DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The Forum
HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Worldwide topics
*****************************************************
#Post#: 15884--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: FTB41 Date: September 7, 2014, 10:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/mitt-smirk.jpg
Tragic, just tragic.
#Post#: 15888--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: FTB41 Date: September 7, 2014, 11:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hey Trolly, I'm curious about something and you'd be in a better
position to answer this than I would. I don't watch FOX (or
MSNBC) but you apparently site FOX reports as a reliable source,
so you must. What was Fox's report on the Republican led House
Intelligence committee on Benghazi? I searched their site, and
I can seem to find them saying ANYTHING about it. Weird huh?
Maybe I'm wrong. Can you point me out to where FOX reported on
that?
#Post#: 15889--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 7, 2014, 12:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]I don't watch FOX (or MSNBC) but you apparently site FOX
reports as a reliable source,[/quote]
Straw man, no more needs to be said.
[quote]What was Fox's report on the Republican led House
Intelligence committee on Benghazi?[/quote]
No idea. I rarely am on the Fox site and as I've said in the
past, I get my news from various sources excluding MSNBC.
Considering you say you don't watch Fox you seem to spend a
large amount of time talking about something you profess to know
nothing about.
[quote]Can you point me out to where FOX reported on
that?[/quote]
I've learned long ago not to post anything for you.
#Post#: 15890--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: FTB41 Date: September 7, 2014, 12:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It was a rhetorical question anyways. I don't really expect you
to give a straight answer to anything. I scare you too much.
Point is, FOX has very little credibility when it comes to
reporting on Benghazi if they only report on side of the story.
This latest bit of Benghazi hype is no different, but it doesn't
matter. True believers like yourself will never be swayed to
the contrary.
Everyone else sees it for what it is.
HTML http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/mitt-smirk.jpg
#Post#: 15893--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 7, 2014, 12:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]It was a rhetorical question anyways. I don't really
expect you to give a straight answer to anything. I scare you
too much. [/quote]
If you're able to ascertain this from the "tone" of my postings
this little ditty goes to show just how inaccurate your ability
to judge the tone of any posting really is. Being fearful of
an internet poster just doesn't make sense. Not only is this
another straw man but it is a complete delusion of grandeur. It
sounds a lot like Snorfin bragging about the intellectual
prowess he claims he has but never shows.
I chose not to answer because I don't know that much about Fox
or it's website. When I don't know I don't respond. Try it for
a change.
[quote]Point is, FOX has very little credibility when it comes
to reporting on Benghazi if they only report on side of the
story. [/quote]
Says the guy who professes to not watching Fox. This wasn't a
Fox report, this was a special about a book written by the
people who were there. If you wish to discredit these soldiers,
read the book, watch the special. Until then see sentence above
about responding to things you know nothing about.
#Post#: 15895--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: FTB41 Date: September 7, 2014, 2:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Just a revision of the zombie "stand down" lie that has
officially been debunked many times over, despite it being
aggressively pushed by both Republican leadership and
conservative media (with FOX leading the charge).
As for those operatives, who knows? Maybe they saw the
potential dollar signs from writing a book that tells
conservatives what they desperately want to hear. I don't see
any reason why I should believe them over the multiple official
reports to the contrary, especially since some of those reports
come from the very people that would profit the most from it
being true.
#Post#: 15896--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 7, 2014, 2:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]Just a revision of the zombie "stand down" lie that has
officially been debunked many times over, despite it being
aggressively pushed by both Republican leadership and
conservative media (with FOX leading the charge). [/quote]
F, nobody denies there was a wait order. Perhaps you should do
a little research before you continue to show how little you
know about a topic. There is nothing revised here.
[quote]As for those operatives, who knows? Maybe they saw the
potential dollar signs from writing a book that tells
conservatives what they desperately want to hear. [/quote]
You would rather impune the word of operatives who were actually
there than look at information that's readily available. Look
it up F. The wait order exists. The link posted by Rapids from
MediaMatters even says so. You would rather discredit those wo
put their lives on the line and ignore the facts. More Vietnam
syndrome from the Liberal party 35 years later. Either show
where what they said was incorrect or STFU. Stop trying to
discredit those who put their lives on the line. They have more
to lose by putting out this book than not. This puts you into
the lowest of the lows, (again)
#Post#: 15897--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: FTB41 Date: September 7, 2014, 3:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ah, so now anyone who was in service is now above reproach?
This is stupid, even for a RWNJ.
I'd say your capacity for critical thought is what hit an
all-time low.
#Post#: 15898--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: trollslayer Date: September 7, 2014, 3:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=FTB41 link=topic=1216.msg15897#msg15897
date=1410120513]
Ah, so now anyone who was in service is now above reproach?
This is stupid, even for a RWNJ.
I'd say your capacity for critical thought is what hit an
all-time low.
[/quote] I really don't understand why you can't comprehend the
obvious. There was a wait order. This is not under any kind of
dispute by anybody but yourself. Its pretty obvious that you're
just trolling. If you have nothing more of sustance to add I'll
leave you to your ruminations
#Post#: 15902--------------------------------------------------
Re: 13 hours at Benghazi
By: Snickers Date: September 7, 2014, 4:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Linda
Here's something on Obama's delay on immigration until after the
November elections.
HTML http://news.yahoo.com/obama-immigration-delay-raw-politics-principle-both-maybe-120550940.html
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page