DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The Forum
HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Worldwide topics
*****************************************************
#Post#: 15903--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: Snickers Date: September 7, 2014, 4:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=trollslayer link=topic=1216.msg15898#msg15898
date=1410120919]
I really don't understand why you can't comprehend the obvious.
There was a wait order. This is not under any kind of dispute by
anybody but yourself. Its pretty obvious that you're just
trolling. If you have nothing more of sustance to add I'll leave
you to your ruminations
[/quote]
FTB is a troll.
He will post the most outlandish and despicable things just to
get a reaction.
That's what he is all about.
#Post#: 15913--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: rapids_60 Date: September 7, 2014, 8:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=trollslayer link=topic=1216.msg15877#msg15877
date=1410094701]
Yes, another exercise in semantics, it wasn't a stand down
order, it was a wait order,
[/quote]
Apparently one issued for legitimate reasons, to attempt to send
in locals to protect the cover of a valuable CIA installation in
an unstable part of the world. This has been out in the open
for several months. No bombshell here, sorry.
Exactly where do you find wrongdoing in that? What has been
covered up?
Poorly thought out in retrospect? Sure. The correct decision
is always clear looking backwards.
[quote]To try to push this off as another conspiracy by Fox
discredits and degrades what these men fought for.[/quote]
Sorry Trolly. Taking a wait order that's been known about for
months, one that was issued for reasons made public long ago
and making it a brand new bombshell "game changer" (Brett
Baier's words, not mine) is another attempt to create a
conspiracy by Fox. Nothing more, nothing less. It has nothing
to do with what these men fought for.
#Post#: 15914--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: rapids_60 Date: September 7, 2014, 8:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=FTB41 link=topic=1216.msg15888#msg15888
date=1410108664]
What was Fox's report on the Republican led House Intelligence
committee on Benghazi? [/quote]
They pretended it did not exist. The silence was so complete
and total, other media outlets actually commented on it. ;D
Why? Because it didn't fit the Fox narrative that Obama is
guilty of something.
They're carrying on with that agenda as though the House
investigation never happened and the faithful are hanging on
every word, eagerly anticipating that smoking gun that isn't
coming. If it weren't so transparently obvious it would be
pathetic.
But you already knew that, didn't you. :D
#Post#: 15917--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: rapids_60 Date: September 7, 2014, 8:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Snickers link=topic=1216.msg15883#msg15883
date=1410101382]
Obama is planning on by passing Congress yet once again.
[/quote]
Actually, he's not. He's asked Congress to have options on his
desk after November. The "pen and a phone" thing got shelved.
But here's a question for you: would executive action happen if
Congress were doing it's job?
#Post#: 15918--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 7, 2014, 9:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]Apparently one issued for legitimate reasons, to attempt
to send in locals to protect the cover of a valuable CIA
installation in an unstable part of the world. [/quote]
Yeah, the locals showed up all right. Shooting mortars quite
precisely and burning the compound. The so called soldiers that
were supposed to protect the compound ran.
[quote]Sorry Trolly. Taking a wait order that's been known about
for months, one that was issued for reasons made public long ago
and making it a brand new bombshell "game changer" (Brett
Baier's words, not mine) is another attempt to create a
conspiracy by Fox.[/quote]
A revelation that State continues to downplay. Again, I ask,
when does the wait order (that F continues to deny) that never
was rescinded become a stand down order. You of all people are
arguing semantics.
The fact that all lefties continue to ignore, Obama created this
environment. Obama left the consulate open to this attack, on
9-11 of all days. Do you seriously think this would have
happened if Obama didn't have Qaddaffi killed. If Obama
wouldn't have insisted on a "light footprint" a few miles away
from terrorists training camps, then have his light footprint
get caught flat footed on 9-11? Hillary as well? Gross
incompetence no matter how you look at it.
#Post#: 15919--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: rapids_60 Date: September 7, 2014, 9:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=trollslayer link=topic=1216.msg15918#msg15918
date=1410142956]
Again, I ask, when does the wait order (that F continues to
deny) that never was rescinded become a stand down order.
[/quote]
We'll never know. No order to engage was ever issued as the men
left of their own accord.
But this is all beside the point. FOX has this "newly
discovered order" on their front page again today under the
heading "smoking gun".
It isn't new and nobody can tell me where the smoke is.
Where is the proof this is anything more than a poor decision by
the CIA station chief?
[quote]
The fact that all lefties continue to ignore, Obama created this
environment.
[/quote]
Ah. The catch-all reason to blame Obama surfaces, and I agree he
made some really bad decisions. The guy's incompetent. Big
news.
But that's basically all there is here- bad decisions. Sure
seems like some want to read a lot more than that into it.
#Post#: 15920--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: FTB41 Date: September 8, 2014, 5:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Obama created turmoil in the middle east?
and here I thought it was an issue since THE DAWN OF FRICKIN
TIME.
No Trolly, you cannot blame Obama for being responsible for the
embassy attack in Benghazi because of "creating this
environment". By the same reasoning, Bush jr is responsible for
ISIS, Rome is responsible for the traffic in Northern England
and George Washington is responsible for the partisan gridlock
in DC.
Besides, Righties don't believe in human created climate change,
anyways. Must be part of Syria's natural cycle or sunspots or
whatever.
#Post#: 15921--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 8, 2014, 6:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]But that's basically all there is here- bad decisions.
Sure seems like some want to read a lot more than that into it.
[/quote]
Bingo give the man a prize. There is nothing more to read into
it. A lot of bad decisions that created a lot of bad outcomes,
including some loss of American lives. Then engaged in some
twisting of the truth afterwards. More bad decisions..
#Post#: 15922--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 8, 2014, 7:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote] Obama created turmoil in the middle east?
[/quote]
When you start the post off with such a poorly constructed straw
man it's hard to take the rest of the post seriously. Funny how
those most hyper partisan blame Bush for everything that
happened/happening in Iraq but fail to see Obama's meddling in
Libya as a contributing factor in anything.
[quote]No Trolly, you cannot blame Obama for being responsible
for the embassy attack in Benghazi because of "creating this
environment". By the same reasoning, Bush jr is responsible for
ISIS, [/quote]
You and your fellow fringe element have declared this already,
however it's a moot point. When Obama withdrew troops from
Iraq, he declared it a "stable country". When the US stopped
bombing Libya it was anything but.
HTML https://grabien.com/story.php?id=9857
Btw, ISIS grew out of Syria, not Iraq post Bush. You may wish
to brush up on the topics you post about before you post about
them. I makes you look a little Snorfy
#Post#: 15927--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 8, 2014, 10:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Time for a (F)acation
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page