URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Human Evolution
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 656--------------------------------------------------
       Aryan bones
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 3, 2020, 11:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OLD CONTENT
       www.livescience.com/49236-bone-density-human-evolution.html
       [quote]"We initially suspected that a more gracile, lightly
       built skeleton might be a characteristic of modern humans in
       general, compared to Neanderthals or our ancestors," Richmond
       said.
       Instead, the researchers discovered that the arms and legs of
       recent modern humans are lightly built compared not only with
       other living primates and with extinct human species, but also
       with modern humans from before the present Holocene Epoch, which
       began about 12,000 years ago. Rather than shifting gradually
       over time, bone density remained high throughout the history of
       human evolution, until the appearance of recent modern humans,
       when it decreased dramatically.
       ...
       "Much to our surprise, throughout our deep past, we see that our
       human ancestors and relatives, who lived in natural settings,
       had very dense bone. And even early members of our species,
       going back 20,000 years or so, had bone that was about as dense
       as seen in other modern species," Richmond said in a statement.
       "But this density drastically drops off in more recent times,
       when we started to use agricultural tools to grow food and
       settle in one place."
       ...
       "There are other things that could account for some of the
       differences between early agriculturalists and foragers — the
       amount of cultivated grains in the diet of the agriculturalists
       — in this case maize — as well as possible deficiencies in
       dietary calcium [that] may also contribute to lower bone mass,"
       Ryan said in a statement. "However, I think the key appears to
       be higher physical activity and mobility from a very young age
       that makes the bones of nonhuman primates and human foragers
       stronger."[/quote]
  HTML https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PjAQFjxosPTjhHU9MkFkKP-970-80.jpeg
       I am unconvinced that farming back then involved less physical
       activity than hunting; indeed there are signs that the opposite
       was the case:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-labour/
       But what Ryan is not considering is that the type of physical
       activity involved in farming actually benefits from lighter
       bones, as the heavier your bones, the more body mass you have to
       shift around all day (in addition to the stuff you are carrying
       around) and hence the more energy is invested with no additional
       return in the amount of food grown (which is limited by
       farmland/sunlight/water/etc.). This is in contrast to hunting,
       when a more skeletally robust hunter (while also spending more
       energy to move) might be able to use heavier bows etc. which
       would make it easier to take down larger prey, thus more than
       compensating for the extra energy spent moving.
       #Post#: 1404--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 5, 2020, 11:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is important:
  HTML https://vdare.com/posts/blonde-vs-brunette
       [quote]This 1939 book “You and Heredity” by science cartoonist
       Amram Scheinfeld, the son of a rabbi, is a good example of how
       popular eugenics was among Jews before WWII, a fact that has
       been completely retconned down the memoryhole since the days of
       Stephen Jay Gould.
       ...
       The most striking revelation is that, contrary to the current
       impression, Jews largely approved of eugenics until the end of
       the 1960s. (The most effective opponents tended to be Catholics,
       such as G.K Chesterton, author of 1922’s Eugenics and Other
       Evils.) Glad quotes endless Jewish spokesmen from the first
       seven decades of the 20th century to the effect that Jews had
       been practicing eugenic marriages for 3,000 years. The medical
       profession, which was largely secular and progressive, was
       enthusiastic about eugenics, and there was little evidence that
       the sizable number of Jewish doctors objected.[/quote]
       Duh!
  HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/other/racial-jewishness-archive-from-true-left-forum/
       But the most important point is, what traits do Jews want to
       breed for? The answer:
  HTML https://i.redd.it/y4z0hduo9la51.jpg
       So, once again, not only is it confirmed that Jews practiced
       eugenics, but it is confirmed that we do not. Controlled
       breeding for gracility is not "eugenics", but Aryanization. The
       fact that Jews have been practicing eugenics for 3000 years is
       the reason why Jews are so ugly.
       (Plus the Jew couldn't even get our face shape correct in the
       drawing.....)
       #Post#: 2893--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: guest27 Date: December 17, 2020, 10:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So there is hope one day we'll have hollow bones and be able to
       fly
       The most Aryan mode of locomotion ;)
       #Post#: 2958--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 19, 2020, 12:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "The most Aryan mode of locomotion"
       While flying would enable us to avoid stepping on crops,
       planting the crops in rows and walking between the rows works
       just as well. Additionally, walking allows us to feel what the
       soil is like, and react accordingly.
       In fact, flying offers the biggest advantage to predators.
       #Post#: 2963--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: guest27 Date: December 19, 2020, 3:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=103.msg2958#msg2958
       date=1608359087]
       "The most Aryan mode of locomotion"
       While flying would enable us to avoid stepping on crops,
       planting the crops in rows and walking between the rows works
       just as well. Additionally, walking allows us to feel what the
       soil is like, and react accordingly.
       In fact, flying offers the biggest advantage to predators.
       [/quote]
       Flying (as soaring/sky-sailing (edit: ok yes the word I was
       looking for was gliding)) largely relies directly on solar
       energy (wind) whereas walking demands complex energy conversion.
       It allows us to bypass needless terrain-obstacles, and best
       avoid injuring living organisms. There's no reason we can't
       still touch the ground.
       Indeed flying gives predators an advantage, shouldn't we even
       the odds? Agriculture also gives predatory humans an advantage;
       you don't see any supervillainous hunter-gatherer nations.
  HTML https://i.pinimg.com/736x/8b/d0/6c/8bd06c2496a3300c966a092bfda61eef.jpg
       #Post#: 2966--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 19, 2020, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have no problem with using flying in war against our enemies.
       But flying was irrelevant to the Neolithic Revolution. Therefore
       it is incorrect to refer to it as Aryan in an evolutionary sense
       (what this subforum is about).
       Regarding energy, you are referring to gliding, but that is only
       possible after considerable horizontal speed has been built up,
       and then there is the issue of changing direction (as would be
       frequently necessary for farm labour). These are what flapping
       wings are for, which require similar energy conversion to
       walking, but in much greater quantity, as energy must be wasted
       to lift and support body weight. You would have to flap your
       wings a lot to do the same amount of farm labour in midair (and
       even more if you are carrying stuff around all day).
       #Post#: 3518--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: guest27 Date: January 20, 2021, 3:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]These are what flapping wings are for, which require
       similar energy conversion to walking, but in much greater
       quantity, as energy must be wasted to lift and support body
       weight. You would have to flap your wings a lot to do the same
       amount of farm labour in midair (and even more if you are
       carrying stuff around all day).[/quote]
       True! Thanks for giving this some thought. I suppose we shan't
       be bees or faeries but a spot of gliding here and there can't
       hurt. Imagine: Light bones and gracile muscles, you spread your
       wings to take advantage of a gust of wind, carrying you
       effortlessly to the middle of your field, where you land gently
       on the soil to tend a wee plant. I shall call this the Mary
       Poppins model. It's possible the energy required to maintain
       extra appendages outweighs the energy saved by occasional
       gliding, however.
       #Post#: 4948--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 19, 2021, 1:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our enemies are now recycling our old content:
  HTML https://incels.co/threads/hunter-gatherers.284516/
       [quote][img]
  HTML https://incels.co/attachments/1615718601151-jpg.424581/[/img][/quote]
       but using it to promote their preferred traits:
       [quote]
       we don't even need muscles and skin to see he was chad and had
       hunter eyes
       brutal af, agricultural revolution was a mistake[/quote]
       They have a new slur for us too:
       [quote]How can farmoid subhumans cope?[/quote]
       Of course they are wrong about who is subhuman. The word "human"
       comes from "humus" (ie. soil). Therefore by definition it is
       non-farmoids/non-Aryans who are subhuman.
       #Post#: 4951--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: rp Date: March 19, 2021, 8:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "hunter eyes" have always been an incel favorite, along with
       high fwhr (face width/height ratios. Until I discovered
       Aryanism, I assumed these were traits that were viewed as
       "superior" by  all  people, when in fact they are only
       "superior" according to Western standards of beauty that
       percolate through Western institutions.
       Also, lol at "farmoids".
       #Post#: 4977--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 19, 2021, 11:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I assumed these were traits that were viewed as "superior" by
       all people"
       Did you yourself too view such traits as superior, or did you
       assume you were alone in not finding such traits superior?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page