DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The Forum
HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Worldwide topics
*****************************************************
#Post#: 19290--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: rapids_60 Date: March 1, 2015, 12:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Snickers link=topic=1399.msg19283#msg19283
date=1425147330]
Those charitable donations may have been given for future
favors.
[/quote]
I'd be surprised if that was NOT the case.
#Post#: 19297--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: Linda Lou Date: March 1, 2015, 6:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Why are charitable donations only bad if they are going to a
Democrat?
#Post#: 19298--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: trollslayer Date: March 1, 2015, 7:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Linda Lou link=topic=1399.msg19297#msg19297
date=1425213813]
Why are charitable donations only bad if they are going to a
Democrat?
[/quote]
Look at the optics here Linda. Mrs Clinton taking donations
from foreign governments. The same foreign governments she is
acting a an emissary from the US while Secretary of State. Even
after telling her boss The President she wouldn't. Algeria,
Kuwait Qatar and Oman. You don't see a conflict of interest
here? Remember the last Presidential election, Obama claimed,
(but never proved) that Republicans were taking donations from
overseas and the outrage from Democrats that followed?
Let me ask you another question. Do you think Chelsea Clinton,
somebody who had no broadcast experience was worth paying
$600,000 a year to?
#Post#: 19305--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: rapids_60 Date: March 1, 2015, 1:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Linda Lou link=topic=1399.msg19297#msg19297
date=1425213813]
Why are charitable donations only bad if they are going to a
Democrat?
[/quote]
They aren't. Generally they aren't bad at all. Problem here is
that Obama's admin put guidelines in place when Hillary became
secretary of state since foreign donations could be a conflict.
Some of these donations violated the agreement.
#Post#: 19342--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: trollslayer Date: March 3, 2015, 1:34 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
So now we find out that while Hillary was SOS she exclusively
used her own personal email account instead of following the law
and using the federal email system. The plot thickens.
#Post#: 19352--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: rapids_60 Date: March 3, 2015, 9:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=trollslayer link=topic=1399.msg19342#msg19342
date=1425411267]
So now we find out that while Hillary was SOS she exclusively
used her own personal email account instead of following the law
and using the federal email system. The plot thickens.
[/quote]
Ah, the old Scott "private network" Walker trick!
#Post#: 19354--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: trollslayer Date: March 4, 2015, 6:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=rapids_60 link=topic=1399.msg19352#msg19352
date=1425440428]
Ah, the old Scott "private network" Walker trick!
[/quote]
That pales in comparison to this. Especially in light of recent
donations to her "charitable fund".
#Post#: 19355--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: Notso Date: March 4, 2015, 7:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=trollslayer link=topic=1399.msg19342#msg19342
date=1425411267]
So now we find out that while Hillary was SOS she exclusively
used her own personal email account instead of following the law
and using the federal email system. The plot thickens.
[/quote]
Just seems strange to me someone in that sensitive position can
have 55 thousand pages of emails and none of them contain
classified information.
I would have thought on many days the Sec States daily schedule
would be classified.
#Post#: 19356--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: trollslayer Date: March 4, 2015, 8:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Notso link=topic=1399.msg19355#msg19355
date=1425474923]
Just seems strange to me someone in that sensitive position can
have 55 thousand pages of emails and none of them contain
classified information.
I would have thought on many days the Sec States daily schedule
would be classified.
[/quote]
I'm sure there were. Those 55,000 emails were just the one the
Clinton machine felt compelled to release. There's more. Just
like the basement session of paper sifting after Benghazi. I
really liked her excuse for doing this. She states that she
just figured that writing emails to those on the government
system would just be saved by them anyway. I'd like to know how
many she wrote to those not on the government system.
What I consider a twist of fate, General Petreaus has pleaded to
charges of mishandling confidential documents. Couldn't this be
considered the very same thing?
#Post#: 19429--------------------------------------------------
Re: The impoverished Clintons are at it again
By: trollslayer Date: March 10, 2015, 4:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hillary finally opens up, states she used a private email so she
could use just one device. A trained monkey with a flip phone
is capable of syncing more than one email account to a phone.
Then says she didn't do anything wrong, even though the Obama
administration says she did. Now she says her server is private
and says it is going to remain private. Maybe she should have
considered this before using it for government business.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page