DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 656--------------------------------------------------
Aryan bones
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 3, 2020, 11:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
www.livescience.com/49236-bone-density-human-evolution.html
--- Quote ---
> "We initially suspected that a more gracile, lightly built
skeleton might be a characteristic of modern humans in general,
compared to Neanderthals or our ancestors," Richmond said.
>
> Instead, the researchers discovered that the arms and legs of
recent modern humans are lightly built compared not only with
other living primates and with extinct human species, but also
with modern humans from before the present Holocene Epoch, which
began about 12,000 years ago. Rather than shifting gradually
over time, bone density remained high throughout the history of
human evolution, until the appearance of recent modern humans,
when it decreased dramatically.
> ...
> "Much to our surprise, throughout our deep past, we see that
our human ancestors and relatives, who lived in natural
settings, had very dense bone. And even early members of our
species, going back 20,000 years or so, had bone that was about
as dense as seen in other modern species," Richmond said in a
statement. "But this density drastically drops off in more
recent times, when we started to use agricultural tools to grow
food and settle in one place."
> ...
> "There are other things that could account for some of the
differences between early agriculturalists and foragers — the
amount of cultivated grains in the diet of the agriculturalists
— in this case maize — as well as possible deficiencies in
dietary calcium [that] may also contribute to lower bone mass,"
Ryan said in a statement. "However, I think the key appears to
be higher physical activity and mobility from a very young age
that makes the bones of nonhuman primates and human foragers
stronger."
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PjAQFjxosPTjhHU9MkFkKP-970-80.jpeg
I am unconvinced that farming back then involved less physical
activity than hunting; indeed there are signs that the opposite
was the case:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-labour/
But what Ryan is not considering is that the type of physical
activity involved in farming actually benefits from lighter
bones, as the heavier your bones, the more body mass you have to
shift around all day (in addition to the stuff you are carrying
around) and hence the more energy is invested with no additional
return in the amount of food grown (which is limited by
farmland/sunlight/water/etc.). This is in contrast to hunting,
when a more skeletally robust hunter (while also spending more
energy to move) might be able to use heavier bows etc. which
would make it easier to take down larger prey, thus more than
compensating for the extra energy spent moving.
#Post#: 1404--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: October 5, 2020, 11:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This is important:
HTML https://vdare.com/posts/blonde-vs-brunette
--- Quote ---
> This 1939 book “You and Heredity” by science cartoonist Amram
Scheinfeld, the son of a rabbi, is a good example of how popular
eugenics was among Jews before WWII, a fact that has been
completely retconned down the memoryhole since the days of
Stephen Jay Gould.
> ...
> The most striking revelation is that, contrary to the current
impression, Jews largely approved of eugenics until the end of
the 1960s. (The most effective opponents tended to be Catholics,
such as G.K Chesterton, author of 1922’s Eugenics and Other
Evils.) Glad quotes endless Jewish spokesmen from the first
seven decades of the 20th century to the effect that Jews had
been practicing eugenic marriages for 3,000 years. The medical
profession, which was largely secular and progressive, was
enthusiastic about eugenics, and there was little evidence that
the sizable number of Jewish doctors objected.
--- End Quote ---
Duh!
HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/other/racial-jewishness-archive-from-true-left-forum/
But the most important point is, what traits do Jews want to
breed for? The answer:
HTML https://i.redd.it/y4z0hduo9la51.jpg
So, once again, not only is it confirmed that Jews practiced
eugenics, but it is confirmed that we do not. Controlled
breeding for gracility is not "eugenics", but Aryanization. The
fact that Jews have been practicing eugenics for 3000 years is
the reason why Jews are so ugly.
(Plus the Jew couldn't even get our face shape correct in the
drawing.....)
#Post#: 2893--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: guest27
Date: December 17, 2020, 10:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
So there is hope one day we'll have hollow bones and be able to
fly
The most Aryan mode of locomotion ;)
#Post#: 2958--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: December 19, 2020, 12:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"The most Aryan mode of locomotion"
While flying would enable us to avoid stepping on crops,
planting the crops in rows and walking between the rows works
just as well. Additionally, walking allows us to feel what the
soil is like, and react accordingly.
In fact, flying offers the biggest advantage to predators.
#Post#: 2963--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: guest27
Date: December 19, 2020, 3:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: 90sRetroFan link ---
>
> "The most Aryan mode of locomotion"
>
> While flying would enable us to avoid stepping on crops,
planting the crops in rows and walking between the rows works
just as well. Additionally, walking allows us to feel what the
soil is like, and react accordingly.
>
> In fact, flying offers the biggest advantage to predators.
>
--- End Quote ---
Flying (as soaring/sky-sailing (edit: ok yes the word I was
looking for was gliding)) largely relies directly on solar
energy (wind) whereas walking demands complex energy conversion.
It allows us to bypass needless terrain-obstacles, and best
avoid injuring living organisms. There's no reason we can't
still touch the ground.
Indeed flying gives predators an advantage, shouldn't we even
the odds? Agriculture also gives predatory humans an advantage;
you don't see any supervillainous hunter-gatherer nations.
HTML https://i.pinimg.com/736x/8b/d0/6c/8bd06c2496a3300c966a092bfda61eef.jpg
#Post#: 2966--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: December 19, 2020, 1:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I have no problem with using flying in war against our enemies.
But flying was irrelevant to the Neolithic Revolution. Therefore
it is incorrect to refer to it as Aryan in an evolutionary sense
(what this subforum is about).
Regarding energy, you are referring to gliding, but that is only
possible after considerable horizontal speed has been built up,
and then there is the issue of changing direction (as would be
frequently necessary for farm labour). These are what flapping
wings are for, which require similar energy conversion to
walking, but in much greater quantity, as energy must be wasted
to lift and support body weight. You would have to flap your
wings a lot to do the same amount of farm labour in midair (and
even more if you are carrying stuff around all day).
#Post#: 3518--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: guest27
Date: January 20, 2021, 3:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> These are what flapping wings are for, which require similar
energy conversion to walking, but in much greater quantity, as
energy must be wasted to lift and support body weight. You would
have to flap your wings a lot to do the same amount of farm
labour in midair (and even more if you are carrying stuff around
all day).
--- End Quote ---
True! Thanks for giving this some thought. I suppose we shan't
be bees or faeries but a spot of gliding here and there can't
hurt. Imagine: Light bones and gracile muscles, you spread your
wings to take advantage of a gust of wind, carrying you
effortlessly to the middle of your field, where you land gently
on the soil to tend a wee plant. I shall call this the Mary
Poppins model. It's possible the energy required to maintain
extra appendages outweighs the energy saved by occasional
gliding, however.
#Post#: 4948--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: March 19, 2021, 1:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies are now recycling our old content:
HTML https://incels.co/threads/hunter-gatherers.284516/
--- Quote ---
>
[img]
HTML https://incels.co/attachments/1615718601151-jpg.424581/[/img]
--- End Quote ---
but using it to promote their preferred traits:
--- Quote ---
>
> we don't even need muscles and skin to see he was chad and had
hunter eyes
>
> brutal af, agricultural revolution was a mistake
--- End Quote ---
They have a new slur for us too:
--- Quote ---
> How can farmoid subhumans cope?
--- End Quote ---
Of course they are wrong about who is subhuman. The word "human"
comes from "humus" (ie. soil). Therefore by definition it is
non-farmoids/non-Aryans who are subhuman.
#Post#: 4951--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: rp
Date: March 19, 2021, 8:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"hunter eyes" have always been an incel favorite, along with
high fwhr (face width/height ratios. Until I discovered
Aryanism, I assumed these were traits that were viewed as
"superior" by all people, when in fact they are only
"superior" according to Western standards of beauty that
percolate through Western institutions.
Also, lol at "farmoids".
#Post#: 4977--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan bones
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: March 19, 2021, 11:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I assumed these were traits that were viewed as "superior" by
all people"
Did you yourself too view such traits as superior, or did you
assume you were alone in not finding such traits superior?
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 4
DIR Next Page