URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TNA Fan World
  HTML https://tnafans.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Chat 
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2650--------------------------------------------------
       who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: tnafanforum Date: September 2, 2012, 10:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       i kick this off , i think the undertaker would win because he
       got so much mroe to give than sting , undertaker is very good
       saying how old he is and last year at WM he took on HHH in a
       hell in a cell match , he did a good job  (love1)
       #Post#: 2663--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: Steve B Date: September 2, 2012, 1:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Depends where they wrestled. If its WWE then taker. Anywhere
       else depends on the match and how its been promoted, they are
       pretty much evenly matched
       #Post#: 2666--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: tnafanforum Date: September 2, 2012, 1:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Steve B link=topic=431.msg2663#msg2663
       date=1346608965]
       Depends where they wrestled. If its WWE then taker. Anywhere
       else depends on the match and how its been promoted, they are
       pretty much evenly matched
       [/quote] Yer but i do think Undertaker as more to give than
       sting , when i sew undertaker in the hell in a cell match he was
       so good , then i sew sting in the ring a week or 2 after and he
       was alot slower than the undertaker ...
       #Post#: 2667--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: Steve B Date: September 2, 2012, 1:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Irrelevant.
       Taker has always been willing to lose if it has been good for
       business. Thats what I mean when I say if they weren't wrestling
       in WWE and it depends on how the match is promoted.
       Ultimately its down to the writers not the dudes in the ring!
       #Post#: 2672--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: tnafanforum Date: September 2, 2012, 1:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Steve B link=topic=431.msg2667#msg2667
       date=1346609311]
       Irrelevant.
       Taker has always been willing to lose if it has been good for
       business. Thats what I mean when I say if they weren't wrestling
       in WWE and it depends on how the match is promoted.
       Ultimately its down to the writers not the dudes in the ring!
       [/quote] that is true , he is alot like kane kane puts alot of
       younger and upcoming guy over letting them beat him ..
       #Post#: 2674--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: Steve B Date: September 2, 2012, 1:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Even in WWE if it weren't for the streak Taker would probably be
       willing to lose but Vince almost certainly wouldn't sanction it
       unless it were exceptional circumstances
       #Post#: 2676--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: tnafanforum Date: September 2, 2012, 1:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Steve B link=topic=431.msg2674#msg2674
       date=1346610235]
       Even in WWE if it weren't for the streak Taker would probably be
       willing to lose but Vince almost certainly wouldn't sanction it
       unless it were exceptional circumstances
       [/quote] Yer i no what you mean , undertaker is a real worker
       and will do any thing to keep the fans happy
       #Post#: 5394--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: jeeban4life Date: October 1, 2012, 5:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sting to end taker's career at wm30 in 2014
       #Post#: 5400--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: Steve B Date: October 2, 2012, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I really think the streak should end as it is.
       20-0 has a symmetry to it that is perfect and lovely and round
       and would stand for all time. 21-0 or 22-0 is somewhat awkward
       and unbalanced.
       21-1 or 20-1 wouldn't make sense no matter how much of a Sting
       fan Taker is or how much the fans want it.
       #Post#: 5402--------------------------------------------------
       Re: who would win undertaker or Sting
       By: tnafanforum Date: October 2, 2012, 4:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       he will not ever loose at WM , but how long can he keep going
       for now tbh he is getting old and only doing one match ayear
       thats how much it takes out ofhim , alsois that agood move for
       wwe to only have him one time a year? i think so , it bring one
       more thing to WM .
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page