DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The NCSA
HTML https://thencsa.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Legal Library
*****************************************************
#Post#: 389--------------------------------------------------
[IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 6, 2015, 7:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> Recognizing That we have new neighbors popping up on the map
and more importantly, joining our region every day. We can't
invite our friends in and allow them to be sitting ducks
immediately.
>
> Acknowledging Many long time members have had put numerous
hours, day and weeks into building some military forces that
would almost be mistaken for a joint world military from 2020. A
new member would not only have to take off of school or work for
a week to compete, let alone even have a chance to defend their
nations people.
>
> Considering That we want to encourage our new members to be
become instantly and heavily active and not turn them off
because they feel so far behind the ball.
>
>
> Congress Hereby Mandates That all nations in the region may
use a real world nations military forces (for equipment only,
not amount of troops) instead of creating their own ranking
system and describing every aspect of their arms, all the way
down to a handgun.( BESIDES NUCLEAR Systems & NUKES). It also
does not allow any nation in a current top 10 ranking to be
selected by use by a member. So no America and China style
forces would be selected.
>
> Noting that a nation selects a real world military nations
forces to use, they will not be able to be selected again unless
that member nation gives up rights. We need to realize that if
we want interested and excited role players, we can't have them
either sucking up to the biggest of nations or spending 40 hours
of their time on here just so they can make a role play and fear
****ing anyone off. GOD BLESS!
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> I motion to table this bill!
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> I second to table.
>
> Not only would this ABSOLUTELY ruin everyone's work, but it
would require everyone to be forced to things. Look at Missouri.
He des what you say. But he does that on his own. It's his
choice. I put a ton of work in and I'm proud of this. And yes,
there is rules against stealing intellectual property: it's
called copyright.
--- End Quote ---
Debate founder here:
HTML http://ncsa.createaforum.com/capitol-building/everything-but-the-nuclear-sink-bill/
"We shall start with the vote to table, please cast your votes
now"
#Post#: 393--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Gondor
Date: September 6, 2015, 7:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Aye to table!
#Post#: 401--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Esnax
Date: September 6, 2015, 7:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Can I ask a question about this bill first?
#Post#: 403--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 6, 2015, 7:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Esnax link ---
>
> Can I ask a question about this bill first?
>
--- End Quote ---
"The Member may ask clarification. No other discussion may be
held at this time."
#Post#: 405--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Esnax
Date: September 6, 2015, 7:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Would this bill make the players who wrote detailed factbooks,
give up theirs in favor of this new system or would this just be
for players who don't want to write out a detailed factbook?
#Post#: 416--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 6, 2015, 7:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Esnax link ---
>
> Would this bill make the players who wrote detailed factbooks,
give up theirs in favor of this new system or would this just be
for players who don't want to write out a detailed factbook?
>
--- End Quote ---
"I will allow for the Author to clarify this point. I must
stress that I will not have this turn into a conversation during
voting period."
OOC: Bamvino. One post response. That is it, by order of the
Chair.
#Post#: 442--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: West Phoenicia
Date: September 6, 2015, 8:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ooc. Bamivo is the creator of the Bill.
#Post#: 448--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 6, 2015, 9:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OOC: Apologizes WP, Bamivo, if he's here.
#Post#: 1030--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 7, 2015, 7:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Esnax link ---
>
> Would this bill make the players who wrote detailed factbooks,
give up theirs in favor of this new system or would this just be
for players who don't want to write out a detailed factbook?
>
--- End Quote ---
Congress Hereby Mandates That all nations in the region may use
a real world nations military forces (for equipment only, not
amount of troops) instead of creating their own ranking system
and describing every aspect of their arms, all the way down to a
handgun.( BESIDES NUCLEAR Systems & NUKES). It also does not
allow any nation in a current top 10 ranking to be selected by
use by a member. So no America and China style forces would be
selected.
Noting that a nation selects a real world military nations
forces to use, they will not be able to be selected again unless
that member nation gives up rights. We need to realize that if
we want interested and excited role players, we can't have them
either sucking up to the biggest of nations or spending 40 hours
of their time on here just so they can make a role play and fear
****ing anyone off. GOD BLESS!
Since Bamivo isn't here, I bolded the relevant section. Yes, it
says all nations MAY. So it is optional.
#Post#: 1042--------------------------------------------------
Re: [IC-Bill] Everything But The Nuclear Sink Bill Failed
DIR By: Confederacy of Turkducken
Date: September 7, 2015, 7:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Also this would be OOC as it handles metagame content, I will
support this, as not everyone enjoys or has the knowledge of the
military industrial complex or the hierarchy of militant
systems.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 3
DIR Next Page