraine showed it was "citizen armies" that
make the difference in conflicts. He said the British military
is currently too small to respond to the threats emerging in a
changing world.
"Taking preparatory steps to enable placing our societies on a
war footing when needed are now not merely desirable but
essential," Sanders said in a speech. "Our friends in eastern
and northern Europe, who feel the proximity of the Russian
threat more acutely, are already acting prudently, laying the
foundations for national mobilization."
The U.K. army is currently estimated to include around 75,000
fully trained professional soldiers, and there are another
60,000 service members in the British navy and air force.
The U.K. spends around 2% of its gross domestic product on its
military. Though the British government says that will increase
to 2.5%, Sanders, who has long argued for more military
spending, said the army should grow to a standing force of
around 120,000 soldiers by 2027, and even that "is not enough."
"Ukraine brutally illustrates that regular armies start wars;
citizen armies win them," Sanders said...[/quote]
HTML https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uk-war-army-patrick-sanders-citizens-should-be-ready-fight/
#Post#: 24923--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: GenZwar Date: January 27, 2024, 2:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Gen Z not "mature enough" for conscription if there is a world
war
[quote]“When you’re on the frontline, you can’t just charge your
phone up.”
With conscription on the cards to bolster the UK’s defences
against Russia, the public isn’t so sure Gen Z is cut out to
fight in a war.[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmqmLJBWfgk
#Post#: 25015--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 9, 2024, 10:31 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DezfvDpShnA
Woke comments:
[quote]Don't forget, the Russians took Outer Manchuria from
China in the early 1900. Vladivostok was known as Yongmingcheng
when it was in the Outer Manchurian state of China. The Chinese
have actually changed to the original Chinese name on their
modern maps. Using Russian logic to invade Ukraine, China could
invade eastern Russia and take back Outer Manchuria.[/quote]
[quote]China would have an easier time taking Siberia than they
would Taiwan. [/quote]
[quote]wait until Russia is further weakened in Ukraine,
probably this summer. taking back Manchuria, which they claim
is historically Chinese(same excuse Russia used for Ukraine),
and the eastern oblasks would give China....
1. control of huge reserves of oil, gas, and water that they are
badly in need of
2. access to the north pacific via petropovlask and the Kamcheka
peninsula, bypassing the first island chain, making a war for
Taiwan less important/urgent[/quote]
[quote]China's astounding advantage in manpower would be
decisive. Even if Russia managed to drag China into a war of
attrition (Russia's typical defensive posture), China wins a war
of attrition.[/quote]
[quote]Cmon, it’s obvious given the short supply lines China
would be able to take the eastern cities such as
Vladivostok[/quote]
[quote]If China took Siberia that would transform China into a
juggernaut, as its biggest weakness is it relies on overseas
shipping to maintain itself, a weakness that the US has
exploited by building bases around the area so they could block
it to greatly damage their economy.
But with Siberia which is incredibly rich in natural resources
such as Oil, minerals, timber etc. that weakness disappears plus
China will now have alternate routes for coastal trade.[/quote]
#Post#: 25101--------------------------------------------------
Re: War
By: Schwartze Katze Date: February 18, 2024, 1:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
How soon can a NATO-Russia war happen?
[quote]It's a mistake to assume that the war in Ukraine must end
before Russia can be a threat to NATO. This idea is built on a
paradox, and it doesn't take into account the question of
Europe's limited defense resources. On the contrary, a Russian
attack on NATO could be a way to improve their chances in
Ukraine.
0:00 Intro
0:24 Why Russia could attack NATO
1:54 Different time estimates
3:19 Why not now?
4:09 The sequential scenario
5:45 The simultaneous scenario
7:37 A way to divert resources from Ukraine[/quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptnboLDPS38
Related:
[quote]What does EU mean in military?
the European Union
The European army or EU army are terms for a hypothetical army
of the European Union which would supersede the Common Security
and Defence Policy and would go beyond the proposed European
Defence Union. Currently, there is no such army, and defence is
a matter for the member states.[/quote]
Italian foreign minister calls for formation of EU army
HTML https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/italian-foreign-minister-calls-formation-eu-army-2024-01-07/
EU member countries push back on Italy’s call for European army
HTML https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2024/02/05/eu-member-countries-push-back-on-italys-call-for-european-army/
Call to urgently revive Theresa May’s plan for EU-wide defence
treaty
[quote]Leader of centrist Renew group in EU parliament says
defence must be main priority over next five years[/quote]
HTML https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/18/call-urgently-revive-theresa-may-plan-eu-wide-defence-treaty
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page