URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sober Thinking
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Hydrocarbon Based Fuels Folly
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 645--------------------------------------------------
       "... tracking of over a million dollars in climate
       disinformation ads on Facebook, primarily from API's Energy
       Citizens 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: November 8, 2022, 11:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211810-2001879.png[/center]
       Make Nexus Hot News part of your morning: click [i]here
  HTML https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/
       to subscribe.[/i]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211808-20001173.png[/center]
       November 8, 2022
       [center]COP, Look 👀, Listen For 🔊 Regular
       Readouts of COP27 🦖😈🐍
       Disinformation[/center]
       SNIPPETS:
       While we usually write these columns with little more at our
       disposal than our wits and a web browser, the Institute for
       Strategic Dialogue
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418201112.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122257-657398.png<br
       />has developed an incredible dashboard that pulls data from
       some
       3,000 social media accounts, millions of posts, and 250 media
       outlets, and we're working with them to produce regular
       bulletins
  HTML https://climatedigital.typeform.com/to/hvGiQcYE?utm_campaign=Hot%20News&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=233012352&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_282w1v7NTSeQtNtRKgS4zIBaEd9wd4efTkS30hN37WIUF8CSQ1OwDqnsTV97wWTnxvENUwW6F1E4R17TBJ9Sp25808w&utm_content=233012352&utm_source=hs_email<br
       />about
       &#129430;&#128520;&#128013;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gif<br
       />climate disinformation. ... ...
       There's also a section on the Russia-Ukraine narrative, some
       tracking of over a million dollars in climate disinformation ads
       on Facebook, primarily from API's Energy Citizens &#128519;
       front &#129430; group and their "American Oil First" framing, "a
       thinly-veiled dog whistle to former President Trump's
       anti-immigrant "America First" policy" and a section on how Elon
       Musk's Twitter takeover showed how right-wing &#128520;
       "comedians" strategically use humor to spread disinformation.
       Read more:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png
  HTML https://newsletter.climatenexus.org/20221108-cop27d02-deforestation-and-drought-world-cup-math-draft-nca
       #Post#: 706--------------------------------------------------
       Big Oil's Big Lies Revealed In Emails Obtained By House
       Oversight Investigation
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: December 12, 2022, 3:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211810-2001879.png[/center]
       Make Nexus Hot News part of your morning: click [i]here
  HTML https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/
       to subscribe.[/i]
       December 12, 2022
       SNIPPET:
       [center]Big Oil's Big Lies Revealed In Emails Obtained By House
       Oversight Investigation[/center]
       Major &#129429;&#129430;&#128013; oil companies BP, Chevron,
       Exxon, and Shell, and the trade group the American Petroleum
       Institute, &#128520; intentionally crafted the appearance
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13822364.jpeg<br
       />of support for clean energy and environmental protection while
       internally working to ensure "the continued promotion of
       &#9760;&#65039; natural gas," documents released Friday by the
       House Committee on Oversight and Reform show.
       The documents, released as a part of an ongoing House
       investigation into the
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gif<br
       />oil and gas industry's climate denial and greenwashing,
       "demonstrate how the fossil fuel industry ‘greenwashed’ its
       public image with promises and actions that oil and gas
       executives knew would not meaningfully reduce emissions, even as
       the industry moved aggressively to lock in continued fossil fuel
       production for decades to come — actions that could doom global
       efforts to prevent catastrophic climate change,” Chair Carolyn
       B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) and environment subcommittee chair Rep. Ro
       Khanna (D-Calif.) said in a statement.
       The internal emails include a warning from &#129430; Bob Stout,
       BP's former U.S. VP and head of regulatory affairs, admitting
       BP's intention to make methane gas a permanent "destination
       fuel,"
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-260322170319.png<br
       />adding "We would not want to spell all this out, but also not
       implicitly concede the point by referring to &#9760;&#65039; it
       mainly as a ‘bridge.'"
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-270718182509.png<br
       />
       The documents also include incredulity at criticism of oil
       majors' sale of oil and gas assets to smaller, less accountable
       firms. (Washington Post $, Reuters, The Guardian, NBC, Bloomberg
       $, CNN, CNBC, The Hill, Politico, NBC, E&E $, Al Jazeera)
       Read more:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080422121331.gif
  HTML https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/
       #Post#: 718--------------------------------------------------
       How to unpick a company net zero target in 7 steps
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: December 17, 2022, 1:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [move]"On closer inspection, countless ambitious-sounding
       pledges ring hollow. Many commitments are little more than vague
       declarations of intent. Others hide huge chunks of a company’s
       CO2 pollution, or rely on dubious promises to compensate
       continued emissions, while lacking efforts to reduce fossil fuel
       use."[/move]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422170948-1092787.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040922152530.png
  HTML https://www.cleanenergywire.org/sites/all/themes/cleanenergywire/logo.png<br
       />
       Dossiers
       CLEW focus: 'Climate neutral'
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153115-13851380.png<br
       />products and companies - Greenwashing or sign of serious
       action?
  HTML https://www.cleanenergywire.org/dossiers/clew-focus-climate-neutral-products-and-companies-greenwashing-or-sign-hope?pk_campaign=daily_newsletter_2022-12-16&pk_keyword=clew-focus-climate-neutral-products-and-companies-greenwashing-or-sign-hope&pk_source=newsletter&pk_medium=email&pk_content=furtherbackground<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080822134118-1710799.gif
       [center]
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/styles/renewablerevolution/files/4132_bigoil.jpeg[/center]
       Factsheets
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13801246.png<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-211122190431.png&#129488;
       How to unpick a company
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
       />net zero target in 7 steps
  HTML https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/how-unpick-company-net-zero-target-7-steps?pk_campaign=daily_newsletter_2022-12-16&pk_keyword=how-unpick-company-net-zero-target-7-steps&pk_source=newsletter&pk_medium=email&pk_content=furtherbackground
       #Post#: 726--------------------------------------------------
       &#128520; Social Darwinist &#129430; Business as &#9760;&#65039;
       Usual 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: December 22, 2022, 4:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-180822134328.png
       December 19, 2022
       [center]
  HTML https://gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/shutterstock_1824598550-1-1536x925.jpg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080422121435.png[/center]
       [center]Here’s Why 32,000+ Abandoned & Orphaned Offshore Wells
       Litter the Outer Continental Shelf[/center]
       SNIPPET:
       In all, it’s estimated that the Taylor Energy spill has released
       up to 140 million gallons of oil to date.
       Not all stories of abandoned and orphaned offshore wells are
       like Taylor Energy’s. Some have been decommissioned the right
       way, while others are long forgotten and pose unknown
       environmental and marine life risks. Inadequate records and
       limited monitoring have made it challenging to accurately track
       the number of abandoned wells and whether they’ve been
       adequately plugged.
       According to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, however,
       more than 32,000 of the 55,000 offshore wells across the
       10.9-million-acre Outer Continental Shelf are abandoned or
       orphaned.
       But why? How can tens of thousands of oil wells sit out in the
       Atlantic, Arctic, and Pacific Oceans without demanding further
       attention or accountability?
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080422121331.gif
       Offshore wells are abandoned when they do not produce enough to
       offset operating costs. Some wells never produce at all. Some
       “dry up,” their accessible reserves exhausted based on current
       extraction methods. Some of these wells are temporarily
       abandoned, with the idea or promise that the owner will return
       to attempt extraction sometime in the future. Yet, the average
       length of time since the 3,364 “temporarily” abandoned wells in
       the Outer Continental Shelf were last drilled is 38 years.
       Wells are considered orphaned when they have no owner. Offshore
       oil wells are often orphaned if the companies that own and
       operate them go bankrupt or close their doors for any other
       reason. With no known owner, orphaned wells present significant
       challenges when it comes to shutting in and decommissioning
       them.
       Full article:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422135315.png
  HTML https://gcaptain.com/heres-why-32000-abandoned-orphaned-offshore-wells-litter-the-outer-continental-shelf
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418202829.png<br
       />Agelbert NOTE: Only in the good old United States of Petroleum
       can a pollution contaminated site, irresponsibly abandonded
       without plugging and cleanup by profit over planet oil loving
       greedballs, be affectionately called an "Orphaned" Oil and Gas
       Well. Friends, if YOU made that kind of a mess in your yard, the
       authorities would have a hazmat team sent there quickly,
       followed by the police charging you with unlawful contamination.
       The wells spewing methane and other (even MORE toxic - i.e.
       Cancer causing) contaminants were &#129429; IRRESPONSIBLY
       &#128520; ABANDONED, not "orphaned" by an "unfortunate" bit of
       Hydrocarbon Business "bad luck". It is absolutely breathtaking
       how the Hydrocarbon Hellspawn keep getting a free pass from the
       media for in-our-faces toxic pollution dumping on we-the-people.
       "Orphaned
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-050921221152.jpeg"<br
       />Oil and Gas
       Well&#10067;&#10067;&#10067;
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-150921161150.png
       Other euphemisms worthy of Orwell that we have all been
       subjected to:
       &#128544; &#9760;&#65039; Highly toxic fisson reactor Uranium
       fuel &#128073;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13822364.jpeg<br
       /> "Enriched" Uranium
       &#128544; &#9760;&#65039; Abortion
       &#128073;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13822364.jpeg<br
       />"Reproductive Right"
       &#128544; &#9760;&#65039; &#129429; "Natural" Gas
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-270718182509.png<br
       />&#128073;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13822364.jpeg<br
       />"Bridge Fuel"
       &#128544; &#128520; Greed is Good, &#129421; Might is Right,
       Losers Finish Last, It doesn't matter how you play the game, but
       whether you Win or Lose (etc. you get the morally bankrupt
       Social Darwinist Ideology Idea)
       &#128073;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13822364.jpeg<br
       />&#129430; "Evolutionary Advantage" of "Apex Predators"
       [move]AND all this time you actually believed the BIG LIE that
       "it was the Communists, not the Capitalists", that had the GOAL
       of CORRUPTING the Language. Now you know better.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422150144.png[/move]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422155138-6292473.jpeghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422155151-6342197.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422170635-107835.jpeg[/center]
       [center]Social Darwinist Business as
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-250817135149.gif<br
       />Usual
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-040718162655-14212306.gifDestruction[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3/3-091121125000.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-041115022304.pnghttps://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-221021140122.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-140822180413-18811555.png[/center]
       #Post#: 791--------------------------------------------------
       the &#129430; fossil fuel industry has been &#128520; lying
       about &quot;natural&quot; gas for nearly a hundred years!
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: January 19, 2023, 12:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211810-2001879.png[/center]
       Make Nexus Hot News part of your morning: click [i]here
  HTML https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/
       to subscribe.[/i]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211808-20001173.png[/center]
       January 19, 2023
       [center]The Gas Stove Backlash Is The Product of Nearly A
       Century of &#129430;&#128520;&#128013; Industry
       Propaganda[/center]
       If you bought something and it didn't work, you probably
       wouldn't buy it again the next year, or the year after, or every
       year for the foreseeable future. The &#129430; fossil fuel
       industry is no different—if it wasn't seeing a return on its
       annual investment in disinformation, it wouldn't keep spending
       billions of dollars on climate
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
       />disinformation &#128013; campaigns.
       The explosion of support for gas stoves in Republican circles is
       the latest example of how the fossil fuel industry's
       near-century of public relations expenditures has created a
       surround-sound media machine to manufacture
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gif<br
       />backlash against even the barest hint of a pending regulation.
       In a disinfo-free world, Republicans eager to show their support
       for rural and working-class communities wouldn't be so quick to
       lend their support to gas stoves because they're primarily used
       in urban areas, where Democratic voters are concentrated.
       Furthermore, gas stoves are often promoted by home renovation
       shows as a luxury good for the fanciest of kitchens. So, since
       new gas stoves are either a prized feature of lavish, elite
       kitchens or a common fixture in the poor Black and Hispanic
       communities that the GOP spends more time attacking than
       defending, the Republican gaslighting on gas stoves seems to
       make little sense.
       The fervent worship of gas stoves seems especially nonsensical
       since Consumer Reports finds that the innovative alternatives to
       gas stoves are so much better in every conceivable way:
       “Induction ranges and cooktops in particular often heat the
       fastest, simmer steadily, and provide quicker temperature
       changes when you adjust a burner.” (They also won't melt plastic
       measuring cups when you turn on the wrong burner…)
       But this pro-gas hullabaloo begins to make sense when you
       consider the fact that the fossil fuel industry has been lying
       about &#129429; [b]methane gas for nearly a hundred years[/b],
       as Rebecca Leber explained in Mother Jones
  HTML https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2021/06/how-the-fossil-fuel-industry-convinced-americans-to-love-gas-stoves/?utm_campaign=Hot%20News&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=242348031&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_gj16Q4YmqhdiyCtdYlJR_70IxhZg-qU6rJL8y6jhxf-0Fs5zH2qwc00gGnKmNenTFdFHUIKZIlrHgmGUopTt-liMcjA.<br
       />In the 1930s, "the &#129429;&#128520; industry embraced the
       term
       'natural &#128519; gas', which gave the impression that its
       product was cleaner than any other fossil fuel" and promoted the
       now-ubiquitous catchphrase "cooking with gas".
       The &#129429; methane gas industry has been at it ever since. As
       recent reporting at the New York Times exposed, the industry is
       sponsoring TV shows to promote gas stoves, part of the hundreds
       of millions the industry has spent on disinfo organizations and
       the billions that it has spent on trade associations and public
       relations.
       So when a federal regulator suggested looking into gas stove
       regulations, especially given the latest study showing that gas
       stoves cause as much asthma in children as second-hand smoke,
       the fossil-funded Republicans snapped into action, and the
       industry barely even needed to misrepresent past studies and
       activate its faux-media outlets and propagandists — though it
       still did.
       The Wall Street Journal's
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
       />opinion page, the crown jewel of climate disinformation media,
       was true to form with its "Biden is Coming for Your Gas Stove"
  HTML https://media.tenor.com/images/8714e6aa996c682f95c9cfd09d64fdf7/tenor.gif<br
       />editorial, falsely ginning up fears that jackbooted Big
       Government agents were on their way to your kitchen.
       Professional PR people like Alex Epstein also sent talking
       points, but that was little more than an opening of the other
       barn door after the horses had already run all around the farm.
       The Daily Caller discovered a so-called 'conflict of interest'
       and did a story attempting to make the fact that the study was
       funded by an advocacy group into a controversy, which is an
       interesting frame for an organization funded to be a
       conservative advocacy group posing as a media outlet.
       Overall, the Right generated plenty of noise but not much heat,
       and that's sort of the point. Make enough noise so that
       regulators, who have been aware of gas stoves' health risks for
       decades, will be too scared to protect the public from that
       particular source of pollution.
       Because it's certainly not about the quality of &#129429; gas
       stoves.
       Literally the only thing Consumer Reports found that gas stoves
       did better than electric stoves is that they have a scary flame:
       "The visual feedback provided by a flame growing and shrinking
       as you adjust a burner is valuable when gauging heat." (A
       problem that was literally solved in 2015.)
       So if you're so &#128053; dumb you need to see a &#128293;
       [b]flame to know the stove is on, then
       &#128024;&#129430;&#128520; Republicans have your back, and your
       stove.[/b] Hopefully it's worth the asthma and the
       climate-killing emissions.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422205132-6472099.gif
  HTML https://climatenexus.org/hot-news/
       #Post#: 863--------------------------------------------------
       CO2 is plant food so MORE CO2 from Burning Hydrocarbon Fuels is
       &#128530; &quot;GOOD&quot;? &#128580;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: February 17, 2023, 3:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have you been told by the &#128520;&#129430; Deniers that
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
       />CO2 is plant food so MORE CO2 is &#128530; "GOOD"? &#128580;
       Well, that is one of those &#128013; [glow=brown,2,300]Orwellian
       tricks[/glow] by the &#129430; [glow=red,2,300]Hydrocarbon
       &#128520; Hellspawn[/glow] that take advantage of the fact that
       most people do not have enough knowledge about HOW a
       [glow=green,2,300]plant leaf[/glow] absorbs CO2 AND &#128167;
       [glow=blue,2,300]water VAPOR[/glow] from the air to see through
       that &#128013; [glow=red,2,300]clever legerdemain[/glow].
       Let me connect the &#127774; photosynthesis 'how it works'
       &#127793; DOTS for those here that didn't study Botany in
       college so you can call out the &#128013; liars for &#129430;
       hire claiming &#128579; burning hydrocarbon based fuels
       "&#128519; INCREASES the greening of our biosphere".
       Plants absorb CO2 and H2O via pores calles STOMATA. Stomata are
       openings (i.e. epidermal pores) in the shaded part (i.e. bottom)
       of plant &#127811; leaves. Stomata are present in LARGE numbers
       in plant leaves. Stomata control the passage of gases into and
       out of a plant.
       Please note that GASES are what is controlled. Liquids DO NOT
       get into a plant leaf via the stomata (Liquids get into plants
       almost exclusively via the roots).
       To more fully understand why plants are &#128681; VERY
       NEGATIVELY affected by Catastrophic Climate Change, you need to
       fix in your mind that Stomatas are tiny.
       [center]Microscopic Photographic of Leaf Stomata:[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-170223144903.jpeg[/center]
       A micrometer is  one millionth of a meter (or one thousandth of
       a millimeter, 0.001 mm, or about 0.00004 inch). A skin cell is
       about 30 micrometers (i.e. 30 millionths of a meter) across.
       Stomata are only about HALF across, at the longest part, as a
       human skin cell. The distribution of stomata on a leaf is, on
       the average, over 100 to the square millimeter. The mean size of
       the open pores is I7.7 X 6.7 millionths (i.e. micrometers) of a
       meter.
       SOURCE: THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF THE STOMATA
       Marked variations in number and size of stomata occur, not only
       in different varieties of the same species, but in the same
       varieties grown under different external conditions. So far as
       my observation goes, however, the variation is greater in number
       than in size. ... ...
       [glow=green,2,300]"... it is to be remembered, as BROWN and
       ESCOMB have shown,5 that in the passage of gases through
       stomata, it is the linear dimensions, and not the area, which is
       important."[/glow]
  HTML https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/329698
       [glow=purple,2,300]AGelbert NOTE:[/glow] So, you now know that
       &#127808;&#127811; plant leaves have, on the bottom side, about
       100 tiny pores per square square millimeter, called Stomata,
       each which is smaller across than half the length of a skin
       cell, that take up gases to make the sugars that enable the
       plant to survive and thrive.
       SO WHAT? &#129335;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039; Well, I'm glad you
       asked &#128513;. You see, Stomata are VERY sensitive to relative
       humidity. You all know what relative humidity is. During a 24
       hour cycle, Stomata adjust their size to capture gases. "The
       pores of the stomata were found as a rule to be widest open at
       about 10 A. M. ..."
  HTML https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/329698
       However, the plant Stomata size WILL NOT reach its optimum size
       (i.e. 10 A.M.) IF the relative humidity is too low (i.e. DRY
       AIR).
       WHY is that BAD for plants?
       1. Low relative humidity tends to suck moisture OUT of the plant
       through the Stomata. The plant Stomata reduce the opening size
       to preserve the plant's moisture content to keep it from dying
       from dehydration.
       2. THUS, the plant CANNOT get enough H2O (AND CO2, even though
       the there is &#129430; MORE CO2 in the atmosphere!) through the
       Stomata to efficiently photosynthesize CO2 and H2O into sugars.
       3. Consequently, the plant growth is arrested and withering will
       follow if dry conditions remain or increase.
       And Lo and Behold, you will never guess what BURNING
       HYDROCARBONS does to the atmosphere. Well, most here will. There
       are a lot of smart cookies here. Yep, you've got it; THE EARTH
       IS BROWNING! &#128565;&#128561;&#129397;
       Here is the IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE, along with a peer reviewed
       scientific paper. Please watch the video and pass both it and
       these graphics to anyone who is brainwashed into thinking that
       the hydrocarbon fuels based economy isn't DEGRADING PLANT LIFE!
       Browning Earth from Catastrophic Climate Change:
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120223134829-22531751.png[/center]
       Atmospheric Drying Reducing Terrestrial Vegetation Growth Since
       1998: Part 2 of 2
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/K2h2gvYU_WI[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120223134817-2245452.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-201222142942.png[/center]
       #Post#: 923--------------------------------------------------
       &quot;It is not difficult to rip up &#129430; Al-Jaber’s
       &#128519; green &#128520; facade.&quot;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: March 8, 2023, 4:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://earthtrack.net/sites/default/files/u10/oilchange%20logo.jpg
       March 7, 2023 By [glow=green,2,300]Andy Rowell[/glow]
       [center][glow=brown,2,300]COP28 &#129430; President[/glow]
       pushes [glow=red,2,300]false[/glow] [glow=brown,2,300]fossil
       fuel [/glow]solutions, such as [glow=red,2,300]CCS[/glow], at
       &#129430;&#128176;&#129408;&#128024;&#129429;&#128013;&#129421;&#128009;
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gif<br
       /> [glow=red,2,300]CERAWeek[/glow][/center]
       For anyone in the oil and gas industry, there is only one place
       to be this week. The great and good of the industry has
       converged on &#129430; [glow=brown,2,300]Houston for
       CERAWeek[/glow], which bills itself as the world’s premier
       &#129429;&#129430;&#128520; [glow=brown,2,300]energy[/glow]
       event.
       Delegates will listen to
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-010922192452.gif<br
       />[glow=red,2,300]big oil bosses[/glow] from
       [glow=red,2,300]BP[/glow], [glow=red,2,300]Shell[/glow],
       [glow=red,2,300]Exxon[/glow], and as well as political
       dignitaries such as John Kelly, the U.S. Special Presidential
       Envoy for Climate, and Jennifer Granholm, the U.S. Energy
       Secretary.
       Also addressing the conference this morning was
       &#129430;&#128520; [glow=red,2,300]Dr. Sultan Al-Jaber,[/glow]
       who currently fulfills two completely contradictory roles. He is
       the Group CEO of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC), as
       well as President for the upcoming [glow=blue,2,300]COP28
       climate talks[/glow]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422145533-5671050.gif<br
       />in Dubai later this year.
       Many scientific, political, civil society commentators,
       including colleagues at Oil Change International, have already
       pointed out how utterly incompatible it is to be the boss of and
       oil company and a host of a climate conference at the same time.
       It is akin to a tobacco baron organizing a conference on smoking
       and health. [size=14pt]The conflict of interest is palpable.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-010922185321.jpeg
       Speaking after his appointment, Tasneem Essop, executive
       director of Climate Action Network International, told the
       Financial Times that Al-Jaber’s presidency of COP28 was
       “tantamount to a full-scale capture of the UN climate talks by a
       petrostate national oil company and its associated fossil fuel
       lobbyists.”
       Even the UN is worried about the appointment. In January,
       Politico reported that the secretariat of the United Nations
       Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) had sent “a
       series of questions to the presidency of the climate talks
       enquiring about whether the presidency will be independent of
       the oil company.”
       You can see why the UN and others are worried. ADNOC, one of the
       world’s largest oil and gas producers, currently plans to
       increase fossil fuel production. A report by OCI published last
       year, titled, Investing in Disaster, revealed that ADNOC is on
       track to be one of the biggest expanders in terms of new Final
       Investment Decisions (FIDs) in new large scale oil and gas
       projects.
       And although ADNOC has set net zero targets for Scope 1 and
       Scope 2 emissions, it admits in its 2021 Sustainability report
       that ADNOC “does not currently monitor its Scope 3 emissions due
       to its current operational business model.”
       So roughly [glow=brown,2,300]eighty-five percent[/glow] of the
       company’s emissions – from consumers burning their products –
       are not measured. &#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;
       Despite this, Dr. Al-Jaber was keen this morning to bolster his
       climate credentials by urging the oil industry to “up its game,
       do more, and do it faster."  The COP28 Presidency was also eager
       to tweet Dr. Al-Jaber’s comments.
       "The oil & gas sector needs to up its game, do more and do it
       faster." #DrSultanAlJaber lays out the next steps for action:
       --- Quote ---
       > -Triple renewable capacity
       >
       > -Double hydrogen production
       >
       > -Build out the hydrogen value chain
       >
       > -Take carbon capture technologies to scale#CERAWeek #COP28UAE
       > pic.twitter.com/FvFIoehUEI
       >
       > — COP28 UAE (@COP28_UAE) March 7, 2023
       --- End Quote ---
       [left]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110822211833-1859945.png[/left]
       It is not difficult to rip up Al-Jaber’s green
       [glow=red,2,300]facade[/glow]. While any comments encouraging
       the oil industry to increase action on climate change are
       welcomed, as long as the industry carries on drilling, such
       rhetoric is flawed.
       And what type of stepping up is Al-Jaber proposing? It is a
       false dawn of flawed solutions to the climate crisis, such as
       hydrogen and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). These will only
       prolong our use of fossil fuels, not diminish them.
       Responding to Al-Jaber's speech, Romain Ioualalen, OCI Global
       Policy Campaign Manager, said the COP28 President: “trotted out
       the tired old playbook of delaying action and relying on
       speculative technologies to ensure fossil fuel CEOs continue to
       get rich, at the expense of all of us. The science is clear: the
       only way to limit warming to 1.5°C is to halt all new fossil
       fuel projects and shift investments to renewables.”
       The only way we have any hope of solving climate change is to
       massively increase renewable energy, a solution that has been
       obvious for decades. But one, if you remain an oilman to your
       core, you cannot countenance, you cannot see.
       The theme of this week’s CERA Week is “Navigating a Turbulent
       World: Energy, Climate and Security." Investing in more fossil
       fuels and false solutions will only make our world more
       turbulent and more disruptive. Any [glow=teal,2,300]climate
       scientist[/glow] will tell you that. And maybe a climate
       scientist, not an oilman, should have been the President of the
       next COP too.
  HTML https://priceofoil.org/2023/03/07/cop28-president-pushes-false-fossil-fuel-solutions-such-as-ccs-at-ceraweek/
       #Post#: 945--------------------------------------------------
       Fossil Fuel Propaganda Modus Operandi
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: March 17, 2023, 11:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Quote of the
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422133654.gif<br
       />CENTURY:
       --- Quote ---
       > Climate [glow=maroon,2,300]&#128520;&#129430;
       disinformation[/glow] doesn’t exist in a vacuum: it is
       inextricably intertwined with [glow=red,2,300]white
       supremacy[/glow], and it is a threat not only to the
       [glow=teal,2,300]future of human life on this plane[/glow]t but
       also to [glow=teal,2,300]Jewish people and people of
       color[/glow] [glow=red,2,300]right[/glow] now.
       --- End Quote ---
       Learn more at
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211810-2001879.png<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png
       [center][glow=maroon,2,300]Audubon[/glow] Keeps
       [glow=red,2,300]Name Tied To Enslaver [/glow]Despite Calls From
       [glow=teal,2,300]Staff [/glow]To [glow=green,2,300]Change[/glow]
       [glow=maroon,2,300]It[/glow]
  HTML https://newsletter.climatenexus.org/03162023<br
       />&#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;[/center]
       #Post#: 949--------------------------------------------------
       Climate &#129430;&#128520; disinformation and &#128127;
       misogynistic hate speech a are deeply intertwined. 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: March 20, 2023, 12:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:17 AM
       --- Quote ---
       > The constant flood of &#128127; online
       [shadow=maroon,left]attacks[/shadow] against
       [glow=blue,2,300]&#128330;&#65039; Thunberg  and
       &#128330;&#65039; Kianni[/glow] serves as a sobering reminder
       that &#129430;&#128520;[shadow=red,left] climate
       disinformation[/shadow] and &#128127;
       [shadow=red,left]misogynistic hate[/shadow] speech are deeply
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122619-6812456.gif<br
       />[glow=maroon,2,300]intertwined[/glow].
       --- End Quote ---
       Read more at
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211810-2001879.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-220922211808-20001173.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png
       [center][glow=red,2,300]SCOTUS &#127913;[/glow] To Rule On
       [glow=blue,2,300][color=teal]Navajo Water Rights[/glow]
  HTML https://newsletter.climatenexus.org/03202023<br
       />
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422205132-6482188.gif[/center]
       #Post#: 1154--------------------------------------------------
       Propagandized Christian &#128586;&#128585;&#128584; Deniers
       should not shoulder the &#128127;&#129430; biosphere degrading
       blame!
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 5, 2023, 1:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       milo
       Four reasons why warmer oceans are not a good thing.
       1) Warmer waters hold less oxygen. Fish require oxygen to
       produce energy. So all the higher fin fish, the ones we like to
       eat, have less ocean to live in. Ergo, fewer fish.
       2) Warmer water changes pH, so shellfish like clams and corals
       find it more difficult to make shells. Without shells they die.
       3) Warmer waters absorb less CO2. So at some point the oceans
       become saturated. They stop absorbing the extra CO2 we produce
       and start outgassing it back into the atmosphere. This hasn't
       happened yet but will become a very big deal when it does start.
       4) Warmer waters are more energetic. So besides intensifying El
       Ninos they also create more violent hurricanes and extreme rain
       events.
       AGelbert > milo
       You are right.
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120623220710.png[/center]
       milo > AGelbert
       Charts like that enrage the anti-AGW crowd, who I think of as
       the Flat Earth crowd, who refuse to admit such things have been
       happening. Their belief systems are as brittle and well-defended
       as those of the anti-vax crowd. I put a lot of effort into
       refuting their claims... but I know it's an exercise in
       futility. I'm up against rigid articles of belief.
       AGelbert > milo
       Agreed. I've often pondered about how the intractable mindset
       you accurately described comes about. I have never come to a
       firm conclusion as to the chain of causation that reduces an
       otherwise reasonable individual into a
       &#128586;&#128585;&#128584; propagandized weapon against common
       sense thinking and action. &#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;
       --- Quote ---
       > "By the skillfull and sustained use of propaganda, one can
       make a people see heaven as hell, or an extremely wretched life
       as paradise." -- Adolf Hitler
       --- End Quote ---
       The best I have been able to reason out is that, somewhere along
       the line, a &#128530; person decides that truth is "relative"
       &#128579;. As soon as that unreality based assumption becomes
       firmly ensconced, said individual is easily convinced of
       irrational baloney by the morally bankrupt &#129430; legerdemian
       pushing &#128520; greedballs who wish to add more suckers to
       their crowd of victims.
       A lot of people out there claim that people don't actually
       believe all the baloney they peddle and that they are just doing
       it for the money. I disagree. If it was just the money, the
       suckers would figure out pretty quick who is getting the lion's
       share of that profit over planet at the expense of the biosphere
       we all depend on and would QUIT. But, the crowd of willfully
       stupid seems immune to that in-their-faces logic.
       Critical Thinking Skills are in short supply in this "Brave New
       World".
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422134013.gif
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-140822181130-19271084.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-190722193007.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Iqseo2pRwtg/XRTayEokARI/AAAAAAAArfA/X1tzXpYlE0g5QxX8edsA2vP4Fr155VuNwCLcBGAs/s640/book.jpg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422132945-7012374.png[/center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-100323192454-23192252.gif
       milo > AGelbert
       The thought that there are millions of people out there, all
       agreeing to lie to us because they're getting paid to do so by
       shadowy forces, and that for many decades now no one has broken
       the silence surrounding the Vast Plot, is the sure sign of a
       shallow, poorly thought out mind.
       milo > AGelbert
       It's pretty simple, really. The deniers come from authoritarian
       households, where their parents assured them they knew beyond
       any doubt what life was like. Usually because the Bible told
       them. So in later life their worldview becomes rigid, and they
       come to believe in their convictions far more than they believe
       the evidence they see in the world around them. "No! It's not
       getting warmer! Why just last winter we had over an inch of
       snow. "
       AGelbert > milo
       --- Quote ---
       > "The deniers come from authoritarian households, where their
       parents assured them they knew beyond any doubt what life was
       like. Usually because the Bible told them. So in later life
       their worldview becomes rigid, and they come to believe in their
       convictions far more than they believe the evidence they see in
       the world around them."
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080822134118-1710799.gif
       I actually was an atheist from the age of 18 to around 28.
       By force of reason I slowy became a Deist.
       A decade or so later I became a nominal Christian.
       Decades later, I now believe the Bible is the Word of God. I
       come from an authoritarian household. My dad was an inflexible
       US Army Major that admired Mussolini! My mom was a devout Roman
       Catholic. I have always been able to reason out right from
       wrong. I firmly  believe that I owe that skill to the fact that
       Truth was never taught to me as a "relative" concept. Having
       Faith in a Creator God never inhibited my critical thinking
       skills, though I believe I did reason well during my youth as an
       atheist (that is why, as long as they are advocates of
       egalitarianism and common sense, I can see atheist Socialists as
       people of good will. &#127774;).
       Thus, while I recognize that my Faith cannot prove the existence
       of God or our obligation to worship Him, when pondering causes
       and consequences of irrational socially destructive behavior
       among humans, I concentrate on root causes. As you surmise,
       belief systems certainly can get people to go full Red Queen in
       Through the Looking Glass, but misguided Christians do not have
       a patent on willful denial of viable biosphere math. Making them
       the whipping boy is choosing an easy target. I'm sure the
       &#129430; Hydrocarbon Hellspawn smile broadly &#128520; when
       they see Socialists placing the lion's share of the blame for
       our polluted biosphere on &#129430; Fossil Fuel Industry
       propagandized &#128586;&#128585;&#128584; Christians.
       Though I am NOT absolving the propagandized Christians from
       their folly, I suggest you look at the [glow=red,2,300]top 100
       &#128176;&#129408; &#128024;&#129429;&#129430;&#128013;
       &#129421;&#128009; &#127913;&#128127;  corporations[/glow] on
       the planet. THEY are responsible for far more than half of the
       degradation of the biosphere now dooming so many mammalian
       vertebrate species to &#9760;&#65039;
       [glow=red,2,300]extinction[/glow]. If you think there are ANY
       &#9757;&#127995; Bible believing Christians in decision making
       positions on those [glow=red,2,300]&#128520;&#129421; Social
       Darwinist run corporations[/glow], I've got a bridge to sell you
       in Brooklyn.
       Mock Christians and brand the Bible as "dangerously irrational
       mindfork" all you wish, that's the expected reaction of
       non-Christians to Christianity (But we preach Christ crucified,
       unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;
       1Corinthians 1:23), but recognize that the &#129421;
       [glow=maroon,2,300]Darwinian ideology [/glow]widely accepted as
       "Evolutionary science based" is ALSO a BELIEF system (i.e.
       Atheism) based speculation, not "science".
       Though you will certainly disagree (with vigor &#128513;), think
       it is irrational for any person with critical thinking skills to
       believe that all the complexity of living organisms in our
       biosphere "just happened" by random undirected processes. Modern
       Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method were both
       championed by God fearing, Bible believing  scientists, not
       atheists. If you were taught, or assume otherwise, you are the
       victim of [glow=red,2,300][glow=maroon,2,300]Darwinian atheist
       mendacious propaganda[/glow][/glow].
       [center]Yes, Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
       — Let’s Hear Some for [glow=red,2,300]Darwinian Evolution[/glow]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/wonders-of-nature/intelligent-design/msg924/#msg924[/center]
       [center]New Peer-Reviewed Paper Challenges
       [glow=red,2,300]Neo-Darwinism[/glow]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/sound-christian-doctrine/darwin/msg956/#msg956[/center]
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page