URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sober Thinking
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Hydrocarbon Industry Skullduggery
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 240--------------------------------------------------
       How the Promise of Chemurgy Was Sabotaged by Big Oil
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: April 9, 2022, 1:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
       Chemurgy is a branch of applied chemistry that is concerned with
       preparing industrial products from agricultural raw materials.
       The word "chemurgy" was coined by chemist William J. Hale and
       first publicized in his 1934 book The Farm Chemurgic,[1] the
       concept was mildly well-developed by the early years of the 20th
       century.
       For example, a number of products, including brushes and motion
       picture film, were made from cellulose. Beginning in the 1920s,
       some prominent Americans began to advocate a more widespread
       link between farmers and industry. Among them were William J.
       Hale and agricultural journalist Wheeler McMillen.
       Contents
       
       1 The Soybean Car
       2 Worths
       3 Downhill
       4 Substitutions
       5 See also
       6 Notes
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422121547-610139.jpeg[/center]
       Henry Ford takes an ax (with a rubber tip on the business end)
       to plant derived plastic rear deck lid (the same material used
       in to build the soybean car) to demonstrate that it was, not
       just lighter than steel, but 10 times stronger as well.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422121533-6092445.jpeg
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422121245-571262.jpeg
       [center]The Soybean Car    [/center]
       Automaker Henry Ford began to test farm crops for their
       industrial potential around 1930, and soon settled on the
       soybean as particularly promising (the famous Soybean Car). The
       Ford Motor Company used soybeans in such parts as gearshift
       knobs and horn buttons.
       In 1935, the Farm Chemurgic Council (later renamed the National
       Farm Chemurgic Council) was formed to encourage greater use of
       renewable raw materials in industry. In its early years, the
       Council received substantial publicity. It was perceived by the
       Roosevelt Administration as a political threat, since Council
       leaders questioned U.S. Department of Agriculture policies.
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418202144.gif
       First placing much of its emphasis on demonstrating the
       [color=green]benefits of Agrol (a line of blended motor fuels
       that included ethanol), the [b]Council drew strong opposition
       from the
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418203402.gif<br
       />petroleum industry.
       [/color]The Agrol pilot plant, which also experienced management
       and financial
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-040718162655-14212306.gif<br
       />difficulties, shut down in 1938.
  HTML https://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183337.bmp
       Wheeler McMillen
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080422122123.jpeg,<br
       />who had become president of the Council the previous year,
       decided to distance the chemurgy movement from ethanol,[i] mend
       fences with the petroleum industry, and place the Council on a
       more [size=14pt] cautious  (&#128073;
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-040718162655-14231561.gif&#129430;)<br
       />course.[/b]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080422121611.png
       The Council’s cause received an unexpected boost when Theodore
       G. Bilbo, a U.S. senator from Mississippi, sought a means to
       promote new uses for his region’s surplus cotton. To make his
       goal more politically attractive, he supported a broader
       research program. In the end, four regional U.S. Department of
       Agriculture laboratories, dedicated to finding new uses for farm
       crops, were authorized under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of
       1938.
       The labs were established in Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania; New
       Orleans, Louisiana; Peoria, Illinois; and Albany, California.
       Over time, their research agendas expanded, and  they became
       less focused on chemurgy.
       Nevertheless, their involvement in that field was symbolic of
       the chemurgy movement’s transformation from a cause associated
       with Roosevelt Administration critics to one with clear support
       from that administration.
       Worths
       Chemurgy demonstrated its worth during World War II,
       particularly in alleviating the rubber shortage caused when
       Japan cut off most of America's supply.
       Corn was used as raw material in much of the synthetic rubber
       produced during the war. Various other plants, including guayule
       and kok-saghyz (Russian dandelion), were investigated as rubber
       sources.
       In the American Midwest, school children were encouraged to
       gather milkweed floss, previously considered a nuisance but now
       valued for a new role as a filler in military life jackets.
       A priest in Iowa even made news by urging congregants to grow
       hemp, whose previous reputation as a drug hazard yielded to
       military requirements for rope and cordage.
       Downhill
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080422121435.png<br
       />
       Prospects for chemurgy appeared promising into the 1950s. An
       article in the December 3, 1951 issue of Newsweek, for example,
       said "“the flood of chemurgy seems to be swelling.”"
       But as uses of agricultural raw materials advanced, so did uses
       for  &#129430; petrochemicals, and non-renewable materials
       eventually
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250817135149.gif<br
       />
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-250718205137.gif<br
       />won out in a number of markets.
       For example, &#129430; petrochemical detergents were widely used
       in place of agriculturally derived soaps, and petrochemical
       plastic wrapping material largely replaced cellophane.
       The Chemurgic Council went through a period of decline and
       finally closed its doors in 1977.
       &#129430;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422162639.gif&#128520;
       In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in
       chemurgy, although the word itself has largely fallen out of
       usage. In 1990, Wheeler McMillen then 97 years old, addressed a
       national conference of latter-day chemurgic enthusiasts in
       Washington, DC. The conference served to launch the New Uses
       Council, which seeks to further the cause formerly promoted by
       the Chemurgic Council.
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422124812-6121253.jpeghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422124805-611948.jpeg[/center]
       [center]George Washington Carver[/center]
       George Washington Carver
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-301021140910.gif<br
       />was one of the most famous scientists of this field. In the
       Environmental Biography of George Washington Carver titled "My
       Work is that of Conservation" author Mark D. Hersey writes,
       "Thus, although he accepted the honorary mantle of "the first
       and greatest chemurgist," he was hardly in its mainstream. On
       the contrary, Carver often misconstrued the movement's aims,
       imagining they fell more in line with his own than in fact they
       did. Because Carver had devoted his energies to improving the
       lives of impoverished black farmers, he saw chemurgy as a field
       in which scientist addressed "a great human problem."
       His 1936 injunction to "chemicalize the farm" sprang from his
       abhorrence of waste rather than a desire for profit, let alone
       an affinity for chemical pesticides and fertilizers. He &#10024;
       wanted "waste products of the farm" to be used for making
       "insulating boards, paints, dyes, industrial alcohol, plastics
       of various kinds, rugs, mats and cloth from fiver plants, oils,
       gums and waxes, etc."
       Substitutions
       Kenaf for jute (rope)
       castor oil for petroleum-based oil (lubrication)
       See also
       Decorticator
       Notes
       Hale, William Jay (1934). The Farm Chemurgic: Farmward the Star
       of Destiny Lights Our Way. University of California: The
       Stratford company. p. 201.
  HTML http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemurgy
  HTML http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemurgy
       [move]&#129429;&#129430;
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-231218145827.png<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422134615.jpeg<br
       />
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250817135149.gif<br
       />
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418203402.gif<br
       />&#129421;
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-040718162655-14212306.gif<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422162639.gif[i]GET<br
       />IT? [/move]
       #Post#: 241--------------------------------------------------
       How Ronald Reagan Turned Out the Lights on Solar Power
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: April 9, 2022, 1:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]How Ronald Reagan Turned Out the Lights on Solar Power
       >:( [/center]
       
       In an excerpt from his new book, John Perlin reveals how one of
       the first actions of the new Reagan administration was to dim
       the lights on the solar energy program.
       SNIPPET:
       Dr. Barry Commoner, a distinguished scientist and strong solar
       advocate, was “surprised and troubled by the smallness of both
       the proposed solar research budget and expected results.” He
       wanted to see the data from the National Science Foundation that
       supported the Atomic Energy Commission’s dismal view of the
       future of solar power, especially since Solar Subpanel IX, the
       scientific panel that appraised photovoltaics’ contribution, was
       made up of, in Commoner’s judgment, “a distinguished group of
       experts.” A report by Solar Subpanel IX contained their
       findings, the scientist learned; when Commoner asked to see a
       copy of the report, the Nixon administration denied that such a
       report existed. Not believing the response credible, Commoner
       enlisted the support of Senator James Abourezk of South Dakota,
       a strong supporter of solar energy.
       He received the same runaround. Finally, a solar-energy friendly
       “Deep Throat” told the senator that a copy existed and could be
       found at the Atomic Energy Commission’s document reading room.
       According to Commoner, “This turned out to be a dim photocopy of
       a hazy carbon; but it has brilliantly illuminated” the
       discrepancies between the science and politics of energy.
       Unlike the author of The Nation’s Energy Future, the subpanel
       recommended an outlay of almost six times more money than the
       Atomic Energy Commission had requested for research and
       development of solar cells. Furthermore, the National Science
       Foundation had great expectations for solar electricity,
       predicting that with its suggested outlay of funds for
       photovoltaics, solar cells would supply “more than 7 percent of
       the required U.S. electrical generation capacity by the year
       2000,” even though the expenditure for the solar option would be
       16 times less than for the nuclear choice.
       The subpanel also found the solar option more appealing because
       “in contrast to problems incurred by nuclear plants,
       photovoltaic systems would find wide public acceptance because
       of their minimal impact on the environment.” However, the report
       warned, if underfunded, “photovoltaics will not impact the
       energy [situation]” in future times.
  HTML http://www.alternet.org/how-ronald-reagan-turned-out-lights-solar-power
       #Post#: 242--------------------------------------------------
       How the Rockefeller Oil Empire Turned the WORLD into a Waste
       Based Society
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: April 9, 2022, 1:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Agelbert NOTE: I originally posted this on November 09, 2013. As
       we all know now in 2022, Big Oil DID NOT mend their
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418203402.gif<br
       />government corrupting, Renewable Energy sabotaging ways, but
       doubled down on all their morally bankrupt social Darwinist
       Skullduggery. We need petroleum based fuels like a dog needs
       ticks!
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422150144.png
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422144022.png[/center]
       [center]How the Rockefeller Oil Empire Turned the WORLD into a
       Waste Based Society[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/5ywwDIsHMbs?t=1061[/center]
       [center][I]The Rockefellers BEGINS at 18:35 into the
       video[/I][/center]
       Learn how the Rockefellers turned the USA into an Oil Oligarchy.
       THEY were the ones who created the framework of U.S. Foreign
       intelligence agencies and policies that continue to this day
       fomenting wars.
       Also they were instrumental in our Domestic policy (education
       and health for a brainwashed obedient and "healthy enough to
       work in factories" labor force).
       Although this discussion of American History, complete with the
       machine gunning and burning of men, women and children by
       Rockefeller goons calling themselves the "Colorado Militia"
       (NOT!) at a miner's strike in Ludlow is given in 1978, you can
       see ALL the tentacles that were in place THEN proving we are NOT
       a Representative Republic or a Democracy but, IN REALITY, an Oil
       Oligarchy. >:(
       The corrupt shell corporation practices and (fake) philanthropic
       tax dodges of the modern corporation used to bribe or bully
       elected officials to do the bidding of NON-elected Foundation
       and think tank DICTATORS was pioneered by the Rockefellers.
       The policy of making foreign lands safe for multinational
       corporations was pioneered by them.
       They set the sick, putrid, wasteful PATTERN of planetary
       predatory capitalism that OWNS this country and most of the
       world.
       It will be interesting to see how they plan to survive now that
       it has been laid bare that THEY and their "business practices"
       as well as "greed is good" mindset are TOTALLY responsible for
       our present climate catastrophe.
       The Rockefellers and their ilk dove wantonly and arrogantly into
       society and planetary resources with the power of fossil fuels
       as if they were gods that could remake the Earth and
       we-the-people into a nice , predictable, productive and
       profitable slave empire. They thought they had it ALL FIGURED
       OUT.
       Their TITANIC HUBRIS, PLANET SIZED EGOS and GREEDY FACES, after
       swan diving with all the power of oil into everybody's business,
       now faced with horrendous climate change, are coming up with
       SAND IN THEIR MOUTHS!
       And the biosphere looks on and observes that pride cometh before
       a fall. The bigger they are the HARDER they fall. Too bad
       we-the-people have to fall too.
  HTML https://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-041115022304.png
       What are the odds that the 1%, with THE Rockefellers & friends
       Octopus in charge, at the pinnacle of human power and having
       human society by the short hairs, are going to become
       cooperative, altruistic and respectful of the biosphere's other
       Earthlings as matter of SURVIVAL, not just common sense?
       What are the chances they will realize they are the biggest,
       most well organized, industrially efficient SCREW UPS in human
       history?
       What are the chances they will mend their ways?
       What did Dorian Gray do when he finally had to face who he
       REALLY was?[/I]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422142602.jpeg<br
       />We can only hope.
       --- Quote ---
       > "ARGO floats have allowed accurate measurement of ocean heat
       gain since 2005. Earth is gaining energy at a rate 0.6 W/m2,
       which is 20 times greater than the rate of human energy use.
       That energy is equivalent to exploding 400,000 Hiroshima atomic
       bombs per day, 365 days per year."
       --- End Quote ---
       A New Age of Risk
       James Hansen
       Mobilizing Science for Sustainable Development:
       The Sustainable Development Solutions Network
       22 September 2012
       Low Memorial Library, Columbia University
       New York, NY
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422145854.jpeg
       [move][i]The &#129429;&#129430; Hydrocarbon &#128121; Hellspawn
       Fossil Fuelers DID THE Clean Energy Inventions suppressing,
       Climate Trashing, Government corrupting, human health depleting
       CRIME. Since [Color=Brown]they have ALWAYS BEEN liars and
       conscience free
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422145428-563469.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422162639.gifcrooks,<br
       />they are trying to AVOID [/color]DOING THE TIME or PAYING THE
       FINE!  Don't let them get away with it! Pass it on!
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422150727.png[/move]
       #Post#: 243--------------------------------------------------
       1931: Edison Advocates for Solar Energy over Fossil Fuels
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: April 9, 2022, 2:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]1931: Edison Advocates for Solar &#127774; Energy over
       Fossil Fuels[/center]
       In a conversation with fellow inventors and entrepreneurs Harvey
       Firestone and Henry Ford, Thomas Edison says of renewable energy
       sources: “We are like tenant farmers chopping down the fence
       around our house for fuel when we should be using nature’s
       inexhaustible sources of energy—sun, wind, and tide.… I’d put my
       money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I
       hope we don’t have to wait until oil and coal run out before we
       tackle that.” [US History, 2013; About Thomas Edison, 8/19/2013]
       Entity Tags: Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, Harvey Firestone
       Timeline Tags: US Solar Industry
  HTML http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/topic.jsp?topic=topic_energy
       It seems &#129430; Rockefeller
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-311013201314.png<br
       />had other views...and the &#128013; GLOBAL WARMING DENIERS
       STILL
       HAVE THEM!
       #Post#: 244--------------------------------------------------
       For GM ethanol wasn’t an option. It couldn’t be patented and
       controlled. And oil companies &quot;hated it&quot;.
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: April 9, 2022, 2:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       AGelbert WARNING: Leaded gasoline is STILL LEGAL
  HTML https://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183337.bmp<br
       />in piston aircraft in the USA. Remember that if you are
       raising
       children under the approach path to a general aviation airport.
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-240718213435-14601598.gif
       Smithsonian Magazine
       December 9, 2016 By Kat Eschner
       [move]For most of the mid-twentieth century, lead &#129430;
       gasoline was considered normal. But lead is a &#9760;&#65039;
       poison, and burning it has had dire consequences.[/move]
       [center]
  HTML https://th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.com/MJVL1WSRzISHPDWgAhvA5PguAXU=/1000x750/filters:no_upscale()/https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer/92/ec/92ec43f0-9bc7-45be-a75a-419a101c2458/standard_stations_filling_station_in_california_1939.jpg[/center]
       [center]A Standard Oil filling station in California, circa
       1939. Wikimedia Commons[/center]
       SNIPPET:
       The answer goes back to this day in 1921, when General Motors
       engineer named Thomas Midgley Jr. told his boss Charles
       Kettering that he’d discovered a new additive which worked to
       reduce the “knocking” in car engines. That additive: tetraethyl
       lead, also called TEL or lead tetraethyl, a highly
       &#9760;&#65039; toxic compound that was discovered in 1854. His
       discovery continues to have impact that reaches far beyond car
       owners.
       Kettering himself had designed the self-starter a decade before,
       wrote James Lincoln Kitman for The Nation in 2000, and the
       knocking was a problem he couldn’t wait to solve. It made cars
       less efficient and more intimidating to consumers because of the
       loud noise. But there were other effective anti-knock agents.
       Kitman writes that Midgley himself said he tried any substance
       he could find in the search for an antiknock, “from melted
       butter and camphor to ethyl acetate and aluminum chloride.” The
       most compelling option was actually ethanol.
       But from the perspective of GM, Kitman wrote, ethanol wasn’t an
       &#128521;&#128520; option. It couldn’t be patented and GM
       couldn’t control its production. And oil companies like Du Pont
       "hated it," he wrote, perceiving it to be a threat to their
       control of the internal combustion engine.
       TEL filled the same technical function as ethanol, he wrote: it
       reduced knock by raising the fuel's combustability, what would
       come to be known as "octane."
       Read more:
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png[/center]
       Leaded Gas Was a Known Poison the Day It Was Invented
  HTML https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/leaded-gas-poison-invented-180961368/
       #Post#: 1492--------------------------------------------------
       How can we stop burning fossil fuels if we still need everything
       else they make?
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: November 28, 2023, 6:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]How can we [b][glow=green,2,300]stop[/glow]
       [glow=maroon,2,300]burning fossil fuels[/glow] if we still need
       everything else they make?[/b][/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/BYWLpdGgJe4[/center]
       Just Have a Think 542K subscribers 99,220 views  Nov 26, 2023
       Petroleum-based products like pharmaceuticals, electronics,
       fertilizers, plastics and a host of other crucial modern world
       commodities are all impossible to make without first producing
       hundreds of millions of tonnes of gasoline, kerosene, and
       diesel. It's just the way the process works. At least that's
       what the fossil fuel industry would like you to believe. Except,
       that is NOT TRUE. An independent petroleum industry consultant
       explains how it REALLY works.
       AGelbert COMMENT: The [glow=maroon,2,300]&#129430; Hydrocarbon
       &#128520; Hellspawn[/glow] will engage in the
       [glow=green,2,300]LOW PROFIT MARGIN methods[/glow] described in
       the above video ONLY
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164718-5381960.png<br
       />WHEN [glow=red,2,300]THEY[/glow]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422155724.png<br
       />&#128073; HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE. These morally bankrupt
       [glow=maroon,2,300]Social Darwinists[/glow]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/who-can-you-trust/corruption-in-government/msg1119/#msg1119<br
       />have NO INTENTION of changing their [glow=red,2,300]HIGH
       PROFIT
       MARGIN, BIOSPHERE POLLUTING[/glow] hydrocarbon based fuels
       "&#9760;&#65039; [glow=red,2,300]business model[/glow]":
       
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-280622182043.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422171501-11561115.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090923144139.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-010922180717.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422171412-1145173.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-190523161348.png[/center]
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1