URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Human Evolution
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 655--------------------------------------------------
       Aryan immune system
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 3, 2020, 11:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OLD CONTENT
       We are just better:
       en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans#Genetic_diversity,_relax
       ed_sexual_selection_and_immunity
       [quote]the transition to early agriculture when the non-neotenic
       traits disappeared, which is theorized to be due to selection
       for the immune system adapting to survive a higher pathogen load
       caused by agriculture and men who retained more childlike traits
       being less burdened by weakening of the immune system from upper
       body musculature competing with the immune system over
       nutrients. It is argued that the genetic evidence of only a
       small part of the male population of the time of early
       agriculture passing on their Y chromosomes can be explained by
       the heredity of non-neotenic traits causing the male descendants
       of the non-neotenic men who were not killed by diseases in one
       generation to die from them in subsequent generations, leaving
       no Y chromosome evidence of their short term continuation of
       paternal bloodlines in present humans. Sexual selection for
       stereotypic masculinity causing most men to fail to breed is
       ruled out as it would have selected against neoteny, not for as
       the archaeological evidence shows.[27][28][/quote]
       #Post#: 4262--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan immune system
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 16, 2021, 10:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Again it all lines up as we predicted:
  HTML https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4398605/
       [quote]Young men with superior upper-body strength typically
       show a greater proclivity for physical aggression. The
       traditional interpretation is that young men calibrate their
       attitudes and behaviors to their physical formidability.
       Physical strength is thus viewed as a causal antecedent of
       aggressive behavior. The present study is the first to examine
       this phenomenon within a developmental framework. We demonstrate
       that males' antisocial tendencies temporally precede their
       physical formidability.
       ...
       This implies that physical aggression and male secondary sex
       development have coevolved as part of an adaptive complex
       (Archer, 2009). Our results cohere with sexual selection theory,
       and suggest that aggressive-antisocial dispositions in childhood
       may serve as preparation for future male-male competition in
       young adulthood, when physical strength is at its peak.[/quote]
       (The Western academic term "antisocial" is confusing by failing
       to distinguish between proactive antisociality (which is caused
       by aggressiveness) and reactive antisociality (which is caused
       by awareness of current society being unfair). Better terms
       would in fact be "anti-socialist" to describe the former (who
       just don't care about society) and "socialist" to describe the
       latter (whose idealism regarding society is the very reason why
       we have trouble being enthusiastic about current society which
       falls so far short of what is ideal).)
       But the main conclusion is important. What the above calls the
       "traditional interpretation" is basically that all men will be
       as aggressive as they can get away with. The new study refutes
       this: there exist ethically superior and inferior men, and the
       ethically superior are indeed also the physiologically more
       neotenous.
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/non-aryan-aggressiveness/
       So how much longer are we going to put up with the
       heavy-upper-body subhumans being allowed to keep reproducing?
       #Post#: 5284--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan immune system
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 4, 2021, 12:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Taylor Greene doesn't get it, unsurprisingly:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwhM4ZtdIpY
       (Ignore False Left TYT's RBG praise.)
       Indeed, it is well documented that more men die of COVID than
       women. While some people attribute it to men more often being
       smokers etc., I wonder if heavier upper body musculature among
       men compared to women on average could suffice to account for
       the disparity?
       #Post#: 11352--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan immune system
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 17, 2022, 11:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150312-what-the-face-betrays-about-you
       [quote]As you might expect, your health and medical history are
       also written in your countenance – and the detail it offers is
       surprising. The amount of fat on your face, for instance,
       provides a stronger indication of your fitness than more
       standard measures, such as your body mass index. Those with
       thinner faces are less likely to suffer infections, and when
       they do, the illness is less severe[/quote]
       Related:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-metabolism/msg7980/#msg7980
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-metabolism/msg8071/#msg8071
       *****************************************************