DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Simply TKD (Taekwondo)
HTML https://simplytkd.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Taekwondo in General
*****************************************************
#Post#: 437--------------------------------------------------
Why was the Attorney Present for CEO Mid Year Review?
By: Ladytkd Date: October 29, 2014, 10:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
USAT has posted minutes of their Executive Session meeting. I
find it really interesting that they had the attorney on the
call - remember, in 2013 over half the expense for the BOD
itself was legal fees. So since they were doing a review of the
CEO - does the presence of Mr. Hess mean that it was such a
great review they are extending his contract or such a horrible
review that the attorney needed to be there for other reasons.
On another note - look at missing BOD members - it is always the
same members. Now I get AAC competitors being gone competing but
maybe at some point the athletes would be better served by
someone who has time to do the job. Same goes for Affiliated and
others.
USA-‐TAEKWONDO SPECIAL BOARD MEETING MINUTES – 13 OCTOBER
2014
1.
Tele-‐Conference – The meeting was called to order at
7:08pm Eastern Time. The meeting was in executive session and
closed to the membership.
2.
were present at the start of the meeting.
a.
b.
traveling.
c.
d.
e.
7:41pm due to a prior commitment.
3.
Review, the current hiring process for COO/CFO, and the Staff
Organizational Structure involving a COO. The Board did not
initiate Board Actions during Executive Session.
4.
a.
Congress followed by the Regular Board Meeting-‐ by
Conference Call and open to the Membership.
5.
7:55pm Eastern Time.
Submitted by: Marco Mack
2014
TAG43a
*****************************************************