DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Wagon Mafia
  HTML https://thewagonmafia.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 34--------------------------------------------------
       A hope in seismic prediction
   DIR By: seo chandna
       Date: September 3, 2023, 6:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As things stand, some believe that the best possible outcome is
       for Ukraine to negotiate and give up its ambitions to join the
       North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). How would you respond
       to that argument? And, in more general terms, how does the
       Social Movement view the issue of NATO and its role in this war?
       First of all, we think that any intention to join NATO cannot
       justify the Russian invasion. This is an issue that is in the
       field of internal debate and national sovereignty. Secondly, we
       see NATO as a club of the richest countries and their allies.
       For Ukraine, it would be better to develop relations with all
       Phone Number Listy
  HTML http://americaemail.me
       and ensure real independence. Third, it
       is important to realize how the NATO issue has impacted
       Ukrainian political life. The prospect of membership was very
       vague: NATO has never guaranteed Ukraine's membership. So an
       “Atlantic orientation” was always more of a case of wishful
       thinking on the part of the government, whereas for the
       citizenry it was a reaction to the collective trauma and fear of
       war in 2014. NATO could have offered Ukraine membership long
       ago, but instead promised some kind of cooperation, which only
       left Ukraine vulnerable. We believe that NATO has played the
       role of passive spectator in this war.
  HTML https://static.wixstatic.com/media/5f5cc3_de20c1649a2247138db1e7faf83ab1c5~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_421,h_248,al_c,lg_1,q_85,enc_auto/5f5cc3_de20c1649a2247138db1e7faf83ab1c5~mv2.png
  HTML http://americaemail.me
       Since the end of 2021, they have not done anything decisive to
       support Ukraine with weapons. It seems that they are more
       interested in assessing the strength of the Russian army. There
       have been debates on the issue of sending weapons to Ukraine.
       Some oppose this saying it would only contribute to the
       remilitarization of Europe and the empowerment of NATO. Others
       say it will lead to a scenario like Afghanistan in the 1980s,
       with the Ukrainians being used to achieve the US goal of
       undermining Russia. What is your position on this issue? I see
       no reason for a debate like this.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1