DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 659--------------------------------------------------
Aryan fingers
By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 4, 2020, 12:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2011.2351
[quote]Facial shapes associated with high digit ratios (figure
2, left panels) are characterized by a relatively large
forehead, long and slim eyebrows, comparably large eyes with a
round shape of the visible iris, and a relatively long distance
of the eyes to the alae origins. The deformation grid in the
nose area indicates a vertical stretching of the nose as well as
a relatively short distance to the mouth. The cheeks are
narrower, the jaw outline is less broad and the chin more
pointed than predicted for faces corresponding with boys with
lower digit ratios (figure 2 right panels). These faces, in
contrast, have a relatively smaller and shorter forehead. The
eyebrows are thicker and further apart from the smaller eyes.
The distance between the eyes is comparably large. The flaring
parts of the nostrils are relatively wide and short. The grids
point to a prominent lower jaw that is laterally and ventrally
extended compared with boys with higher digit ratios.[/quote]
I predicted almost all of this!
[quote]Taken together, the variation in male digit ratio might
thus reflect a preparation for different life-history strategies
depending on social status and environmental context (e.g.
chronic stress). Specifically, we hypothesize dominant and/or
stressed mothers to have children with higher prenatal
testosterone exposure. Such children might behave more
competitively from childhood onwards.[/quote]
Uncertainty about the future is one of the main sources of
stress. In prehistoric times, living in a fixed location already
known to be able to support long-term habitation, especially
with permanent infrastructure, food stockpiles and other
reassuring features of a subsistence farming village, entails
much less uncertainty compared to nomadic life. It all fits.
---
“Uncertainty about the future is one of the main sources of
stress. In prehistoric times, living in a fixed location already
known to be able to support long-term habitation, especially
with permanent infrastructure, food stockpiles and other
reassuring features of a subsistence farming village, entails
much less uncertainty compared to nomadic life. It all fits.”
Yes. But such children (such as myself) will have trouble
adjusting to the stressful world come their teenage years.
---
Guess what? More masculine men have stronger gender-based
double-standards!
www.psypost.org/2016/05/study-prenatal-testosterone-exposure-men
s-agreeableness-toward-women-42504
[quote]A good indicator of the approximate level of fetal
testosterone exposure can be found by comparing the length of
the index and ring fingers (known as the 2D:4D ratio). A low
2D:4D ratio (index finger shorter than ring finger) indicates
high exposure to testosterone in utero, while a high 2D:4D ratio
(ring finger longer than index finger) indicates low exposure.
...
Men were more agreeable in their interactions with women than in
their interactions with men. However, the size of this gender
gap in agreeable behavior was larger among men with low 2D:4D
ratios than among those with high 2D:4D ratios. Both groups of
men were equally agreeable in their interactions with men, but
those with low 2D:4D ratios were significantly more agreeable in
their interactions with women.
Meanwhile, men with high 2D:4D ratios were equally quarrelsome
with men and women, but those with low 2D:4D ratios quarreled
less with women than they did with men. Women’s interactions did
not differ as a function of 2D:4D ratio, or on the basis of the
gender of their interaction partners.
“Our results suggest that greater exposure of the fetal male
brain to androgens may produce changes that enhance how
agreeable adult men are to women, but not to men,” Moskowitz and
his colleague wrote.
The authors conclude that men who experienced higher levels of
testosterone exposure before birth (as indicated by low 2D:4D
ratio) tend to favor women to a greater extent in their adult
social interactions than men exposed to lower testosterone
levels. They suggest that prenatal testosterone exposure affects
fetal brain development in ways that affect motivation to make
social connections with women in adulthood.[/quote]
I have always despised people (men and women) who behave
differently in front of different genders.
This is why I have always despised the uniquely Western "Ladies
First" manners (men expected to open doors/pull chairs/etc. for
women but not the other way round) which is based on this exact
mode of patronizing behaviour, and which is not found in any
other historical civilization.
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ladies%20first
[quote]ladies first
Gentlemen's favorite sentence.
Men with good manners, will always let the woman go first
(example through the door etc.)
but it's not the true meaning.
In reality, it means "Lady, go first so can I stare at your
butt!"[/quote]
---
“Ladies First”
Yes, which is why many MGTOW types condemn it as “gynocentrism”.
However, their solution is to replace it with more masculinity,
when it is masculinity that causes “gynocentrism” in the first
life.
---
"MGTOW types condemn it as “gynocentrism”."
They are idiots. Treating healthy people as if they are disabled
is not complimentary, but insulting. Every time a man opens a
door for a woman in any situation where he would not do the same
for another man, he is intentionally reminding her that women
are on average physically weaker than men. This is the point
behind Western manners: to issue regular veiled threats to
women's safety ("We can physically overpower you any time we
want, so you'd better not act up!") so as to keep them subdued.
This is androcentrism (or what I prefer to call patriarchy), not
gynocentrism. We see the same thing going on with women's
wristwatches being thinner than men's wristwatches (instead of
non-gendered wristwatches catering to each individual wearer's
size), the same with rings, and so on.
HTML https://di2ponv0v5otw.cloudfront.net/posts/2019/08/12/5d51cc238557aff48e5bd93e/m_5d51cc32d1aa252fb42c15bd.jpg
[img]
HTML https://cf.shopee.co.id/file/8be6837ae06b56c58a1ce22460ec498a[/img]
Everything in Western civilization is designed to pound into
women's minds every single day that they are physically weaker
than men on average. This is why I laugh when anyone tries to
claim that Western civilization is less patriarchical than other
civilizations.
*****************************************************