URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sober Thinking
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Who CAN you Trust?
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 263--------------------------------------------------
       Corruption in Government
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: April 18, 2022, 2:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]This is the FRUIT of BAD GOVERNMENT by [/center]
       1) predatory,
       2) conscience free ('liberated' from guilt feelings by the
       almighty Freud in order to avoid 'neurosis'),
       3)
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122619-6812456.gif<br
       />Social Darwinist,
       4) game theory (cooperation is a guise to fool and destroy the
       competition) world view,
       5) situational ethics (an oxymoron!),
       6) if it feels good-DO IT
       corporate consent manufacturing propagandists in the service of
       UNETHICAL SHORT TERM PROFITS!
       The SOLUTION lies in GOOD GOVERNMENT; the PROBLEM is that
       CORPORATIONS ARE the present BAD GOVERNMENT!  They support
       imprisoning people that speak truth to power and giving the
       people the mushroom treatment for the same reason they ignore
       global warming and pollution:  UNETHICAL SHORT TERM PROFITS!
       It's time to eliminate the excuse our fossil fuel loving
       oligarchy uses for "resources" wars for oil that bring nothing
       but misery to us and profits for them.
       [center]
  HTML https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/7MSADSQp4IBIGDQbb24vCjTnZZHwKKiRCofkpI7ZW29HTKGRqYQfZt-jiafQ70oBE1LjoYp8y2zkr48ElFrskeetTY4lCmy-jHoy3w56Rg_t-stwQ5NNNMgDyX0jaEscIfC5QyZN=s0-d-e1-ft#https://therealnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/newsletter-header-2-1024x170.png[/center]
       April 15, 2022
       Dr. Cornel West is the most important standard bearer for the
       Black prophetic tradition, the most important intellectual and
       spiritual movement in our history. Rooted in the experience of
       American racism, capitalist exploitation, and imperialism, this
       tradition has provided an ongoing critique of our economic,
       social, and political institutions and beliefs, as well as
       calling out the country’s spiritual bankruptcy. In this premiere
       episode of The Chris Hedges Report, Dr. West joins Chris Hedges
       to discuss the decay of the American empire, the struggle to
       show international solidarity in the face of escalating
       militarism, and what it means to examine this historical moment
       through a moral and spiritual lens.
       Chris Hedges interviews writers, intellectuals, and dissidents,
       many banished from the mainstream, in his half-hour show The
       Chris Hedges Report. He gives voice to those, from Cornel West
       and Noam Chomsky to the leaders of groups such as Extinction
       Rebellion, who are on the front lines of the struggle against
       militarism, corporate capitalism, white supremacy, the looming
       ecocide, as well as the battle to wrest back our democracy from
       the clutches of the ruling global oligarchy.
       Watch The Chris Hedges Report live YouTube premiere on The Real
       News Network every Friday at 12PM ET.
       Listen to episode podcasts and find bonus content at The Chris
       Hedges Report Substack.
       [center]The Chris Hedges Report with Dr. Cornel West[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/3cWfRdXjepE[/center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png
       Transcript
  HTML https://therealnews.com/the-chris-hedges-report-with-dr-cornel-west?utm_medium=email&utm_source=The+Real+News+Network&utm_campaign=1b6ee167c0-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_04_18_05_04_Hedges_West&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_020676f7fe-1b6ee167c0-420547053&mc_cid=1b6ee167c0&mc_eid=4756ab34de<br
       />
       AGelbert COMMENT:
       Seeing the despicable war profiteering and the hydrocarbon
       hellspawn profit over people and planet modus operandi that has
       thoroughly corrupted our government and judiciary, we can reach
       only one conclusion:
       IT'S THE SOCIAL DARWINISM, STUPID!
       Social Darwinists believe that ethics based principles are
       'limitations pretending to be virtues'. To them, ethics are
       'feel good illusions' that humans invented to pretend our
       species has empathy. To Social Darwinists, empathy is
       irrefutable evidence of inexcusable weakness. To them, all who
       are guided by ethics are deluded fools that should be eliminated
       from the human 'apex predator' gene pool for the "good" of our
       species.
       The ideology of the Social Darwinist is indistinguishable from
       the despicable ideology of NAZI Germany, clearly exemplified in
       their brutally enforced morally bankrupt concentration camp law:
       “Eat your own bread, and if you can, that of your neighbor.”
       Social Darwinism is actually based, not on "survival of the
       fittest", but on fear of tomorrow, a morally bankrupt excuse for
       rejecting altruism and empathy and embracing a selfish greed
       dominated hoarding modus vivendi. "One who fears tomorrow does
       not offer his bread to others. But one who is willing to divide
       his food with a stranger has already shown himself capable of
       fellowship and faith, the two things from which hope is born."
       -- Primo Levi, author of Survival in Auschwitz
       Social Darwinism is the morally bankrupt world view that spawned
       the profit over people and planet neoliberal ideology.
       Neoliberal intellectuals like Friedrich von Hayek, Ludwig von
       Mises and Milton Friedman were all Social Darwinists long before
       they renamed laissez-faire liberalism (that had been thoroughly
       discredited by the Great Depression) with the catchy title of
       "Neoliberalism".
       The celebrated social theorist and geographer David Harvey
       explains that neoliberal ideology serves the following
       principle:
       "There shall be no serious challenge to the absolute power of
       money to rule absolutely. And that power is to be exercised with
       one objective: Those possessed of money shall not only be
       privileged to accumulate wealth endlessly at will, but they
       shall have the right to inherit the earth, taking either direct
       or indirect dominion, not only of the land and all the resources
       and productive capacities that reside therein, but also assume
       absolute command, directly or indirectly, over the labor and
       creative capacities of all those others it needs. The rest of
       humanity shall be deemed disposable."
       David Harvey, “The Party of Wall Street Meets its Nemesis,”
  HTML http://www.zcommunications.org/the/party/of/wall/street/meets/its/nemesis.<br
       />Also, by David Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism
       (Oxford:
       Oxford University Press, 2005.
       Agelbert OBSERVATION: If the morally bankrupt, socially
       destructive ideology which backs no serious challenge to the
       absolute power of money to rule absolutely, while it
       simultaneously deems the rest of humanity disposable, is not
       SOCIAL DARWINISM, I don't know what is. &#128544;
       #Post#: 278--------------------------------------------------
       The Morally Bankrupt Duopoly is Socially Destructive
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: April 24, 2022, 5:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422194649-878527.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://planthepromisedland.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/wages-share5-21a.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422183939.jpeg[/center]
       [move]Why lobby politicians when you can challenge their
       masters?[/move]
       #Post#: 336--------------------------------------------------
       &#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039; Four days. That’s how long
       people’s sadness and outrage last after each major gun massacre
       in the US.
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: June 3, 2022, 1:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://sojo.net/sites/default/files/styles/large_rectangle_crop/public/blog/numb_gun_violence.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422141413-627726.png[/center]
       [center]OUR NUMBNESS TO GUN VIOLENCE IS A SPIRITUAL
       FAILURE[/center]
       BY ADAM RUSSELL TAYLOR &#128330;&#65039;
       JUN 2, 2022
       SNIPPET:
       We must debunk the spiritual lie that the best way to restrain
       evil is for more people to be armed to kill. Instead, we should
       Jesus’ presumption for nonviolence: “those who live by the
       sword, die by the sword” (Matthew 26:52).
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422150144.png
       Full article:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422205132-6472099.gif
  HTML https://sojo.net/articles/our-numbness-gun-violence-spiritual-failure
       #Post#: 349--------------------------------------------------
       What I said cut right through the obfuscation
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: June 10, 2022, 12:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Jun 9, 2022
       Alex Lawson
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422180554-644315.gif,<br
       />Social Security Works <info@socialsecurityworks.org>
       This morning, my colleague Nancy Altman and I had the chance to
       testify before the Senate Budget Committee in support of
       expanding Social Security. I worked hard on my testimony, but
       unfortunately, I was cut off before I got the chance to finish
       it. I wanted to share the full thing with you, below.
       What I said cut right through the obfuscation that Senators
       &#128520; Lindsey Graham,
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122619-6812456.gif<br
       />Rick Scott, and &#128127; Mitt Romney use when talking about
       Social Security. From the questions they asked, it’s clear that
       I got under their skin.
       --- Quote ---
       > Thank you, Chairman Sanders, for holding the first ever Senate
       Budget Committee hearing on expanding Social Security.
       >
       > In 1935, Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed
       the Social Security Act into law. And for the next 87 years,
       Social Security has never missed a single payment.
       >
       > Everybody loves Social Security. Everybody. I have been all
       over this country talking about Social Security and I can tell
       you it doesn’t matter if the crowd is filled with camo NRA or
       the parking lot is filled with electric vehicles. Everyone loves
       Social Security.
       >
       > Well, not everybody, there has always been a tiny splinter
       group, a vanishingly small number of people who hate it with
       every fiber of their being. These are Wall Street men.
       >
       > They see the trillions of dollars the system has put in the
       pockets of the American people and say, “hey! I want that money
       in my pocket instead.”
       >
       > And as there are money men who hate Social Security, there
       will be politicians willing to say how high? At their commands
       to jump.
       >
       > The first, was named Alf Landon in 1936 he ran against FDR on
       an explicitly anti-Social Security platform. He called it a
       “hoax” and a “fraud,” filled with worthless IOUs that would
       never get to the people.
       >
       > And yet 87 years later Social Security is still here making
       payments every month like clockwork to the 70 million people
       today who have earned it.
       >
       > While Alf Landon is forgotten to all except as the guy who
       lost 48 states when he ran against Social Security.
       >
       > For the next few decades the majority of Republicans
       understood Social Security as a birthright and cornerstone of
       economic security for all Americans, not a partisan football.
       >
       > My favorite is President Eisenhower in a letter to his brother
       saying this:
       >
       > “Should any political party attempt to abolish social security
       …you would not hear of that party again in our political
       history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that
       believes you can do these things….. Their number is negligible
       and they are stupid."
       >
       > But unfortunately that greedy splinter faction never stopped
       plotting. And that faction today has taken over the entire
       Republican party.
       >
       > Ronald Reagan was possibly the last Republican president who
       was not totally under their sway. And he stated with perfect
       clarity, “Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit,
       Social Security is totally funded by the payroll tax levied on
       employer and employee, if you reduce the outgo of Social
       Security that money would not go into the general fund to reduce
       the deficit, it would go into the Social Security trust fund, so
       Social Security has nothing to do with balancing the budget or
       lowering or erasing the deficit.”
       >
       > But the splinter group has patience and money, lots of money,
       and politics loves money. So after the 1983 reforms they began
       waging a new type of war against Social Security. The main
       tactic being lying to the faces of the American people about
       what they are doing.
       >
       > So now you will never hear from Republicans that they want to
       destroy Social Security, you will never hear that they want to
       cut benefits. In fact they always start their assaults on Social
       Security with protestations of love. “I love Social Security, I
       am just worried it isn’t going to be there.” The goal is to
       undermine confidence. To rob people of the security of knowing
       that Social Security is going to be there for them.
       >
       > They cloak their attacks under new monikers. George W. Bush
       called for just handing our Social Security to Wall Street so
       they could gamble it away, he called it “privatization,” but
       again it is just destruction. Imagine if George W Bush had given
       our Social Security to Wall Street in 2006 just 2 years before
       Wall Street collapsed the world economy, and 401ks became 101ks.
       But this wasn’t a George W. Bush production, the entire
       Republican party was complicit.
       >
       > And Senator Ron Johnson said as recently as 2015 that it was a
       “shame” the Bush plan to destroy Social Security didn’t succeed.
       >
       > Senator Lindsey Graham, who supported the privatization
       effort, has proposed a bill cutting Social Security benefits by
       21%. He hides that policy by saying he is “raising the
       retirement” age.
       >
       > And he is not an outlier in his caucus, the Republican Party
       platform from 2016 says with coded language that the plan is to
       cut benefits and hand over Social Security to Wall Street, “As
       Republicans, we oppose tax increases and believe in the power of
       markets to create wealth.”
       >
       > Senator Romney recently tried to get an up or down voice vote
       in the dead of night on his so-called TRUST Act, which would
       create an undemocratic, fast-tracked, closed-door process to cut
       Social Security. They know it is so toxic to talk about what
       they want that they tried to legally create a smoky back room
       where they can figure out the best way to rob people of their
       earned benefits.
       >
       > Which brings us to the current Republican agenda as set out by
       Chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee Senator
       Rick Scott. I will have to give this plan faint praise, because
       at least it has a hint of honesty about it. Senator Scott’s plan
       would “sunset” Social Security in 5 years. Rick Scott is the
       modern day Alf Landon, he hates Social Security and wants to
       eliminate it. But even he isn’t brave enough to say that and
       calls it “sunsetting.”
       >
       > In fact, the Republican who was most honest about Republican
       plans on Social Security was former president Donald Trump, who
       as a candidate said from the debate stage, “Every Republican
       wants to do a big number on Social Security…And it’s not fair to
       the people that have been paying in for years.”
       >
       > He said that over and over again, breaking the Republican pact
       to not tell the truth to the American people about their plans
       for Social Security. And he won. Now of course once in office
       the splinter faction got a hold on him as well and he spent his
       single term in office attacking Social Security from all angles.
       >
       > There is only one number that I think should rule the
       discourse in DC about Social Security, $18,457. That is the
       average Social Security benefit. I am proposing that we make
       millionaires and billionaires pay the same rate on all of their
       income just like the rest of us and then we can expand Social
       Security’s modest benefits.
       >
       > If a politician wants to take any of that meager benefit away,
       I welcome that fight, but be honest about what you are
       proposing. And be prepared to lose.
       --- End Quote ---
       Watch the full hearing here, then make a donation to save Social
       Security from these modern day Alf Landons.
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/5bL_VwQeunQ[/center]
       #Post#: 407--------------------------------------------------
       Today I have more evidence to back my firm view that the Supreme
       Court is shooting themselves in the FACE!
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 5, 2022, 4:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Class Struggle
       Tuesday, July 5, 2022 by DAVE LINDORFF &#10024;
       [center] What Would a Real Opposition Party of the People Do?
  HTML https://ongoingclassstruggle.blogspot.com/2022/07/what-would-real-opposition-party-of.html[/center]
       AGelbert COMMENT: It is painfully obvious to those with critical
       thinking skills that a Real Opposition Party, not only does not
       exist in the US of Oligarchs, but has methodically, with malice
       aforethought, been prevented by TPTB from organizing into
       existence. This is the present corrupt Oligarchy governing
       status quo.
       In my 75 years of existence, I seriously doubt this Socially
       Destructive, Social Darwinism based abusive status quo has
       changed in any way. The Perception Management Pig lipstick may
       have been better (SEE: "The Audacity of Hopium", etc. Ad
       nauseam) from time to time, but the Oligarchy's gate keepers
       were firmly entrenched a couple of years before I was born.
       I think the Oligarchs solidified their power over we-the-people
       on that fateful night Wallace was robbed of the Candidacy for
       the VP position. The ruthless Oligarchic greedballs won on July
       21, 1944, the last day of the Democratic National Convention,
       when the LACKEY for the American Oligarchs, Senator Harry S.
       Truman of Missouri, was nominated for vice president. &#129402;
       
       Despite our (disguised dictatorship with "democracy" Pig
       Lipstick) corrupt status quo, up until now, my hope has been
       that Catastrophic Climate Change would spur TPTB to act
       responsibly out of survival instinct, if nothing else. I hoped
       they would, because of ACTUAL enlightened self interest (not the
       greed based Capitalist baloney propaganda they push), take
       aggressive legal and financial action to, not only stop, but
       reverse, Catastrophic Climate Change.
       But, as the recent Orwellian Decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court
       evidences (i.e. Children with Hansen Climate Lawsuit will not be
       heard because, uh, "they don't have Standing" AND The US
       Environmental Protection Agency "Cannot Legally Protect
       Americans from Environmental Damage"), the Oligarchs are too
       committed to their morally bankrupt ideology/Social Darwinist
       religion (see graphic below) to act with common sense.
       
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422153848-10191017.jpeg[/center]
       Yesterday, I tried to reason with a legal sophistry spouting
       poster attempting to defend the latest abysmally stupid Supreme
       Court Decision against the EPA. That &#128013; sophist, besides
       rambling on in long winded this and that about said Decision,
       finished with a ridiculous claim that the "CORE" issue was about
       properly applying the regulatory framework (i.e. "Legal"
       boundaries of EPA enforement actions). Of course I called BS on
       that sophistry laden baloney. Unfortunately, it appears that my
       graphics pointing to the REAL CORE ISSUE were like WATER OFF A
       &#128520; Roberts Supreme Court, &#129421; Social Darwinist,
       &#129430; Hydrocarbon Hellspawn loving DUCK.
       &#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;
       Today (see link after this paragraph), I have more evidence to
       back my firm view that the Supreme Court is shooting themselves,
       and we-the-people, in the FACE (not just the foot) by
       deliberatly ignoring the CORE EVIRONMENTAL ISSUE of human
       society at this time (i.e. Catastrophic Climate Change). No, I
       don't expect the reality challenged water carriers for the
       &#129430; polluters and the &#128520; Supremely corrupt Court to
       get it, but I am certain many people of conscience do, and will
       pass this on for the good of all humanity.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240622175211.png
       
       July 4, 2022
       [center]Chinese Vessel Snapped In Two By Typhoon Chaba, A Dozen
       &#9760;&#65039; Bodies Retrieved
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/catastrophic-climate-change/128681-global-climate-chaos-976065039/msg406/#msg406[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050722131151.jpeg[/center]
       #Post#: 424--------------------------------------------------
       Hydrocarbon Hellspawn thumb their noses at emission cuts through
       bribed Government and Judiciary 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 19, 2022, 4:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080522140849-12222037.pnghttps://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-221219143548.png[/center]
       E&E NEWS
       [center]Climate-focused bill &#128520;&#129430; collapses as
       nation is &#128531; gripped by impacts[/center]
       By Benjamin Storrow | 07/18/2022 07:12 AM EDT
       [center]
  HTML https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/55a1666/2147483647/resize/1110/quality/100/?url=https://static.politico.com/df/81/669481fc4e53882b1d0831c10be7/cw-0718-storrow-climate-impacts-1160-01.jpg<br
       />[/center]
       Vehicles pass by a golf course and homes across the freeway from
       undeveloped desert last week in Palm Desert, Calif. The state is
       now in a third consecutive year of drought amid a climate
       change-fueled megadrought in the southwestern United States.
       Mario Tama/Getty Images
       Water levels have fallen so low on the Colorado River that they
       are threatening a dam relied upon by millions of Americans. In
       Texas, it was so hot last week the state’s grid operator had to
       twice ask people to conserve electricity. And in western Kansas,
       it is so dry that barely any wheat sprouted this year, further
       straining global agricultural markets upended by the war in
       Ukraine.
       Such events are a sign of how climate change is altering life in
       the United States. Yet they have yet to provoke a serious
       response in Washington, where &#128520; Sen. Joe Manchin of West
       Virginia told his Democratic counterparts last week he could not
       support climate provisions in a wider budget bill (E&E Daily,
       July 15). In an evenly divided Senate, the pronouncement likely
       kills the prospects for federal climate legislation.
       The result is a collision of political and atmospheric reality.
       The atmospheric reality is this: The world already has warmed by
       about 1 degree Celsius from pre-industrial levels, juicing many
       of the extreme weather events observed today. As long as people
       continue to put more carbon dioxide and methane into the
       atmosphere than machines and the Earth can absorb, the planet
       will get hotter. And a hotter planet is a recipe for even more
       frequent and stronger heat waves, droughts and hurricanes, among
       other extreme weather events.
       But the political reality is that the federal government of the
       United States, which sets policies for the second largest
       emitter in the world today, is not taking steps that would lead
       to a significant reductions in greenhouse gases this decade.
       That leaves it to states, cities and markets — not to mention
       other countries — to try and make up for the lack of action in
       Washington.
       Few analysts believe they can deliver the needed reductions.
       “There isn’t time for the &#129429;&#129430;&#128013; largest
       carbon emitters in the world to &#128520;
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-200419205214.png<br
       />thumb their nose at emission cuts,” said Rob Jackson, an earth
       systems scientist at Stanford University.
       Jackson is a leader of the Global Carbon Project, a group of
       international climate researchers who track global emissions. In
       2021, they estimated the world had 11 years at current emissions
       rates before the planet reached 1.5 C of warming, the threshold
       after which the dangers of a warming world begin to rapidly
       accelerate. The planet has 32 years before it reaches 2 C of
       warming, the initial target of the Paris climate accord.
       In recent years, Democrats have talked up efforts to curb
       emissions. And so when the party took control of the House of
       Representatives, the Senate and the White House in 2020,
       expectations for a federal climate bill soared. Yet the
       combination of narrow legislative majorities and a slew of
       historic crises have relegated climate on President Joe Biden
       and congressional Democrat’s to-do list.
       “The political reality is that climate isn’t a top priority for
       Democrats,” Jackson said. “I think it means we will zoom past
       1.5 C in a couple years and hurdle toward 2 C before we know
       it.”
       The situation is reminiscent of 2009, when then-President Barack
       Obama and Democratic lawmakers passed a federal stimulus bill,
       health care legislation and financial reforms only to falter on
       climate, Jackson said. The problem, he said, is that the world’s
       emissions budget is nearly exhausted and Republicans have shown
       no serious sign of engaging in climate policy.
       “We don’t have the luxury of waiting another 10 years,” Jackson
       said.
       As Washington dithers, Americans are beginning to grapple with
       the consequences of a warming planet. In the Southwest, federal
       regulators recently warned states that they needed to
       drastically cut back water consumption to protect the dams at
       Lake Mead and Lake Powell in Nevada and Arizona, respectively.
       The two impoundments are critical for managing the flow of water
       along the Colorado River, making them a key source of water for
       some 40 million Americans in the desert Southwest. And as large
       hydroelectric facilities, they are also keystone’s of the West’s
       electric grid.
       At least, they have been.
       Water levels were just 32 feet above the elevation needed to
       generate electricity at the Glen Canyon Dam on Lake Powell
       earlier this year, prompting the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to
       take unprecedented efforts to bolster the reservoir’s levels
       (Greenwire, May 3). In an average year, Glen Canyon Dam
       generates about 5 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity,
       according to Reclamation, enough to power about 466,000 homes.
       But as water levels have dropped, so too has the dam’s output.
       Initial Energy Department data shows it generated a little more
       than 3 billion kWh of power last year.
       In the middle of the country, Texas is experiencing its hottest
       summer since 2011 (Climatewire, July 12). Temperatures in Austin
       reached 105 degrees Fahrenheit on five consecutive days,
       according to the National Weather Service, the third-longest
       streak on record. The searing heat sent power demand soaring as
       Texans sought the relief of their air conditioning. The Electric
       Reliability Council of Texas, the state’s primary grid operator,
       twice asked consumers to cut back on power consumption to avoid
       rolling black outs.
       Further to the north, parts of western Kansas have gone more
       than 300 days without recording an inch of rain. Wheat
       cultivation there is suffering as a result, an unwelcome
       development when the world is scrambling to find grain following
       Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (Climatewire, July 8 ).
       Climate change alone is not solely responsible for events like
       low water levels at Lake Powell or the struggles of Texas’ grid.
       In both those cases, soaring population growth is taxing water
       and electricity supplies. A changing electricity grid, which is
       seeing old coal and gas plants replaced by renewables, is also a
       factor.
       But a warming planet has made those challenges harder.
       “We’ve been through a degree of warming. In a sense, we at least
       have a sense for the magnitude of the impacts. Two degrees of
       warming would be twice as intense,” said John Nielsen-Gammon, a
       professor of atmospheric science at Texas A&M University and the
       Texas state climatologist. “But it gets us farther outside of
       historical conditions, which means the extreme events get more
       and more likely to be worse than anything previously
       experienced.”
       Scientists were once hesitant to ascribe individual weather
       events like the heat wave that baked Texas last week to global
       warming. Yet that thinking has begun to change in recent years
       amid a growing body of irrefutable evidence the planet is
       getting warmer.
       Events such as the heat dome that enveloped the Pacific
       Northwest last year are nearly impossible in a cooler world,
       scientists said. So are storms like Hurricane Harvey, which
       dropped up to 60 inches of rain on parts of Texas, one of the
       most significant rainfall events since record-keeping began in
       earnest in the 1880s.
       Finding consensus over policies that can cut emissions is
       difficult enough, as shown by Congress’s inability to pass
       significant federal climate legislation. But the challenge is
       compounded by atmospheric reality. Methane emitted today will
       stay in the atmosphere for several decades. Carbon dioxide
       released in the air today can stay there for centuries,
       according to NASA.
       “If we wake up in 5 to 10 years and say, ‘This is unbearable to
       our economy, to our communities, to a livable future; we must
       act,’ it will be too late to cut and stem the losses that will
       be going on,” said Kim Cobb, a climate scientist at Brown
       University. “This is a challenge where the decisions we make
       this year, the next year and the next year will determine what
       type of climate we will have at least until mid century and most
       likely beyond.”
       Right now, Washington is making the decision to not to act in a
       way that would seriously limit emissions this decade. Congress
       passed an infrastructure law last year that shovels money into
       research for technologies such as advanced nuclear, hydrogen and
       carbon capture and sequestration. Yet most experts expect it
       would take at least a decade before those technologies can begin
       to be deployed at scale (Climatewire, Aug. 13, 2021).
       In an interview with a West Virginia radio station on Friday,
       &#129430;&#128520; Manchin held open the door to working on a
       climate bill after Congress’ summer recess. The West Virginia
       senator said he wanted to see July’s inflation figures before
       proceeding with a climate bill
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-191017140758.jpeg.<br
       />But many Democrats signaled they had little hope of securing
       Manchin’s vote, which is needed in a 50-50 senate, after seeing
       him back out of two potential climate packages (Greenwire, July
       15).
       The Biden administration, meanwhile, is hamstrung by a recent
       Supreme Court ruling that limits the options available to EPA
       for regulating emissions from power plants. While the agency has
       some significant tools remaining for regulating CO2, the high
       court’s ruling suggests the justices would look skeptically at
       future agency actions that do not have explicit congressional
       approval.
       For all those difficulties, emission reductions are likely to
       continue. Continued renewable deployment and increasing electric
       vehicle adoption means emissions are likely to fall 24 to 32
       percent of 2005 levels by the end of the decade without
       significant changes in policy, the Rhodium Group said in an
       analysis last week. U.S. emissions were 17 percent below 2005
       levels in 2021, Rhodium reported.
       The problem is that those reductions fall far short of the 50-52
       percent reduction targeted by Biden — and leave the United
       States well adrift of achieving net zero emissions by
       midcentury.
       The impact of American climate inaction on global emissions
       ultimately will depend on how far the United States falls from
       meeting its targets, said Michael Mann, a climate scientist at
       Pennsylvania State University.
       “The direct impact on global emissions might be modest, but the
       indirect impact could be huge,” he wrote in an email. “If the
       U.S., the world’s largest historical emitter, is unable to meet
       its commitments to the rest of the world, that provides an
       excuse for countries like China and India, who are likely to
       dominate further emissions, to ease off in their own efforts.”
       The risks of a warming planet grow as temperatures rise. At 1.5
       C, there will be more glacier melt and sea-level rise, causing
       additional “death and destruction,” Mann said. But the impact
       becomes even more
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-070814193155.png<br
       />damaging and pervasive after  temperatures &#127777;&#65039;
       breach, he noted.
       “It is a world,” Mann said, “that we want to avoid.”
  HTML https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-focused-bill-collapses-as-nation-is-gripped-by-impacts/
       AGelbert NOTE: Due to the polluter bought and paid for
       thoroughly corrupted state of the US Government AND the
       Judiciary, there is NO WAY that a 2 C (PLUS &#128561;) world can
       now be avoided. May God have mercy on us.
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/4/3-250222141516.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-210622210759-14331395.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3/3-040222193452-32931084.png[/center]
       #Post#: 431--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Corruption in Government
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 22, 2022, 4:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]SOCIAL DARWINISTS displaying their
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250817135149.gif<br
       />CORE BELIEFS:[/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/styles/renewablerevolution/files/796_10-24-11-the-one-percent.gif[/center]
       [center]THE PRESENT RESULT OF THEIR RELENTLESS CORRUPTION OF THE
       US GOVERNMENT:[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-090221180527.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-221215212409.png[/center]
       #Post#: 434--------------------------------------------------
       A History of &#128534; 21st Century USA in &#128521;
       Entertaining Graphics + pertinent article and &#128544;
       comments...
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: August 6, 2022, 3:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164616-5368.jpeg<br
       />A History of &#128534; 21st Century USA in &#128521;
       Entertaining Graphics[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-060622132630.png[/center]
       August 27, 2000 America must &#128519; not act as “an
       imperialist power, willy-nilly moving into capitals in that part
       of the world, taking down governments.”— VP candidate
       &#128024;&#129429; Cheney
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-030815183114.gif<br
       />
       AGelbert NOTE: SEE ORWELL, SEE: PNAC
       9/11 is not the reason the Bush/PNAC agenda (which included a
       Fascist Coup in the US that gave us the FASCISTS 'R' US
       "Patriot" Act, along with all the MIC SWAG for Endless Wars)
       took &#129421; shape; it is the (&#128520; amazingly convenient)
       excuse for its
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gif<br
       />implementation.
       AGelbert NOTE: SEE ORWELL, SEE: PNAC SEE: INSIDE JOB
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422162859-103630.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422162849-1033113.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195202-9772228.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://78.media.tumblr.com/f763599d30eaeb44b0c2eee92a26a8c5/tumblr_palizer1YQ1tsf68ao1_400.gif[/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-100216204839.gif[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422162847-10321563.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-251218182423-20501556.gif[/center]
       [move]Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way,
       and be filled with their own devices. For the turning away of
       the simple shall slay them, and the prosperity of fools shall
       destroy them. -- Proverbs 1:31-32 KJV[/move]
       Wednesday, August 3, 2022 by Paul Street
       [center]On Schedule (for) F(ascism)
  HTML https://media.tenor.com/images/926c7a7fd37a2d72b10bc8e1252980b5/tenor.gif:<br
       />the Dithering Dems and the Radical Republicans
  HTML https://ongoingclassstruggle.blogspot.com/2022/08/on-schedule-for-fascism-dithering-dems.html#comment-5937763318[/center]
       John Kelly
       In which Paul Street attempts to give the DemocRATS the out they
       so desperately need to remain on the good guys side of the
       political circus narrative. Calling them "dithering" is an
       excuse thinly disguised as a critique for cooperating with, and
       even accelerating the fascist trajectory of death cult #1. They
       are **** complicit, not incompetent. They are the "more
       effective evil", not a lesser evil. Anyone who spends paragraph
       after paragraph on Trump, the Regressives, and the 1/6 mini riot
       and temper tantrum, is a closeted DemocRAT(ICK) cheerleader...
       acting like they are merely soft, not the **** monsters they
       are. They are Tweedle Daddy Feels Your Pain to the Regressive's
       Tweedle Dumpster Fire. The butt cheeks of the same arse.
       Stipulated: Regressives are pure ****. See how short and easy
       that was? Now do the DemocRATS... you know, the left punching,
       virtue signaling, war mongering, Putin under the bed, Trump in
       the head court jesters of death cult America. They are far more
       dangerous, because they and their corporate presstitutes have
       successfully brainwashed millions into voting for and making
       excuses for them. They are every **** bit as evil as the
       Regressives, and far more dangerous.
       AGelbert  > John Kelly
       Agreed. The Democrats and the Republicans are both willing,
       active, and fully bought and paid for, tools of the US
       Oligarchy. &#129402;
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195041-948314.jpeg[/center]
       [right]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195050-951435.jpeg[/right]
       The folowing is a bit dated, but the people crushing trend,
       which continues to ACCELERATE, is firmly
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-040718162656-14241872.gif<br
       />established:
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422194649-878527.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195006-9361393.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195405-10062116.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195003-9352059.jpeg[/center]
       [move]Was Hitler right too?.....[/move]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422194844-9051245.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-010215143525.png[/center]
       Collectivist Action > fuster
       "fortunately, the laws are still standing and the loonies are
       methodically being tried and sent to prison"
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-120818180835-16181943.gif
       Are they?
       AGelbert > Collectivist Action
       Exactly. Also, it is a stretch to believe that the Democratic
       Party is "dithering".
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422154630.png[/center]
       Off topic from the daily dirge &#128169; of in-our-faces
       government
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gifhttp://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418193910.gif<br
       />corruption, but welcome news to people of good will, here is
       some good news on the Wind Renewable Energy for Grid &#9889;
       Demand Predictability and Grid Stabilization front that all my
       fellow socialists will welcome:
       Clean Technica August 3, 2022 By Guest Contributor
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164613-5332481.jpeg
       Can Meteorological Models Correctly Characterize Daily Cycles In
       Wind Generation?
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/renewables/wind-power/msg433/?topicseen#msg433
       #Post#: 436--------------------------------------------------
       &quot;...? Has the &#129421; USSS, &#9760;&#65039; DOD or
       &#128013; DHS left us with any choice but to assume the deleted
       texts would be incriminating?”
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: August 7, 2022, 3:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422165315-10681740.png[/center]
  HTML https://ci6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/bMi5K4CDjFlORKNzbtb8lit774Y1msNFvqsbSgXnjuUWN_dpHltajASyKjxYyLW_EG-St1vg9JhrJR1vAL8SwjJmNeDervxCdhNS7cu1ZyWAx3J0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://truthout.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/truthout_logo.jpg
       August 5, 2022 By William Rivers Pitt &#128509;, Truthout
       [center]The
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195305-9941722.jpeg<br
       />Secret Service Text Cover-Up Keeps Getting Bigger[/center]
       SNIPPET:
       On August 1, “Two influential House Democrats called on Monday
       for two officials at the Department of Homeland Security’s
       independent watchdog to testify to Congress about the agency’s
       handling of missing Secret Service text messages from the day of
       the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, accusing their office of
       engaging in a cover-up,” according to The New York Times.
       &#128520; Joseph Cuffari is one of the two officials so called.
       Not shady enough yet? Try this on for size, courtesy of CNN:
       --- Quote ---
       > The Defense Department wiped the phones of top departing DOD
       and Army officials at the end of the Trump administration,
       deleting any texts from key witnesses to events surrounding the
       January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, according to court
       filings.
       >
       > The acknowledgment that the phones from the Pentagon officials
       had been wiped was first revealed in a Freedom of Information
       Act lawsuit American Oversight brought against the Defense
       Department and the Army. The watchdog group is seeking January 6
       records from former acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller,
       former chief of staff Kash Patel, and former Secretary of the
       Army Ryan McCarthy, among other prominent Pentagon officials —
       having filed initial FOIA requests just a few days after the
       Capitol attack.
       --- End Quote ---
       At least the
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202719-14071062.gif<br
       />Watergate burglars had the sense to pull their stunt in the
       dead
       of night. These
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422205132-6451602.gif<br
       />clowns are out there in broad daylight trashing crucial
       evidence
       pertaining to an attempted coup, and have done so within the
       walls of the Secret Service, Homeland Security and the
       Department of Defense.
       Not only is this cover-up massive, it is altogether audacious,
       brazen, almost arrogant… and why not? This is Washington D.C.,
       right? Nobody ever gets into actual trouble here, unless you
       took a bus from out of town to participate in the Capitol riot.
       Then, you’re probably busted. The
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250817135149.gif<br
       />ones who summoned you there and turned you loose? A few
       deleted
       texts later and they’re
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418193910.gif<br
       />enjoying a steak at the Capitol Hill Club, irony definitely
       intended.
       Full article:
  HTML https://media.tenor.com/images/5423e809b1a22096b6925bf9bc3fd1cb/tenor.gif
  HTML https://truthout.org/articles/the-secret-service-text-cover-up-keeps-getting-bigger/
       #Post#: 443--------------------------------------------------
       The US &quot;Vote&quot; is a MASSIVELY Watered Down Travesty!
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: August 13, 2022, 2:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Comment Source:
  HTML https://ongoingclassstruggle.blogspot.com/2022/08/two-diametrically-opposed-views-of.html#comment-5945959853
       August 12, 2022
       dmorista Mod > AGelbert
       BTW, I think that our Constitution, that has been in place for
       about 230 years is showing its age and needs to be seriously
       amended. Of course the danger is that the right is powerful and
       they want to convene a Constitutional Convention that they
       control. And then make changes that make the Constitution less
       favorable to enhancing democracy rather than advance the process
       of democratizing U.S. society.
       Some legal scholars have pointed out that the U.S. Constitution
       is too short and too hard to amend. There has not been a
       substantive amendment for several decades now. The set up for
       basic institutions like the Supreme Court, the Electoral
       College, and the Senate is not acceptable to the way this
       country is now organized. And the way the U.S. is now operating
       it would be impossible to get any serious amendment through the
       process. Societies change over time and the controlling
       documents need to be amended.
       AGelbert > dmorista Mod
       I hear ya, but I think you and I are in agreement that the code
       speech rhetorical masterpiece known as the US Constitution was
       formulated exclusively for the benefit of (and exclusion of
       everybody else), uh, see below, but add "land owning men" to the
       graphic:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120822162250.png
       Our true "voting legislation" history is very instructive for an
       objective historian, not into "sanitizing" (only those US
       resident historians who are retired and don't fear losing their
       jobs need apply) the US elite's habit, from even before writing
       of the Constitution, of justifying whatevah to "KEEP theirs", so
       to speak.
       The issue I have pointed to with various hair pulling rants, off
       and on during the last 15 years or so, is the happy talk claim
       that the Constitution now applies to "everybody". No it don't!
       Why not?
       Well, was the U.S. founded as a representative Republic, as per
       the Constitution, or not?
       What's that got to do with this?
       REPRESENTATION in GOVERNMENT is "what that's got to do with
       this", and has NOT changed in ANY significant way to lessen the
       stranglehold on POWER that the elite land owners (now happily
       including women greedballs too - there's progress fer ya!)
       CONTINUE to have.
       In fact, the average American voter has LESS power to influence
       government NOW than in 1780.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164519-508103.gif
       I know that is hard to believe, but it is true. Women out there,
       and perhaps some native americans and blacks too, are probably
       calling BS on me right now, but read on.
       I will list some key dates, but the fact is that the grip of
       elite INCREASED at expense of the middle class and poor from
       1780 all the way to TODAY.
       It has been a propaganda tour de force foisted on we-the-people
       loudly boasting that we lesser American mortals are "properly"
       represented.
       Baloney, the apologists say! Minorities can vote! Women can
       vote! What is your problemo, pal?
       My "problemo" is the voting MATH that you double talking,
       sophistry spouting, lackey lap dogs of TPTB refuse to
       acknowledge.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422155724.png
       1780 = one Rep per 30,000 population (minus some fancy 2/3 math
       for the Plantation poo bahs).  I won't bore you with the Senate.
       The name, alone, should tell you ALL you need to know about that
       "we are here for the Oligarchs, PERIOD!" institution honoring
       the Roman Empire. American voters didn't even get to vote for
       Senators until it didn't matter (around 1900) because, by that
       time, the gilded age tycoons had firm control of WHO was on the
       ballot by corrupting BOTH of the two main Political Parties. The
       optics were a bit better because, before that, the tycoons would
       just buy the state legislatures and governors (American
       Democracy, yeah right.).
       1870 = Don't make me laugh telling me blacks got to "vote".
       
       1913-15 = Legislative Cork on the number of Reps so that the
       POWER of the elite that bought and paid for Congress would not
       be "watered down" by the population increase.
       1920 = Women get to "vote" (now that the CORK was put on the
       number of Reps per population).
       1964 = LBJ wanted more cannon fodder for Viet Nam so he pushed a
       "Voting Rights" Act that has done next to nothing to right
       racist wrongs in this country.
       2022 = Your "vote" has approximately the fractional power of
       (700,000 divided by 30,000) 1/23 of a landed white man in 1780.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422135315.png
       Sometimes I feel like Wiley Coyote....
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-100718163624-1442258.jpeg[/center]
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 9
   DIR Next Page