URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sober Thinking
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Catastrophic Climate Change
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 401--------------------------------------------------
       📢 It is now abundantly clear that President Biden must
       declare a 🚩 climate emergency.
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 1, 2022, 12:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       
  HTML https://wiki-gateway.eudic.net/wikipedia_en/I/m/Center_for_Biological_Diversity_logo.jpg
       July 1, 2022
       Anthony,
       Climate change is here, and the stakes couldn't be higher.
       Yesterday's Supreme Court decision limiting the Environmental
       Protection Agency’s authority to regulate coal- and gas-fired
       power plants makes it abundantly clear that President Biden must
       declare a climate emergency.
       Officially declaring the climate crisis a national emergency
       would unlock the tools needed to steer the economy away from
       fossil-fueled climate catastrophe toward a sustainable, just
       future. Biden needs to hear from you.
       Urge President Biden to be a #ClimatePresident by immediately
       declaring a 🚩 climate emergency.
  HTML https://act.biologicaldiversity.org/-rx83gPFbkaJB6naNfS0xw2
       
  HTML https://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-300614160245.gif
       AGelbert NOTE: I did, I recommend all ethically grounded people
       reading this do the same
  HTML https://act.biologicaldiversity.org/-rx83gPFbkaJB6naNfS0xw2.
       
       "Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." --
       Aldous Huxley
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422162854-1034303.png[/center]
       [move]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-260622164503-15371695.png[/move]
       #Post#: 402--------------------------------------------------
       Supreme 👿🦖😈🐘🐍🦕
       Court: "the US EPA cannot Protect the Environment in the
       United States" 🤦‍♂️  
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 2, 2022, 1:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://wiki-gateway.eudic.net/wikipedia_en/I/m/Center_for_Biological_Diversity_logo.jpg
       July 1, 2022
       Anthony,
       Climate change is here, and the stakes couldn't be higher.
       Yesterday's Supreme Court decision limiting the Environmental
       Protection Agency’s authority to regulate coal- and gas-fired
       power plants makes it abundantly clear that President Biden must
       declare a climate emergency.
       Officially declaring the climate crisis a national emergency
       would unlock the tools needed to steer the economy away from
       fossil-fueled climate catastrophe toward a sustainable, just
       future. Biden needs to hear from you.
       Urge President Biden to be a #ClimatePresident by immediately
       declaring a 🚩 climate emergency.
  HTML https://act.biologicaldiversity.org/-rx83gPFbkaJB6naNfS0xw2
       
  HTML https://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-300614160245.gif
       AGelbert NOTE: I did, I recommend all ethically grounded people
       reading this do the same
  HTML https://act.biologicaldiversity.org/-rx83gPFbkaJB6naNfS0xw2.
       
       "Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." --
       Aldous Huxley
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-250422162854-1034303.png[/center]
       [move]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-260622164503-15371695.png[/move]
       Cat's Paw > AGelbert
       The girls wrote a good dissenting opinion.
       Time to put the Old Confederacy down.
       I favor the proposal to add justices. 29 of them.
       The same number as 9th appeals court.
       AGelbert > Cat's Paw
       👍 Well said. I hope that happens VERY SOON!
       When our Supreme (fascist polluter bought and paid for)
       🦖🦍 Court goes 🐍 full Orwell by using
       dial-a-text-definition sophistry to 😈 "establish" that
       "the United States Envronmental Protection Agency cannot Protect
       the Environment in the United States" 🤬, they have lost
       any credibility they ever had.
       The Dissenting Opinion actually told those
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040622210450-1415528.gif<br
       />criminal judges, in less graphic language, but still quite
       clear, what Spiderman would have said (see below):
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3/3-080222174752-3857851.png[/center]
       This goes way past the Old Confederacy (i.e. wanton asset
       stripping abusive economy) into Obi-Won Kenobi's quote (see
       below).
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-251218182749-2077960.jpeg[/center]
       We are running out of time to stop AND REVERSE Catastrophic
       Climate Change. Stopping it is no longer enough.
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-020422164021.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/styles/renewablerevolution/files/3000_Things%20can%20only%20get%20worse.png
       [/center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422205203-6511164.gif
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png<br
       />
       [center]What it Means to be Responsible - Reflections on Our
       Responsibility for the Future by Theresa Morris, State
       University of New York at New Paltz
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/catastrophic-climate-change/future-earth/msg27/#msg27[/center]
       Climate Change, Blue Water Cargo Shipping and Predicted Ocean
       Wave Activity: PART 1 of 3
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/catastrophic-climate-change/future-earth/msg373/#msg373
       [move]The &#129429;&#129430; Hydrocarbon &#128121; Hellspawn
       Fossil Fuelers DID THE Clean Energy Inventions suppressing,
       Climate Trashing, Government corrupting, human health depleting
       CRIME. Since [Color=Brown]they have ALWAYS BEEN liars and
       conscience free
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422145428-563469.pnghttps://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422162639.gifcrooks,<br
       />they are trying to AVOID [/color]DOING THE TIME or PAYING THE
       FINE!  Don't let them get away with it! Pass it on!
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422150727.png[/move]
       #Post#: 403--------------------------------------------------
       ... far worse than all the procedural, regulatory and
       constitutional mishigas is the likely impact of the ruling:
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 2, 2022, 9:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       July 2, 2022
       AGelbert: The &#128009;&#129429;&#129430; Hydrocarbon &#128520;
       Hellspawn DID THE Clean Energy Inventions suppressing, Climate
       Trashing, Government corrupting, human health depleting CRIME.
       Since they have ALWAYS BEEN liars and conscience free crooks,
       they are trying to AVOID DOING THE TIME or PAYING THE FINE!
       Don't let them get away with it! Pass it on!
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422150727.png
       newestbeginning Mod > AGelbert
       Would you be able to put together an article on this subject?
       AGelbert >  newestbeginning
       Thank you for the suggestion but the following article I read
       yesterday at Counterpunch pretty well covers the murderous
       environental damage that will result because of this calloused
       ruling by the
       &#128127;&#129430;&#128520;&#128024;&#128013;&#129429; Supremely
       Corrupt Court:
       COUNTERPUNCH
       JULY 1, 2022 by STEPHEN F. EISENMAN &#10024;
       SNIPPETS:
       In fact, as Justice Eleanor Kagan
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422122257-657398.png<br
       />argued in dissent, Congress expressly empowered the EPA to act
       to protect the environment because legislators cannot – they
       lack the time or expertise to draft complex rules. That’s what
       government agencies are for. As Kagan wrote (with some snark):
       “It is EPA (that’s the Environmental Protection Agency, in case
       the majority forgot) acting to address the greatest
       environmental challenge of our time.” ... ...
       But far worse than all the procedural, regulatory and
       constitutional mishigas is the likely impact of the ruling:
       Government paralysis in the face of the greatest threat that
       humans have ever known.  ... ...
       Heat, drought, and fire, paradoxically paired with more frequent
       and intense hurricanes, high tides, and flooding, will displace,
       and impoverish hundreds of millions, if not billions of people.
       The current die-off of non-domesticated animals and mass
       extinction of species will accelerate. In many parts of the
       world, water will be unavailable either for energy or
       irrigation. At 2.0°C and higher, heat will become a major,
       global killer, as will water-born and vector-borne diseases. ...
       ...
       Wars over food and water will be fought within and between
       nations states. Negative climate feedbacks, also called climate
       tipping points – for example, the loss of Arctic permafrost
       (with consequent release of methane), and the melting of
       Antarctic and Greenland ice caps — will trigger sudden leaps in
       both temperature and sea level that no amount of planning or
       adaptation can manage. To call the world of 3.0°C to 6.0°C rise
       chaotic would be generous in the extreme – a better word would
       be apocalyptic. &#9760;&#65039;&#128565;&#128561;&#129397;
       Full article: &#129417;
       “A Fancy Piece of Homicide” at the U.S. Supreme Court
  HTML https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/07/01/248086/
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/styles/renewablerevolution/files/4144_Hotter%20than%20you%20think.png
       #Post#: 404--------------------------------------------------
       The behavior of the Roberts Court is, like Adam's posts here,
       Prima facie evidence of morally bankrupt ideology.
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 3, 2022, 3:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       July 2, 2022
       AGelbert: The &#128009;&#129429;&#129430; Hydrocarbon &#128520;
       Hellspawn DID THE Clean Energy Inventions suppressing, Climate
       Trashing, Government corrupting, human health depleting CRIME.
       Since they have ALWAYS BEEN liars and conscience free crooks,
       they are trying to AVOID DOING THE TIME or PAYING THE FINE!
       Don't let them get away with it! Pass it on!
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050422150727.png
       newestbeginning Mod > AGelbert
       Would you be able to put together an article on this subject?
       AGelbert >  newestbeginning
       Thank you for the suggestion but the following article I read
       yesterday at Counterpunch pretty well covers the murderous
       environental damage that will result because of this calloused
       ruling by the
       &#128127;&#129430;&#128520;&#128024;&#128013;&#129429; Supremely
       Corrupt Court:
       COUNTERPUNCH
       JULY 1, 2022 by STEPHEN F. EISENMAN &#10024;
       “A Fancy Piece of Homicide” at the U.S. Supreme Court
  HTML https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/07/01/248086/
       newestbeginning > AGelbert
       Thanks for the suggestion, Agelbert. I just posted the article.
  HTML https://ongoingclassstruggle.blogspot.com/2022/07/a-fancy-piece-of-homicide-at-us-supreme.html<br
       /> Hope you are well.
       AGelbert > newestbeginning
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-070422160139.gif
       I am still reasonably healthy for my age. I hope you and yours
       are well also.
       newestbeginning Mod > AGelbert
       Good to hear. Ups and downs w some bumps along the road. The
       clock only runs one way.
       AGelbert > newestbeginning
       Yep.We all have a date with destiny.
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-110422205150-6501296.gif<br
       />Until then I know you will press on to do the right thing,
       come
       hell or high water. I am committed to doing the same.
       larrymotuz
       Here is a very interesting RELATED article:
  HTML https://wallstreetonparade.com/2022/07/the-supreme-courts-epa-decision-is-one-more-win-for-charles-kochs-dystopian-america/<br
       />
       "Justice Elena Kagan wrote the dissenting opinion on behalf of
       herself, Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Stephen Breyer, who
       retired
       yesterday. Kagan wrote:
       “Today, the Court strips the Environmental Protection Agency
       (EPA) of the power Congress gave it to respond to ‘the most
       pressing environmental challenge of our time,’ noting that “The
       Earth is now warmer than at any time ‘in the history of modern
       civilization,’ with the six warmest years on record all
       occurring in the last decade.”
       Kagan directly challenged the majority’s view that the EPA did
       not have the authority to regulate greenhouse gases, writing:
       “Congress charged EPA with addressing those potentially
       catastrophic harms, including through regulation of
       fossil-fuel-fired power plants. Section 111 of the Clean Air Act
       directs EPA to regulate stationary sources of
       any substance that ‘causes, or contributes significantly to, air
       pollution’ and that ‘may reasonably be anticipated to endanger
       public health or welfare.’ 42 U. S. C. §7411(b)(1)(A). Carbon
       dioxide and other greenhouse gases fit that description…”
       Kagan also explained how the Supreme Court has been doing the
       bidding of the fossil fuels industry going back to the Obama
       administration, writing: “This Court has obstructed EPA’s effort
       from the beginning. Right after the Obama administration issued
       the Clean Power Plan, the Court stayed its implementation. That
       action was unprecedented: Never before had the Court stayed a
       regulation then under review in the lower courts….”
       I strongly recommend this article.
       Edit: spacing only
       AGelbert > larrymotuz
       &#128077;&#128077;&#128077; I also strongly recommend this
       article. Thank you for bringing it the attention of the readers
       here.
       &#129430; Hydrocarbon Hellspawn talking points parroted by the
       bought and paid for politicians, judges and pundits are a
       nothing but a thin economic-sounding pretense for their
       misanthropic, self-centered rants, that happens to expose how
       their 'free-market' punditry is merely plain-old cruelty wrapped
       in an economic-sounding pretense for prioritizing private
       polluter profits over public health and the environment (with,
       as Nancy MacLean documents in [I]Democracy in Chains[/i], a
       deeper utility in opposing the Civil Rights Act and subsequent
       racial justice policies).
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-280921141040.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-230622123301.gif[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/styles/renewablerevolution/files/3076_Independence%20from%20Fossil%20Fuels.png[/center]
       &#128024; Adam G. Yoksas
       --- Quote ---
       > At it's core, this case--like most cases that come before the
       Court--is a federalism case. In other words, who has sovereign
       jurisdiction over what goes on in West Virginia? Is it the
       states, states like West Virginia (and all of the other states
       that enjoined WV against the EPA)? Or is it the Environmental
       Protection Agency?
       >
       > Now the key issue in this case is ... ...
       --- End Quote ---
       
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-130418202829.png<br
       />[b]AGelbert NOTE: Long winded BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. He finally
       gets
       to his point, which is, of course, part of the plan to divert us
       from the actual CORE issue:
       --- Quote ---
       > Now the specific language here is over the term "air
       pollutant," and whether this term authorizes the agency to
       regulate anything and everything which emits carbon dioxide,
       including the effective prohibition of anything that emits
       carbon dioxide. Previously in Utility Air v EPA, the Court ruled
       that the carbon dioxide from powerplants, specifically, are
       within EPA's charge. But what this ruling concluded is that the
       EPA's charge does not include the closure of powerplants, based
       only on their estimated CO&#8322; emissions.
       >
       > That's the basis of this decision, and why it was rendered as
       it was.
       --- End Quote ---
       AGelbert > &#128024; Adam G. Yoksas
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-030722134027.png
       If I had nickel for every doubletaliking sophist with a law
       degree mouthing Orwellian pretzel-speak to deliberately (see:
       MENS REA) avoid the REAL CORE ISSUE, I would be a millionaire.
       SEE CORE ISSUE below:
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-090422145854.jpeg[/center]
       &#128024; Adam G. Yoksas > AGelbert
       So the "core issue" consists of a rambling cut-and-paste meme
       containing sensational headlines and polemics, while the legal
       explanation is the "Orwellian pretzel speak." Marx was right
       about you lumpenproletarians. People like you are so driven by
       your ignorance, you're easily led by whatever demagogue makes
       the most sensationalist pitch.
       Now you can disagree with the reasoning of the Court, but I'd
       like to hear a rationale for doing so. What gives the EPA the
       authority to do what it wants to do in West Virginia, against
       what West Virginia has determined for itself? Can you point to
       something, a statute, a decision, an authority, or a principle,
       that gives the EPA this authority?
       AGelbert > &#128024; Adam G. Yoksas
       "Can you point to something, a statute, a decision, an
       authority, or a principle, that gives the EPA this authority?"
  HTML https://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-010215144837.png
       &#129417; Justice Kagan &#10024; did exactly that. &#128077;
       &#128073; Kagan directly challenged the majority’s view that the
       EPA did not have the authority to regulate greenhouse gase,
       writing: “Congress charged EPA with addressing those potentially
       catastrophic harms, including through regulation of
       fossil-fuel-fired power plants. Section 111 of the Clean Air Act
       directs EPA to regulate stationary sources of any substance that
       ‘causes, or contributes significantly to, air pollution’ and
       that ‘may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or
       welfare.’ 42 U. S. C. §7411(b)(1)(A). Carbon dioxide and other
       greenhouse gases fit that description…”
       Why are you avoiding debating her sound legal opinions, if not
       because you want to cloud the CORE issue in order to serve an
       genda to confuse the public about the REAL core issue here?
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-010519192158-2201430.jpeg[/center]
       The only one rambling with sophistry laden long winded
       diversionary cut and paste is you, counselor. Neither pounding
       the law (any precedent you cite is irrelevant to the CORE issue
       here) or wordy ad hominem "indignant" table pounding  is gonna
       work here, counselor.
       Take your knowledge of "Letters" and try to use them for the
       good of mankind instead pushing an underhanded defense of the
       jursisIMprudence profit over planet status quo along with
       feeding your oversized ego.
       The legal principle of Ubi jus, ibi remedium was completley
       discarded by the US legal profession several decades ago when
       the Social Darwinist justification for profit over people and
       planet modus operandi became the 'greed is good' norm.
       That graphic I posted details exactly how the US legal
       profession was corrupted, yet you seem to have (accidentally on
       purpose) difficulty identifying CORE causes for HOW we got here.
       Here's some graphics that went into that collage I made that you
       can pretend are "irrelevant."
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3/3-080222171006-35001814.pnghttps://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-141217224005.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3/3-080222170542-34481922.jpeghttps://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-301021145411.png[/center]
       IF the following is not a CORE ISSUE to YOU, then I will waste
       no more time trying to make you think beyond your thread-bare
       rationalizations (i.e. "logic and reason" limited to statutes,
       decisions, an authority, or a principle Procrustean Bed).
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/1/3-221218194342-1798523.png[/center]
       June 29, 2020 Milwaukee federal judge U.S. District Judge Lynn
       Adelman tells it like it IS about the supremely UNETHICAL
       Roberts Supreme Court and gets charged with "ethics" violation
       in the Orwellian world of the US "Justice" system.
       The longtime Milwaukee jurist created a bit of stir with his
       piece, "The Roberts Court's Assault on Democracy" in the Harvard
       Law & Policy Review.  He identifies two key ways the court
       erodes democracy: by making it harder for the poor and
       minorities to vote, and by "reinforcing the enormous imbalance
       in wealth and political power" in America.
       By now it is a truism that Chief Justice John Roberts’ statement
       to the Senate Judiciary Committee that a Supreme Court justice’s
       role is the passive one of a neutral baseball 'umpire who
       (merely) calls the balls and strikes,'  was a masterpiece of
       disingenuousness. Roberts’ misleading testimony inevitably comes
       to mind when one considers the course of decision&#8208;making
       by the Court over which he presides."
       &#129417;
       [url=
  HTML https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/milwaukee-federal-judge-admonished-for-article-about-us-supreme-court/ar-BB166U3k?ocid=bingcovid"]Full<br
       />article[/url]
       
       The behavior of the Roberts Court is, like your posts here,
       Prima facie evidence of morally bankrupt ideology.
       Read more:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164718-5381960.png
  HTML https://ongoingclassstruggle.blogspot.com/2022/07/a-fancy-piece-of-homicide-at-us-supreme.html
       #Post#: 406--------------------------------------------------
       Chinese  Vessel Snapped In Two By Typhoon Chaba &#9760;&#65039;
       Dozen Bodies Retrieved 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 5, 2022, 12:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240622175211.png
       July 4, 2022
       [center]Chinese  Vessel Snapped In Two By Typhoon
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-300919160022-22802205.png<br
       /> Chaba, A Dozen &#9760;&#65039; Bodies Retrieved[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-050722131151.jpeg[/center]
       A vessel is seen sinking after it snapped in two as tropical
       storm Chaba passed through, according to authorities, in waters
       off Hong Kong, China July 2, 2022. Hong Kong Government Flying
       Service/Handout via REUTERS
       SNIPPETS:
       BEIJING, July 4 (Reuters) – Chinese search and rescue officials
       pulled 12 bodies on Monday from waters southwest of Hong Kong
       after an engineering vessel snapped in two as tropical storm
       Chaba passed through, state television said. ... ...
       Four of its crew were rescued by Monday, although rescue
       officials in the global financial hub had warned the previous
       day that “very slim” chances remained of finding others alive.
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/4t9f1qLI2zI[/center]
       Seven planes and hundreds of boats and fishing vessels are
       joining the search effort, state television said.
       The sunken vessel,&#129430;  ‘Fujing 001’, with a crew of 30,
       was at an anti-typhoon anchorage in waters near Yangjiang in
       Guangdong when its anchor chain snapped.
       Full article:
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-040422164555-532108.png
  HTML https://gcaptain.com/chinese-vessel-snapped-in-two-by-typhoon-chaba-a-dozen-bodies-retrieved/
       Agelbert REMINDER: It will Get MUCH WORSE, MUCH SOONER, than the
       deluded fools and knaves that refuse to responsibly address CORE
       environmental ISSUES (SEE: U.S. Supreme Court AND the
       Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Fuels "Industry"), think.
       &#128681; Learn why:
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-240622140113-1524781.gif[/center]
       [center]Climate Change, Blue Water Cargo Shipping and Predicted
       Ocean Wave Activity: PART 1 of 3
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/catastrophic-climate-change/future-earth/msg373/#msg373[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-210622211034-14412118.pnghttps://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-110217171320.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/A9pHuVX-ZxE[/center]
       #Post#: 410--------------------------------------------------
       &quot;There isn’t one simple answer.&quot;
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 10, 2022, 9:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       COUNTERPUNCH
       JULY 8, 2022 BY RICK THOMAN
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-100722222840.png[/center]
       [center]Why is Alaska Burning?
  HTML https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/07/08/why-is-alaska-burning/[/center]
       #Post#: 417--------------------------------------------------
       Roaring &#127754; Oceans!
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 15, 2022, 3:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-170218174357.png
       July 14, 2022 By Mike Schuler
       [center]
  HTML https://gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/shutterstock_1994535020-1536x1013.jpg[/center]
       File photo of MV APL Vanda. Photo: Peter Titmuss /
       Shutterstock.com
       [center]Ultra-Large Containership APL Vanda Loses Boxes
       &#127754; Overboard in Indian Ocean[/center]
       SNIPPET:
       A CMA CGM-operated mega containership apparently lost an
       undisclosed number of containers overboard while underway in the
       Indian Ocean off the coast of Djibouti earlier this month.
       The revelation puts to rest several questions concerning APL
       Venda’s status after it unexpectedly arrived at a Djibouti
       anchorage on July 6.
       An update from CMA CGM on July 7 said the vessel suffered an
       “unexpected incident” during a westbound voyage on July 3,
       delaying its arrival in North Europe by two weeks.
       Casualty management firm WK Webster reported Thursday that
       17,292 TEU capacity ship lost an unknown number of containers
       overboard on or about July 3 and it was working verify the
       severity of the incident. We now know 55 containers were lost
       overboard.
       Full article:
  HTML https://gcaptain.com/ultra-large-containership-apl-vanda-loses-boxes-overboard-in-indian-ocean/
       AGelbert NOTE: Incidents like &#127754; these are predicted by
       Climate Scientists to increase in frequency and severity.
       &#129417; Learn more:
       Climate Change, Blue Water Cargo Shipping and Predicted Ocean
       Wave Activity: Part 3 of 3 parts
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/catastrophic-climate-change/future-earth/msg375/#msg375
       #Post#: 420--------------------------------------------------
       What If The American Southwest Runs &#128681; Dry?
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 16, 2022, 10:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-160722231226.jpeg[/center]
       [center]No More Water: What If The American Southwest Runs
       Dry?[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://youtu.be/rwTq0EuqKCM[/center]
       What If Geography 19.7K subscribers
       The megadrought continues to be in full swing for the western
       half of the United States and no where is this more acutely felt
       than the naturally dry American Southwest. Home to over 60
       million people (including California) there are very real
       concerns over the longevity of the region's water resources. So
       what happens if there simply is no more water to pull from the
       rivers and ground?
       Note: I understand that California is not culturally "Southwest"
       and make no assumptions it is. California is included due to its
       similar water issues and the fact that it's part of the Colorado
       River Compact.
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422132945-7012374.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-160722232620.png[/center]
       #Post#: 423--------------------------------------------------
       World's largest carbon emitters thumb their noses at emission
       cuts through bribed Government and Judiciary 
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 19, 2022, 12:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-080522140849-12222037.pnghttps://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-221219143548.png[/center]
       E&E NEWS
       [center]Climate-focused bill &#128520;&#129430; collapses as
       nation is &#128531; gripped by impacts[/center]
       By Benjamin Storrow | 07/18/2022 07:12 AM EDT
       [center]
  HTML https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/55a1666/2147483647/resize/1110/quality/100/?url=https://static.politico.com/df/81/669481fc4e53882b1d0831c10be7/cw-0718-storrow-climate-impacts-1160-01.jpg<br
       />[/center]
       Vehicles pass by a golf course and homes across the freeway from
       undeveloped desert last week in Palm Desert, Calif. The state is
       now in a third consecutive year of drought amid a climate
       change-fueled megadrought in the southwestern United States.
       Mario Tama/Getty Images
       Water levels have fallen so low on the Colorado River that they
       are threatening a dam relied upon by millions of Americans. In
       Texas, it was so hot last week the state’s grid operator had to
       twice ask people to conserve electricity. And in western Kansas,
       it is so dry that barely any wheat sprouted this year, further
       straining global agricultural markets upended by the war in
       Ukraine.
       Such events are a sign of how climate change is altering life in
       the United States. Yet they have yet to provoke a serious
       response in Washington, where &#128520; Sen. Joe Manchin of West
       Virginia told his Democratic counterparts last week he could not
       support climate provisions in a wider budget bill (E&E Daily,
       July 15). In an evenly divided Senate, the pronouncement likely
       kills the prospects for federal climate legislation.
       The result is a collision of political and atmospheric reality.
       The atmospheric reality is this: The world already has warmed by
       about 1 degree Celsius from pre-industrial levels, juicing many
       of the extreme weather events observed today. As long as people
       continue to put more carbon dioxide and methane into the
       atmosphere than machines and the Earth can absorb, the planet
       will get hotter. And a hotter planet is a recipe for even more
       frequent and stronger heat waves, droughts and hurricanes, among
       other extreme weather events.
       But the political reality is that the federal government of the
       United States, which sets policies for the second largest
       emitter in the world today, is not taking steps that would lead
       to a significant reductions in greenhouse gases this decade.
       That leaves it to states, cities and markets — not to mention
       other countries — to try and make up for the lack of action in
       Washington.
       Few analysts believe they can deliver the needed reductions.
       “There isn’t time for the &#129429;&#129430;&#128013; largest
       carbon emitters in the world to &#128520;
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/2/3-200419205214.png<br
       />thumb their nose at emission cuts,” said Rob Jackson, an earth
       systems scientist at Stanford University.
       Jackson is a leader of the Global Carbon Project, a group of
       international climate researchers who track global emissions. In
       2021, they estimated the world had 11 years at current emissions
       rates before the planet reached 1.5 C of warming, the threshold
       after which the dangers of a warming world begin to rapidly
       accelerate. The planet has 32 years before it reaches 2 C of
       warming, the initial target of the Paris climate accord.
       In recent years, Democrats have talked up efforts to curb
       emissions. And so when the party took control of the House of
       Representatives, the Senate and the White House in 2020,
       expectations for a federal climate bill soared. Yet the
       combination of narrow legislative majorities and a slew of
       historic crises have relegated climate on President Joe Biden
       and congressional Democrat’s to-do list.
       “The political reality is that climate isn’t a top priority for
       Democrats,” Jackson said. “I think it means we will zoom past
       1.5 C in a couple years and hurdle toward 2 C before we know
       it.”
       The situation is reminiscent of 2009, when then-President Barack
       Obama and Democratic lawmakers passed a federal stimulus bill,
       health care legislation and financial reforms only to falter on
       climate, Jackson said. The problem, he said, is that the world’s
       emissions budget is nearly exhausted and Republicans have shown
       no serious sign of engaging in climate policy.
       “We don’t have the luxury of waiting another 10 years,” Jackson
       said.
       As Washington dithers, Americans are beginning to grapple with
       the consequences of a warming planet. In the Southwest, federal
       regulators recently warned states that they needed to
       drastically cut back water consumption to protect the dams at
       Lake Mead and Lake Powell in Nevada and Arizona, respectively.
       The two impoundments are critical for managing the flow of water
       along the Colorado River, making them a key source of water for
       some 40 million Americans in the desert Southwest. And as large
       hydroelectric facilities, they are also keystone’s of the West’s
       electric grid.
       At least, they have been.
       Water levels were just 32 feet above the elevation needed to
       generate electricity at the Glen Canyon Dam on Lake Powell
       earlier this year, prompting the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to
       take unprecedented efforts to bolster the reservoir’s levels
       (Greenwire, May 3). In an average year, Glen Canyon Dam
       generates about 5 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity,
       according to Reclamation, enough to power about 466,000 homes.
       But as water levels have dropped, so too has the dam’s output.
       Initial Energy Department data shows it generated a little more
       than 3 billion kWh of power last year.
       In the middle of the country, Texas is experiencing its hottest
       summer since 2011 (Climatewire, July 12). Temperatures in Austin
       reached 105 degrees Fahrenheit on five consecutive days,
       according to the National Weather Service, the third-longest
       streak on record. The searing heat sent power demand soaring as
       Texans sought the relief of their air conditioning. The Electric
       Reliability Council of Texas, the state’s primary grid operator,
       twice asked consumers to cut back on power consumption to avoid
       rolling black outs.
       Further to the north, parts of western Kansas have gone more
       than 300 days without recording an inch of rain. Wheat
       cultivation there is suffering as a result, an unwelcome
       development when the world is scrambling to find grain following
       Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (Climatewire, July 8 ).
       Climate change alone is not solely responsible for events like
       low water levels at Lake Powell or the struggles of Texas’ grid.
       In both those cases, soaring population growth is taxing water
       and electricity supplies. A changing electricity grid, which is
       seeing old coal and gas plants replaced by renewables, is also a
       factor.
       But a warming planet has made those challenges harder.
       “We’ve been through a degree of warming. In a sense, we at least
       have a sense for the magnitude of the impacts. Two degrees of
       warming would be twice as intense,” said John Nielsen-Gammon, a
       professor of atmospheric science at Texas A&M University and the
       Texas state climatologist. “But it gets us farther outside of
       historical conditions, which means the extreme events get more
       and more likely to be worse than anything previously
       experienced.”
       Scientists were once hesitant to ascribe individual weather
       events like the heat wave that baked Texas last week to global
       warming. Yet that thinking has begun to change in recent years
       amid a growing body of irrefutable evidence the planet is
       getting warmer.
       Events such as the heat dome that enveloped the Pacific
       Northwest last year are nearly impossible in a cooler world,
       scientists said. So are storms like Hurricane Harvey, which
       dropped up to 60 inches of rain on parts of Texas, one of the
       most significant rainfall events since record-keeping began in
       earnest in the 1880s.
       Finding consensus over policies that can cut emissions is
       difficult enough, as shown by Congress’s inability to pass
       significant federal climate legislation. But the challenge is
       compounded by atmospheric reality. Methane emitted today will
       stay in the atmosphere for several decades. Carbon dioxide
       released in the air today can stay there for centuries,
       according to NASA.
       “If we wake up in 5 to 10 years and say, ‘This is unbearable to
       our economy, to our communities, to a livable future; we must
       act,’ it will be too late to cut and stem the losses that will
       be going on,” said Kim Cobb, a climate scientist at Brown
       University. “This is a challenge where the decisions we make
       this year, the next year and the next year will determine what
       type of climate we will have at least until mid century and most
       likely beyond.”
       Right now, Washington is making the decision to not to act in a
       way that would seriously limit emissions this decade. Congress
       passed an infrastructure law last year that shovels money into
       research for technologies such as advanced nuclear, hydrogen and
       carbon capture and sequestration. Yet most experts expect it
       would take at least a decade before those technologies can begin
       to be deployed at scale (Climatewire, Aug. 13, 2021).
       In an interview with a West Virginia radio station on Friday,
       &#129430;&#128520; Manchin held open the door to working on a
       climate bill after Congress’ summer recess. The West Virginia
       senator said he wanted to see July’s inflation figures before
       proceeding with a climate bill
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-191017140758.jpeg.<br
       />But many Democrats signaled they had little hope of securing
       Manchin’s vote, which is needed in a 50-50 senate, after seeing
       him back out of two potential climate packages (Greenwire, July
       15).
       The Biden administration, meanwhile, is hamstrung by a recent
       Supreme Court ruling that limits the options available to EPA
       for regulating emissions from power plants. While the agency has
       some significant tools remaining for regulating CO2, the high
       court’s ruling suggests the justices would look skeptically at
       future agency actions that do not have explicit congressional
       approval.
       For all those difficulties, emission reductions are likely to
       continue. Continued renewable deployment and increasing electric
       vehicle adoption means emissions are likely to fall 24 to 32
       percent of 2005 levels by the end of the decade without
       significant changes in policy, the Rhodium Group said in an
       analysis last week. U.S. emissions were 17 percent below 2005
       levels in 2021, Rhodium reported.
       The problem is that those reductions fall far short of the 50-52
       percent reduction targeted by Biden — and leave the United
       States well adrift of achieving net zero emissions by
       midcentury.
       The impact of American climate inaction on global emissions
       ultimately will depend on how far the United States falls from
       meeting its targets, said Michael Mann, a climate scientist at
       Pennsylvania State University.
       “The direct impact on global emissions might be modest, but the
       indirect impact could be huge,” he wrote in an email. “If the
       U.S., the world’s largest historical emitter, is unable to meet
       its commitments to the rest of the world, that provides an
       excuse for countries like China and India, who are likely to
       dominate further emissions, to ease off in their own efforts.”
       The risks of a warming planet grow as temperatures rise. At 1.5
       C, there will be more glacier melt and sea-level rise, causing
       additional “death and destruction,” Mann said. But the impact
       becomes even more
  HTML http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-070814193155.png<br
       />damaging and pervasive after  temperatures &#127777;&#65039;
       breach, he noted.
       “It is a world,” Mann said, “that we want to avoid.”
  HTML https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-focused-bill-collapses-as-nation-is-gripped-by-impacts/
       AGelbert NOTE: Due to the polluter bought and paid for
       thoroughly corrupted state of the US Government AND the
       Judiciary, there is NO WAY that a 2 C (PLUS &#128561;) world can
       now be avoided. May God have mercy on us.
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/4/3-250222141516.jpeg[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-210622210759-14331395.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3/3-040222193452-32931084.png[/center]
       #Post#: 426--------------------------------------------------
       &#128681;Social Darwinist Ideology is the greatest material
       &#9760;&#65039; threat humanity has EVER faced.
   DIR By: AGelbert
       Date: July 19, 2022, 7:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       July 19, 2022
       dmorista Mod   > AGelbert
       It has grown increasingly astounding to me that intelligent
       people can just ignore this situation and pursue short term
       projects that pretend that this stuff is not going to happen!! I
       am convinced that the majority of these political operatives and
       business managers and owners are so greedy that they figure that
       anything that is 20 or 30 years hence does not concern them.
       Don't they have children or grand children whose future is some
       concern to them. All the predictions made by the IPCC have
       turned out to be way too conservative, and unfavorable changes
       always arrived years or decades earlier than predicted.
       AGelbert > dmorista Mod
       &#127774; Well said. However, let me metaphorically bend your
       ear (or maybe unmetaphorically tire your eyes) a bit. This is a
       major existential issue for all of us.  I firmly believe that
       the pretense the polluters and those bought and paid for by them
       put up is just that. They DO KNOW the heinous environmental and
       social damage they are doing. They are not fooled by the
       propaganda lies they peddle to us. They KNOW the Catastrophic
       Climate Change score. There is something driving them that is
       FAR more destructive than human greed. By not challenging the
       core belief system/ideology that the polluters and bought and
       paid fors have, your words do not reach them.
       That is the communication problem that you will continue to have
       convincing those doing most of damage to wake up, perceive the
       Catastrophic Climate Change THEY are causing, and act to stop
       and reverse it. You are using excellent logic but you will never
       reach the polluters with it because you are not addressing the
       socially destructive fault at the CORE of  polluter ideology
       that causes them to continue polluting for profit no matter how
       much damage they do. Let us call it the "problem".
       
       The "problem" I see with your logic is that there is no problem
       with it. You, like me, live in the real world. You understand
       that human society, government, business or even a single
       individual that embraces unethical behavior as  the CORE of
       their modus vivendi/operandi  (i.e. integral, indispensable,
       routinely required by their ideology  &#128073; SEE: "Apex"
       predators in general and SOCIAL DARWINISM in particular) will
       always behave in a socially destructive manner.
  HTML http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-040718162655-14212306.gif
       The reason these bought and paid fors out there don't see a
       problem with that is that they honestly believe the Social
       Darwinist HYPE that altruism is "for the weak" and wanton
       predation, as long as it makes money, no matter how polluting
       and/or murderously destructive, is the "OBLIGATION of a
       SUCCESSFUL" person.
       Regardless of the religious FRONT by those you see below, they
       are ALL SOCIAL DARWINISTS to the CORE. Their god is Mammon. They
       are the "Christo-Fascists" that are the exact opposite of what a
       true Christian actually is.
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-190722193217.png[/center]
       However, the greedball scum you see above represent only a TINY
       percentage of the Social Darwinists destroying our biosphere for
       short term profit. Making the above cretins the whipping boys is
       missing the mark. The above are covert camp followers of the
       Social Darwinist cultural POISON afflicting EVERY ASPECT of
       human interactions in the USA today. They are a symptom, not the
       THREAT itself.
       I know you rightfully disdain all the bigots out there that
       claim to be "Christians" and act opposite to ALL of Christ's
       teachings, but the fascist threat they represent is
       insignificant compared with the Social Darwinist THREAT.
       Social Darwinist Ideology is the greatest material threat
       humanity has EVER faced. You CANNOT reason with a person that
       actually believes that "it's all good" if we-the-apex-predators
       end up causing the demise of 90% of our species (and an even
       higher percentage of other mammalian vertebrate species to the
       point of inevitable numerous extinctions). It's just, uh,
       "NATURAL SELECTION", dontcha know? It's, uh, "SCIENCE". There
       "is no good and there is no bad; there is just success or
       failure". If the tardigrades replace us, it's "all good";
       survival of the fittest evolution and all that. We Apex
       Predators just DO what we DO. Ethics? Are you a "weak = unfit"
       life form? We are not going to let no silly ethics keep us from
       makin' &#128176;&#127913; real money...
       
       REALLY?? How far can these extinction causing true believers go
       with their pseudo-scientific magical thinking?
       These Social Darwinist true believers KNOW EXACTLY what they are
       doing. Yes, they are wrong, but their ideology cannot be easily
       countered because it is a RELIGION to them. You will get nowhere
       with them using reason and scientific cause and effect logic,
       simply because they have swallowed the "we can do WHATEVER WE
       WANT" (SEE: "might equals Predators 'R' US Right") Social
       Darwinist HYPE.
       
       The INSTANT that a social Darwinist becomes convinced that
       ETHICAL BEHAVIOR is NOT optional and must be the cornerstone of
       human  behavior towards other humans, other life forms and the
       environment we all depend on, he is no longer a Social
       Darwinist. THEN, and ONLY then, can you talk some sense into
       them.
       My frustration as a Christian who embraces Socialism is that
       every single time I finger Social Darwinsm as THE threat, not
       "some" threat on a laundry list hierarchy of threats to be
       addressed in order to counter and reverse CatastrophicClimate
       Change, my fellow Socialists play deaf and dumb. I suspect they
       are too attached to the Darwinian sacred cow and atheism to see
       the THREAT. &#129318;&#8205;&#9794;&#65039;
       For we-the-humans to climb out of this Social Darwinist
       constructed grave we are in, people of good will, whether they
       be atheists or not, must clearly communicate with and convince
       most everybody around them that all human behaviors MUST be
       based on solid ethics, NOT sliding scale '"situational ethics"
       UNETHICAL-dial-a-behavior-for-convenience'.
       Dmorista, until we expose the THREAT of Social Darwinism and
       stop it, things will continue to get worse.
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-120422132944-700780.png[/center]
       [center]
  HTML https://soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/1-190722193007.png[/center]
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 14
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page