URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Forum
  HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: State and local topics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 13742--------------------------------------------------
       Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: Jeepers
       Date: June 7, 2014, 12:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have no problem with same sex marriages being legal as long as
       churches aren't forced to perform same sex weddings.
       My question is more about judges. Just how much power do judges
       have to overturn or block things that a state votes on or laws a
       state wants to pass? For example: Same sex marriages, legalizing
       pot, voter ID, illegal immigration, concealed carry, etc.
       #Post#: 13748--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: Mr.steve
       Date: June 7, 2014, 8:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Most judges today feel the need to legislate from the bench. Its
       a sad sad world we live in.
       #Post#: 13752--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: trollslayer
       Date: June 7, 2014, 9:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Linda link ---
       >
       > Gay people wouldn't want to be married in any church that
       didn't want them, so that question is moot.
       >
       > Finally, a GOOD day in Wisconsin. Marriage rights for
       EVERYONE.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I beg to differ.  Gay people want to force those to make cakes
       for them that don't want to, so what is the difference?
       #Post#: 13756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: trollslayer
       Date: June 7, 2014, 10:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Linda link ---
       >
       > Oh, please. I heard that story. No self-respecting gay couple
       would want a wedding cake from a freakin' GROCERY STORE.  ;D
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       There's the straw man fallacy again.  I would much rather get a
       cake from a grocery store than somebody who doesn't want to make
       one for me, wouldn't you?
       #Post#: 13761--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: Snickers
       Date: June 7, 2014, 10:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Jeepers link ---
       >
       > I have no problem with same sex marriages being legal as long
       as churches aren't forced to perform same sex weddings.
       >
       > My question is more about judges. Just how much power do
       judges have to overturn or block things that a state votes on or
       laws a state wants to pass? For example: Same sex marriages,
       legalizing pot, voter ID, illegal immigration, concealed carry,
       etc.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Those Judges are political activists.
       #Post#: 13763--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: FTB41
       Date: June 7, 2014, 10:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Predicable, whenever a judge rules against a conservative cause,
       they cry judicial activism.   Way to be on the wrong side of
       history, bigots.
       --- Quote from: trollslayer link ---
       >
       > There's the straw man fallacy again.  I would much rather get
       a cake from a grocery store than somebody who doesn't want to
       make one for me, wouldn't you?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You keep using that phrase.  You really need to google it.
       Honestly though, I think the couple in question baited the bigot
       baker, and the fool fell for it.
       #Post#: 13766--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: Snickers
       Date: June 7, 2014, 12:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FTB41 link ---
       >
       > Predicable, whenever a judge rules against a conservative
       cause, they cry judicial activism.   Way to be on the wrong side
       of history, bigots.
       >
       >
       > You keep using that phrase.  You really need to google it.
       >
       > Honestly though, I think the couple in question baited the
       bigot baker, and the fool fell for it.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Read my post again.
       I never said anything about gay marriages or what I may think
       about them.
       I only gave an opinion on those kinds of Judges. So don't try
       to label me as a bigot.
       
       #Post#: 13768--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: FTB41
       Date: June 7, 2014, 1:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Snickers, I've known you long enough to be able to label you
       that for many, many other reasons besides this latest tidbit.
       As for crying "judicial activism" every time a ruling doesn't go
       your way, modern conservatives have a long history of that kind
       of baseless whining when the laws they like are found to be
       unconstitutional and discriminating.   I'm sure the
       Snickers-type people of old found the Brown vs Board of
       Education ruling to be "judicial activism" as well.
       This was a ruling on weather or not banning gay marriage was
       constitutional.
       Its not.
       #Post#: 13772--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: Snickers
       Date: June 7, 2014, 1:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FTB41 link ---
       >
       > Snickers, I've known you long enough to be able to label you
       that for many, many other reasons besides this latest tidbit.
       >
       > As for crying "judicial activism" every time a ruling doesn't
       go your way, modern conservatives have a long history of that
       kind of baseless whining when the laws they like are found to be
       unconstitutional and discriminating.   I'm sure the
       Snickers-type people of old found the Brown vs Board of
       Education ruling to be "judicial activism" as well.
       >
       > This was a ruling on weather or not banning gay marriage was
       constitutional.
       > Its not.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       
       Justify your labeling me as being bigot.
       Provide proof of it.
       Without that it is nothing but an offensive personal attack.
       FT why are you such an angry person?
       #Post#: 13775--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
   DIR By: trollslayer
       Date: June 7, 2014, 2:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Linda link ---
       >
       > The story I heard was it was a grocery store bakery that
       wouldn't do the cake...
       >
       >
       > Whoever it was, suing was not the answer. I think the bad
       publicity the baker got probably cost him a lot of business.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I may be a little old fashioned, but I believe a business should
       have a right to do business with whomever they want.  To have
       the courts rule otherwise IMO is a violation of the business's
       rights.  If you choose to exclude enough people you go out of
       business.  It should be considered a business decision.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page