DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Stony Brook Fans
HTML https://sbufan.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: SBU Women's Lacrosse
*****************************************************
#Post#: 45534--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 7, 2025, 9:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
USL AC:
HTML https://www.usalacrosse.com/magazine/usa-lacrosse-division-i-womens-top-20
IL #20:
HTML https://www.insidelacrosse.com/league/wdi/polls/2025
#Post#: 45540--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 8, 2025, 12:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
NCAA Bracketology: Princeton Joins the Seeded Teams
HTML https://www.usalacrosse.com/magazine/college/women/ncaa-bracketology-princeton-joins-seeded-teams
--- Quote ---
>
> Outside looking in includes a perennial tournament team
>
> Drexel, a bubble team last week, is in the field as the top
CAA team. Both the Dragons and Stony Brook are 4-0 in league
play, but Drexel gets the nod due to superior RPI (22nd vs.
24th). Without the AQ, Stony Brook isn’t in the field.
>
> The Seawolves don’t have a win against any teams in the top 30
in the RPI and have a loss to a sub-30 team in Rutgers and
another against fellow bubble dweller Colorado.
>
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 45542--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 9, 2025, 10:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
ILWomen's Staff Top 25: Thinking Positively
HTML https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ilwomen-s-staff-top-25-thinking-positively/64996
--- Quote ---
>
>
> 19. Stony Brook (9 - 3)
> Off to a 4-0 start in the CAA, the Seawolves are on track to
repeat as conference champions. No CAA team has yet to score
more than eight goals, while the offense sores with an average
of 17.3 goals per game. They’ll face challengers, but as of now
they are still the top dog.
> —EC
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 45544--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 9, 2025, 3:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
visiting #5 princeton. went down 3-0 quickly. just tied it up,
what a game so far for mcdonald.
#Post#: 45545--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 9, 2025, 4:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
a barnburner. halftime, 12-9 PU.
our offense looks great though, moving the ball and shoot well,
great feeding. this is a good team we are playing.
#Post#: 45546--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 9, 2025, 5:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
lost 19-13. a good effort though.
#Post#: 45547--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: guest152
Date: April 9, 2025, 5:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Impossible to win or even compete giving up 19 goals. This was
not a “top ten” defensive performance. It’s been a humbling
season for Spallina and crew. They better not slip up in
conference play. Drexel will be no cake walk and chances are we
will have to beat them twice. It’s a conference tourney title
or this team doesn’t make the NCAA tourney.
#Post#: 45556--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 15, 2025, 11:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
IL #20
HTML https://www.insidelacrosse.com/league/wdi/polls/2025/479
USL AC
HTML https://www.usalacrosse.com/magazine/usa-lacrosse-division-i-womens-top-20
#Post#: 45557--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: Chairman of the Board
Date: April 15, 2025, 2:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
ILWomen's First 2025 Bracketology, Presented by Get Reps:
Setting the Baseline and the Bubble
HTML https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ilwomen-s-first-2025-bracketology-presented-by-get-reps-setting-the-baseline-and-the-bubble/65051
--- Quote ---
>
> This past weekend’s slate of results was significant in
shaping the RPI. And it’s a big week coming, too, with this
Thursday and Friday going a long way to solidifying the Big Ten
and ACC tournaments. And a game like Stony Brook vs. Drexel on
Friday will tell us a lot about the CAA.
>
>
>
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 45558--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2025 SBU Women's Lacrosse Season
DIR By: guest152
Date: April 15, 2025, 5:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[react][/react]
--- Quote from: Chairman of the Board link ---
>
> ILWomen's First 2025 Bracketology, Presented by Get Reps:
Setting the Baseline and the Bubble
>
HTML https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ilwomen-s-first-2025-bracketology-presented-by-get-reps-setting-the-baseline-and-the-bubble/65051
>
> [quote]
> This past weekend’s slate of results was significant in
shaping the RPI. And it’s a big week coming, too, with this
Thursday and Friday going a long way to solidifying the Big Ten
and ACC tournaments. And a game like Stony Brook vs. Drexel on
Friday will tell us a lot about the CAA.
>
--- End Quote ---
[/quote]
Thorough article but I don’t believe for a second the criteria
they lay out is followed. If it was, Maryland is not a 4 seed
last year. Further, no head coach who has an auto or at large
chance in that year’s ncaa tourney should be allowed on the
selection committee and deciding seeding. Period. That is such
a gross conflict of interest and patently absurd. There is NO
reason not to have a rotating group of neutral administrators
and/or non-participant current coaches each year rotating on the
committee if all they are doing is “following the criteria”.
Yes, I am singling out Maryland head coach Cathy Reese here.
*****************************************************
Page 6 of 12
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page