URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook Fans
  HTML https://sbufan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: SBU Men's Basketball
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18891--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: sbufan
       Date: August 16, 2017, 8:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: sbugold link ---
       >
       > Notwithstanding some very good recruiting lately, I've noticed
       a very disturbing trend.  SBU often goes up against Hofstra for
       good talent.  Some of those players that both schools recruit
       are fiercely recruited by other schools as well, even including
       more reputed mid-majors and even some high majors.  In the past
       week alone, both Jared Rhoden and Samba Diallo (both highly
       rated recruits) have narrowed their candidate lists for their
       commitment decisions.  In both cases, the Seawolves were removed
       from consideration.  Not all that surprising, you might say.
       However, Hofstra remained on the list in each case--WHY?
       >
       > I've attended games at both schools, and grew up on LI.  There
       is no doubt in my mind that SBU's facilities and academics are
       head and shoulders above Hofstra's.  Furthermore, Hofstra's
       record was anything but stellar last season.  Somehow, we must
       get the word out forcefully that if you're a well-rated recruit,
       would consider a lesser hailed conference than others that have
       offered, and are willing to look at Long Island--the choice
       should overwhelmingly be SBU over Hofstra!!
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It's impressive that Hofstra made the cut, but I'm not too
       concerned. At least not yet. We don't know how much focus the
       staff was placing Rhoden and Diallo, and according to verbal
       commits we're still involved with some several high level
       commits.
       What's strange to me is that Pikiell's staff almost never
       competed with Hofstra whereas now Boals seems to have a lot of
       overlap. I'm not sure if Boals is aiming higher, or if he has
       similar AAU contacts as Mihalich
       #Post#: 18905--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: iBOsbu
       Date: August 16, 2017, 11:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Interesting point raised re recruiting competition with Hofstra.
       Hofstra plays against teams from mid-Atlantic and Carolinas as
       opposed to New England. Also CAA already has a good reputation
       as a mid major conference; many still don't realize how much it
       has been weakened by departures. May be the advisers to recruits
       think it's still the same old conference with stellar mid-major
       teams like VCU and GMU etc.
       #Post#: 18907--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: Hammertime
       Date: August 17, 2017, 3:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: iBOsbu link ---
       >
       > Interesting point raised re recruiting competition with
       Hofstra. Hofstra plays against teams from mid-Atlantic and
       Carolinas as opposed to New England. Also CAA already has a good
       reputation as a mid major conference; many still don't realize
       how much it has been weakened by departures. May be the advisers
       to recruits think it's still the same old conference with
       stellar mid-major teams like VCU and GMU etc.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I have been saying since day one when we moved from the Big
       South to the CAA, SB needs to move all sports out of the AE and
       into the CAA.. Some people feel it's a waste of time and would
       only be a lateral because both conferences are one bid
       leagues... I disagree with that assessment.. I think the level
       of competition is tougher in the CAA as a whole for all sports
       then the AE. If you are looking for better athletes, the CAA is
       where we belong. Not the AE.. My opinion..
       #Post#: 18910--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: Checkmate
       Date: August 17, 2017, 9:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: iBOsbu link ---
       >
       > Interesting point raised re recruiting competition with
       Hofstra. Hofstra plays against teams from mid-Atlantic and
       Carolinas as opposed to New England. Also CAA already has a good
       reputation as a mid major conference; many still don't realize
       how much it has been weakened by departures. May be the advisers
       to recruits think it's still the same old conference with
       stellar mid-major teams like VCU and GMU etc.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The last two years have actually been pretty good for the CAA in
       terms of RPI. As a conference, they were 9th overall in 2015-16,
       and 11th in 2016-17. However, they have been a one-bid league in
       each of the last six years, dating back to the VCU/GMU/ODU year
       when VCU made the Final Four.
       Travel to the CAA schools would be a grind/fortune for all
       sports.
       #Post#: 18911--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: Chrissy D.
       Date: August 17, 2017, 10:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hammer this has been explained a few times. SB wanted to mive
       all sports to CAA but were blocked by a couple of schools with
       Hofstra being one of them. Since Hofstra doesnt have football
       anymore they couldnt stop that move.
       #Post#: 18912--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: Hammertime
       Date: August 17, 2017, 10:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Chrissy D. link ---
       >
       > Hammer this has been explained a few times. SB wanted to mive
       all sports to CAA but were blocked by a couple of schools with
       Hofstra being one of them. Since Hofstra doesnt have football
       anymore they couldnt stop that move.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Just curious. Can Hofstra and others still block SB from making
       the leap, if so, why.. Why would they??
       #Post#: 18913--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: Seawolf97
       Date: August 17, 2017, 10:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They could if they wanted to .  I think Hofstra feels a little
       threatened with SBU . Hofstra enrollment is dropping to almost
       under 10k students . A few years ago it was nearly 15k but  cost
       (42,000) a year and the area the campus is may be working
       against them .
       #Post#: 18914--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: Hammertime
       Date: August 17, 2017, 11:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Seawolf97 link ---
       >
       > They could if they wanted to .  I think Hofstra feels a little
       threatened with SBU . Hofstra enrollment is dropping to almost
       under 10k students . A few years ago it was nearly 15k but  cost
       (42,000) a year and the area the campus is may be working
       against them .
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       WOW. I didnt know that about Hofstra enrollment . Maybe they
       need to lower the cost of their admissions, too.. It is my
       understanding Hofstra not cheap to get in.. But what gives
       Hofstra the right to block another institution from
       participating in their sports conference just because they feel
       threaten? Makes no sense and it should not be allowed. I would
       think the CAA commissioner would have a lot to say about that as
       well.. It's not like SB isn't already affiliated with the CAA,
       so it should just be a matter of fitting us in schedule wise
       rather than having a school vote..
       #Post#: 18916--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: NoVA_Seawolf
       Date: August 17, 2017, 3:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've said it before and I'll stick by it, I'm not high on the
       CAA. It's simply another one bid league and a more competitive
       one at that. We're better off being a game or two away from a
       tourney appearance yearly in the AE, then losing in the first
       round of a more competitive CAA tournament. Until it becomes a
       multibid league again I'm not interested. The A10 is a different
       animal though. The CAA will be even weaker once JMU leaves for
       an FBS all sports conference. Perhaps then we'll get the call
       along with Albany,but IDK if we should bite then. It's not a
       worthwhile move if you ask me.
       The CAA has 10 members, usually conferences require a 2/3rds or
       3/4ths vote to admit a new member. Hofstra alone can't block us,
       but if another school like say Northeastern joined them out of
       fear of regional competition, and then College of Charleston
       didn't want to add another member up north, those three together
       could have been enough to end our consideration. It's not hard
       to form a coalition against schools like this. Serves them right
       though. Hofstra can stay in a dying CAA. I could see them coming
       back to the AE begging (along with Delaware) once JMU leaves the
       CAA.
       #Post#: 18917--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 2018 Recruiting
   DIR By: Hammertime
       Date: August 17, 2017, 4:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: VA_Seawolf link ---
       >
       > I've said it before and I'll stick by it, I'm not high on the
       CAA. It's simply another one bid league and a more competitive
       one at that. We're better off being a game or two away from a
       tourney appearance yearly in the AE, then losing in the first
       round of a more competitive CAA tournament. Until it becomes a
       multibid league again I'm not interested. The A10 is a different
       animal though. The CAA will be even weaker once JMU leaves for
       an FBS all sports conference. Perhaps then we'll get the call
       along with Albany,but IDK if we should bite then. It's not a
       worthwhile move if you ask me.
       >
       >
       > The CAA has 10 members, usually conferences require a 2/3rds
       or 3/4ths vote to admit a new member. Hofstra alone can't block
       us, but if another school like say Northeastern joined them out
       of fear of regional competition, and then College of Charleston
       didn't want to add another member up north, those three together
       could have been enough to end our consideration. It's not hard
       to form a coalition against schools like this. Serves them right
       though. Hofstra can stay in a dying CAA. I could see them coming
       back to the AE begging (along with Delaware) once JMU leaves the
       CAA.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I still disagree. Do you realize the AE is constantly always at
       the bottom as far as conference strength is concern!!!! I would
       think SB could attract better athletes if their sports programs
       played in the CAA. You have no idea if JMU is going to move up
       to the CAA anytime soon. I see SH wanting SB to move up to FBS
       before JMU does...
       *****************************************************
       Page 6 of 38
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page