DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Sober Thinking
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: 911 Treason 👉 The NEW Reichstag Fire
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2358--------------------------------------------------
MIC 9/11 COVERUP Modus operandi: Buy em' or ☠️ Bop
🗽 em' 👀
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: September 13, 2024, 3:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
AGelbert NOTE: The following Appendix is is from a lengthy
thought ptovoking article written on the 20th anniversary of the
September 11, 2001 New York City World Trade Center Buildings
and Pentagon Building Attacks. After the Appendix, I post some
snippets from said article, but please set aside an hour or so
to carefully peruse the entire article; it is a real eye opener.
👉 Emojies by AGelbert. 👈
[center]Suddenly
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-100323192456-23211820.gif<br
/>in September?
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080822134118-1710799.gif[/center]
by John Booth ✨
Appendix
New York Emergency Housing Co-ordinator Barry Jennings died
suddenly in 2008, reportedly of a heart attack, in the midst of
a furious debate triggered by his 9/11 witness testimony.
According to Jennings, explosions had gone off in WTC7 before
the attacks on the Twin Towers and there was massive damage and
dead bodies in the evacuated building where he was temporarily
trapped.
In July 2011 Danny Jowenko, the outspoken Dutch
controlled-demolition expert, died in a single car crash into a
tree.
US reporter Michael Hastings died in 2013 after driving at high
speed into a tree. Hastings had upset General Stanley McChrystal
who was fired after a series of articles in Rolling Stone
magazine.
Phillip Marshall was a veteran pilot. At the time of the attacks
he was working for American Airlines and knew two of the pilots
on the hijacked planes. Earlier in his career he worked for the
CIA’s clandestine section. He published False Flag 911 in 2008
and a second book, The Big Bamboozle, in February 2012. His
thesis was that the hijackers had training at a network of
airbases, some run by Saudi Arabia. Not long after his second
book came out, he died horrifically in an alleged suicide. The
bodies of him, his children and his dog were found in what
looked to many like a professional hit.
Beverly Eckert, widowed on September 11 2001 when her husband
died in the South Tower, became a leading campaigner for an
investigation into the events of that day. She chose to go to
court rather than accept a payoff from the 9/11 victims’
compensation fund.
She wrote that her reason for pursuing the legal avenue was ‘to
know what went so wrong with our intelligence and security
systems that a band of religious fanatics was able to turn four
US passenger jets into an enemy force, attack our cities and
kill 3,000 civilians with terrifying ease. I want to know why
two 110-storey skyscrapers collapsed in less than two hours and
why escape and rescue options were so limited. I am suing
because unlike other investigative avenues, including
congressional hearings and the 9/11 commission, my lawsuit
requires all testimony be given under oath and fully uses powers
to compel evidence.’
On February 6, 2009 Eckert travelled with fellow 9/11 Family
Steering Committee member Carol Ashley to meet President Barak
Obama. In her exchange with Obama, Eckert lent her support for
closing Guantanamo Bay. A week later she died in a small plane
crash near Buffalo. [72]
SNIPPETS:
When in 2016 I assembled some material on the September 11
attacks in the United States,[1] the 15th anniversary generated
very little mainstream interest. Would the investigation of 9/11
go the way of the President John F Kennedy assassination in
1963: anniversary recycling of old stories with its surviving
researchers inhabiting the Grassy Knoll cast as ‘conspiracy
theorists’? It seemed likely when those looking into 9/11 were
styled not as sturdy investigators but as obsessive ‘truthers’
indulging in the ‘voodoo history’ alleged by one of 🐍
Rupert Murdoch’s columnists. [2] Some were even described as
‘9/11 fantasists’ and ‘morons’ by Guardian writer
🙊🙉🙈 George Monbiot.[3]
But since this summer’s US and UK evacuation from Afghanistan,
President George Bush’s 2001 Operation Enduring
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202719-1406786.gif<br
/>Freedom response to 9/11 and the pre-emptive wars that
followed
are now being much more widely questioned. For despite President
Joe Biden seeking to draw down the curtain on two decades of
deadly conflict by the US and its allies, the concerning
consequences live on.
This is not just in the continuing suffering and suicides of
veterans as recently recounted by UK Defence Minister James
Heappey, [4] but in the hundreds of thousands of dead
non-combatants and the millions of refugees resulting from 20
years of ‘humanitarian intervention’.
Geographically nearer to the 9/11 attacks themselves, thousands
are still suffering from the noxious debris generated in the
destruction of the three Manhattan skyscrapers that day. ITV
reported recently that in the 20 years since 2001 3,900 people
have died of conditions they contracted from the toxic dust that
included the remains of the many hundreds of Twin Towers victims
who were atomised that day.
Of those surviving at least 22,000 have cancer, 47,000 people
have respiratory and digestive issues and thousands more have
other life-altering or life-ending conditions.[5] This includes
first responders, the people in the area that day and those who
returned to Ground Zero having been falsely told by the Bush
White House that the air was safe to breathe. [6]Under legal
pressure from the families of 9/11 victims,
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-100323192446-23162278.png<br
/>Biden has now said more FBI material will be
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090822140006.gif<br
/>opened up.[7]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422132459.gif
... ...
Many eyewitnesses to 2001 events and their early aftermath are
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202720-1408267.gif<br
/>dead, several in suspicious circumstances. [19] Others have
chosen to 🙊🙉🙈 say nothing, while some of
those who have
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
/>spoken have proved to be, at best, less than frank. Few
elected
🙊🙉🙈 politicians have talked about 9/11
and of those who have, Donald Trump is not the only one to have
been a stranger to the truth. [20] ... ...
I will say more about British politicians who did choose to
speak about Afghanistan, but let’s first trace some Americans
prominent in September 11 events. Her Majesty the Queen honoured
two of them for their reportedly ‘heroic’ work on 9/11: New York
mayor Rudy Giuliani and his police commissioner Bernard Kerik,
the former receiving an honorary knighthood. [25] ‘Sir Rudy’
became known to a more recent audience as President Trump’s
lawyer, most dramatically when his hair dye felt the heat of the
2020 campaign. [26] The licence of the 9/11 hero to practise law
in New York was suspended in 2021 over false Trump election
claims. [27] His long-standing associate Kerik, who on September
11 said his police had come across the intact passport of a
hijacker
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202551-13971996.gif<br
/>in the burning Twin Towers wreckage in which the 9/11
Commission
said the black boxes of two aircraft were
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
/>never found, was jailed for fraud nine years later. [28] He
was
presidentially pardoned by Trump in 2020 [29] after serving Bush
as Minister of Interior of Iraq following the 2003 invasion.
With Kerik in Iraq at the time was L Paul Bremer. After working
as managing director of Kissinger and Associates he became
Bush’s appointee to run the Coalition Provisional Authority in
Iraq in 2003. [30] On 9/11 he would usually have been with his
Marsh & McLennan employees in their Twin Tower offices. But as
hundreds of his trapped work colleagues were dying Bremer was in
a New York TV studio calmly discussing the attack and
identifying the likely assailants. [31]
Bremer cheated death just like Larry Silverstein, the property
magnate who had jointly acquired the Twin Towers housing Marsh &
McLennan just seven weeks before they were destroyed. [32] He
would normally have been having breakfast with his clients in
the Windows on the World restaurant atop the North Tower, but
claimed he was saved that day by his wife insisting he attend a
medical appointment. [33]
While Bremer was quickly framing the ‘war on terror’ narrative
around Osama bin Laden in a New York studio, former Israel Prime
Minister Ehud Barak was doing the same from a BBC World one in
London. [34] His ‘the world will never be the same’ theme was
quickly taken up by Bush and Blair, and echoed throughout the
🐍 mainstream media.
Enter
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gif<br
/>NATO
The following morning NATO Secretary-General Lord Robertson, an
important BAP member from its 1985 foundation, invoked the
self-defence Article 5 of the organisation’s founding treaty.
This turned the criminal attacks in the United States into a war
on its alleged terrorist or terrorist-supporting enemies. By
this means Blair’s former Defence Secretary set up NATO members’
support for the decades of conflict that have followed.
Robertson was duly rewarded by Bush two years later in the
garden of the White House with the Presidential Medal of
Freedom.[35] He then left NATO for a business career in the
arms, energy and finance sectors, working, among others, with
former US Defence Secretary William Cohen. ... ...
... Lady Manningham-Buller, the former MI5 deputy chief. She
told the Lords that when she and the head of MI6 met the Bush
team in Washington shortly after 9/11, ‘the decision was about
al-Qaeda, its base in Afghanistan and its close relationship
with the Taliban. I do not remember any discussion on Iraq.’
[center]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110822211037-18321080.jpeg[/center]
Either she has poor recall or was deaf to what Bremer and Barak
spelled out within an hour of the attack. The message was
reinforced not long afterwards by Bush and Defence Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld: Iraq was to be the real target and enormous
efforts were being made in Washington to link its ruler, Saddam
Hussein, to Osama Bin Laden. [37] Within a week of 9/11
Washington was falsely blaming the Iraq leader for anthrax
attacks that killed five innocent Americans and targeted two
senior Congressional opponents of Bush. [38] Subsequent evidence
points to the anthrax being produced in a US military
laboratory.
If Manningham-Buller’s observation was disappointing, then those
of other parliamentarians displayed even less critical thinking
about 9/11 and what followed. In the Lords debate Blair’s New
Labour Home Secretary Lord Blunkett, who may be remembered for
saying in 2003 that Labour would enjoy a ‘Baghdad bounce’ [39]
in that year’s local elections as a result of the Iraq invasion,
said:
--- Quote ---
> ‘Some 20 years ago, as Home Secretary, I was being interviewed
by Jim Naughtie on the Today programme when we went over to John
Simpson, who was entering Kabul with the Northern Alliance,
supported by our troops. Last Sunday, that was completely
reversed and with it went 20 years not just of sacrifice but of
an international effort to ensure that the world would be a
safer place.
>
> ‘At the time of George Bush’s 2001 inauguration (eight months
before 9/11) an old Washington DC friend, concerned by the
prominence of so many NeoCon hawks in his new administration,
told me there would soon be a war in the Middle East. Her
doctor, a military reservist, had been told to be ready to serve
there in 2002 or 2003. I was unable to second source this at the
time, but abundant confirmation has come since.
>
> ‘Anyone who read Charlie Wilson’s War will understand
precisely why the Taliban retained the capacity to be able to
sweep aside the Afghan forces over recent months. Pakistan has
played both a constructive and a very destructive role over the
last 20 years. Now is the time to engage with it, but it will
take a combined effort across the globe to ensure that we put
right the terrible disaster that has befallen the people of
Afghanistan over recent days. It could easily be reflected in a
resurgence of the jihadists, who have rejoiced at what has
happened.
>
> ‘Today is a very sad day for us all, but there is something to
learn from and reflect on in terms of our humanitarian
commitment and our willingness to re-engage with security.’
--- End Quote ---
Two of the things ‘to learn’ from Blunkett’s references went
unremarked by him, and they might just might have punctured some
of the high-flown rhetoric from the assembled benches and Zoom
screens. One is that interviewer Jim Naughtie had a close
working relationship with Paul Wolfowitz who, at the 2001
initiation of the ‘war on terror’, was Bush’s deputy Defence
Secretary and a key NeoCon figure in promoting the Iraq War and
subsequent conflicts. [40] The other is that anyone reading
George Crile’s Charlie Wilson’s War, as Blunkett suggested, will
know that the Texas Congressman’s success in obtaining enormous
finance and sophisticated weaponry for the Mujahdineen was
strongly promoted by the Israeli lobby in Washington to which
Wilson was very close. [41] Mujahdineen training by the US, UK
and Israel as part of well-funded Operation Cyclone is a matter
of record. One assumes that Blunkett, in recommending the Wilson
book, would have known this, but chose 🙊 not to detail
any of that in his Lords remarks.
In both houses there was much self-congratulatory avoidance of
such detailed realities. Winding up for the Opposition at the
end of the peers’ debate, newly ennobled former New Labour MP
Vernon Coaker said: ‘When we read the contributions that have
been made, I think it will show that this House has risen to the
occasion at a time of great historical significance for our
nation and, indeed, the world.’
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110822204109-17662027.png
In the Commons, Chesterfield Labour MP Toby Perkins said: ‘It is
a day on which we have seen Parliament at its best. We have
heard some wonderful speeches and the debate has been
illuminated in particular by those who have served’.
[center]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110822211833-1859945.png[/center]
A 🕯️ dissenter
But there was no time to hear one Labour member who had served
in the British Army in Afghanistan and might have
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/2823-6925-Whip-Right.png<br
/>turned up the Commons lights a tad. He took a very different
view of events there to three other former soldier MPs who
garnered much of the media coverage for criticising the timing
and manner of the withdrawal. That unheard Afghanistan veteran
was Clive Lewis, the MP for Norwich South, who had to take to
Twitter and then The Guardian [42] to voice his criticism not
only of the UK role in Afghanistan but of its whole ‘war on
terror’ intervention since 2001. In his absence, coverage of the
Commons debate painted a picture of unquestioning consensus with
only the small dissenting voices of Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott
and Zarah Sultana asking the big questions about 20 years of
pre-emptive military action. Even they did little to question
the events of 9/11, a subject to which we now turn.
For the past 20 years 9/11 has been a
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13822364.jpeg<br
/>story of
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
/>freedom-hating Muslims. The many challenges to that narrative
have been largely ignored by the 🐍 mainstream media.
Many of them are well elucidated in 9/11 Unmasked: An
international review panel investigation. [43] Published in
2018, it is the result of years of careful work by panellists
with diverse expertise and experience. The book constitutes
their consensus views on more than 50 points they say illustrate
the problematic status of the main
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
/>[glow=red,2,300]claims of the official 9/11 story[/glow].
These
range from examining the destruction of the three New York
towers and the many US military exercises on and before 9/11, to
reports of insider trading and the role of Osama bin Laden. This
important work has received very little media attention. This is
partly, I suspect, because joint editors
🕯️🗽 David Ray Griffin and
🕯️🗽 Elizabeth Woodworth have long been
styled as ‘truthers’ with their efforts
🎩😈accordingly dismissed. But for anyone open to
material that is well sourced and extensively footnoted this
provides a good base from which to learn more.
A different approach was adopted in the same year
by🕯️🗽 John Duffy and
🕯️🗽 Ray Nowosielski in The Watchdogs
Didn’t Bark. [44] They interviewed a wide range of senior
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153114-13801246.png<br
/>US intelligence and law enforcement officials whose experience
had led them to conclude that the threatened attacks could and
should have been stopped long before September 11 2001. The
authors dedicate their book ‘to everyone harmed by the September
11 tragedy as well as those harmed by the US government’s
response, the “war on terror”, which shows no end in sight. It
is also dedicated to all people of conscience who risked
something to leak or to blow the whistle in order to provide for
us a more complete picture of the world than 🎩👿
[glow=red,2,300]those in 🦍 power[/glow] might have
desired.’
They identify key figures in the CIA, the FBI, the National
Security Council and the National Security Agency (NSA) with
working knowledge of what went on before 👀, during and
after 9/11 – and their account makes for truly 😵
shocking reading. They show how senior intelligence and White
House officials repeatedly failed to respond to the many
warnings of impending attacks. They describe ambitious
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122619-6812456.gif<br
/>Bush government employees who not only authorised
[glow=red,2,300]secret torture in black sites[/glow], but also
choose to use material obtained by it, and with one choosing to
cross the Atlantic to observe [glow=red,2,300]it[/glow].
Duffy and Nowosielski write:
--- Quote ---
> ‘When we take stock of the fact that several of the same names
that come up in the Senate’s 2014 report about torture were also
highlighted by the CIA inspector general’s 2005 report laying
fault for 9/11, we see that a failure to hold individuals to
account for earlier transgressions had later consequences for
the nation, and the world.
>
> ‘We can also track, through these reports, the rise of
repeated wrongdoers to very high positions, and we can similarly
track through news accounts the fall of those who have the
appearance of having tried to expose these wrongdoers.’
--- End Quote ---
Some of those who have spoken out have been jailed. Many others
have had their professional careers ended and their reputations
trashed. Duffy and Nowosielski ask:
--- Quote ---
> ‘What is the purpose of a
[glow=red,2,300]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122619-6812456.gif<br
/>system[/glow] that that makes those who value truth into
enemies
of the state and participate in the kinds of actions detailed
here? Declarations of justice and freedom are but words. They
require nothing of those who bellow them.
[glow=red,2,300]Actions[/glow] speak louder. The purpose of a
system is what it
[glow=red,2,300]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202719-1406786.gif<br
/>does[/glow].’ (authors’ italics)
--- End Quote ---
Many of those dissenting from these malign priorities and
practices of the Bush regime identified by Duffy and Nowosielski
are also regularly featured in the work of journalist
🕯️ Paul Jay in theanalysis.news.[45] Figures such
as 🕯️🗽 Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson,
🕯️🗽 Thomas Drake and
🕯️🗽 Bill Binney, who have held high
office in the US state and military apparatus, cannot be readily
dismissed as ‘truthers’ or ‘conspiracy theorists’ when they
challenge the conventional 9/11 story.
🕯️🗽 Senator Bob Graham co-chaired the
Joint Congressional Committee investigating 9/11, and in
retirement continues to urge greater transparency. In a series
of interviews with Jay he says
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122619-6781750.png<br
/>Bush and
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122619-6781750.png<br
/>Cheney misdirected intelligence prior to 9/11 and
‘aggressively
deceived’ afterwards. He tells Jay:
--- Quote ---
> ‘Virtually all of the agencies of the federal government were
moving in the same 🦍 direction, from a customs agent at
an airport in Orlando who was chastised when he denied entry
into the United States to a Saudi, to the president of the
United States authorizing large numbers of Saudis to leave the
country, possibly denying us forever–important insights and
information on what happened. You don’t have everybody moving in
the 🦍 same direction without there being a
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202719-1406786.gif<br
/>head coach somewhere who was giving them instructions as to
where he wants them to move.’[46]
--- End Quote ---
When people ask why no one has come forward to spill the beans
on 9/11, I simply ask them to tune into the US state insiders:
Drake, Binney and Wilkerson are just three of very many whose
years of whistle-blowing have fallen on deaf political and media
ears. Graham is one of the few senior US politicians to keep
asking questions.
🕯️🗽 Architects and Engineers for 9/11
Truth
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422180553-636818.gif
Other consistent questioners of [glow=red,2,300]9/11
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622202527-13931485.png<br
/>orthodoxy[/glow] include those whose life’s work has been
seriously affected by that day’s events. Many firefighters and
first responders are on record saying
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422133654.gif<br
/>there were explosions at the World Trade Centre. BBC
correspondent Stephen Evans was one of several journalist
eye-witnesses to talk of explosions deep in the Twin Towers.
[47] Some senior New York firefighters are alleging federal
crimes were committed, saying their ‘petition demonstrates
beyond any doubt that pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries
— not just airplanes and the ensuing fires —
[glow=red,2,300]caused[/glow] the destruction of the three World
Trade Center (sic) buildings, [glow=red,2,300]killing[/glow] the
vast majority of the victims who [glow=red,2,300]perished[/glow]
that day.’ [48]
Much of the recent campaigning for a proper inquiry into the New
York events has come from Architects and Engineers for 9/11
Truth. [49] It is now backed by more than 3,400 professionals
and, until his recent death, its campaigns were often fronted by
Hollywood actor and activist 🕯️🗽 Lou
Asner. [50]
Read more:
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164520-5301778.gif<br
/>
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png
HTML https://forthzando.com/9-11-20th-anniversary/
#Post#: 2366--------------------------------------------------
Fascist Termites making the world safe for, and run by, FASCISTS
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: September 14, 2024, 6:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110822002740-17411392.gif<br
/>Thread Source:
HTML https://ongoingclassstruggle.blogspot.com/2024/09/undebatable-what-harris-and-trump-could.html#comment-6549122218
AGelbert:
Here's more that the [glow=red,2,300]DUOPOLY[/glow]
considers"undebatable".
[center]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/2842-155-GenocideGentry.png[/center]
milo > Agelbert
Thanks for posting, I haven't read Counterpunch in quite a
while. Only so many hours in the day.
What makes me both angry and sad is that at the end of the
Second World War, the USA was supposed to be force for good. We
would lead the way into a fresh new world of peace, equity and
prosperity, a world where every man, woman and child was equal,
in the rights they possessed and in the eyes of the law.. And
the world believed the myth. We would teach them the way to
build a better world.
That was a long time ago.
AGelbert > milo
Yep. My (almost) terminal case of the propagandized dumbass had
me continously trying to get good grades in school so I could go
to West Point 🤦‍♂️ (I got in, but,
thank God, was "separated" at 8 months due to a "D" in Calculus
- NOTE: Math was my best subject in High Scool and 18 year old
cadets were not allowed to resign from the USMA without their
father's approval - my dad was a Korean War decorated, retired
US Army Major...I did THAT "math" 😉).
I understand and share your dismay. I grew up in Kansas
believing the same myth. Unfortunately for people of good will,
the [glow=red,2,300]elite FASCIST Social Darwinists 'R' US,
methodically corrupting our Government from within, had
other[/glow] [glow=red,2,300]plans[/glow].
The "[glow=red,2,300]Patriot Act[/glow]" was the equivalent of
the TREASONOUS NAZI Reichstag Fire "justifying" the
P[glow=red,2,300]olice State Enabling Laws[/glow].
SEE: The NEW "[glow=red,2,300]REICHSTAG FIRE[/glow]:
[center]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/2846-494-911Reichstag-Fire.jpeg[/center]
Remembering 9-11 and those who made it special: Sharon,
Netanyahu, Perle, Wolfowitz, Zoellick, Zakheim, Rice, Friedberg
& Cheney, Bolton, Silverstein, Blair, Wolfensohn, Kagan & Kagan,
Khalilzad, Ashcroft, Olsen, Feith, Abrams & Cohen, Tenet, Lew,
Kerry, Kristol, Rumsfeld, Negroponte, Freeh, Gingrich, Bush43 &
JBush, Pataki and, Giuliani.
NOTE: The Social Darwinsits 'R' US plan ahead (WAY AHEAD!):
[center]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/2844-7202-911NIST-LIAR.jpeg[/center]
July 17, 2024
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, of which Ed is Board
Chairman, are endeavoring to expose what really happened on
September 11, 2001. The engineering profession has been used to
cover up the truth regarding the destruction of the three WTC
buildings in New York City. The presentation will describe the
process by which this colossal [glow=red,2,300]fraud [/glow]has
been foisted off on the public by using the leading engineering
organizations to [glow=red,2,300]construct a false narrative
[/glow]that does not stand up to scientific inquiry. The details
of this process will be clearly described and explained.
VIDEO:
 🕯️🗽 Engineer Roland “Ed” Angle
names 9/11 “[glow=red,2,300]persons of interest[/glow]”
HTML https://rumble.com/v57dkh1-weekly-town-hall-roland-ed-angle-engineering-the-911-cover-up.html
[center]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/2849-2299-911BBC-LIAR.png[/center]
[center]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/2845-6478-911andJFK.png[/center]
The Republican Party merged with the Democratic Party decades
ago. The Mens rea identitiy politics distraction HIDES THE FACT
that THERE IS NO "big tent" in the [glow=red,2,300]REQUIRED
[/glow](or else)[glow=red,2,300] endless war profiteering
Ideology[/glow].

AmeroNazis who put Hitler into power in the first place--and
enabled the 3rd Reichsters to escape. Standard Oil Frank A.
Howard was a member in good standing of these AmeroNazis.
[center]
HTML https://pslc.ws/macrog/exp/rubber/synth/exxon/fhoward.jpg[/center]
[center] 😈 Frank A. Howard of the 🦖 Standard Oil
(NJ) Company[/center]
All 💵🎩 Honorable Men
COPYRIGHT 1950, BY JAMES STEWART MARTIN
Continued from previous posts on this book:
--- Quote ---
> Even by 1946 it was to become very difficult for United States
government representatives to get facts from German files. It
was not long before we had to show cause why we should be
permitted to prowl about among the business papers of reputable
German concerns.
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> By 1947 investigations which the Germans considered
troublesome would appear doubly objectionable to American
businessmen acting as military government officials in Bizonia.
Investigations that might disclose embarrassing transactions
between American and German companies were called a "waste of
taxpayers' money."
>
> But for a brief period in 1945 matters were not so well under
control. True, we found a [glow=red,2,300]number of
members[/glow] of the 😈[glow=red,2,300] international
brotherhood, commissioned as colonels and brigadier generals in
the occupation Army[/glow], moving about rather freely in the
field on matters of their own concern; but by the same token it
was also possible for representatives of the government to get
around freely as we all did in the[glow=red,2,300] Standard Oil
case[/glow].
>
> The documents needed by the government to establish the
falsity of the Standard Oil claim were finally shipped by air
back to the United States, along with Dr. von Knieriem as a
government witness. Dr. von Knieriem, who had supervised
Ringer's work, had annotated his own copy of the secret Hague
Memorandum with comments showing its true intent. One of these
phrases alone should have been enough. It was a marginal note,
"[glow=red,2,300]Nach Kriegs Kamouflag[/glow]e"
([glow=red,2,300]postwar 😈 camouflage[/glow]).
--- End Quote ---
These[glow=red,2,300] Fascist Termites[/glow] have been workin'
HARD, since even BEFORE WWII ended, to [glow=red,2,300]make the
world safe for, and run by, FASCISTS[/glow]. In the USA, it
appears they have achieved there [glow=red,2,300]morally
bankrupt, monstrous [/glow]purpose. 😞
Learn more History none of us was taught, even in college:
The [glow=red,2,300]American Republican Party[/glow] is run by
[glow=red,2,300]descendents[/glow] and [glow=red,2,300]still
surviving home-grown AmeroNazis[/glow]
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/who-can-you-trust/corruption-in-government/msg560/#msg560
#Post#: 2377--------------------------------------------------
Grenfell and 9/11: A Tale of Four Towers
DIR By: AGelbert
Date: September 16, 2024, 10:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
👉 Emojies by AGelbert. 👈
[center]
HTML https://forthzando.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/logo-for-nav2.png[/center]
by John Booth ✨| Blog
[center][glow=red,2,300]Grenfell[/glow] and
[glow=red,2,300]9/11[/glow]: A Tale of [glow=red,2,300]Four
Towers[/glow][/center]
[center]
HTML https://forthzando.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/IMG_0201-1024x1006.jpeg[/center]
Still standing: Grenfell Tower a week after the inferno
[glow=red,2,300]killed[/glow] 72 of its London residents in June
2017
The images of Grenfell Tower we saw when the Inquiry chairman
recently published his coruscating report into the tragic fate
of its residents prompt serious questions as we remember what
happened when three much bigger World Trade Center (WTC)
buildings in New York City disintegrated in seconds on September
11 2001.
For seven years after the London inferno claimed 72 lives,
Grenfell still stands, its fire-ravaged wreckage available for
the forensic examination that formed a key part of Sir Martin
Moore-Bick’s recent indictment. But within hours of the
Manhattan tragedy – a crime scene of gigantic proportions – the
evidence was being removed, with much of it quickly shipped to
Asia for recycling.
In the United Kingdom we have what seems to be detailed scrutiny
of Grenfell with a Metropolitan Police investigation already
under way. In the United States we have an unsolved crime whose
worldwide repercussions through the “war on terror” are still
leading to [glow=red,2,300]death and suffering
[/glow]through[glow=red,2,300] wars and conflict[/glow].
The findings of the US official 9/11 inquiry, belatedly set up
by the White House under pressure from the bereaved, were
promptly rubbished by its own Bush-appointed joint chairmen. Yet
the latest anniversary of September 11 has passed with the same
lack of mainstream curiosity I saw on previous ones.
But there are signs that this is changing.
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622153109-13652067.png
More 9/11 campaign groups, politicians, journalists and show
hosts are using social media to reach a public much more
sceptical about official pronouncements than they were in the
years immediately following the events of September 2001.
[center]
HTML https://forthzando.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/1200px-6_World_Trade_Center_Aerial_View-1024x678.jpg[/center]
Instant devastation: The pulverised remains of the Manhattan
World Trade Center in September 2001
Prominent in that campaigning demand for democratic disclosure
are thousands of architects and engineers. Outraged by the
refusal of government agencies to answer their detailed
technical questions on the three WTC buildings, they are now
proposing legislation to ensure scientific integrity in
government reports
Working on similar questioning lines is the International Center
for 9/11 Justice. On this year’s anniversary they focused on the
behaviour of aircraft and the failure of US defences on that day
23 years ago.
They supplement the work of many American whistleblowers who
have courageously revealed what they know. James Corbett has
featured some of them as I have done in earlier work and
summarised in this interview
HTML https://www.themindrenewed.com/interviews/2016/948-int118.
There is far to go in bringing justice to the Grenfell bereaved
and [glow=red,2,300]those still living in 😬 dangerous
buildings[/glow].
But perhaps the United States, with ever more of its citizens
asking questions as it approaches November elections, may for
once follow a British example – the forensic work on Grenfell
Tower of Sir Martin Moore-Bick and those questioning campaigners
for real change.
HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422180949.png
HTML https://forthzando.com/grenfell-and-9-11-a-tale-of-four-towers/
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1