URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook Fans
  HTML https://sbufan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Conference and Athletics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36147--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: April 6, 2022, 8:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       just a reminder all- we can certainly have a discussion here on
       the forum, but in order to avoid descending into what the rest
       of the web looks like (which weve managed to avoid for 10 years)
       please be respectful of others and their thoughts and opinions.
       #Post#: 36149--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: Redwyn Date: April 6, 2022, 10:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hammertime link=topic=916.msg36146#msg36146
       date=1649237938]
       [quote author=VA_Seawolf link=topic=916.msg36144#msg36144
       date=1649219456]
       [quote author=Accelerator link=topic=916.msg36132#msg36132
       date=1649172460]
       To be quite frank, the "Asian invasion" at Stony Brook is the
       big elephant in the room regarding campus life and athletic
       culture that no one wants to discuss because of how sensitive
       the topic is, but it is one of, if not the, biggest issues the
       school has right now.
       International Asian students pay out of state tuition, so they
       help financially. However, we need to work on attracting US out
       of state students bc they contribute more to the culture.
       I was around 10 years ago: 41% white, 32% Asian, which checks
       out with the eye test from when I was there. This year, 42%
       Asian and 38% white. Asians are the majority on campus and
       whites are a minority. That is insane. There's no way any FBS or
       Power 5 school has an Asian majority and a white minority.
       For whatever reason, starting in 2014, Stony Brook became less
       appealing to whites and that has only continued to get worse. I
       can see a trend: white students who like sports are not going to
       want to attend a school with majority Asians who don't know
       sports. Each year, less and less white kids come because they're
       turned off by the demographics here, and this has the potential
       to spiral and get even worse if Stony Brook doesn't nip it in
       the bud soon. Asian students are good for academic rankings and
       diversity numbers, but is it worth the hit to the school's
       social and athletic reputation? This is why most schools have de
       facto Asian quotas, where an Asian's SAT score needs to be 150
       pts higher than a white's, given everything else equal, to earn
       admittance.
       African Americans are good for diversity, and they're way more
       likely to be fans of college sports. But we don't go after them
       (or they don't go after us), since their percentage has declined
       lately.
       NYC is a highly diverse area, yes, but it isn't 42% Asian and
       38% white. No city has those numbers.
       [/quote]
       This is a touchy subject, but you've given me a lot to think
       about with this.
       [/quote]
       It shouldn't be a touchy subject, but certain political parties
       have a way of turning around a meaningful conversation into
       something that is racist. For example. Why all of a sudden they
       are talking about Asians being targeted and attacked by white
       people, when in fact the majority of assaults are committed by
       blacks in major metropolitan cities. This is a fact and
       statistics are not something I am making up, and this has
       nothing to do with people targeting Asians. It has everything to
       do with crime in major cities, but certain political groups like
       to turn things around to fit their agendas.
       People shouldn't be afraid and worried about retaliation when
       they talk about a subject that involves race and culture, but
       SBU will never, ever, admit that the reason why the student fan
       base is shrinking is because of the heavy foreign students based
       at Stony Brook University, and this is only going to get worse,
       not better. Goes to show you. College really is all about money
       for the state, and university, and not about giving the student
       the proper education to be successful in the real world.
       I suppose we need to address the reason why Asians are attracted
       to SBU in the first place. I know for a fact some of it has
       everything to do with the mandatory WOKE classes that my son is
       forced to take for his Major, which is in Business
       administration. And some of these classes have nothing to do
       with business but are more about brainwashing students to
       believe in something that he or she doesnt want to hear or talk
       about. For example.: "Critical race theory" I mean really??
       [/quote]
       I don't think that CRT has much to do with asian attendance at
       SBU, as I don't think national polls have shown that asian
       americans strongly support liberal policies. A great example of
       this is in NYC, where changes to liberalize magnet school
       eligibility prompted massive protests by the asian community. A
       similar reaction was seen in San Francisco over school issues.
       I don't think that SBU is just asian friendly, it's immigrant
       friendly. I don't think they're doing anything specific to
       entice this (nor is this a negative in my mind, it's what a
       state school should be), but there are a few things that make
       this school very attractive to first-generation or lower income
       college graduates:
       1. It's cheap, but with massive value. We are consistently tops
       on return on investment rankings
       2. Our best subjects are quant subjects with excellent career
       potential, including math/applied math, physics, computer
       science, engineering and chemistry. Hell, in some applied math
       and physics rankings we're on par with MIT (except approx 40K
       cheaper/year). That's probably it gents - the school is really,
       really good at launching stable, well paying careers without the
       massive overhead of the Ivy League.
       3. We are proxy to NYC, which means that weekend jobs supporting
       family are possible
       That's it. I posit that SBU is doing EXACTLY what state schools
       were designed to do. They were NOT built to be athletic
       powerhouses. They were built to educate the broadest swath of
       students possible.
       If SBU wants to change that trajectory, they need to throttle
       admissions. I'm pretty sure that's not legal at state schools,
       and private schools (aka Harvard) can't seem to pull it off
       either. Further, applications to many colleges are on the
       downtrend (see - the entire MAAC). I suspect that SBU - given
       what it offers - is not victim to that problem and doesn't want
       to play with a system that works.
       So my feeling is that since you can't change admissions, you can
       only change the atmosphere on campus as much as possible and
       build the athletic reputation to pull the community and
       out-of-state applicants.
       #Post#: 36152--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: April 6, 2022, 12:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       great post red.
       i recall my days at SB that there was more diversity on campus
       than there was in NYC.  in fact, there also were students from
       over 50 different countries (that's like 25% of the globe).
       unfortunately, i also recall students only congregating with
       students of their own color, and also, somehow the international
       students mostly ended up in roosevelt quad (for whatever
       reason).
       it's normal for the tech-heavy subjects to be bookworms, stay at
       home, play video games, go home, etc.  that's fine.  but i'd
       ask- why isnt this an issue at virginia tech?  georgia tech?
       let's be honest here- from an academic standpoint we are more
       like a large state tech school than we are a delaware or rutgers
       or umass.
       id add that the train running right through campus isnt helpful.
       and the island is insular, hard to get off, and its inhabitants
       are very demanding, busy, and not as open minded.
       lastly- i dont even think out of state students is the answer-
       it could simply be get more students from WNY, CNY, cap
       district, etc.  but those kids dont want to drive 6 hours and/or
       through the city.
       #Post#: 36164--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: ecasadoSBU Date: April 8, 2022, 9:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't want to single out the Asian-American student population
       as one of the main factors why Stony Brook lacks a strong
       sports/athletics culture. Because while agree this is among the
       factors - it definitely isn't a major factor. I seen it first
       hand that Asian-Americans like any demographics can buy into
       sports if the conditions are there - Wife attended UConn and
       everyone bought into sports no matter who. Go to UConn,
       Syracuse, and Rutgers and you will see the Asian-American
       community buy into sports. Obviously the racial demographics at
       UConn are very different - but in my opinion the real difference
       is where you draw your students from.
       I think the LIRR and the New York City influence are by far the
       main factor that have us in this shitty situation. Lets face it
       - most of our kids are from NYC (I think over half of the
       student without regard to race). NYC is is a huge "anonymous"
       city with zero college athletics culture. Even HS sports isn't a
       draw in this large city. I was raised here and played H.S sports
       and it had zero influence in my High School days in this major
       city.
       So to expects kids to all of the sudden buy into and fully adopt
       the college sports culture its going to be a challenge when the
       majority of our students are from NYC.
       Rutgers in the other hand draws primarily from NJ and even
       though NJ is indeed part of the New York Metro it is still very
       different from NYC and outside of Jersey City/Newark has a
       stronger small-town culture where people follow & root for their
       H.S teams somewhat similar to Long Island suburbs. UConn's main
       draw is Suburban Connecticut.
       Syracuse is lucky that it has created a loyal following in
       central NY.
       That's not to say that UConn/Rutgers/Syracuse have it all
       figured out. There is a larger regional college sports apathy
       that also affects them. These schools play at the highest level
       and their CFB draw is still peanuts compared to other major
       schools in the Midwest/southeast. So there is a regional
       struggle too on top of everything. Rutgers is in the Big Ten and
       struggles to sell out their 50k football stadium while the
       Midwestern schools draw far more than that.
       Then we face the second major issue that the kids we draw from
       the island that do have that small town sports culture are too
       close to home and end up going home too on the weekends like
       everyone else.
       ---->
       At the end of the day it comes down to the school not placing
       enough emphasis in creating a campus environment where it is fun
       to stay at SBU over the weekends. We need the frats, the
       sororities, the parties, the concerts all working together to
       create a good dynamic that promotes school spirit which would
       improve the appreciation for athletics. We are far from there to
       be honest. We had a good dynamic in 2010-13 which was quickly
       taking off until the school pulled the plug on it and destroyed
       the forward momentum.
       Stony Brook has focused a lot of its resources on becoming a
       respected academic institution and we should be proud of that. I
       don't crap on the institution for trying to be research heavy
       and academically focused. Few (if any) school have climbed the
       academic pyramid of higher education in a mere lifetime (65
       years). We need to be minded that the school's mission is first
       and foremost to educate and to serve as an economic engine of
       Long Island. So far it meets both.
       Hopefully in the next two decades it can also add serve as a
       "cultural engine" to its mission
       so... to sum it up:
       (1) NYC influence & apathy
       (2) Northeast regional apathy overall
       (3) Lack of emphasis in campus life/events
       (4) Weak fraternity/sorority community
       (5) Demographics, international students are probably the 5th on
       my list
       #Post#: 36166--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: Hammertime Date: April 9, 2022, 5:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ecasadoSBU link=topic=916.msg36164#msg36164
       date=1649470701]
       I don't want to single out the Asian-American student population
       as one of the main factors why Stony Brook lacks a strong
       sports/athletics culture. Because while agree this is among the
       factors - it definitely isn't a major factor. I seen it first
       hand that Asian-Americans like any demographics can buy into
       sports if the conditions are there - Wife attended UConn and
       everyone bought into sports no matter who. Go to UConn,
       Syracuse, and Rutgers and you will see the Asian-American
       community buy into sports. Obviously the racial demographics at
       UConn are very different - but in my opinion the real difference
       is where you draw your students from.
       I think the LIRR and the New York City influence are by far the
       main factor that have us in this shitty situation. Lets face it
       - most of our kids are from NYC (I think over half of the
       student without regard to race). NYC is is a huge "anonymous"
       city with zero college athletics culture. Even HS sports isn't a
       draw in this large city. I was raised here and played H.S sports
       and it had zero influence in my High School days in this major
       city.
       So to expects kids to all of the sudden buy into and fully adopt
       the college sports culture its going to be a challenge when the
       majority of our students are from NYC.
       Rutgers in the other hand draws primarily from NJ and even
       though NJ is indeed part of the New York Metro it is still very
       different from NYC and outside of Jersey City/Newark has a
       stronger small-town culture where people follow & root for their
       H.S teams somewhat similar to Long Island suburbs. UConn's main
       draw is Suburban Connecticut.
       Syracuse is lucky that it has created a loyal following in
       central NY.
       That's not to say that UConn/Rutgers/Syracuse have it all
       figured out. There is a larger regional college sports apathy
       that also affects them. These schools play at the highest level
       and their CFB draw is still peanuts compared to other major
       schools in the Midwest/southeast. So there is a regional
       struggle too on top of everything. Rutgers is in the Big Ten and
       struggles to sell out their 50k football stadium while the
       Midwestern schools draw far more than that.
       Then we face the second major issue that the kids we draw from
       the island that do have that small town sports culture are too
       close to home and end up going home too on the weekends like
       everyone else.
       ---->
       At the end of the day it comes down to the school not placing
       enough emphasis in creating a campus environment where it is fun
       to stay at SBU over the weekends. We need the frats, the
       sororities, the parties, the concerts all working together to
       create a good dynamic that promotes school spirit which would
       improve the appreciation for athletics. We are far from there to
       be honest. We had a good dynamic in 2010-13 which was quickly
       taking off until the school pulled the plug on it and destroyed
       the forward momentum.
       Stony Brook has focused a lot of its resources on becoming a
       respected academic institution and we should be proud of that. I
       don't crap on the institution for trying to be research heavy
       and academically focused. Few (if any) school have climbed the
       academic pyramid of higher education in a mere lifetime (65
       years). We need to be minded that the school's mission is first
       and foremost to educate and to serve as an economic engine of
       Long Island. So far it meets both.
       Hopefully in the next two decades it can also add serve as a
       "cultural engine" to its mission
       so... to sum it up:
       (1) NYC influence & apathy
       (2) Northeast regional apathy overall
       (3) Lack of emphasis in campus life/events
       (4) Weak fraternity/sorority community
       (5) Demographics, international students are probably the 5th on
       my list
       [/quote]
       That's all good stuff you just wrote there ecasadoSBU, but the
       fact remains the same. Asians as a whole don't like Football,
       Lacrosse, and most other American sports!
       I've been a season ticket holder for both football and
       basketball, and I can tell you with certainty and confidence
       enough to say that from day one. about 12 years now, I can count
       on one hand the amount of Asians who attend football, the very
       small amount of Asian students and adults who watch SBU
       basketball, and zero who attend lacrosse games. So when you have
       over 50% of students in a school who are of Asian descent, this
       is what is going to happen, and it will only get worse for SBU
       sports because of the direction the state/university decided is
       best..
       I do however agree with you that SBU should not be focusing on
       how to make sports more important than academics but should be
       focusing on how to make SBU the best academic school in the
       country. If bringing in more international students to the
       school will help to achieve this, then fine. Go for it. But keep
       in mind. American-born students are taking notice and will avoid
       SBU for other college universities. MY son chose SBU because he
       didn't want to financially burden his parents or himself with
       high college bills. but he hates this school with a passion. He
       feels like the third wheel. Nobody talks to each other, it's
       just so cold inside
       #Post#: 36170--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: Accelerator Date: April 9, 2022, 11:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There's got to be a way that we can extend our reach to European
       college students. I knew a bunch from Denmark, Sweden, Germany,
       etc who came here for a semester or two and wanted to go to
       college football games at Stony Brook so badly because they had
       heard about how vital it was to the American experience. None of
       the Asian internationals, who stayed here for all 4 years,
       expressed any of that interest.
       Asian Americans and internationals do a lot of good for this
       school academically/financially in the latter, no doubt, but
       like I said, is it worth the trade-off in every other category?
       I don't know.
       #Post#: 36173--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: ecasadoSBU Date: April 9, 2022, 12:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hammertime link=topic=916.msg36166#msg36166
       date=1649500608]
       [quote author=ecasadoSBU link=topic=916.msg36164#msg36164
       date=1649470701]
       I don't want to single out the Asian-American student population
       as one of the main factors why Stony Brook lacks a strong
       sports/athletics culture. Because while agree this is among the
       factors - it definitely isn't a major factor. I seen it first
       hand that Asian-Americans like any demographics can buy into
       sports if the conditions are there - Wife attended UConn and
       everyone bought into sports no matter who. Go to UConn,
       Syracuse, and Rutgers and you will see the Asian-American
       community buy into sports. Obviously the racial demographics at
       UConn are very different - but in my opinion the real difference
       is where you draw your students from.
       I think the LIRR and the New York City influence are by far the
       main factor that have us in this shitty situation. Lets face it
       - most of our kids are from NYC (I think over half of the
       student without regard to race). NYC is is a huge "anonymous"
       city with zero college athletics culture. Even HS sports isn't a
       draw in this large city. I was raised here and played H.S sports
       and it had zero influence in my High School days in this major
       city.
       So to expects kids to all of the sudden buy into and fully adopt
       the college sports culture its going to be a challenge when the
       majority of our students are from NYC.
       Rutgers in the other hand draws primarily from NJ and even
       though NJ is indeed part of the New York Metro it is still very
       different from NYC and outside of Jersey City/Newark has a
       stronger small-town culture where people follow & root for their
       H.S teams somewhat similar to Long Island suburbs. UConn's main
       draw is Suburban Connecticut.
       Syracuse is lucky that it has created a loyal following in
       central NY.
       That's not to say that UConn/Rutgers/Syracuse have it all
       figured out. There is a larger regional college sports apathy
       that also affects them. These schools play at the highest level
       and their CFB draw is still peanuts compared to other major
       schools in the Midwest/southeast. So there is a regional
       struggle too on top of everything. Rutgers is in the Big Ten and
       struggles to sell out their 50k football stadium while the
       Midwestern schools draw far more than that.
       Then we face the second major issue that the kids we draw from
       the island that do have that small town sports culture are too
       close to home and end up going home too on the weekends like
       everyone else.
       ---->
       At the end of the day it comes down to the school not placing
       enough emphasis in creating a campus environment where it is fun
       to stay at SBU over the weekends. We need the frats, the
       sororities, the parties, the concerts all working together to
       create a good dynamic that promotes school spirit which would
       improve the appreciation for athletics. We are far from there to
       be honest. We had a good dynamic in 2010-13 which was quickly
       taking off until the school pulled the plug on it and destroyed
       the forward momentum.
       Stony Brook has focused a lot of its resources on becoming a
       respected academic institution and we should be proud of that. I
       don't crap on the institution for trying to be research heavy
       and academically focused. Few (if any) school have climbed the
       academic pyramid of higher education in a mere lifetime (65
       years). We need to be minded that the school's mission is first
       and foremost to educate and to serve as an economic engine of
       Long Island. So far it meets both.
       Hopefully in the next two decades it can also add serve as a
       "cultural engine" to its mission
       so... to sum it up:
       (1) NYC influence & apathy
       (2) Northeast regional apathy overall
       (3) Lack of emphasis in campus life/events
       (4) Weak fraternity/sorority community
       (5) Demographics, international students are probably the 5th on
       my list
       [/quote]
       That's all good stuff you just wrote there ecasadoSBU, but the
       fact remains the same. Asians as a whole don't like Football,
       Lacrosse, and most other American sports!
       I've been a season ticket holder for both football and
       basketball, and I can tell you with certainty and confidence
       enough to say that from day one. about 12 years now, I can count
       on one hand the amount of Asians who attend football, the very
       small amount of Asian students and adults who watch SBU
       basketball, and zero who attend lacrosse games. So when you have
       over 50% of students in a school who are of Asian descent, this
       is what is going to happen, and it will only get worse for SBU
       sports because of the direction the state/university decided is
       best..
       I do however agree with you that SBU should not be focusing on
       how to make sports more important than academics but should be
       focusing on how to make SBU the best academic school in the
       country. If bringing in more international students to the
       school will help to achieve this, then fine. Go for it. But keep
       in mind. American-born students are taking notice and will avoid
       SBU for other college universities. MY son chose SBU because he
       didn't want to financially burden his parents or himself with
       high college bills. but he hates this school with a passion. He
       feels like the third wheel. Nobody talks to each other, it's
       just so cold inside
       [/quote]
       The thing is Hammertime is that I don't disagree with you in
       regards to Asian-American apathy regarding sports. But we can
       say that about any other group other than native born Americans.
       For example - I'm a native of the Dominican Republic (born
       abroad). We don't know crap about American football. We are a
       baseball first country. So are Puerto Ricans and Cubans who both
       love baseball. Meanwhile, most other Hispanics are soccer first.
       Asians see sports more as a discipline than as recreation - but
       they still play them and advocate them. I have Korean friends at
       SBU that were hardc0re soccer players. So what I'm trying to say
       is that if you create the right conditions we can get everyone
       on board. At the end of the day if you make it fun other kids
       will buy in and try to fit in with the rest of the crowd.
       Look at my anedoctal example - I first started following college
       football/NFL my freshman year of college as my hall-mates would
       always have open-door Sundays to watch games. I bought in big
       time into the sport and now support the Seawolves ever since.
       What I'm trying to say is that while it is true there is overall
       apathy for sports by the Asian-American community at SBU right
       now, it doesn't have to be like that if the school makes moves
       to change that apathy. Its up to the school to create that
       culture. Work with students to create grassroot organizations
       for student life, bring in the frats, give them designated
       tailgating spaces, etc.
       If you were around back in 2010-12 we had that positive momentum
       going. Kids were coming to games in droves and then the school
       pulled the plugs - restricted frat/sor parties, started charging
       for parking spaces in main lot, and killed the momentum that we
       were gaining. That year I was able to get a group of friends to
       tailgate for like three games, that was the first time ever I
       got them to do that. I thought we had finally arrived. and then
       it all fell apart thanks to the anti-fun University policies.
       Like I said the only solution is for the school to put the work
       and money to improve conditions - blocking/reducing
       Asian-Americans from enrolling which would be illegal and
       unethical and hurt the school's academic reputation/mission
       which would do more harm than good
       I really enjoyed my time at Stony Brook. Maybe because it was
       the first time I had left the hood (Bronx) and found good people
       to be sorrounded with. I still keep up with like 20 or friends
       from Stony Brook. We even have a whatsapp group where we chat
       all the time and meet up every once in a while. Not gonna that
       the group is extremely diverse - Asian, White, Hispanic, Indian,
       Black. But we all got together freshmen year and have become
       great friends every since. I think dealing with cultural
       diversity is not easy at first, but if you keep an open-mind it
       is amazing to meet people from all walks of life and you can
       really learn a lot from them. For me it was fascinating after
       growing up in the inner-city and not being exposed to people
       from other places
       #Post#: 36178--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: Hammertime Date: April 9, 2022, 2:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Accelerator link=topic=916.msg36170#msg36170
       date=1649521389]
       There's got to be a way that we can extend our reach to European
       college students. I knew a bunch from Denmark, Sweden, Germany,
       etc who came here for a semester or two and wanted to go to
       college football games at Stony Brook so badly because they had
       heard about how vital it was to the American experience. None of
       the Asian internationals, who stayed here for all 4 years,
       expressed any of that interest.
       Asian Americans and internationals do a lot of good for this
       school academically/financially in the latter, no doubt, but
       like I said, is it worth the trade-off in every other category?
       I don't know.
       [/quote]
       Try to remember what school you are talking about. Now that
       Hochul is declaring SBU a Flagship school. A 100% of the
       school's attention will be on academics, research, grants,
       etc... Nobody cares about sports at SBU anymore. Including NYS.
       I am not joking when I tell you guys SBU should, and I predict
       will go back to D3. As they should.
       #Post#: 36180--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: ecasadoSBU Date: April 9, 2022, 3:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hammertime link=topic=916.msg36178#msg36178
       date=1649531979]
       [quote author=Accelerator link=topic=916.msg36170#msg36170
       date=1649521389]
       There's got to be a way that we can extend our reach to European
       college students. I knew a bunch from Denmark, Sweden, Germany,
       etc who came here for a semester or two and wanted to go to
       college football games at Stony Brook so badly because they had
       heard about how vital it was to the American experience. None of
       the Asian internationals, who stayed here for all 4 years,
       expressed any of that interest.
       Asian Americans and internationals do a lot of good for this
       school academically/financially in the latter, no doubt, but
       like I said, is it worth the trade-off in every other category?
       I don't know.
       [/quote]
       Try to remember what school you are talking about. Now that
       Hochul is declaring SBU a Flagship school. A 100% of the
       school's attention will be on academics, research, grants,
       etc... Nobody cares about sports at SBU anymore. Including NYS.
       I am not joking when I tell you guys SBU should, and I predict
       will go back to D3. As they should.
       [/quote]
       Nah man. Lets keep optimistic boys.
       We are the few and the proud! We need to keep the optimism alive
       in this chat and get more people involved in Seawolves
       athletics!!
       If anything - the flagship label (we were a flagship de facto
       anyway) should only give us more resources and attention from a
       larger pool of students nationwide.
       #Post#: 36181--------------------------------------------------
       Re: CAA all sports???
       By: Hammertime Date: April 9, 2022, 6:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ecasadoSBU link=topic=916.msg36180#msg36180
       date=1649537151]
       [quote author=Hammertime link=topic=916.msg36178#msg36178
       date=1649531979]
       [quote author=Accelerator link=topic=916.msg36170#msg36170
       date=1649521389]
       There's got to be a way that we can extend our reach to European
       college students. I knew a bunch from Denmark, Sweden, Germany,
       etc who came here for a semester or two and wanted to go to
       college football games at Stony Brook so badly because they had
       heard about how vital it was to the American experience. None of
       the Asian internationals, who stayed here for all 4 years,
       expressed any of that interest.
       Asian Americans and internationals do a lot of good for this
       school academically/financially in the latter, no doubt, but
       like I said, is it worth the trade-off in every other category?
       I don't know.
       [/quote]
       Try to remember what school you are talking about. Now that
       Hochul is declaring SBU a Flagship school. A 100% of the
       school's attention will be on academics, research, grants,
       etc... Nobody cares about sports at SBU anymore. Including NYS.
       I am not joking when I tell you guys SBU should, and I predict
       will go back to D3. As they should.
       [/quote]
       Nah man. Lets keep optimistic boys.
       We are the few and the proud! We need to keep the optimism alive
       in this chat and get more people involved in Seawolves
       athletics!!
       If anything - the flagship label (we were a flagship de facto
       anyway) should only give us more resources and attention from a
       larger pool of students nationwide.
       [/quote]
       I'm still doing my part as a fan.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page