URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Oxygen Therapy Technical Review Group Discussion Board
  HTML https://safeoxygenforall.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Join the Oxygen Discussion!
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 5--------------------------------------------------
       Defining our goals
   DIR By: drmdobson
       Date: January 16, 2018, 11:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our brief is “to support access to and utilization of
       life-saving oxygen system products in low-resource settings”
       A lot of this will be about concentrators, but not all.  Here
       are some other aspects we may want to consider:
       “Access”
       Those who need to use the technology must know what is
       available, what it can and can’t do, and whether/how it can be
       applied in their situation.  They need to be able to analyse
       their own needs and resources, and know how to contact a
       reliable source of advice.
       They need to know how to source the right technical resources,
       and how to fund the resources they need.  If B&M Gates pay for
       everything, it’s not development.
       How do we create an oxygen expert for each hospital?  For each
       country would be a start!
       “Utilisation”
       Making resources available to the right groups of health
       workers.
       Training health workers to identify those patients who can
       benefit from oxygen, using appropriate means of clinical
       assessment including pulse oximetry.
       Measuring oxygen needs – from “which patients need oxygen” to
       “how much oxygen does our hospital need”
       Oxygen production – access/utilization/support of each of
       Fractional distillation – medical and “industrial” oxygen
       Concentrators – small & large.  PSA or VSA
       Oxygen plants – DIY or ready-made.  Purchase or lease?
       Becoming an oxygen manufacturer.
       Electrochemical generators
       Choosing the right technology;  who chooses, where do they get
       advice?
       Ancillary equipment – regulators, flow meters, flow splitters,
       patient delivery devices, compressors, pressure storage vessels,
       generators, PV arrays, batteries,
       Technology support
       Training and retaining technicians
       Understanding and analyzing the infrastructure (especially
       electrical).
       Power quality analysis.  Matching PQA with recommended
       technical solutions.
       Matching oxygen systems with hospital and human
       infrastructure
       Safety issues and hazards
       Organizational
       What is the role that UNICEF should seek?
       Education
       Quality control
       Catalogue supply
       Field support
       It seems to me that so far a lot of technical information has
       been assembled on the spreadsheet, much of it available
       elsewhere, for example in the WHO Oxygen Concentrator technical
       Specification booklet and the PATH Oxygen Primer.  We need not
       duplicate this technical work, but should concentrate on making
       things happen.  Some clear aims need to  be our starting point,
       and these should include:
       Definition of the infrastructure support actually available in
       LMIC's - including quality of electricity supply and
       availability of technical support.  I have spent considerable
       effort trying to discover information about these aspects, and
       there is very little.  I don't think we can begin to look for
       solutions until we have defined the problem, and this probably
       means that we need to do our own field research. It's perfectly
       possible to design such a research project, which need not take
       more than 4% of our budget.  Without such information we cannot
       evaluate which forms of technology may be required.
       Having then defined the problem, we should be in a better
       position to state what is required of equipment if it is to
       survive and function adequately in what we know are challenging
       circumstances.
       Having defined the requirements, we must then find a way of
       testing individual pieces of equipment to see if they meet the
       necessary performance standard.  David Peel has already been
       involved in work of this kind looking at the effects of voltage
       variations and adverse climate, dust etc.  Ultimately we need to
       test machines against real-life conditions, but a good start
       would be to see if they even meet the manufacturers' claims.
       Since UNICEF already sells an oxygen concentrator
       (manufacturer's name not given on website) that would be a good
       place to start.
       In regard to the process of our group,  we need to be clear
       about what we are trying to achieve.  We seem to be in
       partnership with a larger number of other organisations than can
       be expected to agree about anything at all - are they there just
       to give street cred, or are they actually expecting to
       contribute (and if so, what?).  Hopefully they will just be
       expecting us to do the work.  In any event, if all we produce is
       another document, we will have failed.
       What I have outlined above is the need for us not to just make
       recommendations, of which the world is not short, but to
       actually cause a change in the availability of oxygen.  Can we
       assume that country and regional offices of UNICEF will be
       available to support this?
       I think that until these questions are answered, it is premature
       to focus on the minutiae of the spreadsheet.  I am not clear
       about how we will make decisions, how we will know when a
       decision has been made, and indeed ultimately who will decide,
       and on what basis. Hopefully we will reach a stage when we do
       need to talk technical details, but that is some way away and we
       need to deal with the main issues first.
       Making a difference to oxygen availability must involve both
       technical and human aspects, and we need to cover both of these.
       #Post#: 6--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defining our goals
   DIR By: Roberto Ayala CENETEC
       Date: January 16, 2018, 12:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good day,
       I think the task was clearly outlined by UNICEF when they
       invited us to participate, by  the following objectives (shared
       in a file named "Oxygen Project Brief"):
       1. Interagency technical specifications and guidance for
       procurement of oxygen system products and components
       2. UNICEF catalogue updated with specifications, technical
       guidance and new procurement mechanisms to include a more robust
       and appropriate selection of oxygen system products
       3. Functioning prototype of an oxygen therapy tool developed to
       provide strategic and technical support for oxygen system
       selection and upgrades at all levels of the healthcare system
       Hope it helps to clear the question.
       Best regards and greetings from Mexico.
       #Post#: 13--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Defining our goals
   DIR By: SusanN
       Date: February 8, 2018, 4:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The task of "having a functioning prototype of an oxygen therapy
       tool to provide strategic and technical support for oxygen
       system selection and upgrades at all levels of the healthcare
       system" seems most crucial and likely needs to encompass all the
       areas outlined by Dr. Dobson.  There is a huge gap to fill in
       helping in-country decision makers answer the question "where
       should we invest our available resources?".  At the most
       fundamental level, the question is "should we invest in oxygen?"
       At the next level, the question is "how should we invest in
       oxygen?"
       Would it be within the scope of this group to brainstorm on the
       best ways to help decision-makers analyze their needs and
       resources, know what options and specific products are
       available, and understand how to make choices that will best fit
       their situation?  Rather than being prescriptive about what is
       needed, offering a framework and support for in-country
       evaluation and decision-making seems preferable.
       As a pediatrician/neonatologist, it would also seem critical to
       help decision-makers understand the key differences in safely
       delivering oxygen to different age groups - adult, child,
       newborn (preterm newborn).  These distinctions may not be
       immediately apparent to administrators/program managers who are
       making procurement decisions. The requirements for delivery
       (flow/concentration/patient interface), monitoring (pulse
       oximetry in infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity), and
       human resources vary widely.  UNICEF is in a strategic position
       to bring these issues forward with clarity.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1