URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thaddeans
  HTML https://thaddeans.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Organised Religions
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 5497--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Gregory Date: May 21, 2023, 3:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No, Leslie, I don't 'believe what I like'. I believe the facts,
       which I outlined in my last post and which you choose to ignore
       or to come up with contrary information, if it even exists,
       rather than a curt, one-line dismissal. And the established
       facts are that over 4000 other people survived the explosion
       within the same area as the four priests. If only those four had
       survived, it would have been much more convincing, but not over
       4000 people. Also, the assertion by someone in your link that
       the priests suffered no after effects is untrue. The information
       about their subsequent radiation sickness was clearly not made
       up. It's based on recorded information at the time with names
       and hospital records and eyewitness testimony, including the
       priests' own rector.
       I have no axe to grind either way and no anti-religious agenda,
       just depending on factual information. If you want to simply
       deny all of that (which would require proof as I said) then I'm
       afraid it's you who wishes to believe what you like.
       #Post#: 5498--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Leslie Date: May 21, 2023, 3:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The facts are that the priests and other people who survived the
       explosion are certainly in the minority, and at least one of
       them did not suffer from radiation sickness. I believe that
       based on the facts of the article, which were not contradicted
       by the author of that book you quote from,(the book gave
       additional facts) is a miracle.
       Whether it is a miracle or not is up to you.
       Miracles in general are approved only after much testing, as at
       Lourdes. This one has not been called a miracle by the church as
       far as I know. This one I happen to believe in as one priest was
       whirled around by the explosion, dropped on the ground and apart
       from some fragments of glass in his neck was uninjured. The
       large building is seen to be standing among an area of land
       that is mainly flattened by the explosion, and of course many
       people will be dead.
       #Post#: 5499--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Lyn Date: May 21, 2023, 4:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It was a miracle that any in the vicinity survived and doubly so
       for those who suffered minimal or no radiation sickness,
       particularly no long term effects.  However it was that way for
       some.  Had it been me I would have considered it to be a miracle
       and given great thanks for my good fortune.
       Miracles, big and small, happen all the time.  They can
       sometimes be explained rationally but that does not detract from
       them being miraculous to the person concerned.
       #Post#: 5514--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Gregory Date: May 22, 2023, 3:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Very good post, Lyn; I agree with every word.
       I've found two definitions of a miracle, the first being the
       most common which attributes it to divine intervention:
       "an extraordinary and welcome event that is not explicable by
       natural or scientific laws and is therefore attributed to a
       divine agency." (Many recorded examples.)
       The second has a broader meaning and is, perhaps, more
       colloquial:
       "a remarkable event or development that brings very welcome
       consequences." (eg. It's a miracle we weren't killed.)
       I think there are a lot of seemingly anomalous, exceptional
       events which seem miraculous in the first sense but may have
       other causes, such as sheer contingency, fortuity, location
       variables, etc. Each of us must make our own minds up on their
       origin but I agree that if we escape unscathed from some
       horrendous situation, or at least survive, we should feel
       thankful.
       #Post#: 5515--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Leslie Date: May 22, 2023, 3:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would define a miracle as a supernatural act of God defying
       natural law and done for the good of the person receiving the
       benefit. Usually by the prayerful intercession of a Saint , but
       not necessarily so. It could be direct from God, or as has been
       known to happen, to a person at a religious shrine, such as
       Lourdes a miracle not desired by the person receiving it who was
       an atheist until this miracle of physical healing occurred.
       After that his atheism disappeared.
       #Post#: 5516--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Lyn Date: May 22, 2023, 4:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That is one definition of a miracle and I know many say it is
       the only accurate one.  I don't think it matters too much, what
       is miraculous to me may not be so to you and vice versa.  I
       believe miracles happen through the grace of God, have
       experienced a couple and know of a few but others may think they
       were just good fortune or coincidence, it's not worth splitting
       hairs.
       Greg quoted one definition:  "a remarkable event or development
       that brings very welcome consequences." (eg. It's a miracle we
       weren't killed.).  That seems pretty good to me.
       #Post#: 5517--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Leslie Date: May 22, 2023, 4:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Lyn link=topic=50.msg5499#msg5499 date=1684704581
       Miracles, big and small, happen all the time.  They can
       sometimes be explained rationally but that does not detract from
       them being miraculous to the person concerned.
       [/quote]
       by Lyn
       If they can be explained rationally, then by my definition of a
       miracle, they are not miracles. Some people as Greg defines it
       could be the recipients of what is
       called miraculous in a colloquial sense. But, if so they are not
       true miracles .
       #Post#: 5523--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Lyn Date: May 22, 2023, 6:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That's your belief and you're not alone, Leslie.
       At the end of the day it really doesn't matter, God knows what
       is in our hearts.
       #Post#: 5790--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Leslie Date: May 29, 2023, 1:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       When I studied some philosophy, many years ago, one professor
       said something like this...what we believe today is the result
       of what some philosopher's teaching was 100 years ago. And that
       was said at St. Michael's College, in class. It is hard to prove
       correct. However,the current attitude to religion is shaped in
       England today by John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White,
       revisionist nineteenth-century historians who portrayed science
       and Christianity being at war with one another. Other later
       writers do not agree, and neither do I . New Atheists draw on
       Draper's History of the Conflict Between Religion and
       Science(1874)and A History of the Warfare of Science with
       Theology in Christendom (1896) by White for some of their
       inspiration.
       The misinformation in the effect on the populace of England is
       hard to dislodge.
       Witness the views of Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens Stephen
       Hawkins and physicist Lawrence Krauss, whose views on the
       conflict are still believed.
       EDIT
       Those two writers Draper and White were influenced greatly by
       Charles Darwin himself.
       #Post#: 5793--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Catholic News
       By: Lyn Date: May 30, 2023, 2:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I will have to unpick your post sine die, Leslie.  My impression
       of the practice of Christian faith in England is that it is
       varied and subject to many influences.  Like yourself, I see no
       contradiction between faith and science but that is one issue
       upon which belief varies.
       "Witness the views of Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens
       Stephen Hawkins and physicist Lawrence Krauss, whose views on
       the conflict are still believed."
       Yes but they are/were people without belief in God.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page