URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TNA Fan World
  HTML https://tnafans.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: WWE Chat
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 6176--------------------------------------------------
       Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: tnafanforum Date: November 11, 2012, 12:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This question is pretty straight forward but i'll give just a
       brief explanation anyway. Who, during any era of WWE should have
       been champion and why? Obviously they have to have never been
       WWE champ before. There are many good choices such as Rowdy
       Roddy Piper, Harley Race, Shelton Benjamin, and Mr.Perfect, but
       my choice is Razor Ramon/Scott Hall. I would have chosen Razor
       in WWE because he was extremely over and was great on the mic
       and in the ring. He had the total package and a feud between him
       and HBK or Bret Hart over the title would have been AWESOME. I
       also say Scott Hall(yes I know they're the same guy) while he
       was in WCW because when deciding weather he should join nWo
       Hollywood or Wolfpac, it would be perfect if he were champion
       because it would be extremely momentous for whom ever he chose.
       2nd place I award to Ted Dibiase but im too lazy to explain why
       .
       #Post#: 6178--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: jeeban4life Date: November 11, 2012, 12:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Davey boy smith, owen hart, mr perfect and rick rude
       #Post#: 6183--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: tnafanforum Date: November 11, 2012, 12:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why do yo uthink that then ?
       #Post#: 6652--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: jeeban4life Date: November 24, 2012, 7:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Perfect and rude certainly had the mic skills and ability to be
       at the top. They would have been better than sgt slaughter who
       won the belt for cheap heat. Dibiase was suppose to be champ at
       mania 4 until honkytonk had a problem with losing the ic belt
       #Post#: 6659--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: tnafanforum Date: November 25, 2012, 8:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Alot of people should of been the champ now you look back at it
       .
       #Post#: 6807--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: Sel Date: November 29, 2012, 5:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       One thing you have to remember is that back in the late 80's and
       early 90's, it was commonly believed that the World Championship
       Title was not given to the best wrestler, but the one who was
       the biggest character. To that end, I don't think Mr Perfect or
       Rick Rude should ever have held the belt. Instead, they held the
       Intercontinental Title which was recognised by fans and pros
       alike to be the true title for the best wrestling had to offer.
       The only other person I can think of who could have carried it
       due to his charisma is "The Million Dollar Man" Ted Debiase. He
       certainly should have had a long reign and played a perfect
       heel. Or even Jake Roberts. But again, thinking back to those
       times, it wouldn't have fitted. No one was ready for that level
       of cerebral intensity.
       #Post#: 6818--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: jeeban4life Date: November 29, 2012, 7:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The ultimate warrior was given the ic belt for some reason.
       Apart from Randy savage i think vince struggled to find a
       sucessful heel champ. Yokozuna and Sid did not perform well at
       the box office. Rock and hhh finally changed that when they won
       their first wwf championships
       #Post#: 6841--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Who should of been WWE Champion?
       By: tnafanforum Date: December 4, 2012, 12:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       When i think about it in the 80s and 90s alot of the guts who
       had the belt should not of had it for as long as they did.  But
       i now days it go's to guys who the fans love to see like john c
       , randy orton. Etc.
       *****************************************************