URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Forum
  HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: State and local topics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 13742--------------------------------------------------
       Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: Jeepers Date: June 7, 2014, 12:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have no problem with same sex marriages being legal as long as
       churches aren't forced to perform same sex weddings.
       My question is more about judges. Just how much power do judges
       have to overturn or block things that a state votes on or laws a
       state wants to pass? For example: Same sex marriages, legalizing
       pot, voter ID, illegal immigration, concealed carry, etc.
       #Post#: 13748--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: Mr.steve Date: June 7, 2014, 8:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Most judges today feel the need to legislate from the bench. Its
       a sad sad world we live in.
       #Post#: 13752--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: trollslayer Date: June 7, 2014, 9:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Linda link=topic=1088.msg13749#msg13749
       date=1402149904]
       Gay people wouldn't want to be married in any church that didn't
       want them, so that question is moot.
       Finally, a GOOD day in Wisconsin. Marriage rights for EVERYONE.
       [/quote]
       I beg to differ.  Gay people want to force those to make cakes
       for them that don't want to, so what is the difference?
       #Post#: 13756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: trollslayer Date: June 7, 2014, 10:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Linda link=topic=1088.msg13753#msg13753
       date=1402152257]
       Oh, please. I heard that story. No self-respecting gay couple
       would want a wedding cake from a freakin' GROCERY STORE.  ;D
       [/quote]
       There's the straw man fallacy again.  I would much rather get a
       cake from a grocery store than somebody who doesn't want to make
       one for me, wouldn't you?
       #Post#: 13761--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: Snickers Date: June 7, 2014, 10:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Jeepers link=topic=1088.msg13742#msg13742
       date=1402120571]
       I have no problem with same sex marriages being legal as long as
       churches aren't forced to perform same sex weddings.
       My question is more about judges. Just how much power do judges
       have to overturn or block things that a state votes on or laws a
       state wants to pass? For example: Same sex marriages, legalizing
       pot, voter ID, illegal immigration, concealed carry, etc.
       [/quote]
       Those Judges are political activists.
       #Post#: 13763--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: FTB41 Date: June 7, 2014, 10:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Predicable, whenever a judge rules against a conservative cause,
       they cry judicial activism.   Way to be on the wrong side of
       history, bigots.
       [quote author=trollslayer link=topic=1088.msg13756#msg13756
       date=1402153751]
       There's the straw man fallacy again.  I would much rather get a
       cake from a grocery store than somebody who doesn't want to make
       one for me, wouldn't you?
       [/quote]
       You keep using that phrase.  You really need to google it.
       Honestly though, I think the couple in question baited the bigot
       baker, and the fool fell for it.
       #Post#: 13766--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: Snickers Date: June 7, 2014, 12:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=FTB41 link=topic=1088.msg13763#msg13763
       date=1402156047]
       Predicable, whenever a judge rules against a conservative cause,
       they cry judicial activism.   Way to be on the wrong side of
       history, bigots.
       You keep using that phrase.  You really need to google it.
       Honestly though, I think the couple in question baited the bigot
       baker, and the fool fell for it.
       [/quote]
       Read my post again.
       I never said anything about gay marriages or what I may think
       about them.
       I only gave an opinion on those kinds of Judges. So don't try
       to label me as a bigot.
       
       #Post#: 13768--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: FTB41 Date: June 7, 2014, 1:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Snickers, I've known you long enough to be able to label you
       that for many, many other reasons besides this latest tidbit.
       As for crying "judicial activism" every time a ruling doesn't go
       your way, modern conservatives have a long history of that kind
       of baseless whining when the laws they like are found to be
       unconstitutional and discriminating.   I'm sure the
       Snickers-type people of old found the Brown vs Board of
       Education ruling to be "judicial activism" as well.
       This was a ruling on weather or not banning gay marriage was
       constitutional.
       Its not.
       #Post#: 13772--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: Snickers Date: June 7, 2014, 1:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=FTB41 link=topic=1088.msg13768#msg13768
       date=1402164340]
       Snickers, I've known you long enough to be able to label you
       that for many, many other reasons besides this latest tidbit.
       As for crying "judicial activism" every time a ruling doesn't go
       your way, modern conservatives have a long history of that kind
       of baseless whining when the laws they like are found to be
       unconstitutional and discriminating.   I'm sure the
       Snickers-type people of old found the Brown vs Board of
       Education ruling to be "judicial activism" as well.
       This was a ruling on weather or not banning gay marriage was
       constitutional.
       Its not.
       [/quote]
       Justify your labeling me as being bigot.
       Provide proof of it.
       Without that it is nothing but an offensive personal attack.
       FT why are you such an angry person?
       #Post#: 13775--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Judge Overturns Wisconsin's Gay Marriage Ban
       By: trollslayer Date: June 7, 2014, 2:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Linda link=topic=1088.msg13757#msg13757
       date=1402153990]
       The story I heard was it was a grocery store bakery that
       wouldn't do the cake...
       Whoever it was, suing was not the answer. I think the bad
       publicity the baker got probably cost him a lot of business.
       [/quote]
       I may be a little old fashioned, but I believe a business should
       have a right to do business with whomever they want.  To have
       the courts rule otherwise IMO is a violation of the business's
       rights.  If you choose to exclude enough people you go out of
       business.  It should be considered a business decision.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page