URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Life after CoD [FUAV]
  HTML https://stillhere.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: COD General Discussion
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 579--------------------------------------------------
       Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: mygamertagsucks Date: February 5, 2020, 1:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hey ya'll,
       You guys know I don't particularly care about the ins and outs
       of the game, as there's just too much stuff to digest in regards
       to weapons and attachments.
       That being said, I know that some of you are really good about
       knowing the damage profiles of the guns, and damage fall off
       ranges, etc, etc. While I'm good with numbers, I am NOT good
       with Call of Duty and how they measure things, as well as things
       like frame rounding, etc, etc. I just pick a gun, and go to
       town.
       I think we have a chance to make a name for ourselves, as a
       site, if we do something like DenKirson forums used to do:
       publish our own gun guides. For some reason, this crop of
       players seem to really, really know about the stats of guns, and
       what each attachment does versus what it says it does. It makes
       me miss the BO2 days where all guns had the same attachments,
       with the attachment guide (those little red and green squares)
       being absolutely useless. That thing was never,ever correct.
       Remember the great "foregrip debate" during BO2? What a mess.
       Anyhow, I can help as far as running numbers, or being a stand
       in body to kill during a custom match in order to get our
       values. This is very similar to what ace and Drift0r do, but I
       would like to create our own stats instead of leaning on Ace and
       his buddy to always be correct.
       What do you guys think? Dumb idea, or potentially good idea?
       #Post#: 584--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: Horrorman Date: February 5, 2020, 2:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Potentially good idea. I'm curious to see who dares to do that.
       #Post#: 588--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: Gordontonio Date: February 5, 2020, 3:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is a good idea. I cannot contribute with numbers or specific
       data about a specific attachment but I can share my observations
       when I am in the Gunsmith changing and trying attachments.
       #Post#: 650--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: Triumph-Rat Date: February 6, 2020, 10:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I like the idea and have created a new board  :)
       i know nothing about this side of things so will leave to the
       more knowledgeable to post.
       Posts on individual guns will probably require merging by mods
       (i.e. you LOL) to make a comprehensive topic for each gun but I
       don't see that being a problem.
       #Post#: 654--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: STABBOTAGE Date: February 6, 2020, 11:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am all for it, even assisting by volunteering my time in
       private matches to test stuff..
       BUT
       The thing I hear eXclusiveAce complain about most, is that after
       all the work he does, a few days later they do a 'weapon
       balance' which totally renders all his data inaccurate and so
       while it may be valuable, imagine if you tested every attachment
       (SOCOM rounds vs. M4 regular rounds, SOCOM with Stopping Power
       vs. M4 9mm rounds, there are about 10 more variations to test
       with just the M4 ammunition, because you need to test the damage
       profile for headshots vs. torso, versus limbs.. all that) Not
       trying to put a damper on things, I'm just saying it's a LOT of
       work and a LOT of data, just to log in tomorrow and find out
       they nerfed this or shadow nerfed that, or buffed this, or
       shadow buffed that etc...
       I'm still willing to help, just saying none of it may be
       relevant after Feb 11th's Season 2 start. (Or any random Tuesday
       that they decide to tweak stuff)
       EDIT: The most obvious solution would be to get back-end data
       from someone at IW or ACTV
       Someone went to great lengths to make this for COD4 and it may
       have been obsolete the very next day:
  HTML https://cod4central.com/images/weaponchart.jpg
       #Post#: 659--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: mygamertagsucks Date: February 6, 2020, 12:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You know, I do recall Ace saying that, and remember saying to
       myself, in my head, "so, why do it at all if it may be changed
       without any warning?" I am glad you brought that up because it
       managed to skip across my radar as I was posting that. I'm
       usually pretty good about not posting potentially problematic
       suggestions, but I failed on this one.
       Guys/Gals, I hate to say this, but I don't think it's worth any
       of our time to do this now. Seriously, we have Ace and Drift0r,
       and we can always use their information as a starting point, and
       only test things that we feel does not match up to our
       experiences. I'm just trying to find ways to drive traffic here,
       and have this become the unofficial forum for both, discussion,
       and support, for Call of Duty, while stressing our
       non-affiliation with Activision, Infinity Ward, Treyarch, or any
       other subsidiary of Activision.
       #Post#: 665--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: Triumph-Rat Date: February 6, 2020, 12:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=STABBOTAGE link=topic=89.msg654#msg654
       date=1581010430]
       I am all for it, even assisting by volunteering my time in
       private matches to test stuff..
       BUT
       The thing I hear eXclusiveAce complain about most, is that after
       all the work he does, a few days later they do a 'weapon
       balance' which totally renders all his data inaccurate and so
       while it may be valuable, imagine if you tested every attachment
       (SOCOM rounds vs. M4 regular rounds, SOCOM with Stopping Power
       vs. M4 9mm rounds, there are about 10 more variations to test
       with just the M4 ammunition, because you need to test the damage
       profile for headshots vs. torso, versus limbs.. all that) Not
       trying to put a damper on things, I'm just saying it's a LOT of
       work and a LOT of data, just to log in tomorrow and find out
       they nerfed this or shadow nerfed that, or buffed this, or
       shadow buffed that etc...
       I'm still willing to help, just saying none of it may be
       relevant after Feb 11th's Season 2 start. (Or any random Tuesday
       that they decide to tweak stuff)
       EDIT: The most obvious solution would be to get back-end data
       from someone at IW or ACTV
       [/quote]
       That is pretty cool, but apart from the names of the guns I have
       no clue what it means LOL
       #Post#: 666--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: Triumph-Rat Date: February 6, 2020, 12:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Triumph-Rat link=topic=89.msg665#msg665
       date=1581015123]
       [quote author=STABBOTAGE link=topic=89.msg654#msg654
       date=1581010430]
       I am all for it, even assisting by volunteering my time in
       private matches to test stuff..
       BUT
       The thing I hear eXclusiveAce complain about most, is that after
       all the work he does, a few days later they do a 'weapon
       balance' which totally renders all his data inaccurate and so
       while it may be valuable, imagine if you tested every attachment
       (SOCOM rounds vs. M4 regular rounds, SOCOM with Stopping Power
       vs. M4 9mm rounds, there are about 10 more variations to test
       with just the M4 ammunition, because you need to test the damage
       profile for headshots vs. torso, versus limbs.. all that) Not
       trying to put a damper on things, I'm just saying it's a LOT of
       work and a LOT of data, just to log in tomorrow and find out
       they nerfed this or shadow nerfed that, or buffed this, or
       shadow buffed that etc...
       I'm still willing to help, just saying none of it may be
       relevant after Feb 11th's Season 2 start. (Or any random Tuesday
       that they decide to tweak stuff)
       EDIT: The most obvious solution would be to get back-end data
       from someone at IW or ACTV
       [/quote]
       That is pretty cool and kudos to whoever spent their time making
       it, but apart from the names of the guns I have no clue what it
       means LOL
       If we get it up and running we can have a fluid system where
       when data changes we can update and modify the individual gun
       topics.
       Will need some thought as to the best way to implement it but
       will give the Mods something to do as they are just twiddling
       their thumbs at the moment LOL
       #Post#: 670--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Possible Cool Feature? 
       By: Dtuchpunk Date: February 6, 2020, 1:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       At least a how to how the stats in cod work.
       Why fmj doesn't kill quicker for example.
       *****************************************************