URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook Fans
  HTML https://sbufan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Conference and Athletics
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 33462--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: ecasadoSBU Date: May 13, 2021, 9:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Accelerator link=topic=368.msg33454#msg33454
       date=1620743866]
       Why would Stony Brook want to associate itself with lowly
       schools like CCSU?
       Stony Brook is too good and popular of a school to be in the
       same conference as New Hampshire, Maine, UMass Lowell, NJIT, and
       (formerly) Hartford, which if I didn't follow the America East,
       I would have assumed those were all D2/D3 schools. If you told
       me when I was a student here at Stony Brook back in the early
       2010s that in 10 years, we would still be in this conference, I
       would have laughed.
       [/quote]
       I don't mind the flagship state schools in New England. Nothing
       wrong with Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. But when you start
       going down to UMass Lowell, NJIT, and Hartford it does bother me
       a little bit as it doesn't feel like a natural fit for Stony
       Brook
       UConn, UMass, and Rutgers would be more natural fit in those
       states.
       But we also need to realize where we come from to understand
       better why we are here. Stony Brook was founded in 1957 which is
       very recent relative to other northern universities. It grew
       very quickly and gained a strong academic reputation in just a
       few decades. But we only joined Division I in the late 90s. We
       joined the party late and the pecking order in athletics was
       already established. We are also a victim of our geographic
       location. The appetite for college sports in the Northeast is
       not the same as down south. A school like Central Florida which
       was founded after Stony Brook was able to climb the college
       athletics ranks much faster - But Florida is a huge market for
       college sports. Even a directional school like UCF can draw 40k
       football crowds in a state where UF/FSU draw 80k crowds
       For Stony Brook the road will definitely be a much longer one.
       Our best bet is for us to continue to support our alma mater and
       hopefully some day it achieves critical mass. Maybe we win a big
       game in the NCAAs in the future which catapults us into a better
       league/draws more fans. For now I say we should continue doing
       things right - invest in facilities, run a clean program,
       compete in all sports, strive to be the best in the America East
       until those days come.
       #Post#: 33735--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: NoVA_Seawolf Date: July 22, 2021, 1:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Massive shakeup in the Big 12 over the last few hours. Texas an
       Oklahoma are on the out. They're talking to the SEC and likely
       the Pac-12 and Big Ten as well. That league literally just
       imploded over the course of a few hours.
  HTML https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/big-12-powers-texas-oklahoma-inquire-about-joining-sec-in-potentially-massive-realignment-shakeup/<br
       />
  HTML https://twitter.com/jasonwhitely/status/1418041621820579841?s=21
       Normally realignment trickles down all the way to the FCS in one
       form or another. This time though, I don't see it impacting SBU
       in any meaningful way. Heilbron has failed to make us an an
       attractive candidate for an FBS conference. We're stuck here.
       This may get JMU a spot somewhere though, so my prediction about
       them being gone soon stands.
       #Post#: 33736--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: Hammertime Date: July 22, 2021, 4:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=VA_Seawolf link=topic=368.msg33735#msg33735
       date=1626935053]
       Massive shakeup in the Big 12 over the last few hours. Texas an
       Oklahoma are on the out. They're talking to the SEC and likely
       the Pac-12 and Big Ten as well. That league literally just
       imploded over the course of a few hours.
  HTML https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/big-12-powers-texas-oklahoma-inquire-about-joining-sec-in-potentially-massive-realignment-shakeup/<br
       />
  HTML https://twitter.com/jasonwhitely/status/1418041621820579841?s=21
       Normally realignment trickles down all the way to the FCS in one
       form or another. This time though, I don't see it impacting SBU
       in any meaningful way. Heilbron has failed to make us an an
       attractive candidate for an FBS conference. We're stuck here.
       This may get JMU a spot somewhere though, so my prediction about
       them being gone soon stands.
       [/quote]
       The article says the Big12 has to vote on allowing Texas and
       Oklahoma to depart, and it is not looking likely that they will
       be granted leave.
       #Post#: 33737--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: July 22, 2021, 7:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       wow, they've already lost colorado, arkansas, nebraska after a
       long run of stability.  now this?  if it happens, of course...
       i could see why the SEC would want texas/ok games against LSU,
       bama, florida, georgia, auburn.  there's a lot of eyeballs on
       that game every week.
       the B12 though would still be decent in bball i think.
       i recall when texas started this whole mess with the longhorn
       network.
       #Post#: 33738--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: NoVA_Seawolf Date: July 22, 2021, 9:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hammertime link=topic=368.msg33736#msg33736
       date=1626946761]
       [quote author=VA_Seawolf link=topic=368.msg33735#msg33735
       date=1626935053]
       Massive shakeup in the Big 12 over the last few hours. Texas an
       Oklahoma are on the out. They're talking to the SEC and likely
       the Pac-12 and Big Ten as well. That league literally just
       imploded over the course of a few hours.
  HTML https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/big-12-powers-texas-oklahoma-inquire-about-joining-sec-in-potentially-massive-realignment-shakeup/<br
       />
  HTML https://twitter.com/jasonwhitely/status/1418041621820579841?s=21
       Normally realignment trickles down all the way to the FCS in one
       form or another. This time though, I don't see it impacting SBU
       in any meaningful way. Heilbron has failed to make us an an
       attractive candidate for an FBS conference. We're stuck here.
       This may get JMU a spot somewhere though, so my prediction about
       them being gone soon stands.
       [/quote]
       The article says the Big12 has to vote on allowing Texas and
       Oklahoma to depart, and it is not looking likely that they will
       be granted leave.
       [/quote]
       That's if they leave before the GOR ends in 2025. If they don't
       want to give up any money, they can simply wait out the GOR and
       then move to the SEC/wherever. The Big 12 was always Texas, OU,
       and then everyone else. If those two leave, the rest of the
       league is AAC tier at best. I think it's a done deal they move
       at this point, only question is where. I fully expect the Pac-12
       and Big Ten to go all out to get Texas and/or OU as well. SEC
       would be crazy lucrative, but you have A&M, Missouri,
       Vanderbilt, and potentially others who may attempt to block the
       move.
       I think a big driver for this is the new laws that let players
       make money off their name and likeness. The Alabama QB already
       has a million in endorsement deals. Way more money in that kind
       of thing if you're in the SEC compared to the Big 12. Money
       driving realignment as it always has.
       #Post#: 33739--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: July 22, 2021, 9:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       oh that post reminded me- i left out missouri too, and of course
       when i mentioned arkansas i meant the big8 days, pre-big 12.
       that's if memory serves!
       #Post#: 33740--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: ecasadoSBU Date: July 22, 2021, 10:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I just hope the whole system implodes.
       that we start from scratch with a new system of amateurism where
       coaching salaries are severely capped, where student-athletes
       are truly student-athlete and not semi-professionals, and where
       resources are allocated on somewhat fairer basis or returned
       back to the academic mission of the university. TV revenues
       should be shared by all members to keep a competitive balance
       and conferences should be limited to 8 members in regional
       geographic footprints.
       I'm so tired of this current system.
       #Post#: 33742--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: Hammertime Date: July 23, 2021, 4:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ecasadoSBU link=topic=368.msg33740#msg33740
       date=1626968895]
       I just hope the whole system implodes.
       that we start from scratch with a new system of amateurism where
       coaching salaries are severely capped, where student-athletes
       are truly student-athlete and not semi-professionals, and where
       resources are allocated on somewhat fairer basis or returned
       back to the academic mission of the university. TV revenues
       should be shared by all members to keep a competitive balance
       and conferences should be limited to 8 members in regional
       geographic footprints.
       I'm so tired of this current system.
       [/quote]
       I have to agree with you about this. I stopped watching pro
       sports because athletes no longer care about the game but care
       more about making as much money as possible.I get that. It's a
       job but most athletes today are taking for granted their
       god-given gift to be an athlete and the love for the sport over
       money.
       Now athletes can get paid to do play sports in college they will
       have that same attitude as pro athletes. It is no longer about
       playing ball, and the love for the sport. It's all about money.
       #Post#: 33744--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: July 23, 2021, 7:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       same, spot on.  its really been getting worse over the past 20
       years.  i think the golden age was maybe the 80s when you could
       flip on national channels and see MJ, montana to rice, gretzky,
       elway, magic, bird, dan marino, etc. and you had to wait until
       the next paper came out for scores/stats.
       #Post#: 33745--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Conference Realignment Rumors 
       By: guest410 Date: July 23, 2021, 11:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chairman of the Board
       link=topic=368.msg33744#msg33744 date=1627042072]
       same, spot on.  its really been getting worse over the past 20
       years.  i think the golden age was maybe the 80s when you could
       flip on national channels and see MJ, montana to rice, gretzky,
       elway, magic, bird, dan marino, etc. and you had to wait until
       the next paper came out for scores/stats.
       [/quote]
       Never a dull day for sports fans back in the 80's. Wish I had
       been alive for that. The Bad Boy Detroit Pistons, the University
       of Miami football glory days, Magic versus Bird, the beginning
       of MJ. Wow.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page