DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 15823--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: September 26, 2022, 7:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, provided those who are being helped are those who deserve
the help being given.
#Post#: 15824--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: September 26, 2022, 7:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
How to simply debunk Carlo M. Cipolla
His arguments
--- Quote ---
> Law 5: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.
--- End Quote ---
The people who founded and build Western Civilization are not
stupid people. But they resulting mass-economic exploitation,
racial slavery, and colonialism. Who are more dangerous? The
so-called "stupid people" according to Cipolla, or the
"non-stupid" people according to him?
#Post#: 15952--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: October 3, 2022, 1:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Our enemies document another shift from False Left to True Left:
HTML https://vdare.com/posts/the-society-for-personality-and-social-psychology-all-presentations-at-our-annual-meeting-must-uphold-ibram-x-kendi-thought
--- Quote ---
> Last week the New York University (NYU) psychology professor
announced that he would resign at the end of the year from the
Society for Personality and Social Psychology, his primary
professional association, because of a newly adopted requirement
that everybody presenting research at the group’s conferences
explain how their submission advances “equity, inclusion, and
anti-racism goals.”
> ...
> Such diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) statements have
proliferated at universities and in academic societies
> ...
> But the SPSP requirement went a step further, dropping
"diversity" in favor of "anti-racism,"
--- End Quote ---
I have always despised the False Left's celebration of diversity
as a leftist value, which is ultimately rooted in relativism.
Lacking an absolute sense of value, relativists think that a
collection of different things (regardless of what the
differences are) is more valuable than a collection of similar
things. Diversity can trivially be shown to lead to conclusions
contrary to leftism. For example, a society of racists as well
as anti-racists would be more diverse than a society of
anti-racists only, so those who value diversity would have to
conclude that the former is preferable to the latter. Diversity
is not what leftists should value. Leftists who value diversity
will never agree with eliminating inferior bloodlines.
Also recall the following example:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-476/msg5081/#msg5081
--- Quote ---
> For example, if there was currently two "white" (including
Jewish) nominees and one "AAPI" nominee and we could change it
to three "black" nominees, we would do so without hesitation. Or
if there were currently two "white" (including Jewish) nominees
and one "black" nominee and we could change it to three "AAPI"
nominees, we would do that too. This is what true anti-racist
solidarity looks like. Nothing in anti-racism is about
self-interest. Everything in anti-racism is about doing whatever
it takes to destroy the enemy, including hurting our own ethnic
group if necessary.
--- End Quote ---
Two "white" (including Jewish) nominees and one "AAPI" nominee
is more diverse than three "black" nominees, but clearly worse.
Two "white" (including Jewish) nominees and one "black" nominee
is more diverse than three "AAPI" nominees, but clearly worse.
Next, SPSP should get rid of "inclusion". If we value
anti-racism, we should obviously not include racists in society,
therefore why tout inclusion as a value?
#Post#: 15976--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: christianbethel
Date: October 5, 2022, 3:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
So no 'diversity', no 'tolerance', no 'inclusion'. What then?
#Post#: 16002--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 6, 2022, 11:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> So no 'diversity', no 'tolerance', no 'inclusion'. What then?
--- End Quote ---
Integration, Empathy, and Unity. That's the most good terms to
describe our way to eternal freedom
#Post#: 16016--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: christianbethel
Date: October 8, 2022, 4:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@90sRF Do you agree with this?
#Post#: 16040--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 11, 2022, 10:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"...Do you agree with this?"
If he not agree with the sentences which I already made days
before, he betray his ideology which already made by him. That 3
terms which I mention are the simplest thing to describe this
online political forum
#Post#: 16383--------------------------------------------------
True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: rp
Date: November 11, 2022, 8:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
MSNBC guest muses that Lauren Boebert will get on OnlyFans after
political career, Jews and False Leftists call him "sexist":
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-lOX2Gfi6M
Sl*t-shaming should become a leftist position. False Leftists
can accept this or GTFO. "Do we have to go in this direction"
says John, the Jew. Give me a break.
#Post#: 16385--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 11, 2022, 8:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Sl*t-shaming should become a leftist position."
As long as promiscuous men are also classified as sluts.
The False Left was at least aware of the double-standard of
shaming female promiscuity while celebrating male promiscuity,
but it tried to remove the double-standard from the wrong
direction, namely by encouraging celebration of female
promiscuity also. The correct direction from which to remove the
double-standard (as we promote) is to encourage shaming of male
promiscuity also.
As for why the False Left made the mistake it did, my guess is
that it might have something to do with:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/mate-choice-copying/
#Post#: 16412--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-relativism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: November 13, 2022, 6:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/thicker-curvy-women-denied-entry-183853217.html
--- Quote ---
> Two women who are models and social media influencers say they
were denied entry into a popular Los Angeles nightclub because
of their size.
>
> Ella Halikas said a bouncer told her and fellow “curvy” model
Alexa Jay that they couldn’t follow their friends into The
Highlight Room in Hollywood.
> ...
> The women believe this problem goes beyond one nightclub.
Halikas said she has received thousands of messages from other
plus-sized women sharing similar stories of being turned away
from bars and nightclubs.
>
> “One of my plus-sized friends went to a club in New York City
and they said, ‘Everyone else can come in,'” said Halikas. “They
let in all her thin friends, got to her and said, ‘You can’t get
in.’ She asked, ‘Why?’ and he goes, ‘If you want to come in, pay
$4,000.'”
--- End Quote ---
[img]
HTML https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/q0m4PePK8MBgGM_NkOjXzw--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQyNTtjZj13ZWJw/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_hill_articles_341/f6cc1340a73dc57b1022005c78f1147b[/img]
Many commenters side with the clubs:
--- Quote ---
> It's been standard operating procedure for swank clubs to
screen out people at the door based on the aesthetics of the
owners. This is hardly new.
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> Look, classifying yourself as a model because you have an
OnlyFans page is akin to me calling myself a soldier because I
play Call of Duty. It's just wildly inaccurate. Every one knows
the clubs cater to a certain aesthetic
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> I think some night clubs want to have a reputation of being a
place where only attractive people go. They let the bouncers
make the call.
--- End Quote ---
Maybe we should start a virtual club on this forum where we
collect pictures of people that fit our aesthetic?
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 6
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page