URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Stony Brook Fans
  HTML https://sbufan.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: SBU Men's Basketball
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 46830--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: Moveitfred Date: March 7, 2026, 1:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Pat on the back for making it close, but another letdown. Tough
       to win when you give up 96. Yikes. I didn't watch the game, but
       the box score tells the story.
       Difficult not to think of this season as yet another big
       disappointment the way it ended. Were we really recently
       thinking the team had the inside track for a 4 seed with even a
       3 or 2 possible? Just a few days later and they’ve looked every
       bit a lower half conference team these final four games.
       But maybe you take a step back, put things in a broader context,
       and as Checkmate said recently perhaps we’re left with a “Eh, I
       guess it was an okay season for Stony Brook.”
       Without a doubt, the CAA appeared to be a stronger conference
       this season, so to go from 4 (in a weaker year) to 9 (in a
       stronger year) conference wins is an upgrade.
       Thoughts on players:
       Pratt: Did not imagine SBU had the capability of landing a
       player like Pratt in the current landscape. He had a legit shot
       at 30 every time he stepped on the floor. Too bad things ended
       the way they did, and I hope the road is a good one for him from
       here. It was a fun one season to watch.
       Shosh: As much fun to watch, perhaps even more so, than Pratt.
       Of course, he had some struggles, but you really saw him develop
       with confidence as the season progressed. Just flat out carried
       and won some games for SBU as a first-year. Consensus here is
       that he’ll go on to bigger money and arenas, and yeah I can’t
       imagine that not happening. Curious to see where he might land
       and what he might do. How much extra did he earn from his
       performance in this game alone?
       Brown: A steady backcourt presence all year. A bit up and down
       with his scoring, but anchored the defense and handled the ball
       well. Overall a solid get and good guy to have in the guard
       rotation.
       Goods: Well, thank goodness for Goods because without him, for
       the bulk of the season, things would have been pretty ugly along
       the front line. Very up and down with his performances, and
       seemed to fall out of favor and effort near the end for I’m sure
       some reason we’ll never know. Again, consensus seems to be he’s
       gone, and I hope things work out better for him elsewhere.
       Simmon: Intriguing, and clearly developed into a player with
       potential. Feels like he could be a solid CAA guard contributor.
       I like his size for a guard in the CAA. Hope we see him back.
       Gorman/Valentiny/Butler: Fair or not, lumping these guys
       together as kind of the same player along the front line. Hope
       at least one comes back, ideally two. I’d say in all 3 cases
       they need to get bigger to have an impact in the CAA. All play
       hard, but always felt like they were giving up an inch and maybe
       20 pounds to the competition.
       And, of course, O’Connor. Assuming Shosh gone, I would think it
       will be his team to lead next season.
       More broadly:
       Ford and coaches will have some big work to do to somehow climb
       into the top half of the CAA next season and beyond. A lot of
       points and experience will be gone.
       It seems to me Ford is pretty good at landing quality guards,
       which is maybe characteristic of mid-majors as a whole, but for
       SBU to be better in the CAA I’d say they need a bigger front
       line. As Chairman said, get more Goods type players.
       Easier said than done, I’m sure. A player 6’7” and above with
       size and talent is probably beyond what SBU can realistically
       target, maybe beyond the CAA as a whole, let alone getting a
       front line of them.
       And then, of course and probably most important these days, is
       the money. Although I don’t know any numbers, I’m sure
       comparatively speaking SBU ain’t got much. Unless that changes,
       they probably stay about where they were this season.
       #Post#: 46831--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: sbu1991 Date: March 7, 2026, 1:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chairman of the Board
       link=topic=1231.msg46829#msg46829 date=1772912534]
       i missed the action (as i was on campus actually).  ill admit
       they had me believing at a few points during the year.  but this
       is an epic underacheivement, given the resources, the roster,
       the funding, etc.
       here we were complaining that campbell U joined the Coastal, and
       then we have a first round exit, against campbell U.  what a
       wakeup call.
       it certainly feels like our team may never get over the hump.
       ive seldom been this down on my alma mater, but today is one of
       those days.
       [/quote]
       It's hard to see it happening under Geno. Shosh gone for sure.
       #Post#: 46833--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: ecasadoSBU Date: March 7, 2026, 1:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chairman of the Board
       link=topic=1231.msg46829#msg46829 date=1772912534]
       i missed the action (as i was on campus actually).  ill admit
       they had me believing at a few points during the year.  but this
       is an epic underacheivement, given the resources, the roster,
       the funding, etc.
       here we were complaining that campbell U joined the Coastal, and
       then we have a first round exit, against campbell U.  what a
       wakeup call.
       it certainly feels like our team may never get over the hump.
       ive seldom been this down on my alma mater, but today is one of
       those days.
       [/quote]
       Yeap.I feel the same way bud. Year after year we boast how Stony
       Brook has so much potential as an institution only to get
       crushed by upstart programs and to be left behind by others
       programs we had a head-start on.
       #Post#: 46834--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: sbu1991 Date: March 7, 2026, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Moveitfred link=topic=1231.msg46830#msg46830
       date=1772912673]
       Pat on the back for making it close, but another letdown. Tough
       to win when you give up 96. Yikes. I didn't watch the game, but
       the box score tells the story.
       Difficult not to think of this season as yet another big
       disappointment the way it ended. Were we really recently
       thinking the team had the inside track for a 4 seed with even a
       3 or 2 possible? Just a few days later and they’ve looked every
       bit a lower half conference team these final four games.
       But maybe you take a step back, put things in a broader context,
       and as Checkmate said recently perhaps we’re left with a “Eh, I
       guess it was an okay season for Stony Brook.”
       Without a doubt, the CAA appeared to be a stronger conference
       this season, so to go from 4 (in a weaker year) to 9 (in a
       stronger year) conference wins is an upgrade.
       Thoughts on players:
       Pratt: Did not imagine SBU had the capability of landing a
       player like Pratt in the current landscape. He had a legit shot
       at 30 every time he stepped on the floor. Too bad things ended
       the way they did, and I hope the road is a good one for him from
       here. It was a fun one season to watch.
       Shosh: As much fun to watch, perhaps even more so, than Pratt.
       Of course, he had some struggles, but you really saw him develop
       with confidence as the season progressed. Just flat out carried
       and won some games for SBU as a first-year. Consensus here is
       that he’ll go on to bigger money and arenas, and yeah I can’t
       imagine that not happening. Curious to see where he might land
       and what he might do. How much extra did he earn from his
       performance in this game alone?
       Brown: A steady backcourt presence all year. A bit up and down
       with his scoring, but anchored the defense and handled the ball
       well. Overall a solid get and good guy to have in the guard
       rotation.
       Goods: Well, thank goodness for Goods because without him, for
       the bulk of the season, things would have been pretty ugly along
       the front line. Very up and down with his performances, and
       seemed to fall out of favor and effort near the end for I’m sure
       some reason we’ll never know. Again, consensus seems to be he’s
       gone, and I hope things work out better for him elsewhere.
       Simmon: Intriguing, and clearly developed into a player with
       potential. Feels like he could be a solid CAA guard contributor.
       I like his size for a guard in the CAA. Hope we see him back.
       Gorman/Valentiny/Butler: Fair or not, lumping these guys
       together as kind of the same player along the front line. Hope
       at least one comes back, ideally two. I’d say in all 3 cases
       they need to get bigger to have an impact in the CAA. All play
       hard, but always felt like they were giving up an inch and maybe
       20 pounds to the competition.
       And, of course, O’Connor. Assuming Shosh gone, I would think it
       will be his team to lead next season.
       More broadly:
       Ford and coaches will have some big work to do to somehow climb
       into the top half of the CAA next season and beyond. A lot of
       points and experience will be gone.
       It seems to me Ford is pretty good at landing quality guards,
       which is maybe characteristic of mid-majors as a whole, but for
       SBU to be better in the CAA I’d say they need a bigger front
       line. As Chairman said, get more Goods type players.
       Easier said than done, I’m sure. A player 6’7” and above with
       size and talent is probably beyond what SBU can realistically
       target, maybe beyond the CAA as a whole, let alone getting a
       front line of them.
       And then, of course and probably most important these days, is
       the money. Although I don’t know any numbers, I’m sure
       comparatively speaking SBU ain’t got much. Unless that changes,
       they probably stay about where they were this season.
       [/quote]
       Nice breakdown. With Shosh gone, O'Connor is the only returning
       player you'd feel good against the top CAA teams.
       #Post#: 46836--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: Chairman of the Board Date: March 7, 2026, 10:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       one more thought.  i think the reason im so deflated is that
       this season- for arguably the first or second time ever- we've
       been a competitive three point shooting team*.  shot selection
       was better, ball movement, rebounding, and if taken in the right
       situation, the % increases.  which it did.  we also had quite a
       few options. (*maybe 2 years ago we shot ok from deep)
       and so the reason im even more disappointed is because we
       finally fix this longstanding issue, and the result is... the
       same.  complete and premature collapse.
       #Post#: 46839--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: Checkmate Date: March 8, 2026, 11:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Chairman of the Board
       link=topic=1231.msg46836#msg46836 date=1772945784]
       one more thought.  i think the reason im so deflated is that
       this season- for arguably the first or second time ever- we've
       been a competitive three point shooting team*.  shot selection
       was better, ball movement, rebounding, and if taken in the right
       situation, the % increases.  which it did.  we also had quite a
       few options. (*maybe 2 years ago we shot ok from deep)
       and so the reason im even more disappointed is because we
       finally fix this longstanding issue, and the result is... the
       same.  complete and premature collapse.
       [/quote]
       I have to think that this was a combination of having the
       personnel and of Hipsher being on the bench. There was a seismic
       change in our offense this year, which coincided with his
       arrival. Things just flowed better. We looked way more competent
       than we have in at least the last decade.
       It’s interesting for Goods to go into the portal (presumably)
       coming off a zero point, zero shot game. And he was invisible
       during this four game losing streak – 3.5 ppg, 4.0 rpg. And as
       our only real big guy, that’s tough to overcome.
       #Post#: 46842--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: Moveitfred Date: March 8, 2026, 12:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If told ahead of time, guess what...Shosh, Pratt, and Brown
       combined will have a monster game and SBU will pin 89 on the
       scoreboard we'd probably all sign up for that and think, great,
       on to the next round.
       But then if told...however SBU will get nothing from anyone
       else, we'd probably wonder, Uh oh, what do you mean by
       "nothing"...
       You're right Chairman in pointing out a huge improvement in most
       of the areas you mention. However the team had what turned out
       to be a fatal flaw--little along the front line, and the best
       guy in that position sort of checked out for the final few
       games.
       As weak as the team was last year I'd argue that SBU's front
       line was no better this year, and perhaps worse in the end. Last
       year they had a pretty consistent Wight and Snoddy, who both
       seemed to play a bit beyond their size. This year, Goods and a
       few other guys chipped in without consistency. Compare rebound
       stats from last year to this year and the picture is about the
       same. And, again, when you then have Goods step away there was
       an especially big problem.
       I'd say Campbell was just simply a better and more well-rounded
       team. And PS, as I'm about to hit "post" I see Campbell up by
       one over UNCW early in the second half.
       Finally, is the university interested in taking SERIOUS steps to
       make SBU men's basketball better? 30+ years now watching the
       program and I can't say I've seen any strong evidence to suggest
       this.
       Update: and with the Camels dispatching UNCW with another
       offensive blast, I'll admit to thinking a little differently
       about the SBU loss now. Maybe SBU was Campbell two years ago,
       and that's about the best we can expect.
       #Post#: 46843--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: Accelerator Date: March 8, 2026, 1:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Campbell destroys UNCW 85-70. Like we all knew, they were
       vulnerable and it could have been us. That makes it feel even
       worse, frankly. I will agree to admitting that I didn't want to
       associate with Campbell in our conference when they joined
       either.
       #Post#: 46844--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: ry1nik Date: March 8, 2026, 1:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can do all the analysis you want but it comes down to the
       realization that the men’s basketball program has reached the
       upper limit of its potential under Geno. Only a coaching change
       will change the outcome going forward.
       #Post#: 46845--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Game 32 vs Campbell (2nd round of CAA Tournament): 3/7 @ 12:
       00PM in Washington, D.C. on FloSports
       By: sbu1991 Date: March 8, 2026, 3:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ry1nik link=topic=1231.msg46844#msg46844
       date=1772995901]
       You can do all the analysis you want but it comes down to the
       realization that the men’s basketball program has reached the
       upper limit of its potential under Geno. Only a coaching change
       will change the outcome going forward.
       [/quote]
       Geno needs to go, but considering that SB was projected to
       finish 11th in the CAA and they managed to finish 8th, he and
       the AD are probably taking victory laps.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page