URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook Fans
  HTML https://sbufan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Around Stony Brook U...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 30111--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: March 31, 2020, 9:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/randi-f-marshall/stony-brook-university-president-coronavirus-covid-19-maurie-mcinnis-1.43567836
       [quote]McInnis, an art historian, said she’s also concerned
       about what COVID-19, and the extraordinary economic strains it
       created, mean for Stony Brook University’s financial standing.
       “I will admit I am very worried about the funding picture for
       Stony Brook,” McInnis said. “I was worried before. I’m
       considerably more worried now.”
       McInnis noted that Stony Brook has been a centerpiece of the
       state’s efforts to fight the coronavirus, from the work its
       hospital and researchers are doing, to its role in hosting
       quarantined study-abroad students, to the fact that its campus
       will be used for an additional field hospital facility. The
       entire State University of New York system, and the state, must
       understand the “disproportionate” economic impact on Stony
       Brook, she said. It will take money from the state, federal
       government, and philanthropists to help Stony Brook gain
       stronger financial footing, she added.[/quote]
       #Post#: 30709--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: July 1, 2020, 8:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/pres/from_president/message_070120.php
       #Post#: 30710--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: iBOsbu Date: July 1, 2020, 9:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Shirley did a great job! I really admired her. Stanley was
       competent, but didn’t wow me. Hope new President outperforms
       both of them. Wish her the best.
       #Post#: 43808--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: May 15, 2024, 8:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook University faculty narrowly defeats resolution
       censuring school president over protest arrests
  HTML https://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/stony-brook-protests-phones-jau0q107
       [quote]
       The Stony Brook University Faculty Senate on Monday narrowly
       defeated a motion to censure the school's president, Maurie
       McInnis, for her handling of the arrests of 29 pro-Palestinian
       protesters earlier this month.
       The senate defeated the resolution by a 55-51 vote, with three
       abstentions, said Richard Larson, a professor and president of
       the senate.
       The senate originally was to vote on a “no confidence”
       resolution, but switched it to a lower-level censure vote with
       somewhat less critical language, he said.
       McInnis said she appreciated the backing.
       “I am deeply grateful for the support of the Stony Brook faculty
       at this challenging time for so many universities,” McInnis said
       in a statement.
       “I realize there remains passionate disagreement among members
       of our community on the issues we are facing, and I pledge to do
       whatever I can to help our campus heal and move forward,” she
       added.
       Larson said the vote underscored that “the campus is divided
       right down the middle. It’s certainly not an endorsement of the
       president’s handling of the May 1 and 2 arrests and the actions
       taken in the wake of those arrests.”
       The vote was largely symbolic — the senate does not have any
       administrative power at the university.
       McInnis had come under fire for the arrests of the protesters
       and the seizing, by campus police, of the cellphones belonging
       to 17 of them. Two professors who had their phones taken were
       among the 29 people arrested.
       University officials on Monday returned 16 of the phones, though
       the protesters and some legal experts said the seizure put a
       chilling effect on the protesters' right to free speech.
       Last Monday, in a heated two-hour Faculty Senate meeting, the
       organization tabled for a week a vote on a resolution expressing
       “no confidence in President McInnis’s capacity to perform the
       ongoing duties of her office in a wise and humane manner.”
       The new censure resolution stated that “President McInnis and
       senior administration have responded to peaceful protests on our
       campus with a disproportionate degree of force, failing to
       negotiate with students in good faith and deploying Suffolk
       County Police and New York State Troopers to arrest members of
       the Stony Brook community.”
       Some faculty members have been circulating a petition supporting
       McInnis, said Gallya Lahav, a political science professor.
       “I think she handled it with grace. I think she handled it in
       the best way she can,” Lahav said. McInnis forcefully spoke out
       against antisemitism on campus, she added.
       A spokesperson for the university said the returned phones were
       given to a lawyer representing the students on Monday morning.
       Stony Brook professor Josh Dubnau, who was arrested and had his
       phone taken, said Monday that police still have one student's
       phone. The university declined to comment on that.
       “All legal processes were followed and adhered to while we had
       the phones in our custody,” the Stony Brook spokesperson said.
       The spokesperson referred further questions to the Suffolk
       County District Attorney’s Office, which has declined to
       comment.
       Fred Klein, a professor at the Hofstra University School of Law
       and a former chief of the Major Offense Bureau in the Nassau
       County District Attorney’s Office, said he believes the seizure
       of the phones was illegal.
       “The phones never should have been taken in the first place,” he
       said. “It seems like a pretty blatant violation of their
       constitutional rights.”
       Police will typically confiscate a wallet, keys and other items
       while a person is being processed for an arrest, but generally
       must return the property after the person has been released from
       custody, legal experts have told Newsday. The exception is if it
       might serve as evidence in a criminal case. The protesters were
       charged with disorderly conduct, which is a non-criminal
       offense.
       School officials warned students protesting on May 1 that they
       had to move from the grassy hill where they had camped out,
       saying it was needed for other events. But the demonstrators
       refused, triggering the arrests.
       [/quote]
       WARNING- this is newsworthy but please proceed with caution
       while discussing this topic.  If you need, please refresh
       yourself with the forum rules that you've agreed to.
       #Post#: 43818--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: ecasadoSBU Date: May 16, 2024, 3:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Very challenging environment across U.S Universities the past
       few months.
       In difficult times like these I'm glad I don't have that job
       (University President)
       #Post#: 43836--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: May 23, 2024, 8:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook University students, faculty members face charges
       from pro-Palestinian campus protest
  HTML https://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/stony-brook-university-protests-charges-arraign-eafz3v14
       [quote]
       Two Stony Brook University professors and eight students were
       arraigned Tuesday on disorderly conduct charges stemming from a
       May 1 pro-Palestinian protest on the campus.
       That followed the arraignment of 19 other protesters on Monday,
       and as the head of Stony Brook’s Faculty Senate said efforts to
       investigate and gain oversight of campus police were being
       stalled by the university’s administration.
       Professors Josh Dubnau, a neurobiologist, and Abena Asare, a
       member of the Africana Studies department, took turns along with
       students before Judge Bernard Cheng in Suffolk County District
       Court in Central Islip to hear the charges. The professors and
       some students had the black and white Palestinian scarf called a
       kaffiyeh draped around their shoulders.
       Peter Brill, a lawyer representing the protesters, called on the
       university to urge the Suffolk County district attorney to drop
       the charges, which are noncriminal offenses.
       “We hope that between now and June, given the interests among
       all of the parties at Stony Brook to move past this incident,
       that there will be a strong recommendation to the district
       attorney to move to dismiss these charges and let everyone open
       a new chapter,” Brill said after the arraignments.
       Stony Brook President Maurie McInnis, through a spokesperson,
       declined to comment.
       The protesters were arrested May 1 after university officials
       ordered them to move to another location, and they refused.
       During their detention for up to 7 1/2 hours, campus police
       seized 17 of their cellphones and kept them for more than a
       week.
       McInnis came under fire and narrowly won a censure vote by the
       Faculty Senate on May 13.
       A week earlier, the Senate approved a resolution calling for an
       independent investigation of Enterprise Risk Management, the
       Stony Brook group that oversees campus police, and its handling
       of the protests and “intelligence gathering” of staff, faculty
       and students. Some professors called the seizure of the phones
       more typical of an authoritarian police state.
       The resolution also called for the formation of a Senate
       subcommittee to exercise continuing oversight of ERM.
       Richard Larson, president of the Faculty Senate, said the
       proposal has stalled because of a lack of cooperation by the
       university administration.
       “There is no indication from administration that they are
       disposed to act on either of the two resolutions that were
       passed at the last public Senate meeting,” Larson said,
       referring also to a resolution calling for the disorderly
       conduct charges to be dropped. “Their stance is not openly
       collaborative.”
       McInnis’s office declined to comment.
       Asare said McInnis needs to take action to restore trust at the
       university.
       “We have a lot of questions about why phones were seized for
       almost two weeks, and we have lots of questions about whether
       they were accessed or used,” she said. “The Senate has passed
       some clear-cut efforts to ask for oversight over this because
       there’s been a huge loss of trust among faculty, students and
       staff. We need to have that trust built back, and the only way
       to do that is through transparency and real openness about how
       all these choices are being made, about how to watch people, to
       surveil, and to act.”
       Legal experts have told Newsday that seizing and keeping
       someone’s property after they are released from custody
       generally is illegal unless authorities have a warrant or the
       property is considered evidence in a crime. Dubnau has said the
       protesters were shown no warrant.
       “Without a warrant or probable cause to believe that there was
       any evidence of a crime, that’s deeply concerning in itself and
       it’s a clear violation of my clients’ Fourth Amendment rights,”
       Brill said.
       Stony Brook has denied it searched the phones. It has not said
       whether it had a warrant or why it seized the devices. According
       to Dubnau, the protesters have seen indications that there were
       attempts to access their phones while campus police held them.
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 43858--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: May 29, 2024, 9:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       thanks EastCoast for posting- to discuss whether this can be a
       good thing for us sports fans- or just TBD?
       [quote]
       Dear Stony Brook University Community,
       I am writing to share that I will be stepping down at the end of
       June to become president of Yale University.
       This opportunity arose unexpectedly. To a great extent, it is a
       direct result of the work that we have been doing at Stony Brook
       and the high regard nationally in which our university is held.
       Academically, Stony Brook has never been stronger. Its stature,
       visibility and impact have grown, from our designation as a SUNY
       flagship campus to our selection as the anchor of the New York
       Climate Exchange. Alumni and donor confidence is high, buoyed by
       the $500 million donation for endowment support from the Simons
       Foundation. Thanks to support from the governor and the New York
       legislature, state support is at its highest level in more than
       a decade. And Stony Brook Medicine and Stony Brook University
       Hospital are leaders in research and medical education and the
       provider of choice in Suffolk County.
       We have achieved all this while demonstrating that excellence
       and a commitment to diversity and inclusion can – and must – go
       together. We have one of the highest proportions of
       Pell-eligible students of all major research institutions, and
       achieved the highest ranking of all AAU institutions in the
       recent New York Times College Access Index. Our first and second
       cohorts of the Simons STEM Scholars represent the highest levels
       of academic excellence nationally. Over the past three years,
       our sponsored research has grown by 18 percent, from $205
       million to $241 million.
       These achievements, and the momentum we have built together, are
       being noticed in higher education and beyond, enabling Stony
       Brook to continue its upward trajectory while attracting
       high-achieving students, stellar faculty and an outstanding
       staff. I am proud of what we have achieved together, and
       confident in Stony Brook’s future.
       I want to express my deep appreciation not only for the support
       you have given to me, but for the passion and commitment you
       show for our mission and for your work. You have been an
       inspiration to me, and I have every confidence that you will
       continue to propel Stony Brook to even greater heights.
       An interim president will be named shortly to ensure a
       thoughtful and seamless leadership transition consistent with
       SUNY processes and protocols. A national search for Stony
       Brook's next president will begin immediately to deliver New
       York State the truly great flagship it deserves. With your
       commitment and collaboration, I am certain Stony Brook is well
       positioned for continued excellence.
       Maurie McInnis
       President [/quote]
       #Post#: 43865--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: guest152 Date: May 29, 2024, 11:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is likely more to this move that will never be spoken
       about publicly. But, consider the  passing of Simons (probably
       her strongest advocate and member of committee that hired her),
       and the recent protests on campus where the president received
       an absurd amount of criticism (in my opinion) for her handling a
       small group of attention seeking fools which included
       professors. I personally don’t think it’s all just a
       coincidence. But, She left for an academically superior
       institution and was probably more than eager to do so.  I also
       hope that the $500 mil  Simon’s foundation endowment isn’t
       pulled because of this. That would be devastating for the
       university.
       #Post#: 43866--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: OldSeawolf Date: May 29, 2024, 11:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Triple Lindy link=topic=840.msg43865#msg43865
       date=1716999139]
       There is likely more to this move that will never be spoken
       about publicly. But, consider the  passing of Simons (probably
       her strongest advocate and member of committee that hired her),
       and the recent protests on campus where the president received
       an absurd amount of criticism (in my opinion) for her handling a
       small group of attention seeking fools which included
       professors. I personally don’t think it’s all just a
       coincidence. But, She left for an academically superior
       institution and was probably more than eager to do so.  I also
       hope that the $500 mil  Simon’s foundation endowment isn’t
       pulled because of this. That would be devastating for the
       university.
       [/quote]
       Simons had a long and storied history with SBU, and I doubt that
       any of the $ donated was directly tied to McInnis being the
       President.  Why on earth would they pull the $ because McInnis
       left for a better job?  As far as future donations from his
       foundation is concerned, that is anyone's guess.  Personally, I
       wouldn't be surprised if his will leaves SBU a nice additional
       sum.  Let's hope the next President continues with an academics
       focus, but also has interest in our athletics programs (which
       McInnis seemed to not care much about).
       #Post#: 43867--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Stony Brook new President 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: May 29, 2024, 12:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       good post- i do agree there was a lot of criticism for what
       appeared to be the proper handling of a small crisis.
       also have to wonder if she'll get any worse/better treatment at
       yale!  rich kids tend to have more free time, less risk of
       engaging in social movements/careers, and complain more.  ::)
       yale has a MASSIVE endowment ($42b).  not sure how it may be
       used.  but it also has gigantic resources otherwise.  in short-
       she's getting a raise.  the former pres got something like $2m
       all in.
       yale of course most would argue is a superior institution that
       predates us by about 200 years, it's her alma mater, carries a
       lot of weight, even lower living costs.  and, it looks like a
       castle; SB looks like a prison.  maybe the one downside is the
       higher pressure, and also the recent mishaps with ivy
       presidents.
       the simons gift was "unrestricted", as they love to advertise,
       but who knows what the terms are as far as rescinding, etc.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page