URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Forum
  HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: National topics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 16798--------------------------------------------------
       Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: trollslayer
       Date: October 10, 2014, 3:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Despite bilateral legislation to the contrary, Obama is looking
       to use his pen to close Gitmo going around members of his own
       party.  This at a time when the US is at war with ISIS..  Check
       that.   ISIS is at war with us.  We aren't at war with anyone.
       I think we should just simplify the process and just parachute
       them into the area of Kobani Syria.  They would end up there
       anyway
       --- Quote ---
       > The White House is drafting options that would allow President
       Barack Obama to close the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay,
       Cuba, by overriding a congressional ban on bringing detainees to
       the U.S., senior administration officials said.
       >
       > Such a move would be the latest and potentially most dramatic
       use of executive power by the president in his second term. It
       would likely provoke a sharp reaction from lawmakers, who have
       repeatedly barred the transfer of detainees to the U.S.
       > The discussions underscore the president’s determination to
       follow through on an early campaign promise before he leaves the
       White House, officials said, despite the formidable domestic and
       international obstacles in the way.
       >
       > Administration officials say Mr. Obama strongly prefers a
       legislative solution over going around Congress. At the same
       time, a senior administration official said Mr. Obama is
       “unwavering in his commitment” to closing the prison—which
       currently has 149 inmates detained in connection with the
       nation’s post-9/11 war on terrorism—and wants to have all
       potential options available on an issue he sees as part of his
       legacy.
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML http://online.wsj.com/articles/obama-weighs-options-to-close-guantanamo-1412899358
       #Post#: 16802--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: rapids_60
       Date: October 10, 2014, 4:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And if he does not close it, the right will hammer it as a
       failed campaign promise.  Can't win either way.
       #Post#: 16803--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: trollslayer
       Date: October 10, 2014, 4:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
       >
       > And if he does not close it, the right will hammer it as a
       failed campaign promise.  Can't win either way.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You don't get it.  We're at war.  Whether or not you declare it
       or not.  The recidivism rate of Gitmo detainees is horrendous.
       Do you think it's appropriate to fulfill a campaign promise at
       the risk of our own National Security?  Wouldn't you call that
       kind of a mix up of priorities?
       #Post#: 16805--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: rapids_60
       Date: October 10, 2014, 4:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We house worse people in Federal Prisons, which is where these
       guys should be.
       Instead we house them with more of their own kind where they can
       share ideas and ideology.
       That's stupid.  In exactly what way has Gitmo worked in our
       favor?
       #Post#: 16806--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: trollslayer
       Date: October 10, 2014, 4:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
       >
       > We house worse people in Federal Prisons, which is where these
       guys should be.
       > Instead we house them with more of their own kind where they
       can share ideas and ideology.
       > That's stupid.  In exactly what way has Gitmo worked in our
       favor?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Easy question.  These guys aren't subject to our rights under
       the Constitution nor should they be.  They're prisoners of war.
       We may end up getting a few more of these in the not too distant
       future and they should be housed there as well.  Or do you think
       we should just give them a one way ticket back to the front
       lines?
       #Post#: 16809--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: rapids_60
       Date: October 10, 2014, 4:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They are not POW's until we declare a war.  They are considered
       unlawful enemy combatants and can be tried either by the US
       criminal court system or by a military tribunal.   Obama appears
       to favor the court system.  You may not like it, but as CIC it
       is his choice.
       If we DO declare a war, the POW's have to be released and
       repatriated when the war ends (Geneva Convention).  Even if they
       go home, reload and come right back.
       #Post#: 16811--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: Linda Lou
       Date: October 10, 2014, 6:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Maybe we should just put them in orange and behead them?
       #Post#: 16815--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: rapids_60
       Date: October 10, 2014, 8:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Or instead of  screwing around, declare war, get in there with
       the full force of the US military and clean house.
       This half-assed  sorta-war sorta-not nonsense will drag on for
       a decade and leaves too much of the process in legal limbo.
       #Post#: 16817--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: trollslayer
       Date: October 10, 2014, 10:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
       >
       > Or instead of  screwing around, declare war, get in there with
       the full force of the US military and clean house.
       > This half-assed  sorta-war sorta-not nonsense will drag on for
       a decade and leaves too much of the process in legal limbo.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       First, it may sound dumb but lets name this operation.  Then
       after naming it let's put it into action.  Once you name it you
       own it.  That seems to be the problem however.  Nobody seems to
       want to own it.  Then again bombing ISIS at a rate of a half a
       dozen bombs per day doesn't add anything to the coffers of the
       DNC.  That's what's really important right now.
       #Post#: 16821--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Obama to close Gitmo?  Really??
   DIR By: rapids_60
       Date: October 10, 2014, 11:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: trollslayer link ---
       >
       > That seems to be the problem however.  Nobody seems to want to
       own it.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       They sure don't. For good reason.  Our political system is so
       screwed up, whatever side "owns" it will be beaten over the head
       with it by the opposing party.  Even if it's what's best for the
       country.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 8
   DIR Next Page