DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The Forum
HTML https://thewiforum.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: National topics
*****************************************************
#Post#: 12951--------------------------------------------------
More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: trollslayer
Date: April 18, 2014, 7:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This time by MediaMatters.
HTML http://www.tpnn.com/2014/04/17/irony-george-soros-funded-media-matters-fights-unionization/
#Post#: 15978--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: Snickers
Date: September 12, 2014, 7:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Teachers Union Wants To Amend Constitution To Limit EVERYONE
ELSE’S Campaign Speech
HTML https://screen.yahoo.com/teachers-union-wants-amend-constitution-135543454.html
They want to put an end to everyone else's right to contribute
to political campaigns.
But at the same time they want to be able to give as much money
as they want to their chosen candidate's political campaigns.
#Post#: 15982--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: rapids_60
Date: September 12, 2014, 7:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
There need to be limits and they need to be applied uniformly.
There is no shortage of hypocrisy on both sides of this.
#Post#: 15984--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: Snickers
Date: September 12, 2014, 7:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
>
> There need to be limits and they need to be applied uniformly.
There is no shortage of hypocrisy on both sides of this.
>
--- End Quote ---
I don't see conservatives wanting to end anyone's free speech
rights when it come to elections.
#Post#: 15986--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: rapids_60
Date: September 12, 2014, 7:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Snickers link ---
>
> I don't see conservatives wanting to end anyone's free speech
rights when it come to elections.
>
--- End Quote ---
Depends on how you view voter ID laws and shortening polling
place hours.
#Post#: 15990--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: trollslayer
Date: September 12, 2014, 8:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
>
> Depends on how you view voter ID laws and shortening polling
place hours.
>
--- End Quote ---
That'll keep them dam liberals from voting. I think the IRS as
done more to silence voices than any party could think to so
far.
Of course there's that blatant attempt by Reid and Senate
democrats to gut the first amendment. As if there is nothing
more important to do in the brief time the Senate is in session.
HTML http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/uncategorized/217270-reids-assault-on-political-freedom
#Post#: 16001--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: wmd102
Date: September 13, 2014, 7:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
>
> Depends on how you view voter ID laws and shortening polling
place hours.
>
--- End Quote ---
One vote for one person, you consider that a limit on voting. ;)
#Post#: 16023--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: rapids_60
Date: September 14, 2014, 1:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: wmd102 link ---
>
> One vote for one person, you consider that a limit on voting.
;)
>
>
--- End Quote ---
Nope.
I consider requiring people to pay money and jump through
hoops to obtain an ID a limit on voting.
Particularly since the state cannot offer one single case of
fraud an ID requirement would have prevented.
#Post#: 16029--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: trollslayer
Date: September 14, 2014, 7:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
>
> Particularly since the state cannot offer one single case of
fraud an ID requirement would have prevented.
>
--- End Quote ---
That's like saying you don't have mice because you don't see
them. Whoops, here's just one. I can find more.
--- Quote ---
> A Shorewood man has been charged with more than a dozen counts
of illegal voting, accused of casting multiple ballots in four
elections in 2011 and 2012, including five in the 2012
gubernatorial recall.
>
> Robert D. Monroe, 50, used addresses in Shorewood, Milwaukee
and Indiana, according to the complaint, and cast some votes in
the names of his son and his girlfriend's son.
>
--- End Quote ---
HTML http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/shorewood-man-charged-with-13-counts-of-voter-fraud-b99297733z1-264322221.html
#Post#: 16030--------------------------------------------------
Re: More liberal hypocrisy
DIR By: wmd102
Date: September 14, 2014, 8:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rapids_60 link ---
>
> Nope.
> I consider requiring people to pay money and jump through
hoops to obtain an ID a limit on voting.
> Particularly since the state cannot offer one single case of
fraud an ID requirement would have prevented.
>
--- End Quote ---
Let me see. What do tobacco, alcohol, lottery tickets and
medical weed all require? (besides cash) I know, some form of
ID! ;D
And who purchases the most of these products? Those same poor
people! :o >:(
BTW the "cost" of id photo ID is being passed to people who get
their id and not complain about it.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page