DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The Forum
HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: National topics
*****************************************************
#Post#: 14130--------------------------------------------------
Romney 2016?
DIR By: FTB41
Date: June 22, 2014, 9:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/06/19/poll-romney-the-frontrunner-in-2016/
CNN poll recently shows ol Mittens as the frontrunner for the
2016 GOP presidential pick.
Yeah, I know, polls this far out are about as accurate as
reading tea leaves so this article is basically pointless, and
nevermind the fact that Mitt himself says he isn't going to
run...but it does bring up an interesting question. Given the
weak field of GOP candidates, WOULD you support Romney?
#Post#: 14134--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: FTB41
Date: June 22, 2014, 10:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thing is, who else do they really have thats any better?
At this point, it looks like Jeb Bush is their best chance. How
desperate do you have to be to consider another Bush for your
nominee?
#Post#: 14141--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: trollslayer
Date: June 22, 2014, 11:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: FTB41 link ---
>
> Thing is, who else do they really have thats any better?
> At this point, it looks like Jeb Bush is their best chance.
How desperate do you have to be to consider another Bush for
your nominee?
>
--- End Quote ---
About as desperate as considering another Clinton for a nominee
I guess. Funny how some overlook the obvious.
#Post#: 14143--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: FTB41
Date: June 22, 2014, 11:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Now now, lets not shift the topic. You know how the admin hates
that.
So who you rooting for at this stage, Trolly? Anyone in
particular or are you just gonna jump on the bandwagon of
whoever makes it through the primaries alive?
#Post#: 14145--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: trollslayer
Date: June 22, 2014, 12:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: FTB41 link ---
>
> Now now, lets not shift the topic. You know how the admin
hates that.
>
> So who you rooting for at this stage, Trolly? Anyone in
particular or are you just gonna jump on the bandwagon of
whoever makes it through the primaries alive?
>
--- End Quote ---
That was the topic. You dead enders laugh at putting the same
ole same ole into office then turn around and nominate the same
ole same ole. Nothing like advertising you're wearing blinders.
I'm not for anyone at this point in time. So if not Clinton,
who do the Dem's have? Biden? LOL!!
#Post#: 14150--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: rapids_60
Date: June 22, 2014, 12:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: trollslayer link ---
>
> About as desperate as considering another Clinton for a
nominee I guess. Funny how some overlook the obvious.
>
--- End Quote ---
Well, except Bills popularity is on top of the heap while
George's is holding up the bottom.
Romney would be a better bet than Christie, Bush, Walker or the
rest of the current lineup. He's a bit more moderate. Which is
exactly why he would not get the nomination again.
His own party thought he wasn't conservative enough last time,
which caused Mitt to make an artificial swing hard right. That
cost him, he wasn't comfortable there.
#Post#: 14153--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: FTB41
Date: June 22, 2014, 2:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: trollslayer link ---
>
> That was the topic. You dead enders laugh at putting the same
ole same ole into office then turn around and nominate the same
ole same ole. Nothing like advertising you're wearing blinders.
I'm not for anyone at this point in time. So if not Clinton,
who do the Dem's have? Biden? LOL!!
>
--- End Quote ---
I'm not particularly happy with Clinton. Not for nutty
Republican reasons though...I just don't like her.
Unfortunately, she's probably what we're going to be stuck with
from the D's. Personally I'd love to see an actual moderate or
progressive run instead of the typical Republican lites like
Obama or Clinton. I sorta like Biden, but probably not for
president. Elizabeth Warren would get my vote, but she's not
running.
See? Direct answers are easy. Try them.
#Post#: 14156--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: Mr.steve
Date: June 22, 2014, 3:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> I sorta like Biden, but probably not for president. Elizabeth
Warren would get my vote, but she's not running.
--- End Quote ---
LMAO! With your "direct" type answer, it shows why there is a
NEED to test people for an IQ above say 50 in order to vote. You
would be barred from ever casting a ballot..... EVER!
#Post#: 14157--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: FTB41
Date: June 22, 2014, 3:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Mr.steve link ---
>
>
> LMAO! With your "direct" type answer, it shows why there is a
NEED to test people for an IQ above say 50 in order to vote. You
would be barred from ever casting a ballot..... EVER!
>
>
--- End Quote ---
Trolly, your intellectual hero has spoken. What wit! What
eloquence!
#Post#: 14159--------------------------------------------------
Re: Romney 2016?
DIR By: trollslayer
Date: June 22, 2014, 4:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Mr.steve link ---
>
>
> LMAO! With your "direct" type answer, it shows why there is a
NEED to test people for an IQ above say 50 in order to vote. You
would be barred from ever casting a ballot..... EVER!
>
--- End Quote ---
Funny how you would vote for a white woman who disparaged Native
Americans by trying to portray herself as one of them for votes.
Another case of select phony outrage.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page