URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Chosen Ones
  HTML https://tcocampaign.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Off-Topic
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 11483--------------------------------------------------
       MBTI
       By: chimto Date: January 13, 2013, 8:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've previously mentioned a personality typing system thing
       before called the 'Four Temperaments', which I've been fond of
       for years.
       The main 'competitor' to this concept was the 'Myers-Briggs Type
       Indicator', or whatever it's called, which it seems that every
       intellectual teenager worth their salt knows about.
       I've been reading about it recently, finding out my type and all
       that, and it's been quite interesting!
       It turns out that my type is most likely INTJ... which happens
       to be the second rarest type.
       The descriptions of this type fits nicely for me: I'm the
       Systems-Builder who prefers drawing connections between abstract
       principles to getting his hands dirty sifting through messy
       reality, who can't remember things, often doesn't even notice
       them, until he understands a theory about what they are and how
       they work, but is able to understand them in depth once he has
       some intellectual handles with which to grasp them. And who,
       once he understands how they work, looks for ways to make them
       work better. This is hardwired into my mind at a very deep level
       - I can't really imagine how I would go about changing it, or
       what it would be like to approach the world in any other way.
       I'm curious about whether anyone else knows their Myers-Briggs
       type thing! I imagine that at least some of you will. There are
       loads of websites that describe them individually in some
       detail, for example: [LINK]
  HTML http://www.personalitypage.com/html/high-level.html
       [LINK]
  HTML http://www.mypersonality.inf
       o/personality-types/intj/ [LINK]
  HTML http://typelogic.com/intj.html.
       Tests: [LINK]
  HTML http://similarminds.com/embj.html
       [LINK]
  HTML http://www.socionics.com/sta/sta_turbo_xl.html.
       #Post#: 11487--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MBTI
       By: Shinokyofu Date: January 13, 2013, 3:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       One of the links doesn't work...
       I took the test and the result was "INTP" the thinker or
       something, i was not sure(it could be though), and took the test
       again(i wasn't sure of some questions, so i tried to understand
       them and took it more seriously). I was hopping to fall into
       INTP again, but it turned into ISTX. Er...it sounds stupid
       enough, but there wasn't any ISTX in that list you give. The X
       would be one of the other letters(P or J)? Well, i'm sure that
       i'm neither, so i'll stick with the INTP.
       #Post#: 11488--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MBTI
       By: Pourquoi Date: January 13, 2013, 7:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]One of the links doesn't work...[/quote]
       Fixed it.
       However I don't think that personality things like this should
       be judged on their tests, because those tests - especially brief
       ones with only 'yes' or 'no' questions - can easily give
       inaccurate results, especially when people are uncertain about
       which answers to give, which is usually the case... It doesn't
       mean that the person's type isn't certain; it's just that
       they're using a really flimsy way of finding it.
       It's much more useful to read about them in detail and then
       decide on the one which is the better fit, to understand them on
       a deep level rather than relying on a test.
       *****************************************************