DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Transparent Soap
HTML https://transparentsoap.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: General Discussion
*****************************************************
#Post#: 22--------------------------------------------------
Balance between conciliation measures
By: chandna rani Date: August 30, 2023, 6:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The text was originally a response to the criticism that
Hanisch's feminist group had received from other radical
movements, especially Marxists. They accused him of organizing
"personal therapy" events to talk about his private things,
instead of planning or organizing a political plan. "We were
belittled," Hanisch wrote in 2006, "for bringing our 'personal
problems' into the public debate, especially those 'body
problems' like sex, appearance, and abortion."1». The fight was
between those who did therapy and those who did politics, and
Hanisch thought that the two approaches had to be combined.
There are many personal aspects that are political. They are
India Email List
HTML https://dbtodata.com/india-email-data/
fundamental rights, which
do not depend on the general interest or the political cycle:
sexual freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of expression, the
right to privacy... For a homosexual in Iran, the personal is
very political. Politics is always radically personal in
dictatorships and totalitarian states. But it can also be so in
democracies. For a woman who wants to have a child, the personal
can often be political: an individual decision has many
political aspects (the wage gap is largely caused by maternity
and the lack of reconciliation measures, for example.
HTML https://zh-cn.indiaphonelist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/image_2023_08_29T07_29_31_891Z-300x182.png
HTML https://dbtodata.com/india-email-data/
But if the origin of the phrase was emancipatory and sought to
correct flagrant gender inequalities in the West by making
historically invisible individuals and practices visible, today
it has lost much of its effect. Today, often saying that the
personal is political is an excuse for moralization or political
narcissism. As Mark Lilla explains in The Liberal Comeback , we
have gone from thinking that the personal is political to that
the political is just the personal.
*****************************************************