DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Lady Killers
  HTML https://theladykillers.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 17--------------------------------------------------
       Instant Answers With Live Search
   DIR By: chandonarani55 sk
       Date: August 29, 2023, 11:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If during the Cold War the hegemonic geopolitical imagination
       spoke of a bipolar world, divided into two ideologically
       polarized blocs, since the fall of the Berlin Wall a hegemonic
       geopolitical imagination began to be forged based on global
       capitalist consensus. If we look at the "Decarbonization
       Consensus" from a perspective of sociohistorical processuality,
       we will see that among the three hegemonic consensuses in force
       in recent decades there are continuities and ruptures.
       Among the points of continuity, three main elements can be
       highlighted. The first is the inevitability discourse, which
       India Email List
  HTML https://dbtodata.com/india-email-data/
       that there is no
       alternative to these consensuses. This restriction of the world
       of the possible has been perfected over the last decades with
       different repertoires of social legitimation, be it access to
       consumption by the popular sectors or the rhetoric of breathing
       healthier air. Also, the "Consensus of theCommodities » was
       built on the idea that there was an agreement on the irrevocable
       or irresistible nature of the extractive dynamics, resulting
       from the growing world demand for raw materials, whose objective
       was to close the possibility of other alternatives. Similarly,
       the "Decarbonization Consensus" today intends to install the
       idea that, given the climate urgency, there is no other possible
       transition, and that the only existing and "realistic" one is
       the corporate transition.
  HTML https://zh-cn.indiaphonelist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/image_2023_08_29T07_29_31_891Z-300x182.png
  HTML https://dbtodata.com/india-email-data/
       Secondly, all these consensuses imply a greater concentration of
       power in non-democratic actors (large corporations, financial
       actors and international organizations), which undermine any
       possibility of democratic governance, much more so in a
       "transition" context. This manifests itself in two main ways. On
       the one hand, it is observed in the corporate capture of
       governance spaces. Areas such as the Conference of Parties ( cop
       ) which, as the supreme body of the United Nations Framework
       Convention on Climate Change, should be multilateral forums to
       advance in the fight against climate change, are increasingly a
       business fair for the green capitalism that maintains the energy
       power relations between the North and the South.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1