DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
The NCSA
HTML https://thencsa.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Legal Library
*****************************************************
#Post#: 382--------------------------------------------------
[DEAD-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 6, 2015, 6:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> REALIZING:That the states are sovereign entities, as set forth
in the Constitution, and they have the right to keep and bear
arms.
> Also REALIZING: That nuclear weapons are an extremely
dangerous threat to the safety of the region, and must be
regulated in some way that keeps the sovereignty of the states
intact.
> ACKNOWLEDGING:That states have the right to free trade.
> OBSERVRING:That Congress has the ability to make all needful
laws about the property of the NCSA, and its lands, and that it
is the duty of the Confederate government to protect the states
from domestic violence.
> DEFINING:Trade as the action of buying and selling goods and
services.
> ALSO DEFINING:Trade goods as any of the following:
> 1. trade good - articles of commerce trade good - articles
of commerce
> commodity, good
> artefact, artifact - a man-made object taken as a whole
> staple, basic - (usually plural) a necessary commodity for
which demand is constant
> consumer goods - goods (as food or clothing) intended for
direct use or consumption
> drygoods, soft goods - textiles or clothing and related
merchandise
> entrant - a commodity that enters competition with established
merchandise; "a well publicized entrant is the pocket computer"
> export, exportation - commodities (goods or services) sold to
a foreign country
> fancy goods - goods that are chiefly ornamental
> fungible - a commodity that is freely interchangeable with
another in satisfying an obligation
> future - bulk commodities bought or sold at an agreed price
for delivery at a specified future date
> import, importation - commodities (goods or services) bought
from a foreign country
> merchandise, product, ware - commodities offered for sale;
"good business depends on having good merchandise"; "that store
offers a variety of products"
> middling - any commodity of intermediate quality or size
(especially when coarse particles of ground wheat are mixed with
bran)
> shopping - the commodities purchased from stores; "she loaded
her shopping into the car"women carrying home shopping didn't
give me a second glance"
> sporting goods - sports equipment sold as a commodity
> worldly good, worldly possession - a commodity or good
associated with the earthly, rather than the spiritual,
existence of human beings
> salvage - property or goods saved from damage or destruction
> Noting:That nuclear weapons and their blueprints are not a
service, but simply a danger to the region, and that they do not
fall under the definition of a trade good. Therefore, the buying
and selling of nuclear weapons and their blueprints shall not
fall under the auspices of trade, but dangerous proliferation.
>
> Congress hereby mandates:That the trade and sell of nuclear
weapons, and their blueprints or schematics from state to state,
is henceforth illegal, for the peace and security of the
NeoConfederate States of America.
>
> To ensure that this law is enforced, a new government agency
shall be established.
>
> 1. This agency shall be called the Nuclear Proliferation
Agency, or NPA.
> 2. The job of this organization shall be to watch for the
proliferation of nuclear weapons and their blueprints, and to
stop them.
> 3. The NPA shall be based in Richmond, but will have a small
station in every state.
> 4. The NPA shall be headed up by the Secretary of Defense,
under the ultimate direction of the President.
>
> If the NPA shall find a state to be illegally distributing
nuclear weapons or blueprints, it shall:
>
> 1. Investigate the situation to ensure that it is true.
> 2. Obtain a warrant from the Supreme Court in order to search
for and seize contraband.
> 3. If said contraband be a nuclear weapon, it will be
confiscated and dismantled, never to be used again.
> 4. If said contraband be blueprints, they shall be destroyed.
>
> If a state is found to be doing illicit actions as defined by
this bill, possible punishments shall be:
> 1.The prohibition of anyone from that state being a
presidential candidate.
> 2.An increased NPA presence in the state.
> 3. With a given warrant from the Supreme Court, it is possible
that a state's nuclear facilities may be searched for more
shipments of nuclear weapons or blueprints.
>
> Cases of this magnitude shall be brought before the Supreme
Court.
--- End Quote ---
Vote to Table: Failed 2-0-6
Debate found here:
HTML http://ncsa.createaforum.com/capitol-building/(bill-ic)-the-nuclear-weapons-proliferation-act/
(Please continue where we left off)
#Post#: 844--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 7, 2015, 4:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OOC: Bump!
#Post#: 849--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Confederacy of Turkducken
Date: September 7, 2015, 4:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I'll support this."
#Post#: 875--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Confederacy of Columbia
Date: September 7, 2015, 4:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Motion the bill to the table, I never thought I'd see this
overreaching wretch back."
#Post#: 913--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: West Phoenicia
Date: September 7, 2015, 4:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
We support this bill.
we would like to see the agency have proper representation from
both nuke supporting and anti nuke states.
we also find it governmental waste to have an EPA agency in
every state. And feel it would best to have just a HQ in
Richmond. If we could amend that?
While we believe the right of states to table a bill that may
not suit the best interest of their state or NCSA. Could we
propose that when someone tables they give an explanation why.
#Post#: 914--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Esnax
Date: September 7, 2015, 4:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
A vote to table the bill has already been attempted and it
failed.
#Post#: 937--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Imperial Celestiana
Date: September 7, 2015, 5:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Confederacy of Columbia link ---
>
> "Motion the bill to the table, I never thought I'd see this
overreaching wretch back."
>
--- End Quote ---
OOC: I need to clarify something here. You can't motion to table
if the motion to table has already failed. You may however,
motion to reconsider the previous motion (motion to table)
within a reasonable time frame and the motion be made from the
prevailing side of the vote.
#Post#: 1024--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: The Carolina Alliance
Date: September 7, 2015, 7:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm fine, as long as I can still make a nuclear weapons program.
They are essential for protection in this new age.
#Post#: 1038--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Confederacy of Turkducken
Date: September 7, 2015, 7:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"While the Representative from Carolina speaks some truth, I
would feel very afraid for the world if every Nation acquired a
nuclear weapon."
#Post#: 1391--------------------------------------------------
Re: [Bill-IC] The Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Act
DIR By: Confederacy of Columbia
Date: September 8, 2015, 12:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OOC: Hold on we went to war for this crap, we went to war over
this and the Police Bill and y'all are still gonna support this?
And with another war to protect servitude probably on the
horizon, you really wanna cause more ruckus?
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 4
DIR Next Page