URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sober Thinking
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Geopolitics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 531--------------------------------------------------
       Good News News for Passage of a long Overdue Bill (i.e.
       overcoming SABOTAGE BY 👿 Pelosi + Her Staffer 🐍
       Primus) 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: September 23, 2022, 1:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [move]Good News News for Passage of a long Overdue Bill (i.e.
       overcoming SABOTAGE by 👿 Pelosi + Her Chief of Staff
       🐍 Primus)
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422144605.png[/move]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080822141004-17202295.gif<br
       />AGelbert NOTE: After the quote below, that I placed here
       because
       it contains "how it works" info for Bills to get to a floor vote
       in Congress (and my :-[ correction), Good News news for another
       Bill that, though not anywhere near as needed for some semblance
       of justice for pensioners, is a step in the right direction.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422145549-5701455.gif
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418201112.png<br
       />Friendly warning to those easily board: Righteous indignation
       rant on inflation theft included further down.
       --- Quote ---
       > My Federal Retirement
       >
       > September 15, 2022
       >
       > [center]Proposed Bill Would Repeal Federal Taxes on Social
       Security Benefits[/center]
       >
       > Representative Angie Craig &#128509; (D-MN)
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422180553-643238.gif<br
       />introduced last month legislation that would repeal federal
       taxes on Social Security benefits for retirees.
       >
       > If passed, the You Earned It, You Keep It Act (HR 8717)
  HTML https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8717<br
       />would repeal all of the federal taxation on Social Security
       retirement benefits beginning in 2023.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422180949.png
       >
       > Craig claims the tax repeal would be fully paid by
       implementing an extension of the payroll tax wage cap to over
       $250,000 a year.
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250817121649.png
       <br
       />Under current law, wages over $147,000 are exempt from the
       Social Security payroll tax.
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250817121649.png
       >
       > “Social Security &#128509; is a promise we have made to the
       American people – if you work hard and play by the rules, the
       dignity of a secure retirement will be within your reach,” said
       Craig &#128509;.
       >
       > “But taxing the very benefits American workers have earned
       after decades on the job diminishes our promise and threatens to
       undermine the financial security of retirees already struggling
       with rising prices, “Craig said. “Eliminating this tax will help
       Social Security benefits go further and ensure that American
       retirees have all the resources they need after a lifetime of
       hard work.”
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-120818180835-1624479.gif<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122257-657398.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422150144.png
       >
       > Craig said that according to non-partisan analysis the
       proposed legislation would also improve the long-term solvency
       of Social Security compared to current law.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422145344-560693.png
       >
       > To read the full text of the bill, go here
  HTML https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8717/text/ih?overview=closed&format=txt.
       >
       >
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164616-5368.jpegAGelbert<br
       />NOTE: Below, if you are good at reality based interpretations
       of
       the Congressional 'how it works' for New Bills,  such as the
       "You Earned It, You Keep It Act (HR 8717)" Bill submitted August
       16, 2022 by Representative Angie Craig &#128509; (D-MN), you
       will learn &#128064; how &#128520; Pelosi, aided and abetted by
       her Chief of Staff, &#128127; Primus (a neoliberal, Wall Street
       worshipping sworn enemy of ANY improvement of Social Security
       and/or Medicare - which is why Pelosi made him Chief of Staff),
       will do all these two &#128520;&#128127; enemies of
       we-the-people can to keep HR 8717
  HTML https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8717/text/ih?overview=closed&format=txt<br
       />from EVER coming to the House Floor for a vote. A Floor Vote
       would expose the FACT that Pelosi, and too many other so-called
       "Democrats", are AGAINST improving Social Security. They don't
       want most Americans to learn that they are FRAUDS. So, Primus
       and Pelosi, on behalf of the 1% American Oligarchy Social
       Darwinist GREEDBALLS, will 'play' with the Scheduling Calendar
       to kill the HR 8717
  HTML https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8717/text/ih?overview=closed&format=txt.<br
       />&#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;&#128545;
       >
       > However, if more than 226 Reps ( :-[ CORRECTION: there must be
       at least 290) &#128509; push for a &#129413; floor vote, the
       corrupt Scheduling 'fun and  games' will be thwarted and we
       MIGHT get some justice, for a welcome change. May God Hear the
       &#128591;&#127996; prayers of all the humble Social Security
       pensioners and force Pelosi to bring HR 8717
  HTML https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8717/text/ih?overview=closed&format=txt<br
       />to a floor vote &#128330;&#65039; THIS MONTH.
       >
       > [center]Congress.gov: Calendars and Scheduling[/center]
       >
       > [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/aCFf3o4bhgs[/center]
       >
       > Library of Congress 257K subscribers
       >
       > Congress.gov Legislative Process videos were produced by the
       Library of Congress (LOC).  In service to Congress, analysts in
       the LOC Congressional Research Service (CRS) authored (Valerie
       Heitshusen) and narrated (Walter J. Oleszek) the videos for
       Congress.gov.  Video also available here
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqa3o3b1hLd0VJSV9scUxXcy14aTcxa09KVUo2QXxBQ3Jtc0tub1JzU2lkSXg0S3o1bklRVUZMQ0VtUC05Y2oxWlNYQlJ1RHgzVHotTTVEYmt4QlFXNGRyT21yX3JGZjlmNUxZMnVfcHpsczhNUTNydU5kcjlHeVhEMWYxNVg1a2l3RVI1eTBxQkhHcXIyUDVuTy1XSQ&q=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.congress.gov%2Flegislative-process%2F&v=aCFf3o4bhgs.
       --- End Quote ---
       September 22, 2022 My Federal Retirement
       [center]Bill Repealing Social Security’s WEP and GPO Advances in
       House
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202614-14002059.gif[/center]
       Reaching more than 290 cosponsors, the Social Security Fairness
       Act  (HR 82) entered an important stage in its path toward a
       possible full floor vote after the House Ways and Means
       Committee advanced the bill by voice vote on Tuesday.
       The proposed legislation would repeal the windfall elimination
       provision (WEP) and the government pension offset (GPO). The WEP
       and GPO provisions reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits
       for those who are covered by a government (federal, state or
       local)-sponsored guaranteed pension plan, such as federal
       employees who are covered by the Civil Service Retirement System
       (CSRS).
       The bill’s sponsor, &#128024; Rep. Rodney Davis (R-IL)
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122505-6702373.gif,<br
       />secured 299 co-sponsors which now allows it to be considered
       for
       a &#129413; floor vote under the Consensus Calendar process in
       the House rules.
       A member of Congress may file a motion with the House Clerk to
       place their legislation on the Consensus Calendar once their
       legislation has accumulated at least &#129413; 290 cosponsors.
       If the legislation maintains at least 290 cosponsors for 25
       legislative days, and the committee of jurisdiction does not
       report the legislation, it will be placed on the Consensus
       Calendar. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has the authority to bring
       legislation on the Consensus Calendar to the floor for a vote
       before the full House of Representatives.
       Davis filed a motion on July 15, 2022, to place the Social
       Security Fairness Act on the Consensus Calendar. The
       25-days-on-the-Calendar requirement for the legislation was met
       Tues, Sept. 22,  2022.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422144605.png<br
       />Davis is urging Speaker Pelosi and House leadership to allow
       an
       immediate vote on this legislation.
       “Our bipartisan ‘Social Security Fairness Act’ has reached
       another important legislative milestone,” said Davis on Tuesday.
       “In the next few days, we will have met the Consensus Calendar
       requirements outlined in the House. Speaker Pelosi
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422155724.png<br
       />must allow a vote.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422145533-5682069.png<br
       />The millions of public service workers across this country who
       are being unfairly punished by the Social Security Act deserve
       it. That’s why a bipartisan supermajority of the House is
       cosponsoring our bill. Let’s get this done.” &#128591;&#127996;
       NARFE Support
       The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association
       (NARFE) this week issued a statement of support for the
       legislation.
       WEP and GPO have deprived public servants of their full Social
       Security benefits for far too long. Federal workers, teachers,
       police officers, firefighters and others earned pensions through
       their service, and earned Social Security benefits separately
       through their or their spouses’ private-sector—or other
       covered—employment,” said NARFE National President Ken Thomas.
       “Yet those earned Social Security benefits are reduced simply
       because they earned their public sector pension.”
       “NARFE has pressed for repeal of these onerous penalties for
       decades, ” Thomas said. “Bills have been introduced each
       Congress, often accumulating cosponsors from a majority of House
       members. Yet not once has the bill been considered by
       committee—until today. By approving the Social Security Fairness
       Act, the House Committee on Ways and Means has made more
       progress on this issue than has ever occurred. That is a real
       achievement.”
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-020818221632-1610966.gif
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164613-5332481.jpeg
       The full text of the bill can be found here
  HTML https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/82.
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png[/center]
       There is a similar bill &#128073; S. 1302: Social Security
       Fairness Act)
  HTML https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/s1302
       in the Senate
       proposed by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) with 42 cosponsors.
       Agelbert additional NOTE: I've been a retired FAA Air Traffic
       Controller for decades. The above Bill, if &#128127; Pelosi
       doesn't manage to kill it with some &#128013; procedural
       legerdemain, and it makes it through the Senate to President
       Biden, AND he signs it into LAW, will do absolutely nothing to
       increase the size of my pension because it only applies to those
       who retired before AFTER December 2021.
       I am celebrating this Bill because it makes EVERY Federal
       Employee out there an advocate of strengthening Social Security.
       Federal employees have a powerful effect on political campaigns
       because they mostly vote their wallet. The Social Darwinist
       enemies of Social Security, which incude a LOT of Democrats, as
       well as almost ALL the Republicans, will then lose 90% PLUS
       votes from Federal employees.
       This is good for all those who need a livable Social Security
       pension instead of the watered down by Greenspan authored BLS
       low balled inflation, and unfairly taxed above $32,000 a year on
       top of that, present Social Security "benefit" amount. Social
       Security needs to be DOUBLED, not just slightly "improved",
       simply because the low balling of inflation has annually
       whittled away at the purchasing power of people on Social
       Security pensions for over 40 YEARS. If you think that is a bit
       "extreme", just look CLOSELY at that $32,000 max not taxed
       figure. That was put in the IRS TAX LAW in 1983, and has not
       been changed since then. >:(
       [center]This graphic is not up to date (i.e. the numbers are for
       2019, not 2022), but it gives you the right idea:[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-301219173646.png[/center]
       &#128226; Even with the low-balled COLA numbers, $32,000 1983
       dollars EQUALS $95,155.34 in 2022 dollars! And THAT is just the
       unfair taxation part! The LOSS of buying power massively above
       and beyond the COLA "increase adjustments" since 1983 (i.e.
       197.4%) add Government sponsored THEFT to the  Government
       sponsored unfair taxation. HOW? There are many, many goods and
       services we all require to live. They are NOT "luxuries". They
       are NOT "optional". THAT is what the Cost Of LIVING formula is
       supposed to be all about, but after Greenspan and his pals in
       the Federal Reserve corrupted the formula, is a Wall
       Street
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-010922192452.gifpleasing<br
       />shadow of REALITY BASED COLA prior to 1980.
       REALLY? HOW can that be? For the eye opening details on how
       we-the-people have been steadily defrauded, year after year
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422182057.gif,<br
       />just check out the Chapwood Index
  HTML https://chapwoodindex.com/
       and/or Shadow Stats.
       In this post I will only point to one cost that affects
       everybody, whether they own a home or not. That cost is the
       Median Sales Price for New Houses Sold in the United States. If
       you don't own, you have to rent. The more houses are valued at,
       the more you will end up paying for rent. Yes, food, water,
       clothing, transportation, etc. are all costs we cannot avoid,
       but the Chapwood Index will show you everything you need to know
       about that sine qua non basket of goods and services to evidence
       the FACT that BLS COLA numbers are ridiculously low-balled. I
       bring up housing cost, because THOSE are even MORE DELIBERATELY
       (see below) low-balled :o than those items I just listed.
       [center] SOURCE:  Median Sales Price for New Houses Sold in the
       United States
  HTML https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPNHSUS[/center]
       February  1983:  $  73,800
       July         2022:  $439,400
       Do the REALITY BASED inflation math:
       $439,400 - $73,800 = $365,600
       $365,600 = [(365,600/73,800) x 100] = % increase of $73,800 =
       495.4% INCREASE
       197.4% BLS CPI Published  minus 495.4% PRESENT  = 298% LESS than
       REAL INFLATION
       The REAL INFLATION in the USA is Two Hundred and Ninety Eight
       percent MORE than the BLS published inflation. What that means
       for a person on Social Security is that they have been ROBBED of
       the 298% INCREASE they were entitled to had the BLS not
       Greenspan gamed the CPI "Owners Equivalent Rent" numbers to
       provide a "wealth effect" ILLUSION.
       Yes, it is hard to believe, but for a Social Security pension of
       $1,000 a month in 1983 to have kept up with REAL inflation, it
       would now have to be $4,954 a month. YET, that $1,000 a month
       1983 pension is at $1,974 a month. &#129402;
       For anyone that is getting cross eyed with the math, my point is
       that this example (which applies to ALL Social Security
       pensioners, more or less, but usually MORE SO) means that
       pension of $1,974 is getting SHORT CHANGED
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422182057.gif<br
       />by $2,980&#10071;
       Now I hope you see why all Social Security pensions need to be
       DOUBLED, at MINIMUM, AND not subject to taxes below, at MINIMUM
       (i.e. using the BLS published 197.4% increase from 1983 to 2022
       COLA numbers), any amount less than $95,168.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422150144.png<br
       />
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-301216162944.png[/center]
       #Post#: 538--------------------------------------------------
       The Reptilian Conscience Challenged (i.e. Social Darwinist)
       HISTORICAL Consistency of the Supreme Court
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: September 26, 2022, 3:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]The Reptilian Conscience Challenged (i.e. Social
       Darwinist) HISTORICAL Consistency of the Supreme Court[/center]
       AGelbert NOTE: This  November 03, 2013 Post :o
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/geopolitics/key-historical-events-that-you-may-have-never-heard-of/msg253/#msg253,<br
       />as anyone who experienced the Reptilian Conscience Challenged
       Consistency of the Supreme Court from 2013 to 2022 can see,
       clearly evidences that the (supremely Social Darwinist) Supreme
       Court of the present is even WORSE than that of the 1920 - 1940
       period, as bad as that one was, because. besides the fact that,
       unlike what FDR accomplished in the 1930's, ZERO reforms have
       occurred since 2013, back then preventing polluters from facing
       legal accountability for causing Catastrophic Climate Change was
       not on MUST-DO list of the 1%.
       
       IOW, we have gone from Frying Pan into the FIRE. Have a nice
       day.
       November 03, 2013, 07:13:12 by AGelbert
       [center][I] >:( Please observe the Reptilian Conscience
       Challenged Consistency of the Supreme Court during the 1920 -
       1940 period. [/I][/center]
       When you look at the following timeline and compare it with the
       1994 -2013 period, the later period of history LACKS ANY of the
       reforms that pulled us out of the earlier Depression even though
       the causes (Government blind eye to predatory business greedfest
       and human needs and dignity of the average worker) were EXACTLY
       THE SAME!  ??? :( :P >:(
       TIMELINES OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION:
       
       1920s (Decade)
       • During World War I, federal spending grows three times larger
       than tax collections. When the government cuts back spending to
       balance the budget in 1920, a severe recession results. However,
       the war economy invested heavily in the manufacturing sector,
       and the next decade will see an explosion of productivity...
       although only for certain sectors of the economy.
       • An average of 600 banks fail each year.  :o
       • Organized labor declines throughout the decade. The United
       Mine Workers Union will see its membership fall from 500,000 in
       1920 to 75,000 in 1928. The American Federation of Labor would
       fall from 5.1 million in 1920 to 3.4 million in 1929.
       • Over the decade, about 1,200 mergers will swallow up more than
       6,000 previously independent companies; by 1929, only 200
       corporations will control over half of all American industry.
       • By the end of the decade, the bottom 80 percent of all
       income-earners will be removed from the tax rolls completely.
       Taxes on the rich will fall throughout the decade.  >:(
       • By 1929, the richest 1 percent will own 40 percent of the
       nation's wealth. The bottom 93 percent will have experienced a 4
       percent drop in real disposable per-capita income between 1923
       and 1929.
       • Individual worker productivity rises an astonishing 43 percent
       from 1919 to 1929. But the rewards are being funneled to the
       top: the number of people reporting half-million dollar incomes
       grows from 156 to 1,489 between 1920 and 1929, a phenomenal rise
       compared to other decades. But that is still less than 1 percent
       of all income-earners.
       1922
       •The conservative Supreme Court strikes down federal child labor
       legislation.  >:(
       1923
       • President Warren Harding dies in office. Calvin Coolidge,
       becomes president. Coolidge is no less committed to
       laissez-faire and a non-interventionist government.
       •Supreme Court nullifies minimum wage for women in District of
       Columbia.  >:(
       1924
       • The stock market begins its spectacular rise. Bears little
       relation to the rest of the economy.
       1925
       •The top tax rate is lowered to 25 percent   >:( - the lowest
       top rate in the eight decades since World War I.
       1928
       • Between May 1928 and September 1929, the average prices of
       stocks will rise 40 percent. The boom is largely artificial.
       1929
       • Herbert Hoover becomes President.
       • Annual per-capita income is $750. More than half of all
       Americans are living below a minimum subsistence level.
       • Backlog of business inventories grows three times larger than
       the year before.
       • Recession begins in August, two months before   the stock
       market crash. During this two month period, production will
       decline at an annual rate of 20 percent, wholesale prices at 7.5
       percent, and personal income at 5 percent.
       • Stock market crash begins October 24. Investors call October
       29 Black Tuesday. Losses for the month will total $16 billion,
       an astronomical sum in those days.
       1930
       • By February, the Federal Reserve has cut the prime interest
       rate from 6 to 4 percent. Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon
       announces that the Fed will stand by as the market works itself
       out: 'Liquidate labor, liquidate real estate... values will be
       adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up the wreck from
       less-competent people'.
       • The Smoot-Hawley Tariff passes on June 17. With imports
       forming only 6 percent of the GNP, the 40 percent tariffs work
       out to an effective tax of only 2.4 percent per citizen. Even
       this is compensated for by the fact that American businesses are
       no longer investing in Europe, but keeping their money
       stateside. The consensus of modern economists is that the tariff
       made only a minor contribution to the Great Depression in the
       U.S., but a major one in Europe.
       •Supreme Court rules that the monopoly U.S. Steel does not
       violate anti-trust laws as long as competition exists, no matter
       how negligible.  >:(
       • The GNP falls 9.4 percent from the year before. The
       unemployment rate climbs from 3.2 to 8.7 percent.
       1931
       • No major legislation is passed addressing the Depression.
       • The GNP falls another 8.5 percent; unemployment rises to 15.9
       percent.
       1932
       • This and the next year are the worst years of the Great
       Depression. For 1932, GNP falls a record 13.4 percent;
       unemployment rises to 23.6 percent.
       • Industrial stocks have lost 80 percent of their value since
       1930.
       •10,000 banks have failed since 1929, or 40 percent of the 1929
       total.
       • GNP has also fallen 31 percent since 1929.
       • Over 13 million Americans have lost their jobs since 1929.
       • International trade has fallen by two-thirds since 1929.
       Congress passes the Federal Home Loan Bank Act and the
       Glass-Steagall Act of 1932.
       •Top tax rate is raised from 25 to 63 percent.
       • Popular opinion considers Hoover's measures too little too
       late. Franklin Roosevelt easily defeats Hoover in the fall
       election. Democrats win control of Congress.
       1933
       • Roosevelt inaugurated; begins 'First 100 Days'; of intensive
       legislative activity.
       • A third banking panic occurs in March. Roosevelt declares a
       Bank Holiday; closes financial institutions to stop a run on
       banks.
       • Alarmed by Roosevelt's plan to redistribute wealth from the
       rich to the poor, a group of millionaire businessmen, led by the
       Du Pont and J.P. Morgan empires, plans to overthrow Roosevelt
       with a military coup and install a fascist government  modelled
       after Mussolini's regime in Italy. The businessmen try to
       recruit General Smedley Butler, promising him an army of
       500,000, unlimited financial backing and generous media spin
       control. The plot is foiled when Butler reports it to Congress.
       • Congress authorizes creation of the[ Agricultural Adjustment
       Administration, the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Farm Credit
       Administration, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the
       Federal Emergency Relief Administration, the National Recovery
       Administration, the Public Works Administration and the
       Tennessee Valley Authority.
       • Congress passes the Emergency Banking Bill, the Glass-Steagall
       Act of 1933, the Farm Credit Act, the National Industrial
       Recovery Act and the Truth-in-Securities Act.
       • Roosevelt does much to redistribute wealth from the rich to
       the poor,   but is concerned with a balanced budget. He later
       rejects Keynes' advice to begin heavy deficit spending.
       • The free fall of the GNP is significantly slowed; it dips only
       2.1 percent this year. Unemployment rises slightly, to 24.9
       percent.
       1934
       • Congress authorizes creation of the Federal Communications
       Commission, the National Mediation Board and the Securities and
       Exchange Commission.
       • The economy turns around: GNP rises 7.7 percent, and
       unemployment falls to 21.7 percent. A long road to recovery
       begins.
       • Sweden becomes the first nation to recover fully from the
       Great Depression. It has followed a policy of Keynesian deficit
       spending.
       1935
       •The Supreme Court declares the National Recovery Administration
       to be unconstitutional.  >:(
       •Congress authorizes creation of the Works Progress
       Administration, the National Labor Relations Board and the Rural
       Electrification Administration.
       • Congress passes the Banking Act of 1935, the Emergency Relief
       Appropriation Act, the National Labor Relations Act, and the
       Social Security Act.
  HTML http://www.websmileys.com/sm/violent/sterb029.gif
       • Economic recovery continues: the GNP grows another 8.1
       percent, and unemployment falls to 20.1 percent.
       1936
       •Top tax rate raised to 79 percent.
       • Economic recovery continues: GNP grows a record 14.1 percent;
       unemployment falls to 16.9 percent.
       1937
       •The Supreme Court declares the National Labor Relations Board
       to be unconstitutional. >:(
       • Roosevelt seeks to enlarge and therefore liberalize the
       Supreme Court  ;D. This attempt not only fails, but outrages the
       public.   ???
       • Economists attribute economic growth so far to heavy
       government spending that is somewhat deficit. Roosevelt,
       however, fears an unbalanced budget and cuts spending for 1937.
       That summer, the nation plunges into another recession. Despite
       this, the yearly GNP rises 5.0 percent, and unemployment falls
       to 14.3 percent.
       1938
       • No major New Deal legislation is passed after this date, due
       to Roosevelt's weakened political power.
       • The year-long recession makes itself felt: the GNP falls 4.5
       percent, and unemployment rises to 19.0 percent.
       1939
       • The United States will begin emerging from the Depression as
       it borrows and spends $1 billion to build its armed forces. From
       1939 to 1941, when the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor, U.S.
       manufacturing will have shot up a phenomenal 50 percent!
       • The Depression is ending worldwide as nations prepare for the
       coming hostilities.
       Roosevelt began relatively modest deficit spending that arrested
       the slide of the economy and resulted in some astonishing growth
       numbers. (Roosevelt's average growth of 5.2 percent during the
       Great Depression is even higher than Reagan's 3.7 percent growth
       during his so-called 'Seven Fat Years!') When 1936 saw a
       phenomenal record of 14 percent growth, Roosevelt eased back on
       the deficit spending, worried about balancing the budget. But
       this only caused the economy to slip back into a recession in
       1938.
       • World War II starts with Hitler's invasion of Poland.
       1945
       • Although the war is the largest tragedy in human history, the
       United States emerges as the world's only economic superpower.
       Deficit spending has resulted in a national debt 123 percent the
       size of the GDP. By contrast, in 1994, the $4.7 trillion
       national debt will be only 70 percent of the GDP!
       • The top tax rate is 91 percent. It will stay at least 88
       percent until 1963, when it is lowered to 70 percent. During
       this time, America will experience the greatest economic boom it
       had ever known until that time.
       The above timeline has been complied by Steve Kangas from the
       Resurgence Magazine.
  HTML http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n2/connections_n2/great_depression.html
       See also cycle of past depressions
  HTML http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n2/connections_n2/depressions.html.<br
       />
       #Post#: 549--------------------------------------------------
       The official COLA numbers are deliberately gamed to produce a
       &quot;Wealth Effect&quot; ILLUSION 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: September 29, 2022, 1:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       . AGelbert NOTE I just posted this at Wolf Street. Enjoy. ;D
       --- Quote ---
       > Steve Sep 27, 2022 at 12:12 am
       > Inflation is just wealth transfer.
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-020818221632-1610966.gif
       > Yort > Steve Sep 27, 2022 at 4:03 am
       > It used to be nearly impossible to accumulate insane amounts
       of wealth when the top Federal Tax rate was 94%. In 1981 an
       actor became President and slashed taxes and dropped the
       marginal tax rate from 70% when he was inaugurated to just 28%
       when his term ended, and had a 74% top approval rating so it
       seems giving out free money worked better in the 80s vs 2022…
       >
       > Yet today if the top capital gains rate for billionaires was
       say 60%, they could simply borrow off their shares and never pay
       a dime like the current scheme to avoid taxes today. The
       proposed billionaire taxes are not going to pass as the
       billionaires buy out Congress via lobby funds. And lobby reform
       is not going to happen as it takes tens to hundreds of millions
       to win elections. Catch-22…
       --- End Quote ---
       AGelbert > Yort
       You are exactly right in absolutely everything you said. Thank
       you for saying it.
       Let me add some (i.e. 1% caused corruption of government for the
       purpose of continuous wealth transfer from the poor and middle
       class to the Wall Street wealthy) details.
       I am certain that the CPI, since 1983 when Reagan put Greenspan
       in there to corrupt the BLS CPI formula in order to short change
       all those who rely on the annual COLA adjustment to pensions or
       wages, has been consistently lower than the actual rate of
       inflation.
       It is my studied view that the actual inflation since 1983 is
       not 197.4% like the Greenspan gamed BLS COLA numbers claim, but
       495.4%.
       197.4% BLS CPI Published  minus 495.4% PRESENT = 298% LESS than
       REAL INFLATION.
       I am not making those numbers up. That 495.4% increase is the
       result of using the  Median Sales Price for New Houses Sold in
       the United States as proxy for overall inflation.
       February  1983:  $  73,800
       July         2022:  $439,400
       SOURCE:
  HTML https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPNHSUS
       Yes, of course it is true that food, water, clothing,
       transportation, etc. are all costs we cannot avoid that, in a
       reality based world, not the "core Inflation" Wall Street
       favoring fictitious world the Fed mendaciously pushes,  must be
       part of the overall CPI formula. There are many, many goods and
       services we all require to live. They are NOT "luxuries". They
       are NOT "optional". THAT is what the Cost Of LIVING formula is
       supposed to be all about, but after Greenspan and his pals in
       the Federal Reserve corrupted the formula, is, with Malice
       Aforethough, a Wall Street pleasing shadow of REALITY BASED COLA
       prior to 1980.
       I bring up housing cost because THAT is even MORE DELIBERATELY
       low-balled than those items I just listed.
       Now some will read this and claim I am being irrationally
       reductionist. They will say I am "cherry picking" the Median
       Sales Price for New Houses Sold in the United States from 1983
       to 2022 to come up with an inflation number 298% higher than
       published.
       I agree that, when all items in a reality based basket of goods
       and services are computed, using the Government formula prior to
       1980, the inflation number perhaps will not be as high as
       495.4%, but you can bet your inflation ravaged dollar that it
       will be at least 100% higher than the official 197.4%
       (explanation for that charitable assumption below).
       To those who cling to the view that the official 197.4% COLA
       increase from 1983 to 2022 is "reality" based, I ask a simple
       question: How much do you think a home, with no improvements, in
       still the same condition, with the same lot size, etc. as that
       home sold in 1983 for $73,800 is "worth" in 2022? According to
       Greenspan's gamed CPI (SEE: Owner's Equivalent Rent "weighting"
       fun and games), it is "worth"  $132,681.20. The difference
       between that price and the actual sales price of that house, and
       houses like it all over the United States, is the alleged
       "wealth effect" of ($439,400.00 - $132,681.20) 306,718.80. That
       is baloney and you know it. However, if we allow for a 100%
       greater inflation than the Government's 197.4%, that 1983
       $73,800 home is worth $219,48.00 in 2022.
       If you are wagging your head saying that is much less than said
       home is actually worth, as proven by the actual sales figures
       quoted above, then I hope you can agree that it is rational to
       conclude that the CPI computation by the BLS to arrive at annual
       COLA percentage is NOT reality based.
       For those who say, "this is complicated and everybody comes up
       with their own version of the cost of living, so it is a joke to
       use any other numbers", I respectfully state that you are
       suffering from Endowment Bias, a type of Confirmation Bias. IOW,
       you are cognitively "invested" in believing the BLS's Greenspan
       gamed COLA numbers, so you irrationally block any other view, no
       matter how well reasoned with ACTUAL cost numbers from 1983 to
       2022.
       For those who agree that the "problem" is the weighting math for
       the different goods and services in the CPI basket formula used
       to compute the COLA adjustment, BINGO!
       So tell me, what should the WEIGHT of "Owner's Equivalent Rent"
       BE? And while we are at it, is that term anything but BLS
       legerdemain? How hard is it to come up with a responsible term
       (e.g. COST Of Shelter) for the stats on home costs and how they
       relate to rent prices? I'm sure Wolf, who has exposed the
       "Owner's Equivalent Rent" low balling more than once here at
       Wolf Street, could come up with a reality based term AND a
       reality based weighting. My back of the envelope COST Of Shelter
       weighting is around 45% of the overall CPI basket. What say ye?
       At any rate, anyone that thinks the published numbers are
       "close" to reality is in Wall Street favoring La-la-land. Have a
       nice day.
  HTML https://wolfstreet.com/2022/09/26/my-wealth-disparity-monitor-september-update-qt-rate-hikes-dropping-stocks-bonds-reduce-outrageous-us-wealth-disparity/
       Learn more:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/geopolitics/money/msg531/#msg531<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164615-5351419.gif
       September 30, 2022 UPDATE:
       Wolf couldn't handle reality so he &#128465;&#65039; my post.
  HTML https://i.pinimg.com/736x/06/ab/a5/06aba53f54b873b730b842f3fc97aa9c--nuest-jr-wise-words.jpg<br
       />That is par for the course (i.e.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110822211802-18571793.png)<br
       />with Wall Street worshipping
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080822134118-17091258.gif$<br
       />Capitalists. They live in their own echo chamber and are quite
       efficient at blocking any irrefutable evidence that they are
       sufferning from Endowment Bias.
       Experience is the best teacher and boy are they going to NOW get
       a MEGA-HARD LESSON in inflation caused Wall Street cratering
       REALITY
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422155724.png&#10071;<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-130922212828-19791483.pnghttp://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250815185137.pnghttp://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-251117173905.jpeg<br
       />
       Reality based comments:
       September 30, 2022
       Macho Latte
       My old cheap ironing board broke at the place where the
       mechanism locks the legs into a standing position, the only real
       place where there is any stress at all.  That board cost me
       around $20 in 2018. The replacement, the same identical board,
       cost me $90.  That's a 350% increase.
       Mushytoe
       We trimmed everything out except for food and fuel. No new
       clothes, no going out...zilch. spending less overall. Wages
       haven't risen so I have no idea where all this excess spending
       is coming from. Unless it is from debt.
       Sardonicus
       Everything you need costs 20-30% more than a year ago.
       Of course spending is up massively.
       The only thing that went down is what you get for your money.
       Which is why the economy is cratering.
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-270220160728.jpeg[/center]
       Hal n back > [b]Sardonicus[/b]
       Is this spending data inclusive of inflation?
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-120818185040-16582181.gif
       i have noticed grocery prices when on sale have increased
       substantially the last couple of months.
       i have little faith in govt data, just like many others here.
       BANNED Phil McCoxwell
       One of my favorite stupid sayings the “experts” always away say:
       “the market has priced in…..”.  Nobody is pricing in anything.
       Just trying to figure out what’s side of the bet to be on.  The
       markets no longer reflect the economy. Haven’t for a long time.
       All speculation based on fake money. That is why all these
       authors care about is what the fed will do. The federal reserve
       should not be at the center of our financial world.  If the
       markets were truly free, risk would be priced by the bond
       markets and the stock market could use it as a risk reference
       for real valuations. Like our government, it should be
       transparent and not interfere in our daily lives. Like that will
       ever happen again.
       gunsfromthegrave > BANNED Phil McCoxwell
       Always perplexed me too. How do you price in large parts of the
       population starving or freezing to death or foreign countries
       embargoing you of goods you are entirely dependent on them for.
       For instance how does europe price in all of their industry
       shutting down due to no fuel to run it on. Seems like the only
       value reasonable to go to in that case is 0.
       Texas Cattle Man
       The University of Michigan Sentiment indicators are worthless
       garbage. They are of no use in calculating or pre-positioning
       purposes. A better index is one I saw in a Youtube video
       yesterday. It's call the CBI (Cracker Barrel Index). Supposedly,
       Cracker Barrel has reported their business softening, as it
       appears that a lot of their customers, to a large extend
       Boomers, are battening down the hatches also. The Boomers Social
       Security and retirement benefits, are not keeping up with
       inflation, so they are turning the burners down on their
       spending. The Boomers are big holders of real estate, and have
       been big spenders historically, but as more and more of them
       that reach retirement age, that spending will be reduced. Things
       are not going back to what they used to be.
       DavosSherman PREMIUM
       With inflation greater than 18%
  HTML http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
       and
       the "Fed" fighting it with 4%, inflation running red hot would
       be the result.
       mtl4 PREMIUM
       ... the uniparty is all in on the pork trough. Try and name one
       president in the last 30 years that actually cut spending (even
       Clinton’s deficit miracle was an accounting gimmick). Bush
       kicked off a deficit explosion with the endless war or terror ,
       Obamaroid carried out the Great Recession bailouts and kicking
       off the EU immigration nightmare, Trump kept the rates
       excessively low while failing to drain the swamp and Joe Xiden
       has been busy playing Manchurian Candidate and caving in
       whatever’s left. Notice, surprise surprise, not a single one has
       reversed anything.  The Republic is toast.
       Agelbert NOTE: Article source of the above comments (The
       "Inflation Indicator" the Fed loves is the fictitious "Core"
       Inflation PCE. Even THAT ridiculously low-balled indicator is
       SURGING!):
       Fed's &#128520; Favorite
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
       />Inflation Indicator Unexpectedly
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202556-13982337.gif<br
       />Surges As Personal Spending Jumps
  HTML https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/feds-favorite-inflation-indicator-unexpectedly-surges-personal-spending-jumps
       [move]Plutarch was, and still is, right.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240422195014-939847.png<br
       />&#128163; &#128073;&#128165;[/move]
       #Post#: 551--------------------------------------------------
       &quot;Panic Seems To Be In The Air&quot;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: September 30, 2022, 3:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       AGelbert NOTE:  Reality continues to assert itself at Wall
       Street. It's about time it did. I recently read a quote from
       then Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon, way back when the Great
       Depression got started after the 1929 Stock Market Crash:
       --- Quote ---
       > 1930 Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon announces that the Fed
       will stand by as the market works itself out: 'Liquidate labor,
       liquidate real estate... values will be adjusted, and
       enterprising people will pick up the wreck from less-competent
       people'.
       --- End Quote ---
       If Powell thinks the same way that Mellon did, this crash will
       make the 1929 Crash look like a walk in the park.
       FRIDAY, SEP 30, 2022 - 03:10 PM By Ven Ram, Bloomberg Markets
       Live reporter and strategist
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-020818215732-1575138.jpeg[/center]
       [center]"Panic Seems To Be In The Air"
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-251117173905.jpeghttps://media.tenor.com/images/8714e6aa996c682f95c9cfd09d64fdf7/tenor.gif
  HTML https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/panic-seems-be-air
       [/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-300922170453.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-100718163624-1442258.jpeg[/center]
       #Post#: 577--------------------------------------------------
       More &#127776; EVIDENCE &#129488; that GREED is BAD! 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 7, 2022, 3:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FRIDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2022 &#127776;
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-130922212828-19791483.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-130922212836-1981317.gif[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-071022164659.png[/center]
       #Post#: 588--------------------------------------------------
       More proof that the Financial system is in as severe a crisis
       &#128680; NOW as in &#128680; 2008:
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 11, 2022, 5:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       AGelbert OBSERVATION: These Financial "Experts" either have no
       idea what they are doing or they know exactly what they are
       &#127913;&#128520; doing. Both of those prospects are
       terrifying.
       [move]May 17, 2007 Forbes &#128073; Federal Reserve Chairman
       Bernanke Believes Housing Mess Contained [/move]
       Bernanke telling us not to worry about housing, mortgages, or
       car companies in the years before the recession, like denying a
       train wreck that is coming down the tracks.
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/INmqvibv4UU[/center]
       [move]October 11, 2022 US Treasury Secretary Yellen: &#128073;
       "I'm not seeing anything in the markets that cause me to be
       concerned."
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202533-1394275.gif[/move]
       [center]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-060714185706.gif[/center]
       THE WOLF STREET REPORT
       Oct 9, 2022 by Wolf Richter
       [center] Something Big Has Already Broken: Price
       Stability[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/m9SIdAVIgeg[/center]
       TUESDAY, OCT 11, 2022 - 06:00 PM
       --- Quote ---
       > Bank of America analysts warned in a note this month that
       shrinking trading volumes in the US Treasury market may be one
       of the greatest threats to global financial stability.
       --- End Quote ---
       Nobody Has Traded 10Y Japanese Govt Bonds For 3 Days!
  HTML https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/nobody-has-traded-10y-japanese-govt-bonds-3-days
       nsa Oct 12, 2022 at 8:39 am
       The elites and their (not your) central bank know exactly what
       they are doing…..to think otherwise is delusional. The central
       bank has published numerous papers on the subject of
       inflation…..even quoting Keynes extensively: “inflation is just
       another method of taxation which the government uses to obtain
       real resources”. Let’s hear from a former central banker and
       nobel laureate, the Helicopter Man, himself: “The US government
       has a technology called a printing press, which allows it to
       produce as many dollars as it wishes at zero cost…..a determined
       government can always generate inflation….”. Your rulers know
       exactly what they are doing…..stealing what little you have.
       Oct 9, 2022 at 6:06 pm
       Wolf Richter
       Read the section “Housing costs surge: part of services CPI”
       about halfway down, with lots of charts:
       The CPI for “rent of shelter” accounts for 31.9% of total CPI.
       It measures housing costs as a service – “shelter” – not as an
       investment asset to be purchased.
       
       Its major components:
       “Rent of primary residence” (accounts for 7.2% of total CPI)
       jumped by 0.7% in August from July, and by 6.7% year-over-year
       (red in the chart below). It’s based on actual rents paid by a
       large panel of tenants, including in rent-controlled apartments.
       “Owner’s equivalent rent of residences” (accounts for 23.7% of
       total CPI) jumped by 0.7% for the month and by 6.3%
       year-over-year (green line). It measures the costs of
       homeownership as a service, based on what a large panel of
       homeowners report their home would rent for.
       Both measures are still below overall CPI and are therefore
       still &#127913;&#128520; holding down overall CPI, but are
       holding it down less each month. And this is where a big part of
       the
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202719-1406786.gif<br
       />action is, going forward: ... ...
       “Core”
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-250718202127.gif<br
       />CPI.
       The “core” CPI, which excludes the volatile
       commodities-dependent food and energy components, jumped to 6.3%
       on a year-over-year basis, and to 0.6% on a monthly basis. This
       index is designed
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-260322170319.png<br
       />to measure inflation in the broader economy
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202551-13971996.gif<br
       />... ...
       Sep 13, 2022 Services Inflation Spikes, Core CPI Jumps, Food
       Inflation Worst since 1979, Durable Goods Rise, but Gasoline &
       Airfares Plunge
  HTML https://wolfstreet.com/2022/09/13/services-inflation-spikes-core-cpi-jumps-food-inflation-worst-since-1979-even-durable-goods-rise-but-gasoline-airfares-plunge/
       Oct 12, 2022 at 10:59 am
       AGelbert Your comment is awaiting &#128465;&#65039; moderation.
       &#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;
       All true and accurately stated. I agree 100%. I just wish you
       would not deep six my comments on the disingenuous gaming of the
       CPI. Your post makes it crystal clear to anyone with critical
       thinking skills that the CPI is thoroughly gamed, and not just
       in “Owners Equivalent Rent” legerdemain.
       The CPI will be down tomorrow. Why? Because this is the last
       month of the three months that is &#127913;&#128520; used for
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202719-1406786.gif<br
       />calculating the COLA for next year's SS increase…
       Oct 12, 2022 at 11:05 am
       AGelbert Your comment is awaiting &#128465;&#65039; moderation.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090822164302.gif
       The inflation rate isn’t bad at all, if you
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202719-1406786.gif<br
       />don’t count the things that people buy…
       #Post#: 598--------------------------------------------------
       Billionaires Spend Millions to Hide Trillions! 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 14, 2022, 1:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       October 14, 2022
       The Real News Network
       The workers’ struggle can’t take a break—not with the way the
       ruling class maneuvers! This week we take a special look at the
       US states aiding and abetting billionaire tax evasion, the fight
       against “right to work” laws, where things stand in the railroad
       workers’ struggle, and the battle to free Julian Assange.
       A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies is naming and
       shaming the US states most responsible for providing tax
       shelters to the uber-wealthy. South Dakota, Nevada, Delaware,
       and Alaska top the list as the worst offenders, but are joined
       by over a dozen other states whose lax laws leave loopholes for
       lavish laundering. These states are a key element of the story
       of expanding wealth inequality. Total billionaire wealth peaked
       at $5 trillion after the COVID-19 pandemic started, and it is
       likely that there are untold trillions that remain uncounted.
       Where has all this money gone? It’s been holed away in trusts
       headquartered in states friendly to billionaire tax evasion.
       As the federal government reiterates that it
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
       />doesn’t have money for student loan debt forgiveness,
       universal
       healthcare, or free college—while billions of people around the
       world suffer from needless hunger, lack of clean water,
       sanitation, and education—untold trillions are sitting in
       &#127913;&#128520;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422205132-6451602.gif<br
       />trusts, doing nothing but further amassing private wealth.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080422121331.gif
  HTML https://therealnews.com/these-us-states-are-billionaire-tax-havens
       Billionaires would have us believe they are “job and wealth
       creators,” but we know the truth is that workers produce the
       wealth capitalists take for themselves.
       On the railroad front, the shoddy deal patched together between
       rail workers and Wall Street by Biden’s Presidential Emergency
       Board is showing signs of falling apart. On Oct. 10, the
       Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees (BMWE) rejected the
       deal by a majority of 56%.
       Union officials said workers rejected the deal out of a sense
       that “management holds no regard for their quality of life,
       illustrated by their stubborn reluctance to provide a higher
       quantity of paid time off, especially for sickness.” While other
       unions have ratified the deal, BMWE’s rejection could set a
       precedent for others to follow. For now, BMWE is delaying a
       potential strike until Nov. 19 at the earliest.
  HTML https://therealnews.com/we-are-not-done-yet-railroad-track-workers-reject-deal
       #Post#: 609--------------------------------------------------
       Inflation continues to RISE in the United States.
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 20, 2022, 1:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       CLASS STRUGGLE
       Wednesday, October 19, 2022
       [center]What Social Security Should Really Be Paying to Survive
       in This
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422182057.gif<br
       />Economy ~~ SONALI KOLHATKAR[/center]
       SNIPPET:
       Inflation continues to rise in the United States. Although gas
       prices have recently fallen since their record high over the
       summer, the cost of groceries rose by 11.4 percent over the last
       year, and there is no expectation that they will fall back to
       reasonable levels. Prices overall have risen by 8.2 percent,
       according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price
       Index report covering September 2022 as compared to the same
       month last year. While most working Americans are not getting
       hefty wage raises to compensate for inflation, seniors will see
       their Social Security benefits—which are pegged to
       inflation—rise next year. Starting in January 2023,
       beneficiaries will see an 8.7 percent cost-of-living adjustment
       (COLA) bump in their Social Security checks.
       Conservatives are scoffing at this automated increase, as if it
       were a special treat that the Biden administration has cooked up
       to bribe older voters. Fox News reported that there was a
       “social media backlash” against White House Chief of Staff Ron
       Klain’s tweet lauding the upcoming increased COLA benefits for
       seniors. The outlet elevated comments by the conservative
       America First Policy Institute’s Marc Lotter, who retorted to
       Klain, “Nice try Ron. Raising benefits next year does not help
       seniors with the higher prices they are paying today or the
       higher prices they’ve been paying since you took office.”
       But Social Security benefits have risen automatically with
       inflation since 1975 by design, precisely so that the
       livelihoods of seniors are not beholden to partisanship. This is
       an imminently sensible way to ensure that retired Americans, who
       spent their working lives paying Social Security taxes, can have
       a basic income.
       If conservatives are complaining that an 8.7 percent bump is not
       enough to counter inflation, one might expect them to demand an
       even greater increase to Social Security benefits.
       But, as is often the case with conservative economic logic,
       hypocrisy abounds.
       Full article:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164613-5332481.jpeg
  HTML https://ongoingclassstruggle.blogspot.com/2022/10/what-social-security-should-really-be.html
       AGelbert COMMENT: The euphemistic label the "conservatives"
       favor is Orwellian codespeak. People who advocate "creative"
       (LOL!) destruction want ONLY to conserve the cruel exploitation
       of the underclass, NOT "ethics based values", as their
       propaganda disingenuously claims.
       I just read news about a new Scientific Study on &#129429; Gas
       Stove &#9760;&#65039; Leaks
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/catastrophic-climate-change/pollution/msg608/#msg608.<br
       />I'll bet you dollars to donutes that the "conservatives" will
       whine and moan about "Government attacks on liberty and freedom
       to use gas stoves" that this study may result in. As usual,
       "conservatives" (all Social Darwinists = Capitalists to the ends
       of their chinny chin chins) will studiously deny any
       responsibility for causing thousands of cancers because of their
       &#128520; inveterate &#128176; kotowing to the &#129430;
       Hydrocarbon Fuels "Industry". All these "conservatives" want to
       conserve is the "freedom" to be irresponsible with impunity.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422142505.gif
       #Post#: 623--------------------------------------------------
       Comment of the DECADE
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 28, 2022, 3:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > allfactsmatter
       > Ironically, this may actually be the moment when the best
       thing for the Fed to do is....nothing.
       >
       > They've already proven that inflation is not tamed by interest
       rates (Volcker actually proved that in 1980 but to acknowledge
       that would eviscerate the myth of Tall Paul and end the image of
       the omniscient Fed Chairman who can guide the US economy through
       any crisis of any kind).
       >
       > As a means to reduce the bloated money supply interest rates
       have had all the efficacy of using a teaspoon to empty a
       swimming pool.
       >
       > If there has to be a pivot, let the Fed pivot towards actual
       banking regulation, using its statutory authorities, and use a
       regulatory cudgel to get Wall Street to address its glaring
       vulnerabilities from rising interest rates. The one thing all
       the hoopla about the Fed "pivoting" shows is that there is an
       interest rate inflection point at which either defaults or
       margin calls (or both) trigger a mass market meltdown in which
       all the buyers suddenly turn into sellers and all the sellers
       run for the hills--i.e., a liquidity crisis.
       >
       > Wall Street knows that inflection point is out there, and has
       been shrieking for the Fed to not cross it--but won't take any
       preventative measures to unwind exposed positions to get ahead
       of a crisis (that would mean less profit, and we can't have
       that). The markets are convinced the government/the Fed will
       bail them out when the crisis hits, mainly because between the
       S&L crisis of the late 1980s and the derivatives crisis of
       2007-2008 the precedent has been well and truly set. As a
       result, they are content to ride the rollercoaster until it
       crashes, and let the government clean up the wreckage.
       >
       > The Fed has the regulatory tools to both identify (and even
       quantify) those interest rate vulnerabilities and to require
       banks to establish "living will" plans to unwind those positions
       in the event of a crisis. They have the capacity to get ahead of
       any liquidity crisis. They just need to use it.
       >
       > That's what the Fed "should" do. Which means it's the one
       thing the Fed absolutely positively will not do.
       >
  HTML https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/nomura-warns-another-rug-pull-imminent-due-premature-pause-mini-pivot-step-down-hopes
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 624--------------------------------------------------
       &quot;Irony&quot;? &#129335;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;
       &quot;surprisingly?&quot; &#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039; YOU
       HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING. &#129397;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: October 29, 2022, 5:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://ci6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/bMi5K4CDjFlORKNzbtb8lit774Y1msNFvqsbSgXnjuUWN_dpHltajASyKjxYyLW_EG-St1vg9JhrJR1vAL8SwjJmNeDervxCdhNS7cu1ZyWAx3J0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://truthout.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/truthout_logo.jpg
       October 28, 2022 by Liz Theoharis, TomDispatch
       AGelbert NOTE: The only adjective in the following reality based
       statement that is worthy of Orwell is, "surprisingly".
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153115-13851380.png<br
       />
       "To address the problems of our surprisingly
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422145218.gif<br
       />impoverished democracy, policymakers would have to take
       seriously the realities of those tens of millions of poor and
       low-income people, while protecting and expanding voting rights.
       After all, before the pandemic hit, there were 140 million
       &#129397; of
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422182057.gif<br
       />them: 65% of Latinx people (37.4 million), 60% of Black people
       (25.9 million), 41% of Asians (7.6 million), and 39.9% of White
       people (67 million) in the United States. Forty-five percent of
       our women and girls (73.5 million) experience poverty, 52% of
       our children (39 million), and 42% of our elders (20.8 million).
       In other words, poverty hurts people of all races, ages,
       genders, religions, and political parties."
       Read more:
  HTML https://media.tenor.com/images/5423e809b1a22096b6925bf9bc3fd1cb/tenor.gif
       [center]Poverty Is at Emergency Levels in the US. Why Isn’t It a
       [color=navy]Midterm Election [glow=red,2,300]Issue[/glow]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202747-1412965.gif
  HTML https://truthout.org/articles/poverty-is-at-emergency-levels-in-the-us-why-isnt-it-a-midterm-election-issue/[/center]
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 17
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page