DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 21367--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: rp Date: August 6, 2023, 8:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
" I prefer the simpler blood memory theory that accounts for
non-Giant Gentile worship of Giants directly by recognizing that
Giants are likely to be able to hunt better (draw a heavier bow)
than they themselves could."
The two theories need not necessarily be mutually exclusive. We
have established that Gentiles (Giants or otherwise) were only
interested in farming for its economic benefits. We could
similarly deduce that they viewed Aryans with deference because
of this reason. Additionally, non-Giant Gentiles, who are
shorter than Aryans on average, would have viewed them with even
more deference than Giants would have, as their blood memory
associates height with size/dominance/strength and therefore
being a better hunter (without distinguishing between mesomorphy
and ectomorphy). So when Giants came along, who were
taller/stronger than Aryans, the Gentiles immediately switched
to worshipping them, as they viewed them as "upgraded" versions
of what they thought Aryans were (i.e. better hunters).
#Post#: 21369--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: rp Date: August 6, 2023, 9:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
" This also lines up with an observation that leading Hollywood
actors (who are facially more neotenous and politically more
left-leaning than the national average) tend to be shorter than
the national average "
HTML https://medium.com/@shanesnow/heightism-and-success-why-are-actors-short-and-presidents-tall-a735a5dfac50#:~:text=Film%20producer%20Brian%20Hennessey%20sums,and%20large%20easier%20to%20shoot.
#Post#: 21394--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: rp Date: August 7, 2023, 11:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-46806084
[quote]
[img]
HTML https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/15005/production/_105112068_dsc_9075.jpg.webp[/img]
About 4,500 years ago, a man and a woman were buried in a grave
together in a sprawling cemetery on the outskirts of a thriving
settlement of one of the world's earliest urban civilisations.
In 2016, archaeologists and scientists from India and South
Korea found these two "very rare" skeletons in a Harappan (or
Indus Valley) city - what is now Rakhigarhi village in the
northern Indian state of Haryana. For two years, they researched
the "chronology" and possible reasons behind the deaths; and the
findings have now been published in a peer-reviewed
international journal.
"The man and the woman were facing each other in a very intimate
way. We believe they were a couple. And they seemed to have died
at the same time. How they died, however, remains a mystery,"
archaeologist Vasant Shinde, who led the team, told me.
How ancient DNA may rewrite prehistory in India
They were buried in a half-a-metre-deep sand pit. The man was
around 35 years old at the time of his death, while the woman
was around 25. Both were reasonably tall - he was 5.8ft (1.77m)
and she, 5.6ft. They were both possibly "quite healthy" when
they died - tests didn't find any lesions or lines on the bones
or any "abnormal thickness" of skull bones, which could hint at
injuries or diseases such as brain fever.
[/quote]
#Post#: 21759--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: rp Date: August 27, 2023, 8:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://peoplelivingtall.com/why-do-tall-people-have-more-back-problems
It is my theory that tall people suffer from back problems as a
result of disproportionately longer verterbrae (i.e. torso).
This is because the lower body/legs need to support more upper
body mass. This is consistent with our view that ectomorphs are
superior, even if (perhaps because) they are shorter.
#Post#: 22912--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 19, 2023, 8:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies re-derive Aryan evolution (which they consider to be
a misfortune):
HTML https://incels.is/threads/brutal-frame-and-wristpill-framelets-dont-enter.528393/
[quote]If that wasn't enough, the universe decided it wasn't
done with fucking with my fitness goals. When I went to the
doctor for this, I mentioned my bulk and he told me that it's
possible that my body cannot sustain this weight because of my
thin frame
...
I called my parents later too (mom's a nurse) and they confirm
basically both parts of what my doctor said. Firstly that both
sides of my family's genetics have thin wrists[/quote]
[quote]I have no idea how Asian men were able to hunt food with
such low testosterone at this point.[/quote]
[quote]We devolved.[/quote]
[quote]Early "asian" hunter gatherers were probably a lot higher
T individuals. More like what kazakhs are nowadays. Then at some
point the east asians started morphing back into baby form
because of environmental pressure.[/quote]
[quote]Can you elaborate on the environmental pressure? I'm very
qurious.[/quote]
[quote]Rice agriculture was a mistake.[/quote]
#Post#: 23458--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 6, 2023, 8:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Long ago, Zea_mays and I had already identified heritable myopia
as a likely positive correlate with Aryan traits, since myopia
would be completely debilitating for hunters and a major
inconvenience for herders but only a minor inconvenience for
farmers, hence likely to be more strongly selected against by
the former lifestyles but only weakly (if at all) selected
against by the latter.
Now I just came across:
[img]
HTML https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322403088/figure/fig2/AS:667701315923978@1536203807368/Prevalence-of-myopia-according-to-a-Birth-season-b-Education-level-c-Height-d.ppm[/img]
Note the negative correlation between myopia and weight (4th
graph) as well as with what looks like BMI (5th graph), which
supports our theory given the advantages of low weight/BMI in
farming already covered here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-bones/msg656/#msg656
Distribution:
HTML https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055754/
[quote]In children from similar sociodemographic backgrounds
attending the same schools, South Asian children were nine times
more likely to be myopic and black African Caribbeans three
times more likely, compared with white Europeans.
...
Data were available for 1179 children. The prevalence of myopia
was 25.2%, 10.0%, and 3.4%, respectively, in the South Asian,
black African Caribbean, and white European children. Adjusted
odds ratios (ORs) of myopia compared with the white European
children were 8.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 19.4) in
the South Asian and 3.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 7.2) in black African
Caribbean children. Ethnic differences in the prevalence of
myopia were largely accounted for by ethnic differences in axial
length. The South Asian and black African Caribbean children had
longer axial lengths (0.44 mm; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.57 mm and 0.30
mm; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.44 mm, respectively).[/quote]
#Post#: 30615--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 17, 2025, 8:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.nationalgeographic.com/health/article/crooked-teeth-human-evolution-jaw-size
[quote]How farming may have reshaped the human face
Ancient human skulls were strikingly different from our own.
Early hunter-gatherers had large, powerful jaws built for the
demanding work of chewing tough meats, fibrous vegetables,
seeds, and nuts. But around 12,000 years ago, things began to
change. As humans around the world traded hunting for farming,
their diets changed too, incorporating more grains and
cultivated produce into their diet.
...
With softer diets came less mechanical strain on the jaw. Over
generations, our mandibles began to shrink— a trend visible in
the fossil record. That shrinkage is, at least in part, adaptive
and the result of millennia of evolution, says Myra Laird,
assistant professor of basic and translational sciences at the
University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine. “If you
don’t need a huge mandible, it’s energetically costly to build
that extra bone.”[/quote]
Previously in this topic we have mostly emphasized the energetic
cost associated with dragging around the extra bone weight
during daily life, but this reminds us that growing that extra
bone weight in the first place comes at another energetic cost
that Aryans save on. While the above article focuses on the
skull, the same would be true of bone weight throughout the
skeleton. Gracility FTW!
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page