DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RoyalChatter
HTML https://royalchatter.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Luxembourg
*****************************************************
#Post#: 6418--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Chris Date: December 9, 2018, 7:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The Lux royals come out of this looking mean and nasty, IMO.
51,000 BP is nothing to live on in London, even with no housing
costs. Apparently, the Lux royals don't like Tessy at all. I
wonder why?
#Post#: 6476--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Tigerben Date: December 12, 2018, 6:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuNa8vIWsAADrWd.jpg
Not a happy bunny , making use of the title while she still has
it ...
#Post#: 6481--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Cloaked Date: December 13, 2018, 3:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm not fully understanding the 1.5 million offer of her own
home.
Would Tessy own that outright? Would she need to pay basic
rates etc. herself?
Would 1.5 million be enough buy a house in the suburb in which
she and the boys now live?
Could she invest the 1.5 million in her current house? ..and be
allowed free rent of the portion owned by Louis' family?
I think the lack of security of a home is not right.
Why would Louis' family, normally seen as nice people, act
seemingly mean?
The Lux family might be afraid that she will sell it and the
boys then have no home.
For them to continue owning it does absolutely make sure their
grandsons are housed.
However, I think that also gives the message that Tessy can't be
trusted to provide a home base and isn't capable of being a home
owner... and also isn't deserving of a home. Unless they also
don't trust that Tessy will keep a home over her own head and
are trying to be sure of that. (Tessy might have a future
partner who takes advantage of her home ownership, for example.)
Perhaps the Lux family has no plan at all to ask Tessy to move
out. If so the six month length of rental agreement needs to be
taken out.
#Post#: 6483--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Tigerben Date: December 13, 2018, 6:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The luxes have offered to buy a house for 1.5 million , along
with any costs that goes along with buying the house for Tessy
and the boys to live in until the youngest gets his degree . On
the judgement released it says the day to day running of the
home will be met by Tessy , shopping , bills , basic maintenance
ect.
The boys go to board school which is paid for by the luxes and I
suppose all relevant school costs which all in could be over 20
grand per child with extra activities. The weekends and holidays
are split so she has them two weekends a month , a week at
Easter , a three weeks during the summer and a week at Xmas
give or take which is why the judge ruled most like on €4000 a
year per child in maintenance .
Tessy did not get anything she asked for . I think on memory ,
she wanted 70 grand a year in spousal and child maintenance so
with her wage would give her around €130 grand a year which
still isn’t much for where she wants to live in Kensington, but
enough if schooling fees are paid .
Now the divorce can be signed now , appealing the courts
judgement won’t make a difference to that Even if she succeeds.
She has handed in her notice on the job that paid the £75 grand
wage ( after tax £51 grand ) whether she has a job lined up I
don’t know but a judge wouldn’t take lightly if it was thought a
better settlement was behind leaving a well paid job.
Her lifestyle was based on Louis’s parents income and property.
The core of the family fortune is for the reigning grand ducal
couple and the heir. As the judgement says Louis is dependent on
his parents for income, income that could be stopped. They
already advanced the couple 500 grand as part of Louis’s
inheritance which must have being used up on day to day living
over the years.
Tessy also wanted the £ 66 thousand she owes to her lawyers paid
as well.
So if she appeals , she will run up more costs . Louis might
have to paid a little more child maintenance or it could lessen
its toss up. The family was rich but not Louis ....
#Post#: 6486--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Cara Date: December 13, 2018, 1:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Below is an excerpt from the court's decision which details what
the Luxes offered, i.e. to buy a house in which Tessy and the
boys could stay until the youngest child gets his first degree.
The house would be owned by the ADB (an organization that
manages financial interests for/of the LRF), not by tessy or the
boys. And it would be provided for only a few years at the
condition that she signs a gag order.
I do not know what kind of person Tessy is but so far the Luxes
come across as nasty and cheap.
I completely get the gag order. At this point it does look like
there's a bit of dirty laundry to hide... but then do the
smarter thing. Put the house in the name of the boys and allow
the mother a lifelong right to stay in it. A lot can be worked
out. Tessy's request to get a lump sum and money to buy a house
and a car (and I guess the schooling for the boys) was in my
opinion not extravagant. Something could have been easily worked
out.
As it looks like right now, it sounds like they want to keep the
boys and the mother under their thumb. As for Louis, he fathered
two children with her and he acknowledged in court that she did
a good job as a princess of Luxembourg (not to mention that a
few months ago he recognized that there had been a smear
campaign of tessy in the press in which he claimed to have had
no part in)... I get that he too is under the thumb of his
parents and that he is dependent on them. still he should be
ashamed by the way this goes.
Excerpt from the ruling
With respect to the position of the ADB, by an open letter dated
11 December 2017 the ADB set out its open proposals as follows:
i)
the former matrimonial home in London shall be withdrawn
forthwith;
ii)
nominees of the ADB's choice) at a cost of £1.5M;
iii)
for the acquisition;
iv)
of the wife at any reasonable location in London or the South
East of England with the wife identifying the property to be
purchased but with the ADB to have ultimate approval, which
approval will not be unreasonably withheld;
v)
remain living in the property rent free until the date the
younger child completes his full time tertiary education
(limited to a first degree) irrespective of whether the wife
remarries or cohabits in the interim;
vi)
capital nature which relates to the property. The day to day
outgoings will be met by the wife;
vii)
signing a non-disclosure agreement in broadly the following
terms:
"The Applicant undertakes to the Court and agrees with the
Respondent not to, whether directly or indirectly, publish or
communicate any confidential or private information, on the
internet or social media, or to any newspaper, magazine,
publication or book, or in any written correspondence whatsoever
to any third party, or on any broadcast on television or radio
or by any form of communication, whether in writing, electronic
or spoken or otherwise, and whether in the UK or in any other
jurisdiction or which shall contain negative views or negative
comments about either party or their wider family (to include
generally in respect of the Luxembourg Royal Family), whether in
relation to their marriage, their personal and financial
affairs, or in relation to the private business or information
of the Luxembourg Royal Family."
#Post#: 6487--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Cloaked Date: December 13, 2018, 5:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I agree, that it seems the Lux family wants to keep Tessy
and the boys under their thumb.
What I don't know is if that is for sinister or for caring
reasons?
I think it fair that Tessy and the boys stay living within a
familiar district in London.
The Lux family have the means to make sure their living
arrangments are disrupted as little as possible. Stress has a
huge affect on children. England provides back up in the form
of NHS and social security at least but Tessy should not have to
rely on the British public when her in-laws were once so willing
to provide for them. Tessy married only Louis but also
'married' into the Lux Royal Family. It is unusual but it is
fact that they were both dependant on his family. That's why
it's fair that their obligations are not all of a sudden made to
be non existent.
I think if Tessy had proof that the offer was made out of
genuinely wanting what was best she might accept it. And also
proof that her power to parent was respected.
#Post#: 6868--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Cloaked Date: January 18, 2019, 9:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Tessy has every right to feel that the Lux family only values
her as a mother of the boys and not for her own contributions.
That must be painful.
#Post#: 6991--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Tigerben Date: February 10, 2019, 5:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Louis will be able to finalize the divorce shortly , the courts
decision was dec 5th and the three months will be up in three
weeks. If Tessy appeals the judgement it won’t make a difference
to the divorce been granted. I would expect a press release by
the lux royal house in March sometime. I also think Tessy by
using Tessy Antony Princesss de Luxembourg is using the English
divorce style . Twice she has liked articles in a lux newspaper
where she was called former princess Tessy Antony. [quote]
In our ongoing series on Luxembourg's Royals, RTL Today delves
into the history of the Grand Ducal family.
In today's instalment of our popular Royals series, we're going
to go slightly outside the line of succession and shed a light
on the life of Tessy Antony, the former wife of Prince Louis and
as such a former Princess of Luxembourg.[/quote]
#Post#: 7003--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Cloaked Date: February 12, 2019, 8:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Tessy has publically expressed that Meghan Markle is being
treated badly.
With Tessy fighting her cause Meghan might come out worse.
#Post#: 7009--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tessy(formerly?) of Luxembourg
By: Tigerben Date: February 13, 2019, 9:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Tessy is turning in to Fergie , she’ll say anything to get a few
column inches in the daily mail .
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page