URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook Fans
  HTML https://sbufan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: SBU Football
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 20164--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: NoVA_Seawolf
       Date: November 21, 2017, 10:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: iBOsbu link ---
       >
       >
       > Besides Fordham and Youngstown, none of the rest really excite
       me. Even these two won’t make up for the loss of JMU and
       Delaware.
       >
       > JMU has been FBS ready. But they don’t want go to Sunbelt
       which has no peer school.. wisely. Delaware will be starting to
       renovate and upgrade their stadium soon. I think they both want
       to get in AAC or otherwise will stay at FCS. But you are right
       though, no change will happen until Big 12 adds more. And Big 12
       will add more because need a real conference title game... not
       the fake title game they are starting this year.
       >
       > I just hope we continue to win and make buzz. And be ready
       when the right opportunity comes along. We don’t need real 15k
       attendance for FBS invite. Coastal is a prime example. As you
       mentioned earlier we have the facilities, budget, and prestige.
       I love what we are doing now in CAA. And keep working hard to be
       a better candidate than JMU and Delaware when AAC eventually
       comes calling in 5/6 years. I would decline any invite from
       sunbelt or cusa like JMU and wait for AAC. I am not even
       interested in MAC anymore. CAA>MAC in my opinion. Peer schools.
       Relatable. Rather than Akron or Ball state. Even presence of
       Buffalo doesn’t entice me.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It's slim pickings once schools start leaving the CAA. The
       league is a strong as it's going to be going forward until
       schools start leaving. None of those schools are very exciting,
       but that's all that's left.
       I agree the MAC isn't very exciting, but as the only realistic
       path to FBS, it might be worth considering. Though save for
       Buffalo, and whoever of NIU/Toledo/WMU is hot in the west that
       year, I have zero interest in any of those schools. It's a tough
       position. Going the Umass route is a non-starter I think, but
       compared to a MAC schedule, I think an independent schedule
       could be much more interesting. Now that Liberty is FBS, it's
       hard to block other schools from going FBS Indy. If we can knock
       off JMU and/or make a deep playoff run, the FBS buzz is going to
       start up again. It always does when desirable schools start
       winning.  I believe we were actually in talks with the MAC about
       being their 14th team if Umass joined for all-sports.
       JMU and Delaware can want the AAC, but the AAC won't take any
       FCS schools in it's current state. Once this Power 6 thing they
       have falls apart after their best programs get raided by a
       gutted Big 12, they may change their tune. I'd also love a new
       east coast G5 conference that was once being rumored years ago.
       the following would be nice:
       Stony Brook, UNH, Uconn (FB only), Umass, Buffalo, Temple,
       Delaware, JMU, ODU, Marshall, ECU, Georgia St.
       In the meantime, I think our current situation is excellent as
       we're in geographically logical leagues for both major sports.
       The AE being strong this year in BB is a huge bonus too. Though
       I'd like an all-sports move to the A10. That's the best non-FBS
       move we can make. I couldn't give a damn about the CAA
       all-sports conference anymore. Moving from one 1-bid league to
       another makes little sense. Serves Hofstra right for trying to
       block us.
       #Post#: 20167--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: iBOsbu
       Date: November 21, 2017, 11:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: VA_Seawolf link ---
       >
       > [quote author=iBOsbu link=topic=98.msg20162#msg20162
       date=1511277994]
       >
       > Besides Fordham and Youngstown, none of the rest really excite
       me. Even these two won’t make up for the loss of JMU and
       Delaware.
       >
       > JMU has been FBS ready. But they don’t want go to
       Sunbelt which has no peer school.. wisely. Delaware will be
       starting to renovate and upgrade their stadium soon. I think
       they both want to get in AAC or otherwise will stay at FCS. But
       you are right though, no change will happen until Big 12 adds
       more. And Big 12 will add more because need a real conference
       title game... not the fake title game they are starting this
       year.
       >
       > I just hope we continue to win and make buzz. And be ready
       when the right opportunity comes along. We don’t need real
       15k attendance for FBS invite. Coastal is a prime example. As
       you mentioned earlier we have the facilities, budget, and
       prestige. I love what we are doing now in CAA. And keep working
       hard to be a better candidate than JMU and Delaware when AAC
       eventually comes calling in 5/6 years. I would decline any
       invite from sunbelt or cusa like JMU and wait for AAC. I am not
       even interested in MAC anymore. CAA>MAC in my opinion. Peer
       schools. Relatable. Rather than Akron or Ball state. Even
       presence of Buffalo doesn’t entice me.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It's slim pickings once schools start leaving the CAA. The
       league is a strong as it's going to be going forward until
       schools start leaving. None of those schools are very exciting,
       but that's all that's left.
       I agree the MAC isn't very exciting, but as the only realistic
       path to FBS, it might be worth considering. Though save for
       Buffalo, and whoever of NIU/Toledo/WMU is hot in the west that
       year, I have zero interest in any of those schools. It's a tough
       position. Going the Umass route is a non-starter I think, but
       compared to a MAC schedule, I think an independent schedule
       could be much more interesting. Now that Liberty is FBS, it's
       hard to block other schools from going FBS Indy. If we can knock
       off JMU and/or make a deep playoff run, the FBS buzz is going to
       start up again. It always does when desirable schools start
       winning.  I believe we were actually in talks with the MAC about
       being their 14th team if Umass joined for all-sports.
       JMU and Delaware can want the AAC, but the AAC won't take any
       FCS schools in it's current state. Once this Power 6 thing they
       have falls apart after their best programs get raided by a
       gutted Big 12, they may change their tune. I'd also love a new
       east coast G5 conference that was once being rumored years ago.
       the following would be nice:
       Stony Brook, UNH, Uconn (FB only), Umass, Buffalo, Temple,
       Delaware, JMU, ODU, Marshall, ECU, Georgia St.
       In the meantime, I think our current situation is excellent as
       we're in geographically logical leagues for both major sports.
       The AE being strong this year in BB is a huge bonus too. Though
       I'd like an all-sports move to the A10. That's the best non-FBS
       move we can make. I couldn't give a damn about the CAA
       all-sports conference anymore. Moving from one 1-bid league to
       another makes little sense. Serves Hofstra right for trying to
       block us.
       [/quote]
       That would be a dream come true.. but for some reason,
       historically big football schools from northeast megapolis
       (
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_megalopolis)
       fight with
       each other rather that working with each other. Schools
       routinely blocking each other from the top of the chain in Old
       Big East, ACC, etc to the bottom chain in CAA/Hofstra! lol I
       hope Umass, Uconn, Temple etc come to senses and realize the
       potential for a great conference in this region.
       I also agree that we are in sweet position now.. with logical
       leagues for both major sports. Just need to keep winning in both
       :) If we have a run like JMU did last year to FCS title, we
       would get 100 times more media exposure and publicity.. just for
       being close to NYC and being a top National research university.
       #Post#: 20169--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: newfan
       Date: November 21, 2017, 11:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: newfan link ---
       >
       > [quote author=iBOsbu link=topic=98.msg20157#msg20157
       date=1511273373]
       > Either drop scholarships and be like Ivy, or add red-shirting
       and be like CAA. Most of them have pretty good facilities for
       FCS standard. Or may be Fordham can get into CAA if JMU ever
       leaves.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I am pretty certain the PL does have red shirting...for example
       I know Holy Cross' QB is a 5th year senior and thanks to being
       redshirted was able to be the rare (or maybe only) 4 year
       football captain.
       [/quote]
       You could be right, at least in Holy Cross' case I know the QB
       was a medical redshirt...which is how he became a 4 year
       captain...redshirt actually occurred in his senior year and due
       to a strong freshman year, he's been a captain since his
       sophomore year
       #Post#: 20170--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: ecasadoSBU
       Date: November 21, 2017, 11:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think the MAC with Buffalo, Massachusetts, and Stony Brook
       would bring some interest for the Stony Brook fan. The problem
       with UMass is that I'm not sure they want to leave the A10 for
       MAC Basketball. If we could find a fourth school in the
       Northeast area to join the MAC that would work well. Hey... who
       knows... can they add Army?
       #Post#: 20171--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: ecasadoSBU
       Date: November 21, 2017, 12:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: iBOsbu link ---
       >
       > [quote author=VA_Seawolf link=topic=98.msg20164#msg20164
       date=1511281571]
       > [quote author=iBOsbu link=topic=98.msg20162#msg20162
       date=1511277994]
       >
       > Besides Fordham and Youngstown, none of the rest really excite
       me. Even these two won’t make up for the loss of JMU and
       Delaware.
       >
       > JMU has been FBS ready. But they don’t want go to Sunbelt
       which has no peer school.. wisely. Delaware will be starting to
       renovate and upgrade their stadium soon. I think they both want
       to get in AAC or otherwise will stay at FCS. But you are right
       though, no change will happen until Big 12 adds more. And Big 12
       will add more because need a real conference title game... not
       the fake title game they are starting this year.
       >
       > I just hope we continue to win and make buzz. And be ready
       when the right opportunity comes along. We don’t need real 15k
       attendance for FBS invite. Coastal is a prime example. As you
       mentioned earlier we have the facilities, budget, and prestige.
       I love what we are doing now in CAA. And keep working hard to be
       a better candidate than JMU and Delaware when AAC eventually
       comes calling in 5/6 years. I would decline any invite from
       sunbelt or cusa like JMU and wait for AAC. I am not even
       interested in MAC anymore. CAA>MAC in my opinion. Peer schools.
       Relatable. Rather than Akron or Ball state. Even presence of
       Buffalo doesn’t entice me.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It's slim pickings once schools start leaving the CAA. The
       league is a strong as it's going to be going forward until
       schools start leaving. None of those schools are very exciting,
       but that's all that's left.
       I agree the MAC isn't very exciting, but as the only realistic
       path to FBS, it might be worth considering. Though save for
       Buffalo, and whoever of NIU/Toledo/WMU is hot in the west that
       year, I have zero interest in any of those schools. It's a tough
       position. Going the Umass route is a non-starter I think, but
       compared to a MAC schedule, I think an independent schedule
       could be much more interesting. Now that Liberty is FBS, it's
       hard to block other schools from going FBS Indy. If we can knock
       off JMU and/or make a deep playoff run, the FBS buzz is going to
       start up again. It always does when desirable schools start
       winning.  I believe we were actually in talks with the MAC about
       being their 14th team if Umass joined for all-sports.
       JMU and Delaware can want the AAC, but the AAC won't take any
       FCS schools in it's current state. Once this Power 6 thing they
       have falls apart after their best programs get raided by a
       gutted Big 12, they may change their tune. I'd also love a new
       east coast G5 conference that was once being rumored years ago.
       the following would be nice:
       Stony Brook, UNH, Uconn (FB only), Umass, Buffalo, Temple,
       Delaware, JMU, ODU, Marshall, ECU, Georgia St.
       In the meantime, I think our current situation is excellent as
       we're in geographically logical leagues for both major sports.
       The AE being strong this year in BB is a huge bonus too. Though
       I'd like an all-sports move to the A10. That's the best non-FBS
       move we can make. I couldn't give a damn about the CAA
       all-sports conference anymore. Moving from one 1-bid league to
       another makes little sense. Serves Hofstra right for trying to
       block us.
       [/quote]
       That would be a dream come true.. but for some reason,
       historically big football schools from northeast megapolis
       (
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_megalopolis)
       fight with
       each other rather that working with each other. Schools
       routinely blocking each other from the top of the chain in Old
       Big East, ACC, etc to the bottom chain in CAA/Hofstra! lol I
       hope Umass, Uconn, Temple etc come to senses and realize the
       potential for a great conference in this region.
       I also agree that we are in sweet position now.. with logical
       leagues for both major sports. Just need to keep winning in both
       :) If we have a run like JMU did last year to FCS title, we
       would get 100 times more media exposure and publicity.. just for
       being close to NYC and being a top National research university.
       [/quote]
       That's because they are fighting to get the a share of the
       extremely small pie of attention that College football gathers
       in this region. The NFL dominates this part of the country like
       no other (there are historical reasons for that. NFL was
       centered in the NE from early on and the fall of the Ivy
       destroyed all College Football traditions). Even at the highest
       level, College Football is an afterthought for most people in
       this part of the country. Look at BC/Syracuse/Rutgers - the
       highest level of Power 5 CFB and it barely draws 30-40k fans per
       game.
       Life is rough in this region. Whatever we do we have to think
       smart in financially... adding 20 more scholarships and leaving
       the playoffs behind needs to be justified first - we seriously
       need an sustainable attendance bump or a conference that will
       bring in extra $$$
       #Post#: 20172--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: NoVA_Seawolf
       Date: November 21, 2017, 12:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ecasadoSBU link ---
       >
       > I think the MAC with Buffalo, Massachusetts, and Stony Brook
       would bring some interest for the Stony Brook fan. The problem
       with UMass is that I'm not sure they want to leave the A10 for
       MAC Basketball. If we could find a fourth school in the
       Northeast area to join the MAC that would work well. Hey... who
       knows... can they add Army?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Umass turned down an all sports invite to the MAC. A move that
       may come back to bite them in the rear end now that their
       football is struggling as an independent and the A10 only got
       two bids last year. If anymore A10 realignment occurs, say VCU
       to The American or Dayton and St. Louis to the Big East, Umass
       will look like a bunch of fools for turning down the MAC and
       will come back begging with their tail between their legs.
       I think Army will stay as an independent. If they wanted to they
       could join and G5 conference they want and have not done so. The
       American would add them and Air Force/BYU in a heartbeat.
       #Post#: 20173--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: NoVA_Seawolf
       Date: November 21, 2017, 12:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ecasadoSBU link ---
       >
       >
       > That's because they are fighting to get the a share of the
       extremely small pie of attention that College football gathers
       in this region. The NFL dominates this part of the country like
       no other (there are historical reasons for that. NFL was
       centered in the NE from early on and the fall of the Ivy
       destroyed all College Football traditions). Even at the highest
       level, College Football is an afterthought for most people in
       this part of the country. Look at BC/Syracuse/Rutgers - the
       highest level of Power 5 CFB and it barely draws 30-40k fans per
       game.
       >
       >
       > Life is rough in this region. Whatever we do we have to think
       smart in financially... adding 20 more scholarships and leaving
       the playoffs behind needs to be justified first - either we
       seriously need an sustainable attendance bump or a conference
       that will bring in extra $$$
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Two of the three schools you mentioned are private schools and
       Rutgers is a perennial doormat. We'd probably beat them if we
       played them this year. Penn St. I'd consider in the northeast
       and they're near the top of all college football in attendance.
       I don't think getting 25k out to games against regional
       opponents out here is an unrealistic goal some day soon.
       The 44 scholarships (have to keep the numbers for men and women
       equal) is chump change compared to our budget. Our athletic
       budget is already top 5 among FCS public schools and higher than
       several FBS schools in G5 conferences. In 2015 we outspent San
       Jose St. and Nevada and they play in the Mountain West.
       I'm convinced once we go on a deep playoff run in either
       football or basketball, Heilbron's phone will be ringing off the
       hook for conference invites. Mac, A10, CAA, etc.
       #Post#: 20178--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: iBOsbu
       Date: November 21, 2017, 1:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: VA_Seawolf link ---
       >
       > [quote author=ecasadoSBU link=topic=98.msg20171#msg20171
       date=1511287478]
       >
       > That's because they are fighting to get the a share of the
       extremely small pie of attention that College football gathers
       in this region. The NFL dominates this part of the country like
       no other (there are historical reasons for that. NFL was
       centered in the NE from early on and the fall of the Ivy
       destroyed all College Football traditions). Even at the highest
       level, College Football is an afterthought for most people in
       this part of the country. Look at BC/Syracuse/Rutgers - the
       highest level of Power 5 CFB and it barely draws 30-40k fans per
       game.
       >
       >
       > Life is rough in this region. Whatever we do we have to think
       smart in financially... adding 20 more scholarships and leaving
       the playoffs behind needs to be justified first - either we
       seriously need an sustainable attendance bump or a conference
       that will bring in extra $$$
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Two of the three schools you mentioned are private schools and
       Rutgers is a perennial doormat. We'd probably beat them if we
       played them this year. Penn St. I'd consider in the northeast
       and they're near the top of all college football in attendance.
       I don't think getting 25k out to games against regional
       opponents out here is an unrealistic goal some day soon.
       The 44 scholarships (have to keep the numbers for men and women
       equal) is chump change compared to our budget. Our athletic
       budget is already top 5 among FCS public schools and higher than
       several FBS schools in G5 conferences. In 2015 we outspent San
       Jose St. and Nevada and they play in the Mountain West.
       I'm convinced once we go on a deep playoff run in either
       football or basketball, Heilbron's phone will be ringing off the
       hook for conference invites. Mac, A10, CAA, etc.
       [/quote]
       Me too!
       #Post#: 20186--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: ecasadoSBU
       Date: November 21, 2017, 6:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah BC and Syracuse are private schools. But those are schools
       with long football traditions. Syracuse gets a lot of fan
       support from the city not just alumni, but they still can't draw
       fans to their football games. BC is also private in a large New
       England town but their fan base is more alumni based.
       Rutgers sucks, we all know. But it's still B1G football! No
       matter how bad they may be Big Ten is a high-level of football.
       Connecticut was drawing 40k for most of the 2000s but after
       downgrading to the AAC has seen their attendance collapse to the
       20,000s. Guys, lets not underestimate how hard is going to be to
       climb the ladder. I'm not saying we shouldn't try it. We should
       aim that high but lets also be realistic of the CFB atmosphere
       in the Northeast.
       #Post#: 20189--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2012-2020: Future of SBU Football - Conference Affiliation,
       FBS Football, etc
   DIR By: Chairman of the Board
       Date: November 21, 2017, 8:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: VA_Seawolf link ---
       >
       > [quote author=iBOsbu link=topic=98.msg20157#msg20157
       date=1511273373]
       > I like the 4 home-home games scheduled with Fordham next 4
       year’s. May be they can provide a new NYC/LI rivalry spark. May
       be lol.
       >
       > I think Fordham wants to improve but stuck in Patriot League.
       Patriot League as a whole needs to make a decision. They need to
       commit to either fully follow their role model Ivy League or be
       fully competitive. They are in between and it’s not helping
       them. Either drop scholarships and be like Ivy, or add
       red-shirting and be like CAA. Most of them have pretty good
       facilities for FCS standard. Or may be Fordham can get into CAA
       if JMU ever leaves.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Fordham is a potential add if JMU, or any other programs leave.
       Fordham
       Monmouth
       Howard
       Hampton
       CCSU
       Youngstown St.
       Robert Morris
       Kennesaw St.
       could all be backfills if 1-3 teams leave in no particular
       order. All could be great additions, but none are worth
       proactively expanding for.  JMU will be the next team out the
       door and then we'll see. Delaware is likely to follow if JMU
       goes. Hopefully by then we're not far from an FBS invite either.
       A pretty attractive conference of east coast G5 schools could be
       made if the AAC gets raided by the Big 12 and implodes during
       the next great realignment shuffle.
       [/quote]
       that's a good point- the b12 could at any point court houston,
       SMU, tulsa, cincy, memphis.  maybe even tulane?  noting that
       houston is the most successful of the lot, memphis/cincy have
       their years, and we all know the SMU story...
       *****************************************************
       Page 29 of 35
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page